Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Software Engineering Perspective on Testing Large Language Models: Research, Practice, Tools and Benchmarks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08216 v1 pith:EW27QSKL submitted 2024-06-12 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords researchtestingtoolsbenchmarksengineeringsoftwaresystemscomponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly becoming ubiquitous both as stand-alone tools and as components of current and future software systems. To enable usage of LLMs in the high-stake or safety-critical systems of 2030, they need to undergo rigorous testing. Software Engineering (SE) research on testing Machine Learning (ML) components and ML-based systems has systematically explored many topics such as test input generation and robustness. We believe knowledge about tools, benchmarks, research and practitioner views related to LLM testing needs to be similarly organized. To this end, we present a taxonomy of LLM testing topics and conduct preliminary studies of state of the art and practice approaches to research, open-source tools and benchmarks for LLM testing, mapping results onto this taxonomy. Our goal is to identify gaps requiring more research and engineering effort and inspire a clearer communication between LLM practitioners and the SE research community.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Testing for LLM-Based Applications: A Diversity-based Approach

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A farthest-first diversity-based selection method for prompt templates finds LLM failures faster than random selection, with compression distance giving the strongest average gains.

Pith tools