Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 72 references

Tensor Network Representations for Intrinsically Mixed-State Topological Orders

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper presents a general protocol that builds exact fixed-point tensor-network representations for intrinsically mixed-state topological phases obtained by strongly decohering pure topological phases in Abelian anyon channels.

desk verdict A genuinely useful fixed-point tensor network protocol for Abelian decoherence of topological phases, with two under-verified example identifications that need referee attention. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22989 v1 pith:EWX6PBPW submitted 2025-07-30 cond-mat.str-el math-phmath.MPquant-ph

Bader Aldossari , Sergey Blinov , Zhu-Xi Luo This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords mixed-statetopologicalorderfixed-pointtensornetworkanyoncondensationdoubledHilbertspacedecoherencetoriccodequantumdoubleCSScodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims a general recipe for writing intrinsically mixed-state topological phases as exact fixed-point tensor networks. The recipe starts from any pure topological phase, applies strong decoherence that creates only Abelian anyons (quasiparticles whose braiding gives simple phase factors rather than matrices), and works in the doubled Hilbert space to turn the noise channel into a set of commuting projectors. The output is a fixed-point tensor network of the form of Eq. (29): the decohered density matrix is a doubled-layer network with a connecting tensor $h$ that encodes the channel constraints. If correct, this gives a practical handle for computing observables and entanglement quantities in mixed-state topological phases and for studying their stability under further perturbations.

What carries the argument

The machine is the doubled-Hilbert-space isomorphism followed by simultaneous diagonalization. The density matrix is first doubled into a pure state $|\rho_0\rangle\rangle = |\psi\rangle \otimes |\psi^*\rangle$; the channel becomes a product of paired operators $\tilde K_a = K_a \otimes \overline{K_a}$. Because the channel creates only Abelian anyons, these paired operators commute exactly, so a basis exists that diagonalizes all of them at once. The local tensors are the vertex tensor $T$ (Gauss law), the link tensor $g$ (projection onto the physical qudit), the doubled tensors $\tilde T$, $\tilde g$, and the connecting tensor $h$ that enforces the channel's eigenvalue constraint, e.g. $h_{\mu_l \nu_{l-a}} = 1$ if $(a\mu_l + b\nu_{l-a}) \bmod N = 0$. The tensor-entanglement renormalization group of the pure state then applies unchanged, so the network is a fixed point.

What would settle it

Take maximal decoherence of the $e^2 m^2$ dyon in the $\mathbb{Z}_4$ toric code, contract the tensor network of Eq. (48) on a finite square lattice, and compare it element-by-element with the closed-form stabilizer mixture of Eq. (49); any mismatch shows the construction does not reproduce the claimed fixed-point state. A complementary check is to apply the protocol to a non-Abelian channel, such as the $S_3$ quantum double with decoherence of the $([2], C_s)$ anyon: computing the commutator of two ribbon operators should give a matrix $U$ whose doubled copies do not cancel, confirming that the diagonalization step is the precise place where the Abelian assumption is needed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that any intrinsically mixed-state topological phase obtained by maximal decoherence of a pure topological phase in Abelian anyon sectors admits an exact fixed-point tensor network. Concretely, the density matrix takes the form $\rho = \frac{1}{C}\sum_{j,j'} \left[\prod_v \tilde T_v \prod_l \tilde g^{(j_l,j'_l)}\, h_l\right] |\{j\}\rangle\langle\{j'\}|$ (Eq. (29)), where $\tilde T_v$ enforces Gauss law in both bra and ket layers, $\tilde g$ carries the physical $X/Z$ basis and the diagonalized channel, and $h_l$ projects onto the channel's eigenvalue constraints. Decoherence in the doubled space acts like anyon condensation: it is a projector onto eigenvalue sectors of anyon-creation operators, and because those operators are Abelian they can be simultaneously diagonalized. The paper demonstrates the construction for $m^a e^b$ decoherence of $\mathbb{Z}_N$ toric code, the decohered $S_3$ quantum double, pure $Z/X$ decoherence of arbitrary CSS codes, the three-dimensional toric code, and a chiral semion state.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on the channel's operators being simultaneously diagonalizable in the doubled Hilbert space, which holds when they create only Abelian anyons and fails when the channel creates non-Abelian excitations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every strongly decohered $\mathbb{Z}_N$ toric-code state in an $m^a e^b$ channel acquires an exact fixed-point tensor network; after taking the trace, its renormalization reduces to the pure-state case with only a constant factor.
  • The same construction gives fixed-point tensor networks for the decohered non-Abelian $S_3$ quantum double, arbitrary CSS codes under pure $Z$ or $X$ noise, the three-dimensional toric code, and the chiral semion state.
  • The chiral semion example provides a fixed-point tensor network for a chiral topological phase in the mixed-state setting, where such states cannot arise from local commuting projector Hamiltonians in pure states.
  • Because the networks are exact fixed points of tensor-entanglement renormalization, deforming the connecting tensor $h$ (for example toward a Boltzmann factor) yields a concrete route to study stability and phase transitions of mixed-state topological order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not pursue it, but the connecting tensor $h$ can be treated as a tuning parameter: interpolating between a delta constraint (maximal decoherence) and an identity or Boltzmann weight should trace a decoherence-driven phase transition, potentially giving a variational ansatz for error thresholds.
  • The paper's failure mode for non-Abelian channels suggests a hierarchy: Abelian channels are exactly representable by this doubled-layer network, while non-Abelian channels would need either fermionic tensor networks (as in the paper's appendix for the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ fermion example) or a generalized doubled-space construction built around the commutator matrix $U$.
  • Because Eq. (29) is a pure tensor network for the density matrix, standard contraction algorithms could be applied directly to compute entanglement negativity and Renyi entropies of mixed-state topological phases, which the paper lists only as future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a general protocol for constructing fixed-point tensor network representations of intrinsically mixed-state topological phases obtained by strongly decohering pure-state topological phases in Abelian sectors. The method works in the Choi doubled space, diagonalizes the paired Kraus operators of the channel, and imposes the channel constraints by connecting tensors h; the main result is Eq. (29). The authors apply the protocol to Z_N toric code with m^a e^b decoherence, to the non-Abelian S_3 quantum double, to arbitrary CSS codes, and to a chiral semion example. They also review the TERG fixed-point property for the pure and decohered tensor networks and provide a fermionic tensor network representation for the Z_2 fermion decoherence channel.

Significance. If correct, the protocol would provide an explicit, parameter-free family of fixed-point tensor networks for a broad class of decohered topological phases, connecting anyon condensation in Choi states to calculable tensor network representations. The construction is algebraically explicit for the Z_N and CSS examples, and the e2m2-decohered Z_4 state is matched to the known stabilizer result of [17], which is a concrete and valuable checkpoint. The paper is also careful to state the scope of the method: it requires channels that create only Abelian excitations, since non-Abelian channels break the simultaneous diagonalization step. The main weakness is that several load-bearing identifications—notably the double semion representation and the chiral semion example—are asserted rather than derived; these need to be supported before the headline examples can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (14) and Fig. 6] The claim that the tensor network obtained by condensing e2m2 from the Z_4 toric code, Eq. (14), is a representation of the double semion ground state is supported only by the sentence 'It can be easily verified that |ψ_cond> is stabilized by the appropriate stabilizers of the double semion state.' No stabilizer computation is shown. This identification is load-bearing: the pure-state condensation example motivates the mixed-state construction, and the chiral example in Sec. VI D inherits its validity from this claim. Anyon condensation of a dyon from Z_4 toric code is a nontrivial operation whose outcome must be checked against the double semion anyonic data (including the semion twist and the resulting fusion rules). Please provide an explicit verification that the state (14) is a simultaneous +1 eigenstate of A^DS_v and B^DS_p from Fig. 6, with the correct phase factors, or give a rigorous argument that the condensation procedure yields the double semion theory rather than another Z_4-condensed state.
  2. [Sec. VI D, Eq. (83)] The tensor network in Eq. (83) is claimed to be a fixed-point representation of a chiral semion mixed state, but the manuscript provides no diagnostic supporting this identification. No topological invariant is computed, no comparison to an established chiral semion model is made, and no RG fixed-point check is given for the mixed state that contains both the condensation connectors h̃ and the decoherence connectors h. Since the paper explicitly notes that chiral topological order is believed to be unrealizable by local commuting projector models, the claim that this tensor network captures chiral semion order is unusual and needs a concrete, gauge-invariant verification. Please compute, for example, the anyonic excitations in the doubled formalism or the modular data of the resulting density matrix, and show that it matches the chiral semion theory.
  3. [Sec. V B 4, Eqs. (48)-(51)] The derivation that ρ in Eq. (49) is the maximally mixed state in the A^DS_v, B^DS_p-stabilized subspace relies on the assertion that the pure states labeled by subsets S (with an even number of links in S around each vertex) form a basis of that subspace. This basis-completeness claim is not proved. The dimension of the stabilized subspace and the linear independence of the constructed states need to be shown explicitly. In addition, the RG argument after Eq. (51) states that contracting the r tensors gives δ_{κ,κ',0} and that the connectors decouple from the rest of the network; this decoupling should be demonstrated for all local configurations, not only in the trace, because it underlies the claim that the mixed-state RG reduces to the pure-state RG. Please supply the missing counting and decoupling derivations.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The notation 'maeb decoherence' in the abstract should be typeset as m^a e^b; several superscripts appear to be missing due to formatting issues throughout the text.
  2. [Sec. II A, Eq. (5) and Eq. (10)] The normalization constant 1/sqrt(N^{M/2+1}) in Eq. (5) is dropped without comment in the basis-changed expression (10); the normalization of |ψ> after the change of basis should be stated.
  3. [Sec. V A, Eq. (27)] The definition of h_l in Eq. (27) uses indices µ_{l1}, ν_{l2}, ... without explicitly connecting them to the projector decomposition in Eq. (23) or to the phase q_l; the correspondence between the vector of indices, the constraint q_l, and the channel outcome c_l should be spelled out.
  4. [Sec. VI D, Eq. (78)] The basis transformation eU from the eX, eZ basis to the (a,b) basis is not explicitly defined; please give the explicit matrix or a reference so that the tensor eg in Eq. (78) is well specified.
  5. [Appendix A, Eq. (A5)] The notation ⟨...⟩_{virt} and the expression |phys>|virt> are not defined; the role of the virtual vacua and the contraction over virtual modes should be clarified.
  6. [Sec. III, header] There is a typo in the section heading: 'any on condensation' should be 'anyon condensation'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular reduction in the Choi-space protocol: Eq. (29) is the channeled state by construction and the RG fixed point is inherited from the pure-state TERG; only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation [24] appears.

full rationale

The central protocol (Sec. V A, Eqs. 20-29) is a parameter-free transcription of the channel action in the Choi space: because the Kraus strings commute up to a phase, the paired operators K⊗K̄ commute exactly (the paper states the contrapositive in Sec. VII: for non-Abelian channels 'U, U do not cancel out'), so the simultaneous diagonalization and the connectors h_l (Eqs. 26-29) reproduce the channel projectors (Eq. 23), and Eq. (29) is the post-channel density matrix itself, not a fitted or imported object. The RG fixed-point claim is reduced to the pure-state TERG fixed point: for the dyonic case the trace evaluation collapses tr(ρ) to the pure-state overlap contraction via Eq. (37), and the paper notes 'the trace has allowed immediate evaluation of the connectors h which contain all information about the channel'; the pure-state fixed-point property is proven in Sec. II B with explicit tensors L1, R1, L2, R2 (Eqs. 7-8) and is not assumed from a self-citation. Topological identifications are benchmarked externally: the e2m2-decohered state is checked 'matching the result given in [17]' (Sec. VB4), and the double semion stabilizers are cited to [53], neither of which involves the present authors. The only self-citation is [24] (co-author Z.-X. Luo) for the strong-to-weak 1-form SSB diagnosis of the flux-decohered toric code (Sec. IV); it is contextual and corroborated by external refs [14-16, 27, 31], so it is not load-bearing. Genuine gaps exist but are support gaps, not circularity: the double semion identification ('It can be easily verified that |ψcond⟩ is stabilized by the appropriate stabilizers of the double semion state [53]', Sec. III), the basis-completeness claim of Sec. VB4, and the chiral semion identification of Sec. VID are asserted without shown computations, and these assertions carry the headline examples; Section VII honestly delimits the Abelian-channel scope. Such omissions affect correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, dimensions, or fitted parameters are introduced. The protocol's inputs are the pure-state fixed-point tensor network, the Abelian channel, and its projectors; the connecting tensors encode the channel data. The main burdens are the commutativity/diagonalizability assumption on the channel, the projector form of strong decoherence, and the asserted stabilizer identifications in the double semion and chiral examples.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Kraus operators of the decoherence channel mutually commute up to a phase, allowing simultaneous diagonalization in the Choi space.
    Section V A assumes commuting channels; Section VII states the method breaks for channels creating non-Abelian excitations, marking the boundary of applicability.
  • domain assumption The strong decoherence channel is projector-valued, i.e. the sum of paired Kraus operators is a projector onto a fixed eigenvalue, as in Eqs. (22)-(23).
    The construction depends on this projector form; the connecting tensor h in Eq. (27) enforces the projected eigenvalue condition.
  • standard math The pure-state Z_N toric code tensor network is an exact fixed point of the TERG procedure with the splitting tensors of Eqs. (7)-(8).
    Section II B relies on prior results from refs. [42-44] and on the SVD argument that only zero singular values are dropped.
  • domain assumption Condensation of a self-bosonic anyon m^a e^b is equivalent to imposing (a mu_l + b nu_{l-a}) mod N = 0 through the h tensor in Eq. (15).
    Section III introduces this condition; the stabilizer verification is asserted as 'easily verified' rather than fully shown.
  • domain assumption The chiral semion mixed state is obtained by fermionic decoherence of the double semion state, and the constructed tensor network is a fixed point.
    Section VI D makes this identification with brief checks; the claim that the result is the chiral semion theory is load-bearing for that example.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tensor Network Representations for Intrinsically Mixed-State Topological Orders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EWX6PBPW

@misc{pith2026250722989,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tensor Network Representations for Intrinsically Mixed-State Topological Orders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EWX6PBPW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22989}
}
abstract

Tensor networks are an efficient platform to represent interesting quantum states of matter as well as to compute physical observables and information-theoretic quantities. We present a general protocol to construct fixed-point tensor network representations for intrinsically mixed-state topological phases, which exhibit nontrivial topological phenomena and do not have pure-state counterparts. The method exploits the power of anyon condensation in Choi states and is applicable to the cases where the target states arise from pure-state topological phases subject to strong decoherence/disorders in the Abelian sectors. Representative examples include $m^a e^b$ decoherence of $\mathbb{Z}_N$ toric code, decohered non-Abelian $S_3$ quantum double as well as pure $Z$/$X$ decoherence of arbitrary CSS codes. An example of chiral topological phases which cannot arise from local commuting projector models are also presented.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22989 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    J. Y. Lee, Y.-Z. You, and C. Xu, Symmetry protected topological phases under decoherence, Quantum9, 1607 (2025)

    2025

  2. [1]

    Pure-flux decoherence 7

    work page

  3. [2]

    Dyonic decoherence 8

    work page

  4. [3]

    Fermion channel in theZ2 toric code 8

    work page

  5. [4]

    Y v T v Y l gjl # |{j}⟩ (5) (i) TN of Choi state|ρ0⟩ ⟩= |ψ⟩|ψ∗⟩ before decoherence, written in the basis where the channel is diagonalized |ρ0⟩ ⟩ ∝ X {x,z}

    Decohering e2m2 from Z4 toric code 9 VI. Extensions 9 A. Decoherence in theS3 topological phase 10 B. Generalization to arbitrary CSS codes 11 C. 3D toric code renormalization group procedure 12 D. Tensor network representation of chiral topological order 12 VII. Summary and Outlook 13 Acknowledgments 14 ∗ baldossari3@gatech.edu † sergey.blinov@yale.edu ‡...

    arXiv 2025

  6. [5]

    (30) 8 The single-link support of the Kraus operators makes the doubled space approach unnecessary

    Pure-flux decoherence Consider here a channel where each Kraus operator only acts on a single link, of the form: Nl(ρ) = 1 N N −1X j=0 (X a l )jρ(X a l )−j. (30) 8 The single-link support of the Kraus operators makes the doubled space approach unnecessary. ForN = 2, a = 1, this reduces to the case covered in sec. IV. Note that the number of decohered anyo...

    work page

  7. [6]

    6; they represent the most general form for the decoherence of an arbitrary individual anyonmaeb in the ZN topological phase

    Dyonic decoherence An important channel type to consider are those of the form X a l Z b l−a, where a is the constant vector defined in fig. 6; they represent the most general form for the decoherence of an arbitrary individual anyonmaeb in the ZN topological phase. The general form of the projector in (23) that makes up the channel is: P(ωa N )x,(ωb N )z...

    work page

  8. [7]

    The local channel acts as: Nl [(·)] = 1 2 ((·) + XlZl−a(·)XlZl−a)

    Fermion channel in the Z2 toric code As a special example of the previous subsection, here we visit the simplest case of non-bosonic decoherence: maximally decohering the fermionf = em in theZ2 toric code [14, 17–19]. The local channel acts as: Nl [(·)] = 1 2 ((·) + XlZl−a(·)XlZl−a) . (38) In the Choi state, the projector form of N Choi l corre- sponds to...

    work page

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    (44) Since e2m2 is a self-boson, the bases ofHl and H∗ l can separately be taken to diagonalizeX 2 l and Z 2 l , which al- lows us to skip the doubled representation altogether

    Decohering e2m2 from Z4 toric code Consider the Z4 quantum double with maximal deco- herence of the dyone2m2: Nl [(·)] = 1 2 (·) + X 2 l Z 2 l−a(·)X 2 l Z 2 l−a . (44) Since e2m2 is a self-boson, the bases ofHl and H∗ l can separately be taken to diagonalizeX 2 l and Z 2 l , w...

  2. [9]

    III: X 2 |x, z⟩ = ( −1)x |x, z⟩ , Z 2 |x, z⟩ = (−1)z |x, z⟩

    Here,x, z∈ {0, 1} are powers of eigenvalues forX 2 and Z 2 as in sec. III: X 2 |x, z⟩ = ( −1)x |x, z⟩ , Z 2 |x, z⟩ = (−1)z |x, z⟩. The basis change can be done separately in each layer, leading to: g(x,z) αβ = X j U (x,z) j gj αβ. (46) After extending g with ancillae g(x,z) αβ...

  3. [10]

    B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou, and X.-G. Wen, Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter (Springer, 2019)

    2019

  4. [11]

    Freedman, A

    M. Freedman, A. Kitaev, M. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Topo- logical quantum computation, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 40, 31 (2003)

    2003

  5. [12]

    Moessner and J

    R. Moessner and J. E. Moore, Topological Phases of Matter (Cambridge University Press, 2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    McGinley and N

    M. McGinley and N. R. Cooper, Fragility of time-reversal symmetry protected topological phases, Nature Physics 16, 1181 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    de Groot, A

    C. de Groot, A. Turzillo, and N. Schuch, Symmetry Pro- tected Topological Order in Open Quantum Systems, Quantum 6, 856 (2022)

    2022

  8. [15]

    Ma, J.-H

    R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Topological phases with average symmetries: the de- cohered, the disordered, and the intrinsic (2025), arXiv:2305.16399 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Ma and C

    R. Ma and C. Wang, Average symmetry-protected topo- logical phases, Phys. Rev. X13, 031016 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Zhang, K

    J.-H. Zhang, K. Ding, S. Yang, and Z. Bi, Fractonic higher-order topological phases in open quantum sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B108, 155123 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Ma and A

    R. Ma and A. Turzillo, Symmetry-protected topological phases of mixed states in the doubled space, PRX Quan- tum 6, 010348 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Y. Guo, K. Ding, and S. Yang, A new frame- work for quantum phases in open systems: Steady state of imaginary-time lindbladian evolution (2025), arXiv:2408.03239 [quant-ph]

    2025

  13. [21]

    Guo and S

    Y. Guo and S. Yang, Strong-to-weak spontaneous sym- metry breaking meets average symmetry-protected topo- logical order, Phys. Rev. B111, L201108 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Guo, J.-H

    Y. Guo, J.-H. Zhang, H.-R. Zhang, S. Yang, and Z. Bi, Locally purified density operators for symmetry- protected topological phases in mixed states, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021060 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Y. Bao, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and E. Altman, Mixed-state topological order and the errorfield double formulation of decoherence-induced transitions (2023), arXiv:2301.05687 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    R. Fan, Y. Bao, E. Altman, and A. Vishwanath, Diag- nostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory, PRX Quantum5, 020343 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement, PRX Quantum 4, 030317 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    T. D. Ellison and M. Cheng, Toward a classification of mixed-state topological orders in two dimensions, PRX Quantum 6, 010315 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Sohal and A

    R. Sohal and A. Prem, Noisy approach to intrinsically mixed-state topological order, PRX Quantum6, 010313 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wu, and Z. Wang, Intrinsic mixed-state topological order, PRX Quantum 6, 10.1103/prxquan- tum.6.010314 (2025)

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    Li and R

    Z. Li and R. S. K. Mong, Replica topological order in quantum mixed states and quantum error correction (2024), arXiv:2402.09516 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Chen and T

    Y.-H. Chen and T. Grover, Separability transitions in topological states induced by local decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 170602 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    S. Sang, Y. Zou, and T. H. Hsieh, Mixed-state quantum phases: Renormalization and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. X14, 031044 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    M. S. Zini and Z. Wang, Mixed-state tqfts (2021), arXiv:2110.13946 [math.QA]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Xu, J.-H. Zhang, C. Xu, Z. Bi, and Z.-X. Luo, Strong-to-weak spontaneous breaking of 1- form symmetry and intrinsically mixed topological order (2025), arXiv:2409.17530 [quant-ph]

    2025

  26. [34]

    Wang, X.-D

    Z. Wang, X.-D. Dai, H.-R. Wang, and Z. Wang, Topo- logically ordered steady states in open quantum systems, SciPost Phys. 17, 167 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    X.-D. Dai, Z. Wang, H.-R. Wang, and Z. Wang, Steady- state topological order, Phys. Rev. B111, 115142 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Sang and T

    S. Sang and T. H. Hsieh, Stability of mixed-state quan- tum phases via finite markov length, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 070403 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    L. A. Lessa, S. Sang, T.-C. Lu, T. H. Hsieh, and C. Wang, Higher-form anomaly and long-range entanglement of mixed states (2025), arXiv:2503.12792 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Z. Li, D. Lee, and B. Yoshida, How much entanglement is needed for topological codes and mixed states with anomalous symmetry? (2024), arXiv:2405.07970 [quant- ph]. 16

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Kikuchi, K.-S

    K. Kikuchi, K.-S. Kam, and F.-H. Huang, Anyon condensation in mixed-state topological order (2024), arXiv:2406.14320 [hep-th]

    2024

  32. [40]

    Y. Zou, S. Sang, and T. H. Hsieh, Channeling quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 250403 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Bombin, Topological subsystem codes, Phys

    H. Bombin, Topological subsystem codes, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032301 (2010)

    2010

  34. [42]

    T. D. Ellison, Y.-A. Chen, A. Dua, W. Shirley, N. Tanti- vasadakarn, and D. J. Williamson, Pauli topological sub- system codes from Abelian anyon theories, Quantum7, 1137 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Annals of Physics321, 2–111 (2006)

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Annals of Physics321, 2–111 (2006)

    2006

  36. [44]

    Kapustin and L

    A. Kapustin and L. Spodyneiko, Thermal hall conduc- tance and a relative topological invariant of gapped two- dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B101, 045137 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    J. I. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Z.-C. Gu, M. Levin, B. Swingle, and X.-G. Wen, Tensor- product representations for string-net condensed states, Physical Review B 79, 10.1103/physrevb.79.085118 (2009)

    2009 doi

  39. [47]

    Buerschaper, M

    O. Buerschaper, M. Aguado, and G. Vidal, Explicit ten- sornetworkrepresentationforthegroundstatesofstring- net models, Phys. Rev. B79, 085119 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Zhu and G.-M

    G.-Y. Zhu and G.-M. Zhang, Gapless coulomb state emerging from a self-dual topological tensor-network state, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 176401 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Buerschaper, J

    O. Buerschaper, J. M. Mombelli, M. Christandl, and M. Aguado, A hierarchy of topological tensor network states, Journal of Mathematical Physics54 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    M. B. Şahinoğlu, D. Williamson, N. Bultinck, M. Mariën, J. Haegeman, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Character- izing topological order with matrix product operators, in Annales Henri Poincaré, Vol. 22 (Springer, 2021) pp. 563–592

    2021

  43. [51]

    Levin and C

    M. Levin and C. P. Nave, Tensor renormalization group approach to two-dimensional classical lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 120601 (2007)

    2007

  44. [52]

    Z.-C. Gu, M. Levin, and X.-G. Wen, Tensor- entanglement renormalization group approach as a uni- fiedmethodforsymmetrybreakingandtopologicalphase transitions, Phys. Rev. B78, 205116 (2008)

    2008

  45. [53]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topo- logical order, Phys. Rev. B80, 155131 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    D. J. Williamson, C. Delcamp, F. Verstraete, and N. Schuch, On the stability of topological order in tensor network states, Phys. Rev. B104, 235151 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Duivenvoorden, M

    K. Duivenvoorden, M. Iqbal, J. Haegeman, F. Verstraete, and N. Schuch, Entanglement phases as holographic du- alsofanyoncondensates,Phys.Rev.B 95,235119(2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Zhang, W.-T

    Q. Zhang, W.-T. Xu, Z.-Q. Wang, and G.-M. Zhang, Non-hermitian effects of the intrinsic signs in topologi- cally ordered wavefunctions, Communications Physics3, 209 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    W.-T. Xu, Q. Zhang, and G.-M. Zhang, Tensor network approach to phase transitions of a non-abelian topologi- cal phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 130603 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Zhu, J.-Y

    G.-Y. Zhu, J.-Y. Chen, P. Ye, and S. Trebst, Topological fracton quantum phase transitions by tuning exact tensor network states, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216704 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    H. Xue, J. Y. Lee, and Y. Bao, Tensor network formula- tion of symmetry protected topological phases in mixed states (2024), arXiv:2403.17069 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Iqbal, K

    M. Iqbal, K. Duivenvoorden, and N. Schuch, Study of anyon condensation and topological phase transitions from a 𭟋4 topological phase using the projected en- tangled pair states approach, Phys. Rev. B97, 195124 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics303, 2–30 (2003)

    A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics303, 2–30 (2003)

    2003

  54. [62]

    T. D. Ellison, Y.-A. Chen, A. Dua, W. Shirley, N. Tanti- vasadakarn, and D. J. Williamson, Pauli stabilizer mod- els of twisted quantum doubles, PRX Quantum3, 010353 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications 10, 285 (1975)

    M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications 10, 285 (1975)

    1975

  56. [64]

    Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics3, 275 (1972)

    A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics3, 275 (1972)

    1972

  57. [65]

    L. Chen, Y. Ren, R. Fan, and A. Jaffe, A univer- sal circuit set using the s3 quantum double (2025), arXiv:2411.09697 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    C. F. B. Lo, A. Lyons, R. Verresen, A. Vishwanath, and N. Tantivasadakarn, Universal quantum computa- tion with thes3 quantum double: A pedagogical exposi- tion (2025), arXiv:2502.14974 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Beigi, P

    S. Beigi, P. W. Shor, and D. Whalen, The quantum double model with boundary: Condensations and sym- metries, Communications in Mathematical Physics306, 663–694 (2011)

    2011

  60. [68]

    H. He, Y. Zheng, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, En- tanglement entropy from tensor network states for stabi- lizer codes, Physical Review B97, 125102 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases, Physical Review B 71, 10.1103/physrevb.71.045110 (2005)

    2005 doi

  62. [70]

    H. He, Y. Zheng, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, En- tanglement entropy from tensor network states for stabi- lizer codes, Phys. Rev. B97, 125102 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    C. V. Kraus, N. Schuch, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Fermionic projected entangled pair states, Physical Re- view A 81, 10.1103/physreva.81.052338 (2010)

    2010 doi

  64. [72]

    Y.-A. Chen, A. Kapustin, and D. Radičević, Exact bosonization in two spatial dimensions and a new class of lattice gauge theories, Annals of Physics393, 234–253 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.