Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BAO scale inference from biased tracers using the EFT likelihood

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.06177 v2 pith:EY6R56FA submitted 2022-03-11 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords scaleinferencehalolikelihoodanalysisbiasedclusteringcutoff
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The physical scale corresponding to baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), the size of the sound horizon at recombination, is precisely determined by CMB experiments. Measuring the apparent size of the BAO scale imprinted in the clustering of galaxies gives us a direct estimate of the angular-diameter distance and the Hubble parameter as a function of redshift. The BAO feature is damped by non-linear structure formation, which reduces the precision with which we can infer the BAO scale from standard galaxy clustering analysis methods. Many methods to undo this damping via the so-called BAO reconstruction have so far been proposed; however, they all rely on backward modeling. In this paper, we present the first results of BAO inference from rest-frame halo catalogs using forward modeling combined with the EFT likelihood, in the case where the initial phases of the density field are fixed. We show that the remaining systematic bias is less than 2% when we consider cutoff values of $\Lambda \leq 0.25 \,h\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ for all halo samples considered, and below 1% and consistent with zero for all but the most highly biased samples. We also demonstrate that, when compared to the standard power spectrum likelihood approach under the same assumption of fixed phases, the 1$\sigma$ errors associated to the field level inference of the BAO scale are 1.1 to 3.3 times smaller, depending on the value of the cutoff and the halo sample. Our analysis therefore unveils another promising feature of using field-level inference for high-precision cosmology.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Equivalence of the field-level inference and conventional analyses on large scales

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A joint power spectrum, bispectrum and trispectrum analysis achieves the same precision on the density amplitude as field-level inference for halos on large scales.

Pith tools