Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

How Charged Can Neutrinos Be?

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Only flavor-universal U(1)_X symmetries such as B−L and L can endow neutrinos with a tiny electric charge while staying consistent with measured neutrino masses and mixing; flavor-dependent symmetries like L_μ−L_τ fail.

desk verdict Useful model-by-model update to mini-charged neutrino bounds, but the "only flavor-universal" claim is stronger than the six benchmark models prove. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20044 v1 pith:EZNPQIKR submitted 2025-04-28 hep-ph astro-ph.HEhep-exhep-th

Sudip Jana , Michael Klasen , Vishnu P.K This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HEhep-exhep-th
keywords neutrinoelectricchargemillichargedneutrinosU(1)_XgaugesymmetrydequantizationoscillationsDiracquantizationanomalycancellation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether neutrinos can carry a small electric charge without destroying electromagnetic gauge invariance. It shows that such a charge can arise by gauging a linear combination of the standard hypercharge generator with a new global U(1)_X symmetry under which neutrinos transform. The central claim is that only flavor-universal U(1)_X symmetries, such as B−L and total lepton number L, are compatible with the observed neutrino masses and mixing; flavor-dependent symmetries like L_μ−L_τ forbid the mixings seen in oscillation experiments. If correct, this means neutrino-charge bounds must be derived model-by-model, not applied generically. The paper also computes the resulting upper bounds on the charge for each viable symmetry.

What carries the argument

The central construction is the modified charge operator $Q = Q_{\mathrm{st}} + \epsilon X$, obtained by gauging $U(1)_{Y+\epsilon X}$ instead of $U(1)_Y$, where $X$ is the generator of an anomaly-free, unbroken global $U(1)_X$ symmetry under which neutrinos carry charge $X_\nu$. The three conditions—anomaly freedom, exact conservation, and non-trivial lepton charges—make this charge operator valid at all scales. This identity is what lets the paper classify allowed symmetries and translate bounds.

What would settle it

Construct an explicit, anomaly-free model using a flavor-dependent $U(1)_X$ (for instance $L_\mu-L_\tau$) that nonetheless generates the observed three-flavor neutrino masses and mixing angles, for example by adding scalar or fermion fields that allow the required off-diagonal Yukawa couplings; if such a model satisfies all experimental constraints, the paper's claim that flavor-dependent symmetries are incompatible with oscillation data would be disproven.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that in the Standard Model, a neutrino electric charge can only be generated without spoiling the electroweak structure by gauging a linear combination of hypercharge and an anomaly-free, unbroken global U(1)_X symmetry, leading to the charge operator $Q = Q_{\mathrm{st}} + \epsilon X$. It then classifies the allowed U(1)_X symmetries. Flavor-dependent ones ($L_\alpha - L_\beta$, $B_i - L_i$) give different charges to different neutrino flavors, which forbids neutrino flavor mixing and leaves some neutrinos massless, conflicting with oscillation data. Flavor-universal ones ($B-L$, $L$) give the same charge to all neutrinos, allow Dirac mass terms and mixing, and pass the anomaly conditions. The paper argues that for these scenarios neutrinos are necessarily Dirac fermions, with the Dirac nature protected by the electromagnetic gauge symmetry, and it compiles model-specific experimental and astrophysical bounds, concluding that generic millicharge bounds are not valid across models.

Load-bearing premise

The entire classification presupposes that the chosen global U(1)_X symmetry is exactly conserved and anomaly-free, so the altered charge operator $Q = Q_{\mathrm{st}} + \epsilon X$ remains exact at all energy scales; if $U(1)_X$ is broken by anomalies, higher-dimensional operators, or spontaneous breaking, the neutrino charge ceases to be a well-defined quantum number.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Flavor-dependent U(1) symmetries like $L_\mu - L_\tau$ cannot accommodate observed neutrino oscillations, so any model with charged neutrinos based on them is excluded.
  • Flavor-universal $U(1)_{B-L}$ and $U(1)_L$ can produce charged neutrinos consistent with masses and mixing, so future searches should target these cases.
  • In such models neutrinos must be Dirac, because a Majorana mass would break electromagnetic gauge symmetry; this provides a symmetry-based rationale for Diracness.
  • The strongest current bounds are about $10^{-21}e$ for $L_e-L_\mu$, $L_e-L_\tau$, and $L$ (from matter neutrality), $10^{-19}e$ for $L_\mu-L_\tau$ (from pulsar timing), and $10^{-21}e$ for $B-L$ (from neutron and matter neutrality).
  • Model-independent millicharge bounds are not applicable; constraints must be recast per U(1)_X scenario.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the classification holds, then a future measurement of a neutrino charge would immediately identify the underlying $U(1)_X$ symmetry by the pattern of quark and lepton charge shifts, turning the charge itself into a fingerprint of the model.
  • The Dirac nature conclusion suggests that charged neutrinos automatically evade neutrinoless double-beta decay constraints, distinguishing them observationally from Majorana scenarios.
  • The $B-L$ and $L$ scenarios predict specific shifts in quark and lepton charges (in $B-L$, neutron charge $Q_n = -Q_\nu$), which could be tested by improved neutrality experiments; the current neutron-charge measurement already reaches $Q_\nu \sim 10^{-21}e$.
  • A testable extension is to recast limits from future reactor and dark-matter experiments (e.g., DUNE, LHC forward detectors, neutrino telescopes) separately for $B-L$ and $L$, since they predict different flux attenuation and recoil spectra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper investigates models in which neutrinos acquire small electric charges by gauging a linear combination of the Standard Model hypercharge generator Y and a new gaugable global U(1)_X symmetry, so that the physical charge operator becomes Q = Q_st + ε X. The authors classify possible U(1)_X symmetries into flavor-dependent cases such as L_α − L_β and B_i − L_i, which they argue are incompatible with neutrino oscillation data because different neutrino flavors then carry different electric charges and off-diagonal mass terms are forbidden, and flavor-universal cases such as B − L and L, which they argue are viable. They show that a nonzero neutrino charge forces neutrinos to be Dirac particles, since a Majorana mass term would violate electromagnetic gauge invariance. They then recast existing laboratory, astrophysical, and neutrality constraints on neutrino millicharge for five benchmark models and conclude that the relevant bounds are model-dependent rather than generic. The paper's central message is that only flavor-universal U(1)_X symmetries can generate tiny neutrino charges consistent with observed masses and mixing.

Significance. If the classification were fully established, it would be a useful organizing principle for neutrino millicharge searches: instead of applying a single generic bound, each U(1)_X scenario would have to be evaluated separately. The basic argument that flavor-dependent charges forbid neutrino mixing is sound for minimal particle content, and the paper usefully compiles updated constraints from scattering, neutrality, g−2, and astrophysical observations. The Dirac nature argument is clean. However, the exhaustiveness claim goes beyond what is proven, and some phenomenological formulas contain sign and dimensional inconsistencies. The paper can become publishable after the central claim is either proven or appropriately qualified and the quantitative issues are fixed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Table I; section 'Flavor dependent U(1)_X'] The abstract and Table I claim that 'only flavor-universal U(1)_X symmetries, such as U(1)_{B−L} and U(1)_L, can generate tiny neutrino charges consistent with observed masses and mixing.' This is an exhaustive negative statement, but the paper analyzes only the prototypes L_i − L_j and B_i − L_i. The argument that different electric charges forbid off-diagonal neutrino mass terms is correct for those minimal assignments, but the paper itself allows extra fermions for anomaly cancellation, as in Eq. (7) for U(1)_L. The authors do not prove that no flavor-dependent, anomaly-free U(1)_X with additional fermions can assign equal X charges to all lepton doublets while distinguishing other SM fields, nor that such assignments necessarily fail anomaly cancellation. The asserted incompatibility of U(1)_{B_i−L_i} with quark mixing is also not derived. The word 'only' should be replaced by a qualified statement such as 'in the minimal scenarios considered here,' or a general no-go theorem should be provided.
  2. [Section 'Current status of charged neutrinos', Eq. (32)] Equation (32) states |δaℓ| ≃ 3|ε| α_em/(2π) e/(2mℓ), but this cannot be correct as written because δaℓ is dimensionless while the right-hand side has dimensions of inverse mass. The standard one-loop result for a charged lepton with charge Q = −1+ε is δaℓ ≈ [(−1+ε)^2 − 1] α/(2π) = (−2ε + ε^2) α/(2π), which is linear in ε at leading order but contains no e/(2mℓ) factor. The bounds quoted immediately after Eq. (32) and in Table II should be recomputed with the corrected formula, or the paper should clarify if a different quantity, such as a magnetic moment shift, was intended.
  3. [Table I and section 'Flavor universal U(1)_X'] The electric charge assignments for U(1)_{B−L} are inconsistent between Table I and the text. Table I lists Qu = 2/3 − ε_ν/3, Qd = −1/3 − ε_ν/3, Qe = −1 + ε_ν, Qν = +ε_ν, whereas Eq. (5) and the surrounding text give Qu = 2/3 + ε/3, Qd = −1/3 + ε/3, Qe = −1 − ε and state Qν = −ε. The matter-neutrality relation in Eq. (31), Qm = −N Qν/A for B−L, is only consistent with one of these sign conventions. The authors should harmonize the signs and recheck all entries in Table II and Fig. 1 that depend on these relations.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 'Mini-charged neutrinos within a left-right symmetric model', Eq. (16)] The sentence 'The corresponding eigenvalues can be obtained by block-diagonalizing M by performing a bi-unitary transformation, leading order which leads' contains a typo; it should read 'to leading order, which leads.'
  2. [Table II] The row labels for the experiments are misleading: the 'Accelerator ν experiment' row includes reactor experiments TEXONO, GEMMA, CONUS, and Dresden-II, while the 'Reactor ν experiment' row includes LSND, which is an accelerator experiment. Please reclassify these entries or rename the rows.
  3. [Section 'Mini-charged neutrinos within a left-right symmetric model', Eq. (10)] The notation (2(1), 1(2)) in Eq. (10) is confusing; the reader must infer that the numbers in parentheses denote transformation properties under SU(2)_L and SU(2)_R, respectively. Please define this notation explicitly.
  4. [Section 'Dirac nature of charged neutrinos'] The sentence 'if this symmetry is off, discrete or global in nature' contains a typo; 'is off' should presumably read 'is broken' or 'is absent.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: construction, Dirac link, and bounds are derived from stated symmetries and external data; minor self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against its stated assumptions. The modified charge operator Q = Q_st + ϵX (Eq. 1) follows from the explicit assumption that U(1)_X is anomaly-free, unbroken, and gauged as part of U(1)_{Y+ϵX}; these are stated conditions, not consequences of the neutrino-charge conclusion. The Dirac nature of charged neutrinos follows from gauge invariance: a Majorana mass term would carry charge 2Q_ν and is forbidden by the unbroken U(1)_Q, so no independent 'Diracness' input is smuggled in. The incompatibility of flavor-dependent U(1)_X scenarios with oscillation data is deduced from the same unbroken-symmetry condition (off-diagonal neutrino mass terms would break U(1)_X), combined with the external requirement of observed mixing; this is a logical consequence, not a fit renamed as a prediction. The phenomenological bounds are imported from external experiments (TEXONO, COHERENT, LUX-ZEPLIN, XENONnT, neutron/matter neutrality tests, stellar cooling, SN1987A) and recast via the model-dependent charge assignments of Table I; no parameter is fitted to the quantity being 'predicted.' Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [27,29,75-79]) appear only in contextual remarks about Dirac-neutrino model-building or future experimental sensitivity and are not load-bearing supports of the central classification. The main caveat is not circularity: the abstract's exhaustive claim that 'only flavor-universal U(1)_X symmetries' work is stronger than the six benchmark models actually analyzed, and the sentence 'In general, other flavor dependent U(1)_X scenarios also suffer from such inconsistencies with experimental data' is an unsupported generalization; these are completeness/correctness risks, not reductions of the derivation to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central construction has one free parameter epsilon; the flavor-universal models require additional fermions (right-handed neutrinos, vectorlike fermions) which are borrowed from prior literature and have no independent experimental evidence. The analysis does not predict the value of epsilon; it only compiles upper bounds from external experiments.

free parameters (2)
  • epsilon
    Charge-shift parameter in Q = Q_st + epsilon X; constrained by experiments to be tiny, but not predicted by the model.
  • a = 1/2 (chosen)
    Free parameter in the U(1)_L model (Eq. 7); set to 1/2 for concreteness, with no experimental handle.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper A gaugable global U(1)_X symmetry exists that is anomaly-free, unbroken, and non-trivial on leptons.
    Conditions 1-3 in 'Pathways to mini-charged neutrinos' are assumed for all benchmark models.
  • domain assumption Anomaly freedom determines allowed U(1)_X charges; flavor-dependent symmetries can be anomaly-free in the SM, while flavor-universal ones require extra fermions.
    Used to build U(1)_{B-L}, U(1)_L, and left-right models.
  • standard math The neutrino mass matrix must commute with the unbroken electric charge operator.
    Central to the argument that flavor-dependent charges forbid mixing.
  • standard math Charged neutrinos cannot have a Majorana mass because it would break U(1)_Q.
    Used to conclude charged neutrinos are Dirac.
invented entities (3)
  • Right-handed neutrinos nu_R (three copies)
    purpose: Cancel U(1)_X anomalies and generate Dirac neutrino masses via Yukawa couplings.
    Introduced in U(1)_{B-L} and U(1)_L models; no direct experimental evidence cited.
  • Vectorlike fermions psi_1,2 (with components)
    purpose: Cancel anomalies and provide mass generation in the U(1)_L model of Eq. (7).
    Borrowed from Chao 2011; their charges are chosen to satisfy anomaly cancellation, with a free parameter a set to 1/2.
  • Vectorlike fermions N, E, U, D
    purpose: Generate fermion masses via generalized see-saw in the left-right model.
    Introduced in the left-right example, no independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of How Charged Can Neutrinos Be?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EZNPQIKR

@misc{pith2026250420044,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: How Charged Can Neutrinos Be?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EZNPQIKR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20044}
}
abstract

We investigate how neutrinos may acquire small electric charges within the Standard Model framework while preserving electromagnetic gauge invariance. Instead of gauging the standard hypercharge generator $Y$, a linear combination of $Y$ and a new generator $X$ from a gaugable global $U(1)_X$ symmetry is embedded, under which neutrinos transform non-trivially. We demonstrate that minimal scenarios based on flavor-dependent $U(1)_X$ symmetries, such as $X = L_\alpha - L_\beta$, are incompatible with current neutrino oscillation data. In contrast, we have shown that only flavor-universal $U(1)_X$ symmetries-such as $U(1)_{B-L}$, which shifts both quark and lepton charges, and $U(1)_L$, which modifies only the lepton sector-can generate tiny neutrino charges consistent with observed masses and mixing. We also discuss the necessary connection between such charges and the Dirac nature of neutrinos. By analyzing the phenomenological implications in detail, our findings emphasize that constraints on neutrino charges should be evaluated within the specific framework of the $U(1)_X$ symmetry under consideration, rather than assuming a generic approach, as is often the case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.20044 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Summary of constraints on charged neutrinos. Here [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Monophotons at Neutrino Experiments from Neutrino Polarizability

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    NOMAD and MiniBooNE data currently constrain the neutrino-polarizability coupling product most strongly, while SBND and DUNE are projected to improve these bounds by up to three orders of magnitude.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    U(1)X symmetry has to comply with all the gauge anomaly conditions

  2. [2]

    U(1)X symmetry is neither explicitly nor sponta- neously broken

  3. [3]

    Under U(1)X symmetry, the SM leptons should transforms non-trivially. Conditions 1 and 2 ensure that any linear combination of Y and X can be a gaugable symmetry of the model and also guarantee that after the symmetry breaking of SU (2)L×U(1)Y +ϵX, the electric charge of the particles will be modified in the following way Q =Qst +ϵX. (1) Here Qst is the s...

    2002

  4. [4]

    Is There a Connection Between Quantization of Electric Charge and a Majorana Neutrino?,

    K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, “Is There a Connection Between Quantization of Electric Charge and a Majorana Neutrino?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 938

    1989

  5. [5]

    Do the SuperKamiokande atmospheric neutrino results explain electric charge quantisation?

    R. Foot and R. R. Volkas, “Do the Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino results explain electric charge quantization?,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 097301, arXiv:hep-ph/9808388

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    The Charged Neutrino: A New Approach to the Solar Neutrino Problem

    A. Y. Ignatiev and G. C. Joshi, “The Charged neutrino: 8 A New approach to the solar neutrino problem,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9 (1994) 1479–1488, arXiv:hep-ph/9403332

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,

    L. Wolfenstein, “Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2369–2374

    1978

  8. [8]

    Resonant amplification of neutrino oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spectroscopy,

    S. P. Mikheev and A. Y. Smirnov, “Resonant amplification of neutrino oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spectroscopy,” Nuovo Cim. C 9 (1986) 17–26

    1986

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    Resonance Amplification of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos,

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, “Resonance Amplification of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42 (1985) 913–917

    1985

  2. [10]

    Solar neutrinos and neutrino physics,

    M. Maltoni and A. Y. Smirnov, “Solar neutrinos and neutrino physics,” Eur. Phys. J. A 52 no. 4, (2016) 87, arXiv:1507.05287 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics,

    C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, “Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 (2015) 531, arXiv:1403.6344 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Large Neutrino Magnetic Moments in the Light of Recent Experiments,

    K. S. Babu, S. Jana, and M. Lindner, “Large Neutrino Magnetic Moments in the Light of Recent Experiments,” JHEP 10 (2020) 040, arXiv:2007.04291 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Muon g − 2 anomaly and neutrino magnetic moments,

    K. S. Babu, S. Jana, M. Lindner, and V. P. K, “Muon g − 2 anomaly and neutrino magnetic moments,” JHEP 10 (2021) 240, arXiv:2104.03291 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    On the charge radius of the neutrino,

    J. Bernabeu, L. G. Cabral-Rosetti, J. Papavassiliou, and J. Vidal, “On the charge radius of the neutrino,” Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 113012, arXiv:hep-ph/0008114

    2000 arXiv

  7. [15]

    New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?,

    R. Foot, “New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 527–530

    1991

  8. [16]

    Bounds on minicharged neutrinos in the minimal Standard Model,

    K. S. Babu and R. R. Volkas, “Bounds on minicharged neutrinos in the minimal Standard Model,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) R2764–R2768, arXiv:hep-ph/9208260

    1992 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Neutrino Electromagnetic Properties,

    C. Giunti, K. Kouzakov, Y.-F. Li, and A. Studenikin, “Neutrino Electromagnetic Properties,” arXiv:2411.03122 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions,

    T. D. Lee and C.-N. Yang, “Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions,” Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 254–258

    1956

  11. [19]

    Possible consequences of parity conservation,

    R. Foot, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, “Possible consequences of parity conservation,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7 (1992) 2567–2574

    1992

  12. [20]

    Reconciling present neutrino puzzles: Sterile neutrinos as mirror neutrinos,

    Z. G. Berezhiani and R. N. Mohapatra, “Reconciling present neutrino puzzles: Sterile neutrinos as mirror neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6607–6611, arXiv:hep-ph/9505385

    1995 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Neutrino mass and the mirror universe,

    Z. K. Silagadze, “Neutrino mass and the mirror universe,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 60 (1997) 272–275, arXiv:hep-ph/9503481

    1997 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dirac neutrino mass generation from dark matter,

    Y. Farzan and E. Ma, “Dirac neutrino mass generation from dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 033007, arXiv:1204.4890 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Dirac or inverse seesaw neutrino masses with B− L gauge symmetry and S3 flavor symmetry,

    E. Ma and R. Srivastava, “Dirac or inverse seesaw neutrino masses with B− L gauge symmetry and S3 flavor symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 741 (2015) 217–222, arXiv:1411.5042 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gauge B− L Model with Residual Z3 Symmetry,

    E. Ma, N. Pollard, R. Srivastava, and M. Zakeri, “Gauge B− L Model with Residual Z3 Symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 750 (2015) 135–138, arXiv:1507.03943 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dirac Neutrinos and Dark Matter Stability from Lepton Quarticity,

    S. Centelles Chuli´ a, E. Ma, R. Srivastava, and J. W. F. Valle, “Dirac Neutrinos and Dark Matter Stability from Lepton Quarticity,” Phys. Lett. B 767 (2017) 209–213, arXiv:1606.04543 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Two-loop Dirac neutrino mass and WIMP dark matter,

    C. Bonilla, E. Ma, E. Peinado, and J. W. F. Valle, “Two-loop Dirac neutrino mass and WIMP dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 214–218, arXiv:1607.03931 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Pathways to Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Masses,

    E. Ma and O. Popov, “Pathways to Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Masses,” Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 142–144, arXiv:1609.02538 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Mass with Intermediate SU (2)L Multiplet Fields,

    W. Wang and Z.-L. Han, “Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Mass with Intermediate SU (2)L Multiplet Fields,” JHEP 04 (2017) 166, arXiv:1611.03240 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    A4 flavour model for Dirac neutrinos: Type I and inverse seesaw,

    D. Borah and B. Karmakar, “ A4 flavour model for Dirac neutrinos: Type I and inverse seesaw,” Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 461–470, arXiv:1712.06407 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Minimal dirac neutrino mass models from U(1) R gauge symmetry and left–right asymmetry at colliders,

    S. Jana, P. K. Vishnu, and S. Saad, “Minimal dirac neutrino mass models from U(1) R gauge symmetry and left–right asymmetry at colliders,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 11, (2019) 916, arXiv:1904.07407 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Double type II seesaw mechanism accompanied by Dirac fermionic dark matter,

    P.-H. Gu, “Double type II seesaw mechanism accompanied by Dirac fermionic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 1, (2020) 015006, arXiv:1907.10019 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Minimal realizations of Dirac neutrino mass from generic one-loop and two-loop topologies at d = 5,

    S. Jana, P. K. Vishnu, and S. Saad, “Minimal realizations of Dirac neutrino mass from generic one-loop and two-loop topologies at d = 5,” JCAP 04 (2020) 018, arXiv:1910.09537 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Different Varieties of Massive Dirac Neutrinos,

    L. Wolfenstein, “Different Varieties of Massive Dirac Neutrinos,” Nucl. Phys. B 186 (1981) 147–152

    1981

  26. [34]

    On Pseudodirac Neutrinos, Neutrino Oscillations and Neutrinoless Double beta Decay,

    S. T. Petcov, “On Pseudodirac Neutrinos, Neutrino Oscillations and Neutrinoless Double beta Decay,” Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982) 245–249

    1982

  27. [35]

    Lepton Number Violation With Quasi Dirac Neutrinos,

    J. W. F. Valle and M. Singer, “Lepton Number Violation With Quasi Dirac Neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 540

    1983

  28. [36]

    Pseudo Dirac scenario for neutrino oscillations,

    M. Kobayashi and C. S. Lim, “Pseudo Dirac scenario for neutrino oscillations,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 013003, arXiv:hep-ph/0012266

    2001 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Naturally light Dirac and pseudo-Dirac neutrinos from left-right symmetry,

    K. S. Babu, X.-G. He, M. Su, and A. Thapa, “Naturally light Dirac and pseudo-Dirac neutrinos from left-right symmetry,” JHEP 08 (2022) 140, arXiv:2205.09127 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Connecting pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with pseudo-Dirac neutrinos in a left-right symmetry model,

    S. Biswas, V. P. K., and A. Thapa, “Connecting pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with pseudo-Dirac neutrinos in a left-right symmetry model,” arXiv:2407.05482 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    CHARGED NEUTRINOS?,

    R. Foot, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, “CHARGED NEUTRINOS?,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5 (1990) 95. [Erratum: Mod.Phys.Lett.A 5, 2085 (1990)]

    1990

  32. [40]

    Electric charge quantization,

    R. Foot, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, “Electric charge quantization,” J. Phys. G 19 (1993) 361–372, arXiv:hep-ph/9209259. [Erratum: J.Phys.G 19, 1067 (1993)]

    1993 arXiv

  33. [41]

    [80–85] for scenarios of charged neutrinos emerging from the breaking of electromagnetic gauge symmetry

    See Refs. [80–85] for scenarios of charged neutrinos emerging from the breaking of electromagnetic gauge symmetry

  34. [42]

    NEW Z-prime PHENOMENOLOGY,

    X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, “NEW Z-prime PHENOMENOLOGY,” Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 22–24

    1991

  35. [43]

    Pure Leptonic Gauge Symmetry, Neutrino Masses and Dark Matter,

    W. Chao, “Pure Leptonic Gauge Symmetry, Neutrino Masses and Dark Matter,” Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 157–161, arXiv:1005.1024 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Limit on the electron neutrino magnetic moment from the Kuo-Sheng reactor neutrino experiment,

    TEXONO Collaboration, H. B. Li et al., “Limit on the electron neutrino magnetic moment from the Kuo-Sheng reactor neutrino experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 131802, arXiv:hep-ex/0212003. 9

    2003 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor Antineutrinos,

    J. Colaresi, J. I. Collar, T. W. Hossbach, C. M. Lewis, and K. M. Yocum, “Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor Antineutrinos,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 21, (2022) 211802, arXiv:2202.09672 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Constraints on millicharged neutrinos via analysis of data from atomic ionizations with germanium detectors at sub-keV sensitivities,

    J.-W. Chen, H.-C. Chi, H.-B. Li, C. P. Liu, L. Singh, H. T. Wong, C.-L. Wu, and C.-P. Wu, “Constraints on millicharged neutrinos via analysis of data from atomic ionizations with germanium detectors at sub-keV sensitivities,” Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 1, (2014) 011301, arXiv:1405.71...

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Impact of the Dresden-II and COHERENT neutrino scattering data on neutrino electromagnetic properties and electroweak physics,

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, C. A. Ternes, and Y. Y. Zhang, “Impact of the Dresden-II and COHERENT neutrino scattering data on neutrino electromagnetic properties and electroweak physics,” JHEP 09 (2022) 164, arXiv:2205.09484 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon,

    COHERENT Collaboration, D. Akimov et al., “First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 1, (2021) 012002, arXiv:2003.10630 [nucl-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT,

    COHERENT Collaboration, D. Akimov et al., “Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 8, (2022) 081801, arXiv:2110.07730 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Search for exotic neutrino-electron interactions using solar neutrinos in XMASS-I,

    XMASS Collaboration, K. Abe et al., “Search for exotic neutrino-electron interactions using solar neutrinos in XMASS-I,” Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135741, arXiv:2005.11891 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al., “First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 4, (2023) 041002, arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    New constraint on neutrino magnetic moment and neutrino millicharge from LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter search results,

    M. Atzori Corona, W. M. Bonivento, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, and F. Dordei, “New constraint on neutrino magnetic moment and neutrino millicharge from LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter search results,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 5, (2023) 053001, arXiv:2207.05036 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Search for New Physics in Electronic Recoil Data from XENONnT,

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “Search for New Physics in Electronic Recoil Data from XENONnT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 16, (2022) 161805, arXiv:2207.11330 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Implications of first LZ and XENONnT results: A comparative study of neutrino properties and light mediators,

    S. K. A., A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “Implications of first LZ and XENONnT results: A comparative study of neutrino properties and light mediators,” Phys. Lett. B 839 (2023) 137742, arXiv:2208.06415 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Search for Light Fermionic Dark Matter Absorption on Electrons in PandaX-4T,

    PandaX Collaboration, D. Zhang et al., “Search for Light Fermionic Dark Matter Absorption on Electrons in PandaX-4T,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 16, (2022) 161804, arXiv:2206.02339 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Testing neutrino electromagnetic properties at current and future dark matter experiments,

    C. Giunti and C. A. Ternes, “Testing neutrino electromagnetic properties at current and future dark matter experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 9, (2023) 095044, arXiv:2309.17380 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Closing the windows on MeV Tau neutrinos,

    K. S. Babu, T. M. Gould, and I. Z. Rothstein, “Closing the windows on MeV Tau neutrinos,” Phys. Lett. B 321 (1994) 140–144, arXiv:hep-ph/9310349

    1994 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Search for millicharged particles in reactor neutrino experiments: A Probe of the PVLAS anomaly,

    S. N. Gninenko, N. V. Krasnikov, and A. Rubbia, “Search for millicharged particles in reactor neutrino experiments: A Probe of the PVLAS anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 075014, arXiv:hep-ph/0612203

    2007 arXiv

  51. [59]

    New bounds on neutrino electric millicharge from limits on neutrino magnetic moment,

    A. Studenikin, “New bounds on neutrino electric millicharge from limits on neutrino magnetic moment,” EPL 107 no. 2, (2014) 21001, arXiv:1302.1168 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: EPL 107, 39901 (2014), Erratum: Europhys.Lett. 107, 39901 (2014)]

    2014 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Prompt Neutrino Production in 400-GeV Proton Copper Interactions,

    BEBC W A66 Collaboration, H. Grassler et al., “Prompt Neutrino Production in 400-GeV Proton Copper Interactions,” Nucl. Phys. B 273 (1986) 253–274

    1986

  53. [61]

    Bound on the tau-neutrino magnetic moment from the BEBC beam dump experiment,

    A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, S. Sarkar, J. Guy, W. Venus, P. O. Hulth, and K. Hultqvist, “Bound on the tau-neutrino magnetic moment from the BEBC beam dump experiment,” Phys. Lett. B 280 (1992) 153–158

    1992

  54. [62]

    The results of search for the neutrino magnetic moment in GEMMA experiment,

    A. G. Beda, V. B. Brudanin, V. G. Egorov, D. V. Medvedev, V. S. Pogosov, M. V. Shirchenko, and A. S. Starostin, “The results of search for the neutrino magnetic moment in GEMMA experiment,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2012 (2012) 350150

    2012

  55. [63]

    First upper limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties from the CONUS experiment,

    CONUS Collaboration, H. Bonet et al., “First upper limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties from the CONUS experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no. 9, (2022) 813, arXiv:2201.12257 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Measurement of electron - neutrino - electron elastic scattering,

    LSND Collaboration, L. B. Auerbach et al., “Measurement of electron - neutrino - electron elastic scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 112001, arXiv:hep-ex/0101039

    2001 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Neutrino charge constraints from scattering to the weak gravity conjecture to neutron stars,

    A. Das, D. Ghosh, C. Giunti, and A. Thalapillil, “Neutrino charge constraints from scattering to the weak gravity conjecture to neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 11, (2020) 115009, arXiv:2005.12304 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    A New upper limit for the tau - neutrino magnetic moment,

    DONUT Collaboration, R. Schwienhorst et al., “A New upper limit for the tau - neutrino magnetic moment,” Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001) 23–29, arXiv:hep-ex/0102026

    2001 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Experimental limit for the charge of the free neutron,

    J. Baumann, R. G¨ ahler, J. Kalus, and W. Mampe, “Experimental limit for the charge of the free neutron,” Phys. Rev. D 37 (Jun, 1988) 3107–3112. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3107

    1988 doi

  60. [68]

    Testing the neutrality of matter by acoustic means in a spherical resonator,

    G. Bressi, G. Carugno, F. Della Valle, G. Galeazzi, G. Ruoso, and G. Sartori, “Testing the neutrality of matter by acoustic means in a spherical resonator,” Phys. Rev. A 83 (May, 2011) 052101. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052101

    2011 doi

  61. [69]

    Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm,

    Muon g-2 Collaboration, D. P. Aguillard et al., “Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 16, (2023) 161802, arXiv:2308.06230 [hep-ex]

    2023

  62. [70]

    Review of particle physics,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al., “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 030001

    2024

  63. [71]

    New bounds on light millicharged particles from the tip of the red-giant branch,

    A. Fung, S. Heeba, Q. Liu, V. Muralidharan, K. Schutz, and A. C. Vincent, “New bounds on light millicharged particles from the tip of the red-giant branch,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 8, (2024) 083011, arXiv:2309.06465 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties: An update,

    G. G. Raffelt, “Limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties: An update,” Phys. Rept. 320 (1999) 319–327

    1999

  65. [73]

    Electric Charge of the Neutrinos from SN1987A,

    G. Barbiellini and G. Cocconi, “Electric Charge of the Neutrinos from SN1987A,” Nature 329 (1987) 21–22

    1987

  66. [74]

    Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN 1987a,

    Kamiokande-II Collaboration, K. Hirata et al., “Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN 1987a,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 1490–1493

    1987

  67. [75]

    Millicharged neutrino 10 with anomalous magnetic moment in rotating magnetized matter,

    A. I. Studenikin and I. Tokarev, “Millicharged neutrino 10 with anomalous magnetic moment in rotating magnetized matter,” Nucl. Phys. B 884 (2014) 396–407, arXiv:1209.3245 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Using DUNE to shed light on the electromagnetic properties of neutrinos,

    V. Mathur, I. M. Shoemaker, and Z. Tabrizi, “Using DUNE to shed light on the electromagnetic properties of neutrinos,” JHEP 10 (2022) 041, arXiv:2111.14884 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Neutrino electromagnetic properties and the weak mixing angle at the LHC Forward Physics Facility,

    R. Mammen Abraham, S. Foroughi-Abari, F. Kling, and Y.-D. Tsai, “Neutrino electromagnetic properties and the weak mixing angle at the LHC Forward Physics Facility,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 1, (2025) 015029, arXiv:2301.10254 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Neutrino up-scattering via the dipole portal at forward LHC detectors,

    A. Ismail, S. Jana, and R. M. Abraham, “Neutrino up-scattering via the dipole portal at forward LHC detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 5, (2022) 055008, arXiv:2109.05032 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Probing new physics at future tau neutrino telescopes,

    G.-y. Huang, S. Jana, M. Lindner, and W. Rodejohann, “Probing new physics at future tau neutrino telescopes,” JCAP 02 no. 02, (2022) 038, arXiv:2112.09476 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Probing heavy sterile neutrinos at neutrino telescopes via the dipole portal,

    G.-y. Huang, S. Jana, M. Lindner, and W. Rodejohann, “Probing heavy sterile neutrinos at neutrino telescopes via the dipole portal,” Phys. Lett. B 840 (2023) 137842, arXiv:2204.10347 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Exploiting a future galactic supernova to probe neutrino magnetic moments,

    S. Jana, Y. P. Porto-Silva, and M. Sen, “Exploiting a future galactic supernova to probe neutrino magnetic moments,” JCAP 09 (2022) 079, arXiv:2203.01950 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Resonances of Supernova Neutrinos in Twisting Magnetic Fields,

    S. Jana and Y. Porto, “Resonances of Supernova Neutrinos in Twisting Magnetic Fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 no. 10, (2024) 101005, arXiv:2303.13572 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Minicharge nonconservation in SU(3)(C) x SU(2)(L) x U(1)(Y) models,

    M. Maruno, E. Takasugi, and M. Tanaka, “Minicharge nonconservation in SU(3)(C) x SU(2)(L) x U(1)(Y) models,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 86 (1991) 907–916

    1991

  76. [84]

    Charge nonconservation and charges of neutrinos, neutron and atoms,

    E. Takasugi and M. Tanaka, “Charge nonconservation and charges of neutrinos, neutron and atoms,” Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 3706–3708

    1991

  77. [85]

    Charged neutrinos and atoms in the standard model,

    E. Takasugi and M. Tanaka, “Charged neutrinos and atoms in the standard model,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 87 (1992) 679–684

    1992

  78. [86]

    Possible electric charge nonconservation and dequantization in SU(2) x U(1) models with hard symmetry breaking,

    A. Y. Ignatiev and G. C. Joshi, “Possible electric charge nonconservation and dequantization in SU(2) x U(1) models with hard symmetry breaking,” Phys. Lett. B 381 (1996) 216–220, arXiv:hep-ph/9604238

    1996 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Hybrid SU(2) x U(1) models, electric charge nonconservation and the photon mass,

    A. Y. Ignatiev and G. C. Joshi, “Hybrid SU(2) x U(1) models, electric charge nonconservation and the photon mass,” Chaos Solitons Fractals 10 (1999) 1, arXiv:hep-ph/9710552

    1999 arXiv

  80. [88]

    WHY DOES ELECTROMAGNETISM CONSERVE PARITY?,

    K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, “WHY DOES ELECTROMAGNETISM CONSERVE PARITY?,” Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3866–3869

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.