pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01075 · v1 · pith:F27HJD2Gnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Shedding light on the nature of φ(2170) with the parton and hadron cascade model PACIAE

Jian Cao , Wen-Chao Zhang , Bo Feng , Ya-Hui Hou , An-Ke Lei , Zhi-Lei She , Hua Zheng , Li-Lin Zhu
show 3 more authors
Dai-Mei Zhou Yu-Liang Yan Ben-Hao Sa
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 09:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords phi(2170)PACIAE modelstrangeoniumhybrid statetetraquarkmolecular statee+e- collisionscoalescence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Simulations of φ(2170) in e+e- collisions at 4.95 GeV produce distinct yields and kinematic distributions for different structural interpretations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses the PACIAE 4.0 model to generate partonic and hadronic final states in e+e- collisions and forms candidate states for φ(2170) either by parton coalescence in the final partonic state or hadron recombination in the final hadronic state. It then computes the orbital angular momentum of each candidate in its rest frame to assign spectroscopic labels consistent with J^{PC}=1^{--}. The resulting yields range from order 10^{-4} for D-wave strangeonium, P-wave hybrid, and most tetraquark configurations down to 10^{-6} for the P-wave ss s-bar s-bar tetraquark, with 10^{-5} for the molecular states. Rapidity distributions and transverse-momentum spectra also differ markedly among the candidates, supplying observable signatures that could discriminate among the interpretations.

Core claim

Given J^{PC}=1^{--}, φ(2170) can be interpreted as a D-wave s s-bar, a P-wave s s-bar g, a P-wave u u-bar s s-bar / d d-bar s s-bar / ss s-bar s-bar, an S-wave Λ-bar Λ, or an S-wave φ K+K- state. The yields of the D-wave s s-bar, P-wave s s-bar g, u u-bar s s-bar and d d-bar s s-bar states are of order 10^{-4}; those for the S-wave Λ-bar Λ and φ K+K- states are of order 10^{-5}; while the P-wave ss s-bar s-bar yield is of order 10^{-6}. Significant discrepancies appear in the rapidity distributions and the p_T spectra among the various candidates.

What carries the argument

PACIAE 4.0 sequential generation of final partonic state followed by final hadronic state, with dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence for partonic candidates and recombination for hadronic candidates, plus rest-frame orbital-angular-momentum calculation for spectral classification.

If this is right

  • Yields differing by one or two orders of magnitude separate the strangeonium/hybrid/tetraquark families from the molecular states.
  • Rapidity distributions vary enough among candidates to serve as a discriminator even with modest statistics.
  • p_T spectra exhibit discrepancies large enough to be tested with existing or near-future e+e- data.
  • The U(1) anomaly coupling permits non-strange quarks to participate in a vector s s-bar component, allowing the d d-bar s s-bar tetraquark to be considered on equal footing with u u-bar s s-bar.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If any one candidate's distribution is confirmed experimentally, the others can be excluded without needing a full spectroscopic assignment.
  • The same formation machinery could be applied to other vector resonances whose internal structure is debated.
  • Kinematic observables provide a route to structure identification that is complementary to decay-mode branching ratios.

Load-bearing premise

The coalescence and recombination procedures correctly assemble the candidate states while preserving the orbital angular momentum quantum number evaluated in each state's rest frame.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement at √s=4.95 GeV that finds a φ(2170) yield or p_T spectrum inconsistent with all five simulated families would rule out the set of interpretations considered.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01075 by An-Ke Lei, Ben-Hao Sa, Bo Feng, Dai-Mei Zhou, Hua Zheng, Jian Cao, Li-Lin Zhu, Wen-Chao Zhang, Ya-Hui Hou, Yu-Liang Yan, Zhi-Lei She.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Similar as that in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The nature of $\phi(2170)$ remains open. We simulate its production in $e^+e^-$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=4.95$ GeV using PACIAE 4.0, which sequentially generates the final partonic state (FPS) and the final hadronic state (FHS). While previous studies have interpreted $\phi(2170)$ as an $ss\bar{s}\bar{s}$ or $u\bar{u}s\bar{s}$ state, the $U(1)$ anomaly coupling allows non-strange quarks to couple to a vector $s\bar{s}$ component via soft-gluon interactions. This motivates us to also explore the $d\bar{d}s\bar{s}$ tetraquark configuration. In addition, we consider $\phi(2170)$ as an excited strangeonium state, an $s\bar{s}g$ hybrid state, a $\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda$ bound state, and a $\phi K^+K^-$ resonance state. The strangeonium, hybrid, and tetraquark candidates are formed by coalescing their constituent partons in the FPS using the dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model. The $\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda$ and $\phi K^+K^-$ states are produced via recombination of their constituent hadrons in the FHS. We calculate the orbital angular momentum quantum number of each candidate in its rest frame and perform spectral classification. Given $J^{PC}=1^{--}$, $\phi(2170)$ can be interpreted as a $D$-wave $s\bar{s}$, a $P$-wave $s\bar{s}g$, a $P$-wave $u\bar{u}s\bar{s}/d\bar{d}s\bar{s}/ss\bar{s}\bar{s}$, an $S$-wave $\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda$, or an $S$-wave $\phi K^+K^-$ state. The yields of the $D$-wave $s\bar{s}$, $P$-wave $s\bar{s}g$, $u\bar{u}s\bar{s}$ and $d\bar{d}s\bar{s}$ states are of order $10^{-4}$; those for the $S$-wave $\bar{\Lambda}\Lambda$ and $\phi K^+K^-$ states are of order $10^{-5}$; while the $P$-wave $ss\bar{s}\bar{s}$ yield is of order $10^{-6}$. Moreover, significant discrepancies are observed in the rapidity distributions and the $p_T$ spectra among the various candidates. These discrepancies could serve as valuable criteria for unraveling the nature of $\phi(2170)$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses the PACIAE 4.0 parton-hadron cascade model to simulate e⁺e⁻ collisions at √s = 4.95 GeV. Candidate states for φ(2170) (D-wave s s-bar, P-wave s s-bar g, P-wave tetraquarks u u-bar s s-bar / d d-bar s s-bar / s s s-bar s-bar, S-wave Λ-bar Λ, and S-wave φ K⁺K⁻) are formed either by dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence of partons in the final partonic state or by hadron recombination in the final hadronic state. Orbital angular momentum L is computed for each candidate in its rest frame to enable spectral classification under the assumption J^{PC}=1^{--}. Yields are reported at the 10^{-4}–10^{-6} level and significant differences are found in rapidity distributions and p_T spectra, which the authors propose as experimental discriminants.

Significance. If the extracted L values can be shown to correspond to spectroscopic quantum numbers rather than coalescence artifacts, the reported order-of-magnitude yield differences and spectral discrepancies would constitute a concrete, falsifiable set of predictions that could guide experimental searches for the internal structure of φ(2170). The sequential use of PACIAE to generate both partonic and hadronic stages is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and formation description] Abstract, paragraph on formation and spectral classification: The central classification rests on computing L in the rest frame after DCPC coalescence (for strangeonium/hybrid/tetraquark candidates) or hadron recombination (for ΛΛ and φK⁺K⁻). DCPC is a geometric phase-space proximity criterion; the manuscript supplies no test that the resulting L is stable under reasonable variations of the coalescence radius or that it reproduces the intended spectroscopic label (D-wave vs. P-wave). Because the entire J^{PC}-based interpretation and the claim that discrepancies serve as criteria depend on this assignment, the absence of such validation is load-bearing.
  2. [Results on yields and spectra] Results section on yields: The yields are stated only as orders of magnitude (10^{-4}, 10^{-5}, 10^{-6}) with no reported uncertainties, no tabulation of the specific coalescence parameters employed, and no validation of the model against known vector-meson data. This directly affects the quantitative support for using the reported discrepancies as discriminants.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. The points raised regarding validation of the orbital angular momentum assignments and the quantitative presentation of yields are well taken. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional tests, parameter tables, uncertainties, and model validation as outlined below. These changes will strengthen the support for our proposed discriminants.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and formation description] Abstract, paragraph on formation and spectral classification: The central classification rests on computing L in the rest frame after DCPC coalescence (for strangeonium/hybrid/tetraquark candidates) or hadron recombination (for ΛΛ and φK⁺K⁻). DCPC is a geometric phase-space proximity criterion; the manuscript supplies no test that the resulting L is stable under reasonable variations of the coalescence radius or that it reproduces the intended spectroscopic label (D-wave vs. P-wave). Because the entire J^{PC}-based interpretation and the claim that discrepancies serve as criteria depend on this assignment, the absence of such validation is load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the L assignments is necessary to confirm they reflect spectroscopic properties rather than coalescence artifacts. In the revised manuscript, we will add an appendix presenting sensitivity tests in which the DCPC coalescence radius is varied by ±20% around the default value. We will show that the computed L values (and resulting D-wave vs. P-wave classifications) remain stable for the candidate states. This will directly address the load-bearing concern while preserving the original methodology. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on yields and spectra] Results section on yields: The yields are stated only as orders of magnitude (10^{-4}, 10^{-5}, 10^{-6}) with no reported uncertainties, no tabulation of the specific coalescence parameters employed, and no validation of the model against known vector-meson data. This directly affects the quantitative support for using the reported discrepancies as discriminants.

    Authors: We acknowledge that orders-of-magnitude statements alone limit the strength of the claims. In the revision we will (i) tabulate the exact DCPC and recombination parameters employed, (ii) report yields with statistical uncertainties derived from the simulated event samples, and (iii) add a short validation subsection comparing PACIAE predictions for the well-measured φ(1020) vector meson in e⁺e⁻ collisions near 5 GeV to experimental data. These additions will provide the quantitative support needed for the proposed spectral discriminants. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model outputs generate independent comparative content

full rationale

The paper applies the PACIAE model to generate FPS and FHS, forms candidate states for φ(2170) via DCPC coalescence or hadron recombination, computes orbital angular momentum L directly from the rest-frame four-momenta/positions of constituents, and reports the resulting yields plus rapidity/pT spectra for each spectroscopic assignment. These quantities are explicit simulation outputs for distinct input configurations rather than quantities defined in terms of themselves or statistically forced by parameter fits. The claim that spectral discrepancies could distinguish natures follows from the computed differences and does not reduce the classification or yields to the model parameters by construction. No load-bearing premise relies solely on an unverified self-citation chain; the derivation remains a self-contained phenomenological comparison.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; ledger entries are inferred from standard assumptions in cascade models. Full text would be required to list exact fitted parameters or additional axioms.

free parameters (1)
  • coalescence parameters
    Dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model requires parameters that are typically adjusted to reproduce known yields.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption PACIAE 4.0 accurately generates the final partonic and hadronic states in e+e- collisions at √s = 4.95 GeV
    Invoked when the model is used to produce FPS and FHS for all candidate structures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6073 in / 1480 out tokens · 42517 ms · 2026-07-02T09:43:27.422733+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references

  1. [1]

    The con- stituent mesons of each accepted candidate are subse- quently removed from the list

    is accepted as a φ(2170) candidate. The con- stituent mesons of each accepted candidate are subse- quently removed from the list. The triple-loop process is repeated on the updated list until no mesons remain or no further valid candidates can be formed. The production ofφ(2170) candidates with other configurations (e.g., ex- cited strangeonium, tetraquark...

  2. [2]

    For the φ(2170) state, different theoretical interpreta- tions lead to distinct P and C formulas

    leads to: L = round ( − 1 + √ 1 + 4|l∗|2/ ℏ2 2 ) , (7) where round(X) returns the integer nearest to X. For the φ(2170) state, different theoretical interpreta- tions lead to distinct P and C formulas. If φ(2170) is interpreted as an excited s¯s state, the parity is P =Ps · P¯s ·(− 1)L = (− 1)L+1, where L is the total orbital angu- lar momentum of the syst...

  3. [3]

    31 × 10− 4, and 7

    60 × 10− 4, 1. 31 × 10− 4, and 7. 89 × 10− 6 to 1. 61 × 10− 6,

  4. [4]

    91 × 10− 8, respectively

    21 × 10− 6, and 3 . 91 × 10− 8, respectively. In contrast, theS-wave ¯ΛΛ and φK +K − states show an opposite ten- dency with respect to the lower bound of R0. When the lower limit is decreased from 1.0 fm to 0.7 fm, their yields increase from 6. 58 × 10− 5 and 6. 43 × 10− 5 to 1. 30 × 10− 4 and 1. 46 × 10− 4, respectively. Moreover, further increas- ing t...

  5. [5]

    trunc(X)

    64 times the total width of φ(2170). Furthermore, we examined the sensitivity of the results to the method used for extracting the orbital angular momentum quantum number L in Eq. ( 7). An alternative procedure based on “trunc(X)”, which discards the fractional part of X, was compared with the default “round( X)” method. Re- placing “round” with “trunc” e...

    2019

  6. [6]

    Amsler and N

    C. Amsler and N. A. T¨ ornqvist, Mesons beyond the naive quark model, Phys. Rep. 389, 61 (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    Klempt and A

    E. Klempt and A. Zaitsev, Glueballs, hybrids, multi- quarks: Experimental facts versus QCD inspired con- cepts, Phys. Rep. 454, 1 (2007)

    2007

  8. [8]

    Crede and C

    V. Crede and C. Meyer, The experimental status of glue- balls, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 74 (2009)

    2009

  9. [9]

    Brambilla, et al., QCD and strongly coupled gauge theories: challenges and perspectives, Eur

    N. Brambilla, et al., QCD and strongly coupled gauge theories: challenges and perspectives, Eur. Phys. J C 74, 2981 (2014)

    2014

  10. [10]

    Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964)

    1964

  11. [11]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symme- try and its breaking, CERN Report No

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symme- try and its breaking, CERN Report No. CERN-TH-401

  12. [12]

    Choi et al

    S.-K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a narrow charmoniumlike state in exclusive B± → K ± π +π − J/ψ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003)

    2003

  13. [13]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hid- dencharm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639, 1 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark resonances, Phys. Rept. 668, 1 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Exotics: heavy pen- taquarks and tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    R. F. Lebed, E. S. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy- quark QCD exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstan- dard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018). 7

    2018

  19. [19]

    Brambilla et al

    N. Brambilla et al. The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept. 873, 1 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), A model- independent study of resonant structure in B+ → D+D− K + decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242001 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Physics 18, 751–754 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Liu et al

    Z.-Q. Liu et al. (Belle Collaboration), Study of e+e− → π +π − J/ψ and observation of a charged charmoniumlike state at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 (2013)

    2013

  23. [23]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of structure in the J/ψ -pair mass spectrum, Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020)

    1983

  24. [24]

    Hayrapetyan et al

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), New struc- tures in the J/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum in proton-proton col- lisions at √ s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of an excess of dicharmonium events in the four-muon final state with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, B. Barsbay, and H. Sundu, Fully charmed resonance X(6900) and its beauty counterpart, Nucl. Phys. A 1041, 122768 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    J. Z. Wang, D. Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Pro- ducing fully charm structures in the J/ψ -pair invariant mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 103, 071503 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    M. A. Bedolla, J. Ferretti, C. D. Roberts, and E. San- topinto, Spectrum of fully-heavy tetraquarks from a di- quark+antidiquark perspective, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1004 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Liu, F.-X

    M.-S. Liu, F.-X. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Fully heavy tetraquark states and their evidences in LHC ob- servations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076017 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    J. F. Giron and R. F. Lebed, Simple spectrum of c¯cc¯c states in the dynamical diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074003 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of an axial-vector state in the study of the decay ψ (3686) → φηη ′, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 191901 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of a structure in e+e− → φη ′ at √ s from 2.05 to 3.08 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 102, 012008 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Structure at 2175 MeV in e+e− → φf 0(980) observed via initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D 74, 091103(R) (2006)

    2006

  34. [34]

    C. P. Shen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of the φ (1680) and the Y (2175) in e+e− → φπ +π − , Phys. Rev. D 80, 031101(R) (2009)

    2009

  35. [35]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Observation of Y (2175) in J/ψ → ηφf 0(980), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 102003 (2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of J/ψ → ηφπ +π − at BESIII, Phys. Rev. D 91, 052017 (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of e+e− → ηY (2175) at center-of-mass energies above 3.7 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 99, 012014 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of the process e+e− → φη at center-of-mass energies between 2.00 and 3.08 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 104, 032007 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Measurement of e+e− → φπ +π − cross sections at center-of-mass ener- gies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032011 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), The e+e− → K +K − π +π − ,K +K − π 0π 0, and K +K − K +K − cross sec- tions measured with initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D 76, 012008 (2007)

    2007

  41. [41]

    J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Cross Sections for the Reactions e+e− → K +K − π +π − , K +K − π 0π 0, andK +K − K +K − measured using initial-state radiation events, Phys. Rev. D 86, 012008 (2012)

    2012

  42. [42]

    Pang, Excited states of φ meson, Phys

    C.-Q. Pang, Excited states of φ meson, Phys. Rev. D 99, 074015 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Barnes, N

    T. Barnes, N. Black, and P. R. Page, Strong decays of strange quarkonia, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054014 (2003)

    2003

  44. [44]

    S. S. Afonin and I. V. Pusenkov, Universal description of radially excited heavy and light vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094020 (2014)

    2014

  45. [45]

    Li, L.-C

    Q. Li, L.-C. Gui, M.-S. Liu, Q.-F. L¨ u, and X.-H. Zhong, Mass spectrum and strong decays of strangeonium in a constituent quark model, Chin. Phys. C 45, 023116 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Wang, Z.-F

    X. Wang, Z.-F. Sun, D.-Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Nonstrange partner of strangeonium-like state Y (2175), Phys. Rev. D 85, 074024 (2012)

    2012

  47. [47]

    Ding and M.-L

    G.-J. Ding and M.-L. Yan, A candidate for 1 − strangeo- nium hybrid, Phys. Lett. B 650, 390 (2007)

    2007

  48. [48]

    P. R. Page, E. S. Swanson, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Hybrid meson decay phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 59, 034016 (1999)

    1999

  49. [49]

    Wang, Analysis of the Y (2175) as a tetraquark state with QCD sum rules, Nucl

    Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the Y (2175) as a tetraquark state with QCD sum rules, Nucl. Phys. A 791 106 (2007)

    2007

  50. [50]

    H.-X. Chen, X. Liu, A. Hosaka, and S.-L. Zhu, The Y (2175) state in the QCD sum rule, Phys. Rev. D 78, 034012 (2008)

    2008

  51. [51]

    Drenska, R

    N.V. Drenska, R. Faccini, and A.D. Polosa, Higher tetraquark particles, Phys. Lett. B 669, 160 (2008)

    2008

  52. [52]

    Ke and X.-Q

    H.-W. Ke and X.-Q. Li, Study of the strong decays of φ (2170) and the future charm-tau factory, Phys. Rev. D 99, 036014 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    Liu, M.-S

    F.-X. Liu, M.-S. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Fully strange tetraquark ss¯s¯s spectrum and possible experi- mental evidence, Phys. Rev. D 103, 016016 (2021)

    2021

  54. [54]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu, Nature of the vector resonance Y (2175), Phys. Rev. D 101, 074012 (2020)

    2020

  55. [55]

    L. Zhao, N. Li, S.-L. Zhu, and B.-S. Zou, Meson-exchange model for the Λ ¯Λ interaction, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054034 (2013)

    2013

  56. [56]

    C. Deng, J. Ping, Y. Yang, and F. Wang, Baryonia and near-threshold enhancements, Phys. Rev. D 88, 074007 (2013)

    2013

  57. [57]

    Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, Q. L¨ u, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Selected strong decays of η(2225) and φ (2170) as Λ ¯Λ bound states, Phys. Rev. D 96, 074027 (2017)

    2017

  58. [58]

    Martinez Torres, K

    A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, L. S. Geng, M. Napsuciale, and E. Oset, X(2175) as a resonant state of the φK ¯K system, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074031 (2008)

    2008

  59. [59]

    Gomez-Avila, M

    S. Gomez-Avila, M. Napsuciale and E. Oset, φK +K − production in electron-positron annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 79, 034018 (2009)

    2009

  60. [60]

    She, Y.-L

    A.-K Lei, Z.-L. She, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, L. Zheng, W.-C. Zhang, H. Zheng, L. V. Bravina, E. E. Zabrodin, 8 and B.-H. Sa, A brief introduction to PACIAE 4.0, Com- put. Phys. Commun., 310, 109520 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Y.-L. Yan, G. Chen, X.-M. Li, D.-M. Zhou, M.-J. Wang, S.-Y. Hu, L. Ye, and B.-H. Sa, Predictions for the pro- duction of light nuclei in pp collisions at √ s = 7 and 14 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024907 (2012)

    2012

  62. [62]

    B. R. Martin and G. Shaw, Particle Physics (Third edi- tion), (John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, 2008)

    2008

  63. [63]

    Cao, W.-C

    J. Cao, W.-C. Zhang, J.-P. Zhang, B. Feng, A.-K. Lei, Z.- L. She, H. Zheng, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, B.-H. Sa, Deci- phering the nature of X(2300) with the PACIAE model, Phys. Rev. D 113, L031501 (2026)

    2026

  64. [64]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 026 (2006)

    2006

  65. [65]

    B. L. Combridge, J. Kripfganz, and J. Ranft, Hadron pro- duction at large transverse momentum and QCD, Phys. Lett. B 70, 234 (1977)

    1977

  66. [66]

    R. D. Field, Applications of perturbative QCD (Addison - Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1989)

    1989

  67. [67]

    Baldini, et al., Total cross section for reactions of high energy particles, (Spring-veslay, Berlin, 1988)

    A. Baldini, et al., Total cross section for reactions of high energy particles, (Spring-veslay, Berlin, 1988)

    1988

  68. [68]

    Lei, Y.-L

    A.-K. Lei, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, Z.-L. She, L. Zheng, G.-C. Yong, X.-M. Li, G. Chen, X. Cai, and B.-H. Sa, Introduction to the parton and hadron cascade model PACIAE 3.0, Phys. Rev. C 108, 064909 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Xu, Z.-L

    H.-G. Xu, Z.-L. She, D.-M. Zhou, L. Zheng, X.-L. Kang, G. Cheng, and B.-H. Sa, Investigation of exotic state X(3872) in pp collisions at √ s = 7, 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 784 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    Wu, Z.-L

    C.-T. Wu, Z.-L. She, X.-Y. Peng, X.-L. Kang, H.-G. Xu, D.-M. Zhou, G. Chen, and B.-H. Sa, Study on the struc- ture of exotic states χ c1(3872) via beauty-hadron decays in pp collisions at √ s = 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114022 (2023)

    2023

  71. [71]

    She, A.-K

    Z.-L. She, A.-K. Lei, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, W.-C. Zhang, H. Zheng, L. Zheng, Y.-L. Xie, G. Chen, and B.-H. Sa, Identifying an X(3872) tetraquark state versus a molecular state by formation time, velocity, and tem- perature in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 110, 014910 (2024)

    2024

  72. [72]

    Zhang, L

    Z. Zhang, L. Zheng, G. Chen, H.-G. Xu, D.-M. Zhou, Y.- L. Yan, and B.-H. Sa, The study of exotic state Z± c (3900) decaying to J/ψπ ± in the pp collisions at √ s= 1.96, 7, and 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 198 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    Cao, W.-C

    J. Cao, W.-C. Zhang, Z.-L. She, A.-K. Lei, J.-P. Zhang, H. Zheng, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, Z.-Q. Wang, and B.-H. Sa, Charmonium-like exotic hadron productions in e+e− collisions at the BESIII energy with the PACIAE model, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014033 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    Chen, Y.-L

    C.-H. Chen, Y.-L. Xie, H.-G. Xu, Z. Zhang, D.-M. Zhou, Z.-L. She, and G. Chen, Exotic states Pc(4312),Pc(4440), and Pc(4457) in pp collisions at √ s = 7, 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054013 (2022)

    2022

  75. [75]

    H.-G. Xu, G. Chen, Y.-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou, L. Zheng, Y.-L. Xie, Z.-L. She, and B.-H. Sa, Study on the Ω 0 c states decaying to Ξ + cK − in pp collisions at √ s = 7, 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 102, 054319 (2020)

    2020

  76. [76]

    Wang, Z.-L

    Q. Wang, Z.-L. She, A.-K. Lei, D.-M. Zhou, W.-C. Zhang, H. Zheng, Y.-L. Yan, B.-H. Sa, Investigation of T ∗ cs0(2870)0 in pp collisions at √ s = 7 TeV with the PA- CIAE model, Phys. Lett. B 872, 140068 (2026)

    2026

  77. [77]

    Cao, Z.-L

    J. Cao, Z.-L. She, J.-P. Zhang, J.-H. Shi, Z.-Y. Qin, W.- C. Zhang, H. Zheng, A.-K. Lei, D.-M. Zhou, Y.-L. Yan, and B.-H. Sa, X(2370) glueball-like particle productions in e+e− collisions at the BESIII energy and in pp colli- sions at the LHC energy with the PACIAE model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054046 (2024)

    2024

  78. [78]

    Kubo, Statistical mechanics (North-Holland Publis h- ing Company, Amsterdam, 1965)

    R. Kubo, Statistical mechanics (North-Holland Publis h- ing Company, Amsterdam, 1965)

    1965

  79. [79]

    Stowe, An introduction to thermodynamics and statis - tical mechanics (Cambridge University, Cambridge, Eng- land, 2007)

    K. Stowe, An introduction to thermodynamics and statis - tical mechanics (Cambridge University, Cambridge, Eng- land, 2007)

    2007

  80. [80]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

Showing first 80 references.