Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Safety Assessment of Vehicle Characteristics Variations in Autonomous Driving Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.14461 v1 pith:F5A3RQH3 submitted 2023-11-24 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords vehiclecharacteristicsadssdrivingsafetyvariationssafevarautonomous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous driving systems (ADSs) must be sufficiently tested to ensure their safety. Though various ADS testing methods have shown promising results, they are limited to a fixed set of vehicle characteristics settings (VCSs). The impact of variations in vehicle characteristics (e.g., mass, tire friction) on the safety of ADSs has not been sufficiently and systematically studied.Such variations are often due to wear and tear, production errors, etc., which may lead to unexpected driving behaviours of ADSs. To this end, in this paper, we propose a method, named SAFEVAR, to systematically find minimum variations to the original vehicle characteristics setting, which affect the safety of the ADS deployed on the vehicle. To evaluate the effectiveness of SAFEVAR, we employed two ADSs and conducted experiments with two driving simulators. Results show that SAFEVAR, equipped with NSGA-II, generates more critical VCSs that put the vehicle into unsafe situations, as compared with two baseline algorithms: Random Search and a mutation-based fuzzer. We also identified critical vehicle characteristics and reported to which extent varying their settings put the ADS vehicles in unsafe situations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking Image Perturbations for Testing Automated Driving Assistance Systems

    cs.SE 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A benchmark of 32 image perturbations on two ADAS shows most corruptions cause failures, and retraining on perturbed data improves robustness to simulated weather, but the retraining effect is confounded by new road data.

  2. OpenCat: Improving Interoperability of ADS Testing

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    OpenCat converts OpenDRIVE roads to Catmull-Rom splines; re-running SensoDat in Udacity with Dave-2 raises the pass rate from 61% to 98%, suggesting the benchmark is coupled to its original ADAS and simulator.

Pith tools