Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Characterizing Idioms: Conventionality and Contingency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.08664 v3 pith:F7R3V3VY submitted 2021-04-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords idiomsidiomwordsdimensionsmachinerymeaningsnon-canonicalproperties
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Idioms are unlike most phrases in two important ways. First, the words in an idiom have non-canonical meanings. Second, the non-canonical meanings of words in an idiom are contingent on the presence of other words in the idiom. Linguistic theories differ on whether these properties depend on one another, as well as whether special theoretical machinery is needed to accommodate idioms. We define two measures that correspond to the properties above, and we implement them using BERT (Devlin et al., 2019) and XLNet(Yang et al., 2019). We show that idioms fall at the expected intersection of the two dimensions, but that the dimensions themselves are not correlated. Our results suggest that special machinery to handle idioms may not be warranted.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating LLMs on Chinese Idiom Translation

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 900 annotated translation pairs from nine MT systems, the best system still mistranslates Chinese idioms in 28% of cases, and standard metrics miss these errors (Pearson correlation below 0.48).

Pith tools