REVIEW 1 cited by
Characterizing Idioms: Conventionality and Contingency
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Idioms are unlike most phrases in two important ways. First, the words in an idiom have non-canonical meanings. Second, the non-canonical meanings of words in an idiom are contingent on the presence of other words in the idiom. Linguistic theories differ on whether these properties depend on one another, as well as whether special theoretical machinery is needed to accommodate idioms. We define two measures that correspond to the properties above, and we implement them using BERT (Devlin et al., 2019) and XLNet(Yang et al., 2019). We show that idioms fall at the expected intersection of the two dimensions, but that the dimensions themselves are not correlated. Our results suggest that special machinery to handle idioms may not be warranted.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Evaluating LLMs on Chinese Idiom Translation
Across 900 annotated translation pairs from nine MT systems, the best system still mistranslates Chinese idioms in 28% of cases, and standard metrics miss these errors (Pearson correlation below 0.48).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.