Effect of weak positional disorder on the miniband structure of spherical quantum dot chains

R. Ya. Leshko

arxiv: 2606.22128 · v1 · pith:FASPYGHUnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Effect of weak positional disorder on the miniband structure of spherical quantum dot chains

R. Ya. Leshko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords spherical quantum dotsminiband structurepositional disordertight-binding approximationeffective-medium approachdispersion relationAnderson localization

0 comments

The pith

Weak positional disorder broadens minibands in spherical quantum dot chains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that weak positional disorder in one-dimensional chains of spherical quantum dots causes broadening of the electron minibands. It maps the stochastic fluctuations in inter-dot distances onto renormalized hopping, overlap, and on-site parameters through an ensemble average in the tight-binding and effective-medium approximations. This matters because it shows how fabrication imperfections affect electron transport in these nanostructures without causing localization. The calculation indicates an 8 to 12 percent increase in miniband width for typical disorder of 0.1 times the mean spacing. The effect weakens as the average spacing grows due to the exponential decay of wave functions.

Core claim

What carries the argument

Renormalization of the hopping integral B, overlap integral Q, and on-site energy shift M through ensemble averaging over a Gaussian distribution of inter-dot spacings in the tight-binding effective-medium model.

If this is right

For typical fabrication fluctuations of σ = 0.1 a, the miniband width increases by 8-12% depending on the mean inter-dot distance a.
The sensitivity of the miniband width to disorder decreases rapidly with increasing lattice period due to exponential decay of wave functions.
In the considered weak-disorder regime, the Anderson localization length significantly exceeds the lattice constant, so the miniband states remain delocalized.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Fabrication processes for quantum dot chains could tolerate small positional variations without losing delocalized transport properties.
The broadening effect may influence design choices in optoelectronic devices based on quantum dot arrays.
Similar renormalization approaches could apply to other one-dimensional nanostructure systems with weak disorder.

Load-bearing premise

The fluctuations in inter-dot spacing can be accounted for by renormalizing the Hamiltonian parameters through an ensemble average over a narrow Gaussian distribution in the tight-binding approximation.

What would settle it

Comparing the measured width of minibands in fabricated quantum dot chains with positional disorder of about 10 percent to the width in perfectly ordered chains would test if the predicted 8-12 percent broadening occurs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22128 by R. Ya. Leshko.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: (Colour online) One-dimensional chains of spherical QDs. For an isolated QD (at 𝑅0 = 0 ), the Hamiltonian of one QD has form 𝐻ˆ𝑄𝐷 = − ℏ 2 2 ∇® 1 𝑚(®𝑟) ∇ +® 𝑈(®𝑟), (2.1) where 𝑈(®𝑟) = ( −𝑈0, 𝑟® ∈ QD, 0, 𝑟® ∈ matrix, (2.2) is the confinement potential of the QD. The electron effective masses within the heterosystem are 𝑚0 in the QD and 𝑚1 in the matrix, respectively. In the isolate QD, electron has energy ei… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (Colour online) Electron miniband structure of an ideal (blue curves 1) and a disordered (red curves 2) spherical QD chain. 23703-7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (Colour online) Electron miniband width calculated with (red curve 1) and without (blue curve 2) disorder. The inset shows the difference in miniband widths between the disordered and ideal cases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Dependence of integrals 𝑄, 𝑀, and 𝐵 on the period 𝑎. 23703-8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

A theoretical framework is developed for the electron miniband structure in one-dimensional chains of spherical quantum dots subjected to weak positional disorder. Within the tight-binding approximation combined with the effective-medium approach, the stochastic fluctuations of the inter-dot spacing are mapped onto the renormalization of the key Hamiltonian parameters: the hopping integral $ B $, the overlap integral $ Q $, and the on-site energy shift $ M $. Analytical expressions for these disorder-renormalized parameters are derived by performing an ensemble average over a narrow Gaussian distribution of positional deviations ($ \sigma \ll a $). The resulting generalized dispersion relation shows that weak positional disorder causes a broadening of the minibands. Specifically, for typical fabrication fluctuations $\sigma = 0.1\,a $, the miniband width increases by 8-12\% (depending on the mean inter-dot distance $a$). At the same time, the sensitivity of the miniband width to disorder decreases rapidly with increasing lattice period due to the exponential decay of the electron wave functions. In the considered weak-disorder regime, the Anderson localization length significantly exceeds the lattice constant, so the miniband states remain delocalized.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper maps weak positional disorder in QD chains to renormalized tight-binding parameters and reports 8-12% miniband broadening, but the independent averaging of correlated B, Q, M needs checking.

read the letter

The paper's main result is a quantitative estimate: for Gaussian positional fluctuations with σ = 0.1a, the miniband width in a 1D chain of spherical dots increases by 8-12% depending on mean spacing a. It reaches this by averaging the hopping B, overlap Q, and on-site M over the narrow distribution inside the tight-binding plus effective-medium framework, then inserting the averages into the clean dispersion.

What it does well is give explicit analytical expressions for those renormalized parameters and show that the broadening shrinks rapidly as a grows, which follows directly from the exponential decay of the wave functions. The statement that Anderson localization length stays much larger than the lattice constant in this regime is also consistent with the weak-disorder assumption.

The soft spot is the replacement step itself. B, Q, and M are deterministic functions of the same instantaneous spacing, so their fluctuations are perfectly correlated. The paper averages them separately and uses the product of averages in the secular equation. Because Q sits in the denominator, this is not obviously equivalent to the typical eigenvalue spread of the actual random transfer-matrix product. No numerical validation against exact diagonalization or transfer-matrix results is mentioned in the abstract, so the size of the approximation error is unknown.

This is a narrow theoretical calculation aimed at modelers who already work with tight-binding descriptions of QD arrays and want an analytical disorder correction. It does not introduce new physics or device concepts. The work is coherent on its own terms and deserves a serious referee to verify the averaging step and the resulting percentage.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theoretical framework for the miniband structure of one-dimensional chains of spherical quantum dots with weak positional disorder. Using the tight-binding approximation combined with an effective-medium approach, stochastic fluctuations in inter-dot spacing (modeled as a narrow Gaussian with σ ≪ a) are mapped onto renormalized values of the hopping integral B, overlap integral Q, and on-site energy shift M via ensemble averaging; the resulting generalized dispersion relation is then used to show that such disorder broadens the minibands (by 8-12% for σ = 0.1a, with the effect weakening for larger mean spacing a) while leaving states delocalized.

Significance. If the effective-medium step is accurate, the work supplies analytical expressions for the disorder-renormalized parameters and a quantitative estimate of fabrication-induced broadening, which could guide tolerance analysis in quantum-dot arrays. The derivation of closed-form averages over the Gaussian and the observation that localization length remains long are useful contributions.

major comments (2)

[main derivation (effective-medium mapping) and dispersion relation] The central step replaces the disordered secular equation by the clean dispersion evaluated at the averaged parameters <B>, <Q>, <M>. Because B, Q and M are deterministic functions of the identical instantaneous spacing d_i, their fluctuations are perfectly correlated; the manuscript provides no a-priori bound on the error incurred by interchanging the average and the product (especially with Q appearing in the denominator), nor any transfer-matrix or numerical diagonalization check that would confirm the reported 8-12% broadening is not an artifact of this replacement.
[results for miniband width] The quoted percentage broadening (8-12% at σ = 0.1a) is obtained after inserting the averaged parameters into the clean tight-binding formula; without an explicit demonstration that the typical eigenvalue range of the random transfer-matrix product coincides with the range obtained from the averaged parameters, the quantitative claim remains conditional on the validity of the effective-medium approximation.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states that the broadening 'depends on the mean inter-dot distance a'; the functional dependence and the specific values of a used for the 8-12% range should be stated explicitly in the main text or a table.
Notation for the renormalized parameters (<B>, <Q>, <M>) and the original clean parameters should be introduced with a single consistent symbol set to avoid reader confusion when the averaged quantities are substituted back into the dispersion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on the effective-medium approximation. We respond point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [main derivation (effective-medium mapping) and dispersion relation] The central step replaces the disordered secular equation by the clean dispersion evaluated at the averaged parameters <B>, <Q>, <M>. Because B, Q and M are deterministic functions of the identical instantaneous spacing d_i, their fluctuations are perfectly correlated; the manuscript provides no a-priori bound on the error incurred by interchanging the average and the product (especially with Q appearing in the denominator), nor any transfer-matrix or numerical diagonalization check that would confirm the reported 8-12% broadening is not an artifact of this replacement.

Authors: We agree that B, Q and M are perfectly correlated through the common spacing d_i and that replacing the random secular equation by the clean dispersion at the averaged parameters omits higher-order fluctuation effects, particularly those arising from the denominator involving Q. The derivation supplies only the leading renormalization for σ ≪ a; no a-priori error bound is given because the focus was on obtaining closed-form averages. We will revise the manuscript to state explicitly that the mapping is an effective-medium approximation whose accuracy is not quantified beyond the weak-disorder assumption, and we will add a short discussion of the neglected correlation terms. revision: partial
Referee: [results for miniband width] The quoted percentage broadening (8-12% at σ = 0.1a) is obtained after inserting the averaged parameters into the clean tight-binding formula; without an explicit demonstration that the typical eigenvalue range of the random transfer-matrix product coincides with the range obtained from the averaged parameters, the quantitative claim remains conditional on the validity of the effective-medium approximation.

Authors: The 8-12% figure is obtained precisely by substituting the averaged parameters into the clean dispersion relation. We acknowledge that this leaves the quantitative claim conditional on the effective-medium step. In the revision we will qualify the reported broadening as a prediction within that approximation and note that a direct transfer-matrix comparison would be required to confirm the eigenvalue range for finite disorder. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses explicit ensemble averaging within stated approximations

full rationale

The paper derives renormalized parameters B, Q, M via explicit ensemble averages over a Gaussian distribution of spacings inside the tight-binding + effective-medium framework, then inserts the averages into the clean dispersion relation to obtain a generalized formula. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. The mapping of positional fluctuations to parameter renormalization is performed analytically from the model definitions rather than presupposing the miniband broadening result. The 8-12% width increase is an output of that calculation for the chosen σ = 0.1a, not an input. Concerns about correlation between B(Q,M) or validity of replacing random transfer-matrix products by products of averages pertain to approximation accuracy, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the tight-binding approximation for QD chains and the validity of ensemble averaging over a narrow Gaussian for weak disorder; no free parameters are explicitly fitted to data in the abstract, but the mean spacing a and σ are input parameters.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Tight-binding approximation combined with effective-medium approach is valid for the electron states in the QD chain.
Invoked in the abstract as the framework for mapping fluctuations to renormalized parameters.
domain assumption Positional deviations follow a narrow Gaussian distribution with σ ≪ a.
Used to derive analytical expressions via ensemble average.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5728 in / 1416 out tokens · 26456 ms · 2026-06-26T11:33:36.146445+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[1]

XuQ.,WangZ.,ZhangT.,WangS.,PengS.,ZhangY.,LiP.,SongY.,PanQ.,Matter,2025,8,No.12,102459, doi:10.1016/j.matt.2025.102459

work page doi:10.1016/j.matt.2025.102459 2025
[2]

Yu L., Tian P., Liang K., Quantum Beam Sci., 2025,9, 9, doi:10.3390/qubs9010009

work page doi:10.3390/qubs9010009 2025
[3]

W., Wang S., Opto-Electron

Gao P., Li C., Zhou H., He S., Yin Z., Ng K. W., Wang S., Opto-Electron. Sci., 2025,4, No. 6, 240028, doi:10.29026/oes.2025.240028

work page doi:10.29026/oes.2025.240028 2025
[4]

ZhengL.,ZhaiG.,ZhangY.,JinX.,GaoL.,YunZ.,MiaoY.,WangH.,WuY.,XuB.,SuperlatticesMicrostruct., 2020,140, 106460, doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106460

work page doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106460 2020
[5]

K., Kim E

Chandrasekaran S., Bowen C., Roscow J., Zhang Y., Dang D. K., Kim E. J., Misra R., Deng L., Chung J. S., Hur S. H., Phys. Rep., 2019,792, 1–33, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.001 2019
[7]

2, 94–123, doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.02.006

Lan H., Ding Y., Nano Today, 2012,7, No. 2, 94–123, doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.02.006

work page doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.02.006 2012
[8]

Hahn R. V. H., Rodríguez-Bolívar S., Rodosthenous P., Skibinsky-Gitlin E. S., Califano M., Gómez- Campos F. M., Nanomaterials, 2022,12, 3387, doi:10.3390/nano12193387

work page doi:10.3390/nano12193387 2022
[9]

LiS.-S.,XiaJ.-B.,YuanZ.L.,XuZ.Y.,Phys.Rev.B,1996,54,11575–11581,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11575

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11575 1996
[10]

V., Makhanets O

Tkach M. V., Makhanets O. M., Zegrya G. G., Semicond. Sci. Technol., 2000,15, 395–398, doi:10.1088/0268- 1242/15/4/315

work page doi:10.1088/0268- 2000
[11]

L., Balandin A

Lazarenkova O. L., Balandin A. A., J. Appl. Phys., 2001,89, 5509–5515, doi:10.1063/1.1366662

work page doi:10.1063/1.1366662 2001
[12]

L., Pokatilov E

Nika D. L., Pokatilov E. P., Shao Q., Balandin A. A., Phys. Rev. B, 2007,76, 125417, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76.125417

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.125417 2007
[13]

23703-5 R

TsaiY.-C.,LeeM.-Y.,LiY.,SamukawaS.,Jpn.J.Appl.Phys.,2016,55,04EJ14,doi:10.7567/JJAP.55.04EJ14. 23703-5 R. Ya. Leshko

work page doi:10.7567/jjap.55.04ej14 2016
[14]

BoichukV.I.,BilynskyI.V.,PazyukR.I.,Condens.MatterPhys.,2017,20,23704,doi:10.5488/CMP.20.23704

work page doi:10.5488/cmp.20.23704 2017
[15]

BilynskyiI.,LeshkoR.,BanduraH.,J.Phys.Chem.Solids,2020,21,584–590,doi:10.15330/pcss.21.4.584-590

work page doi:10.15330/pcss.21.4.584-590 2020
[16]

Leshko R., Bandura H., Bilynskyi I., Slusarenko M., Physica B, 2024,690, 416272, doi:10.1016/j.physb.2024.416272

work page doi:10.1016/j.physb.2024.416272 2024
[17]

S., Nikoghosyan G., Physica B, 2022,628, 413574, doi:10.1016/j.physb.2021.413574

Nikoghosyan H. S., Nikoghosyan G., Physica B, 2022,628, 413574, doi:10.1016/j.physb.2021.413574

work page doi:10.1016/j.physb.2021.413574 2022
[18]

R., Ram-Mohan L

Vurgaftman I., Meyer J. R., Ram-Mohan L. R., J. Appl. Phys., 2001,89, 5815–5875, doi:10.1063/1.1368156

work page doi:10.1063/1.1368156 2001
[19]

N., Honsberg C., Punegov V

Faleev N. N., Honsberg C., Punegov V. I., J. Appl. Phys., 2013,113, 163506, doi:10.1063/1.4802662

work page doi:10.1063/1.4802662 2013
[20]

D., Miranti R., Kikitsu T., Hikima T., Hashizume D., Matsushita N., Iwasa Y., Bisri S

Septianto R. D., Miranti R., Kikitsu T., Hikima T., Hashizume D., Matsushita N., Iwasa Y., Bisri S. Z., Nat Commun, 2023,14, No. 1, 2670, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38216-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38216-y 2023
[21]

Rep., 2017,7, 5625, doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05631-3

Kothari K., Maldovan M., Sci. Rep., 2017,7, 5625, doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05631-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05631-3 2017
[22]

ядро-оболонка

Cha M.-H., Hwang J., Sci. Rep., 2020,10, 16699, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73578-z. Вплив слабкого позицiйного невпорядкування на мiнiзонну структуру в одновимiрних ланцюжках сферичних квантових точок Р . Я. Лешко Кафедра фiзики та iнформацiйних систем, Дрогобицький державний педагогiчний унiверситет iменi Iвана Франка, вул. Стрийська, 3, 82100 Дрогобич, Укра...

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73578-z 2020

[1] [1]

XuQ.,WangZ.,ZhangT.,WangS.,PengS.,ZhangY.,LiP.,SongY.,PanQ.,Matter,2025,8,No.12,102459, doi:10.1016/j.matt.2025.102459

work page doi:10.1016/j.matt.2025.102459 2025

[2] [2]

Yu L., Tian P., Liang K., Quantum Beam Sci., 2025,9, 9, doi:10.3390/qubs9010009

work page doi:10.3390/qubs9010009 2025

[3] [3]

W., Wang S., Opto-Electron

Gao P., Li C., Zhou H., He S., Yin Z., Ng K. W., Wang S., Opto-Electron. Sci., 2025,4, No. 6, 240028, doi:10.29026/oes.2025.240028

work page doi:10.29026/oes.2025.240028 2025

[4] [4]

ZhengL.,ZhaiG.,ZhangY.,JinX.,GaoL.,YunZ.,MiaoY.,WangH.,WuY.,XuB.,SuperlatticesMicrostruct., 2020,140, 106460, doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106460

work page doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106460 2020

[5] [5]

K., Kim E

Chandrasekaran S., Bowen C., Roscow J., Zhang Y., Dang D. K., Kim E. J., Misra R., Deng L., Chung J. S., Hur S. H., Phys. Rep., 2019,792, 1–33, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.001 2019

[6] [7]

2, 94–123, doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.02.006

Lan H., Ding Y., Nano Today, 2012,7, No. 2, 94–123, doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.02.006

work page doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.02.006 2012

[7] [8]

Hahn R. V. H., Rodríguez-Bolívar S., Rodosthenous P., Skibinsky-Gitlin E. S., Califano M., Gómez- Campos F. M., Nanomaterials, 2022,12, 3387, doi:10.3390/nano12193387

work page doi:10.3390/nano12193387 2022

[8] [9]

LiS.-S.,XiaJ.-B.,YuanZ.L.,XuZ.Y.,Phys.Rev.B,1996,54,11575–11581,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11575

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11575 1996

[9] [10]

V., Makhanets O

Tkach M. V., Makhanets O. M., Zegrya G. G., Semicond. Sci. Technol., 2000,15, 395–398, doi:10.1088/0268- 1242/15/4/315

work page doi:10.1088/0268- 2000

[10] [11]

L., Balandin A

Lazarenkova O. L., Balandin A. A., J. Appl. Phys., 2001,89, 5509–5515, doi:10.1063/1.1366662

work page doi:10.1063/1.1366662 2001

[11] [12]

L., Pokatilov E

Nika D. L., Pokatilov E. P., Shao Q., Balandin A. A., Phys. Rev. B, 2007,76, 125417, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76.125417

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.125417 2007

[12] [13]

23703-5 R

TsaiY.-C.,LeeM.-Y.,LiY.,SamukawaS.,Jpn.J.Appl.Phys.,2016,55,04EJ14,doi:10.7567/JJAP.55.04EJ14. 23703-5 R. Ya. Leshko

work page doi:10.7567/jjap.55.04ej14 2016

[13] [14]

BoichukV.I.,BilynskyI.V.,PazyukR.I.,Condens.MatterPhys.,2017,20,23704,doi:10.5488/CMP.20.23704

work page doi:10.5488/cmp.20.23704 2017

[14] [15]

BilynskyiI.,LeshkoR.,BanduraH.,J.Phys.Chem.Solids,2020,21,584–590,doi:10.15330/pcss.21.4.584-590

work page doi:10.15330/pcss.21.4.584-590 2020

[15] [16]

Leshko R., Bandura H., Bilynskyi I., Slusarenko M., Physica B, 2024,690, 416272, doi:10.1016/j.physb.2024.416272

work page doi:10.1016/j.physb.2024.416272 2024

[16] [17]

S., Nikoghosyan G., Physica B, 2022,628, 413574, doi:10.1016/j.physb.2021.413574

Nikoghosyan H. S., Nikoghosyan G., Physica B, 2022,628, 413574, doi:10.1016/j.physb.2021.413574

work page doi:10.1016/j.physb.2021.413574 2022

[17] [18]

R., Ram-Mohan L

Vurgaftman I., Meyer J. R., Ram-Mohan L. R., J. Appl. Phys., 2001,89, 5815–5875, doi:10.1063/1.1368156

work page doi:10.1063/1.1368156 2001

[18] [19]

N., Honsberg C., Punegov V

Faleev N. N., Honsberg C., Punegov V. I., J. Appl. Phys., 2013,113, 163506, doi:10.1063/1.4802662

work page doi:10.1063/1.4802662 2013

[19] [20]

D., Miranti R., Kikitsu T., Hikima T., Hashizume D., Matsushita N., Iwasa Y., Bisri S

Septianto R. D., Miranti R., Kikitsu T., Hikima T., Hashizume D., Matsushita N., Iwasa Y., Bisri S. Z., Nat Commun, 2023,14, No. 1, 2670, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38216-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38216-y 2023

[20] [21]

Rep., 2017,7, 5625, doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05631-3

Kothari K., Maldovan M., Sci. Rep., 2017,7, 5625, doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05631-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05631-3 2017

[21] [22]

ядро-оболонка

Cha M.-H., Hwang J., Sci. Rep., 2020,10, 16699, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73578-z. Вплив слабкого позицiйного невпорядкування на мiнiзонну структуру в одновимiрних ланцюжках сферичних квантових точок Р . Я. Лешко Кафедра фiзики та iнформацiйних систем, Дрогобицький державний педагогiчний унiверситет iменi Iвана Франка, вул. Стрийська, 3, 82100 Дрогобич, Укра...

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73578-z 2020