Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Coupled Generative Adversarial Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.07536 v2 pith:FD6AD5GW submitted 2016-06-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords distributionjointimageslearningcogancorrespondingadversarialcoupled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose coupled generative adversarial network (CoGAN) for learning a joint distribution of multi-domain images. In contrast to the existing approaches, which require tuples of corresponding images in different domains in the training set, CoGAN can learn a joint distribution without any tuple of corresponding images. It can learn a joint distribution with just samples drawn from the marginal distributions. This is achieved by enforcing a weight-sharing constraint that limits the network capacity and favors a joint distribution solution over a product of marginal distributions one. We apply CoGAN to several joint distribution learning tasks, including learning a joint distribution of color and depth images, and learning a joint distribution of face images with different attributes. For each task it successfully learns the joint distribution without any tuple of corresponding images. We also demonstrate its applications to domain adaptation and image transformation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Paired and Unpaired Image to Image Translation using Generative Adversarial Networks

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Using Pix2Pix and CycleGAN on four standard datasets, the paper finds that L1 loss and paired supervision beat alternatives in FID, precision, and recall, a conclusion already found in the cited literature.

Pith tools