REVIEW 4 cited by
Three-Loop Mixing of Dipole Operators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We calculate the complete three-loop O(alpha_s^3) anomalous dimension matrix for the dimension-five dipole operators that arise in the Standard Model after integrating out the top quark and the heavy electroweak bosons. Our computation completes the three-loop anomalous dimension matrix of operators that govern low-energy |Delta F| = 1 flavor-changing processes, and represents an important ingredient of the next-to-next-to-leading order QCD analysis of the Bbar -> X_s gamma decay.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The photon-energy spectrum in $B\to X_s\gamma$ to N$^3$LO: light-fermion and large-$N_{\rm c}$ corrections
N3LO calculation of the B to Xs gamma photon spectrum including complete light-fermion corrections, two massive fermion loops, and large-Nc terms, with improved results in kinetic and MSR mass schemes.
-
Current-current operator contribution to the decay matrix in $B$-meson mixing at next-to-next-to-leading order of QCD
The full charm-mass dependence of the three-loop current-current contribution to the B-meson decay matrix is computed, yielding Delta_Gamma_s = (0.077 +/- 0.016) ps^-1 with the leading-term perturbative error reduced ...
-
Investigating non-local contributions in $B_{s} \to \phi \bar{\ell} \ell$ including higher-twist effects
Including twist-5 and twist-6 B_s-meson distribution amplitudes enhances the charm-loop non-local form factors in B_s to phi l+l- by about an order of magnitude, producing a larger but still Standard-Model-consistent ...
-
Radiative B to tensor meson decays at NLO in SCET
An NLO SCET calculation predicts B(B to K2*(1430) gamma) = (16.7 ± 6.4 ± 1.2) × 10^-6, close to the experimental average, with much smaller predictions for the a2 and f2 modes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.