REVIEW 2 cited by
Physics Reasoner: Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning for Solving Physics Problems with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Physics problems constitute a significant aspect of reasoning, necessitating complicated reasoning ability and abundant physics knowledge. However, existing large language models (LLMs) frequently fail due to a lack of knowledge or incorrect knowledge application. To mitigate these issues, we propose Physics Reasoner, a knowledge-augmented framework to solve physics problems with LLMs. Specifically, the proposed framework constructs a comprehensive formula set to provide explicit physics knowledge and utilizes checklists containing detailed instructions to guide effective knowledge application. Namely, given a physics problem, Physics Reasoner solves it through three stages: problem analysis, formula retrieval, and guided reasoning. During the process, checklists are employed to enhance LLMs' self-improvement in the analysis and reasoning stages. Empirically, Physics Reasoner mitigates the issues of insufficient knowledge and incorrect application, achieving state-of-the-art performance on SciBench with an average accuracy improvement of 5.8%.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models
UGPhysics is a new bilingual benchmark of 5,520 undergraduate physics problems; the strongest tested LLM, OpenAI o1-mini, reaches only 49.8% accuracy.
-
A Survey of Large Language Models in Discipline-specific Research: Challenges, Methods and Opportunities
A review that categorizes methods for adapting LLMs to discipline-specific research and surveys applications across five broad academic fields.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.