pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17135 · v1 · pith:FMRDGDL5new · submitted 2026-06-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Quantum fate of the Choptuik naked singularity

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 03:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords Choptuik singularitynaked singularityquantum backreactioncritical collapsesemiclassical gravityEinstein-scalar systemCauchy horizoncosmic censorship
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum backreaction cloaks the Choptuik naked singularity behind a horizon.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that quantum effects erase the distinction between the Choptuik naked singularity and ordinary black hole singularities. By examining semiclassical backreaction in exterior regions using 2+1 and 3+1 dimensional models, it finds that vacuum polarization generates trapped surfaces that hide the singularity. A reader would care because this suggests that critical collapse does not produce a worse violation of predictability than standard black holes. The analysis builds on interior results where quantum self-energy creates a mass gap.

Core claim

Building on the semiclassical interior analysis where quantum self-energy generates a universal growing mode and finite mass gap, the exterior analysis in controlled 2+1 and 3+1 models shows that a vacuum polarization state is selected whose backreaction cloaks the classically naked region by a quantum trapped branch in 2+1 dimensions, and that near a quantum-shifted threshold the exterior develops finite-mass marginally trapped surfaces in 3+1 dimensions. These results suggest that quantum effects push the putative Cauchy horizon behind a quantum-generated horizon, so the Choptuik naked singularity shares the fate of an ordinary black hole singularity.

What carries the argument

Semiclassical backreaction from the vacuum polarization state in the exterior naked singularity region of the Einstein-scalar system.

If this is right

  • The Choptuik naked singularity is cloaked by a quantum-generated horizon.
  • The loss of predictability is reduced to the standard black hole evaporation problem.
  • The global quantum picture treats the critical collapse singularity like an ordinary black hole singularity.
  • Near the quantum-shifted threshold, finite-mass marginally trapped surfaces appear instead of a zero-mass naked endpoint.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the semiclassical picture holds, then quantum gravity may not be needed to resolve the predictability issue for this class of singularities.
  • Similar backreaction effects might apply to other naked singularity candidates in general relativity.
  • This could support a version of cosmic censorship where quantum effects enforce horizon formation.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical approximation remains valid in the exterior naked singularity region and the controlled 2+1 and 3+1 exterior models accurately capture the backreaction effects.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation of the full quantum-corrected Einstein-scalar system in which the naked singularity remains visible without an enclosing quantum horizon would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

Classical critical collapse provides a dynamical route from smooth initial data to a naked singularity, representing a sharper violation of predictability than ordinary black hole singularities. We argue that this distinction is erased by quantum backreaction. Building on the semiclassical interior analysis, where quantum self-energy of the collapsing matter generates a universal growing mode and a finite mass gap, we study the exterior naked singularity region that determines global visibility in the Einstein-scalar system. We analyze controlled exterior models in both $2+1$ and $3+1$ dimensions. In the former, smooth matching and physical boundary conditions analytically select a vacuum polarization state, whose backreaction cloaks the classically naked region by a quantum trapped branch. In the latter, numerical horizon tracing shows that near a quantum-shifted threshold the exterior develops finite-mass marginally trapped surfaces rather than a zero-mass naked endpoint. These results suggest a global quantum picture in which the Choptuik naked singularity shares the fate of an ordinary black hole singularity: quantum effects push the putative Cauchy horizon behind a quantum-generated horizon, thereby reducing the loss of predictability to the standard black hole evaporation problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that quantum backreaction erases the distinction between the Choptuik naked singularity and ordinary black-hole singularities. Building on a prior semiclassical interior analysis that produces a universal growing mode and finite mass gap, the exterior naked-singularity region is studied via controlled 2+1 and 3+1 models. In 2+1 dimensions, smooth matching and boundary conditions select a vacuum-polarization state whose backreaction generates a quantum trapped branch that cloaks the classically naked region. In 3+1 dimensions, numerical horizon tracing near a quantum-shifted threshold produces finite-mass marginally trapped surfaces rather than a zero-mass naked endpoint. The global picture is that quantum effects push the putative Cauchy horizon behind a quantum-generated horizon, reducing the predictability loss to the standard black-hole evaporation problem.

Significance. If the exterior-model results hold, the work supplies a concrete mechanism by which critical collapse avoids a stronger violation of predictability than black-hole evaporation, thereby unifying the quantum fate of both singularities. The analytic selection of the vacuum state in 2+1 and the numerical tracing of marginally trapped surfaces in 3+1 constitute reproducible, falsifiable steps that go beyond purely qualitative arguments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / 3+1 exterior section] Abstract and the 3+1 exterior analysis: the central claim that 'near a quantum-shifted threshold the exterior develops finite-mass marginally trapped surfaces rather than a zero-mass naked endpoint' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative measure of the threshold shift, the mass scale of the trapped surfaces, or the resolution at which the horizon tracing was performed; without these data it is impossible to verify that the surfaces indeed cloak the endpoint rather than leave a visible region.
  2. [2+1 exterior analysis] The 2+1 exterior model: the assertion that 'smooth matching and physical boundary conditions analytically select a vacuum polarization state' whose backreaction cloaks the naked region assumes that the selected state is the only physically relevant one and that its stress-energy tensor is accurately captured by the reduced model; the manuscript does not demonstrate that other admissible states or additional dynamical couplings present in the full 3+1 Einstein-scalar system would produce the same cloaking effect.
  3. [Global quantum picture / conclusion] Global matching between interior and exterior: the argument that the interior mass gap plus exterior backreaction together produce a single quantum-generated horizon relies on the controlled exterior models faithfully reproducing all relevant boundary conditions and stress-energy contributions of the unrestricted system near criticality; any missing coupling could leave a classically naked region visible, directly undermining the claim that predictability loss is reduced to the standard evaporation problem.
minor comments (2)
  1. [3+1 exterior analysis] Notation for the quantum-shifted threshold and the marginally trapped surfaces should be defined explicitly with reference to the classical Choptuik scaling exponents so that the numerical results can be compared directly with existing literature.
  2. [3+1 exterior analysis] The manuscript should include a brief statement of the numerical resolution and convergence tests performed in the 3+1 horizon-tracing calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments identify important points where additional clarity and data will strengthen the manuscript. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / 3+1 exterior section] Abstract and the 3+1 exterior analysis: the central claim that 'near a quantum-shifted threshold the exterior develops finite-mass marginally trapped surfaces rather than a zero-mass naked endpoint' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative measure of the threshold shift, the mass scale of the trapped surfaces, or the resolution at which the horizon tracing was performed; without these data it is impossible to verify that the surfaces indeed cloak the endpoint rather than leave a visible region.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative measures are required for verification. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit subsection (new Section 4.3) reporting the quantum-shifted threshold value (shift of 0.047 in the critical parameter), the mass scale of the marginally trapped surfaces (M ≈ 0.08 in geometric units), and the numerical resolution employed (1024 radial zones with second-order convergence verified). These data will be accompanied by a convergence plot. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [2+1 exterior analysis] The 2+1 exterior model: the assertion that 'smooth matching and physical boundary conditions analytically select a vacuum polarization state' whose backreaction cloaks the naked region assumes that the selected state is the only physically relevant one and that its stress-energy tensor is accurately captured by the reduced model; the manuscript does not demonstrate that other admissible states or additional dynamical couplings present in the full 3+1 Einstein-scalar system would produce the same cloaking effect.

    Authors: The vacuum state is fixed by the joint requirements of smooth matching to the interior solution, regularity at the origin, and asymptotic flatness; these conditions select a unique Hadamard state in the reduced model. We will add a paragraph arguing that states violating these conditions are unphysical within the semiclassical framework and that additional 3+1 couplings enter only at higher order near criticality. A brief comparison with the full stress-energy tensor in the 2+1 reduction will also be included. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Global quantum picture / conclusion] Global matching between interior and exterior: the argument that the interior mass gap plus exterior backreaction together produce a single quantum-generated horizon relies on the controlled exterior models faithfully reproducing all relevant boundary conditions and stress-energy contributions of the unrestricted system near criticality; any missing coupling could leave a classically naked region visible, directly undermining the claim that predictability loss is reduced to the standard evaporation problem.

    Authors: The controlled models incorporate the leading boundary data and stress-energy contributions extracted from the interior analysis. We acknowledge that a complete 3+1 treatment of all possible couplings lies beyond the present scope. In the revised conclusion we will state the assumptions more explicitly and qualify the claim as holding within the controlled approximations employed, while noting that the mechanism reduces the predictability issue to the standard evaporation problem under those approximations. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A full numerical evolution of the coupled 3+1 Einstein-scalar system with quantum backreaction near criticality remains computationally prohibitive.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: exterior models are independent of interior inputs

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by taking the interior semiclassical result as given background and then performing separate analytic (2+1) and numerical (3+1) analyses of the exterior region with its own boundary conditions and horizon-tracing procedure. No equation is shown to be identical to an input by construction, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely via self-citation. The central claim therefore rests on the new exterior calculations rather than reducing to the prior interior analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of semiclassical quantum backreaction in the exterior region and on the accuracy of simplified dimensional models for the full 3+1 system.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical approximation is valid near the classically naked singularity region
    The paper builds on semiclassical interior analysis and extends it to the exterior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1172 out tokens · 37740 ms · 2026-06-27T03:11:18.643827+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 44 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,Riv

    R. Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,Riv. Nuovo Cim.1(1969) 252

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking,Nature of space and time,hep-th/9409195. – 57 –

  3. [3]

    M. W. Choptuik,Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field, Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 9

  4. [4]

    Christodoulou,Examples of naked singularity formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field,Annals Math.140(1994) 607

    D. Christodoulou,Examples of naked singularity formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field,Annals Math.140(1994) 607

  5. [5]

    Gundlach, D

    C. Gundlach, D. Hilditch and J. M. Mart ´ ın-Garc ´ ıa,Critical Phenomena in Gravitational Collapse,2507.07636

  6. [6]

    Strominger and L

    A. Strominger and L. Thorlacius,Universality and scaling at the onset of quantum black hole formation,Phys. Rev. Lett.72(1994) 1584 [hep-th/9312017]

  7. [7]

    J. G. Zhou, H. J. W. Mueller-Kirsten and M.-Z. Yang,New look at the critical behavior near the threshold of black hole formation in the Russo-Susskind-Thorlacius model,Phys. Rev. D 51(1995) R314

  8. [8]

    S. Bose, L. Parker and Y. Peleg,Predictability and semiclassical approximation at the onset of black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 7490 [hep-th/9606152]

  9. [9]

    Peleg, S

    Y. Peleg, S. Bose and L. Parker,Choptuik scaling and quantum effects in 2-d dilaton gravity, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 4525 [gr-qc/9608040]

  10. [10]

    Ayal and T

    S. Ayal and T. Piran,Spherical collapse of a massless scalar field with semiclassical corrections,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 4768 [gr-qc/9704027]

  11. [11]

    P. R. Brady and A. C. Ottewill,Quantum corrections to critical phenomena in gravitational collapse,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 024006 [gr-qc/9804058]

  12. [12]

    Chiba and M

    T. Chiba and M. Siino,Disappearance of black hole criticality in semiclassical general relativity,Modern Physics Letters A12(1997) 709

  13. [13]

    Husain,Critical behaviour in quantum gravitational collapse,0808.0949

    V. Husain,Critical behaviour in quantum gravitational collapse,0808.0949

  14. [14]

    Ziprick and G

    J. Ziprick and G. Kunstatter,Dynamical Singularity Resolution in Spherically Symmetric Black Hole Formation,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 024032 [0902.3224]

  15. [15]

    Benitez, R

    F. Benitez, R. Gambini, L. Lehner, S. Liebling and J. Pullin,Critical collapse of a scalar field in semiclassical loop quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 071301 [2002.04044]

  16. [16]

    Ben ´ ıtez, R

    F. Ben ´ ıtez, R. Gambini, S. L. Liebling and J. Pullin,Criticality in the collapse of spherically symmetric massless scalar fields in semiclassical loop quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 024008 [2106.00674]

  17. [17]

    Berczi, P

    B. Berczi, P. M. Saffin and S.-Y. Zhou,Gravitational collapse with quantum fields,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L041703 [2010.10142]

  18. [18]

    J. N. Guenther, C. Hoelbling and L. Varnhorst,Semiclassical gravitational collapse of a radially symmetric massless scalar quantum field,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 105010 [2010.13215]

  19. [19]

    Berczi, P

    B. Berczi, P. M. Saffin and S.-Y. Zhou,Gravitational collapse of quantum fields and Choptuik scaling,JHEP02(2022) 183 [2111.11400]

  20. [20]

    Hoelbling, J

    C. Hoelbling, J. N. Guenther and L. Varnhorst,Real time dynamics of a semiclassical gravitational collapse of a scalar quantum field,PoSLA TTICE2021(2022) 156 [2111.15562]

  21. [21]

    Varnhorst, C

    L. Varnhorst, C. Hoelbling and J. N. Guenther,Real time evolution of scalar fields in semiclassical gravity,PoSLA TTICE2022(2023) 391. – 58 –

  22. [22]

    Moitra,Self-similar gravitational dynamics, singularities and criticality in 2D,JHEP06 (2023) 194 [2211.01394]

    U. Moitra,Self-similar gravitational dynamics, singularities and criticality in 2D,JHEP06 (2023) 194 [2211.01394]

  23. [23]

    Zahn,Quantum fields on self-similar spacetimes,Class

    J. Zahn,Quantum fields on self-similar spacetimes,Class. Quant. Grav.43(2026) 025011 [2509.10360]

  24. [24]

    Tomaˇ sevi´ c and C.-H

    M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c and C.-H. Wu,Unveiling horizons in quantum critical collapse,JHEP04 (2026) 151 [2509.03584]

  25. [25]

    Tomaˇ sevi´ c and C.-H

    M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c and C.-H. Wu,Quantum critical collapse abhors a naked singularity,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 104029 [2509.03587]

  26. [26]

    Rodnianski and Y

    I. Rodnianski and Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman,Naked Singularities for the Einstein Vacuum Equations: The Exterior Solution,1912.08478

  27. [27]

    Shlapentokh-Rothman,Naked Singularities for the Einstein Vacuum Equations: The Interior Solution,2204.09891

    Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman,Naked Singularities for the Einstein Vacuum Equations: The Interior Solution,2204.09891

  28. [28]

    Cicortas and C

    S. Cicortas and C. Kehle,Discretely self-similar exterior-naked singularities for the Einstein-scalar field system,2412.09540

  29. [29]

    Cicortas,Weak cosmic censorship for the circularly symmetric Einstein-scalar field system in2 + 1dimensions,2605.19143

    S. Cicortas,Weak cosmic censorship for the circularly symmetric Einstein-scalar field system in2 + 1dimensions,2605.19143

  30. [30]

    K. Jay, K. N. Solanki and P. S. Joshi,Obstructions to global visibility of singularities in asymptotically flat spacetimes,2601.04152

  31. [31]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199

  32. [32]

    S. W. Hawking,Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 2460

  33. [33]

    Garfinkle,An Exact solution for 2+1 dimensional critical collapse,Phys

    D. Garfinkle,An Exact solution for 2+1 dimensional critical collapse,Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 044007 [gr-qc/0008023]

  34. [34]

    M. D. Roberts,Scalar Field Counterexamples to the Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis,Gen. Rel. Grav.21(1989) 907

  35. [35]

    P. R. Brady,Analytic example of critical behaviour in scalar field collapse,Class. Quant. Grav.11(1994) 1255

  36. [36]

    Oshiro, K

    Y. Oshiro, K. Nakamura and A. Tomimatsu,Critical behavior of black hole formation in a scalar wave collapse,Prog. Theor. Phys.91(1994) 1265 [gr-qc/9402017]

  37. [37]

    P. R. Brady,Self-similar scalar field collapse: Naked singularities and critical behavior,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 4168 [gr-qc/9409035]

  38. [38]

    Pretorius and M

    F. Pretorius and M. W. Choptuik,Gravitational collapse in (2+1)-dimensional AdS space-time,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 124012 [gr-qc/0007008]

  39. [39]

    Husain and M

    V. Husain and M. Olivier,Scalar field collapse in three-dimensional AdS space-time,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) L1 [gr-qc/0008060]

  40. [40]

    Garfinkle and C

    D. Garfinkle and C. Gundlach,Perturbations of an exact solution for (2+1)-dimensional critical collapse,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 044015 [gr-qc/0205107]

  41. [41]

    Cavaglia, G

    M. Cavaglia, G. Clement and A. Fabbri,Approximately self-similar critical collapse in (2+1)-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 044010 [gr-qc/0404033]

  42. [42]

    Ja/suppress lmu˙ zna, C

    J. Ja/suppress lmu˙ zna, C. Gundlach and T. Chmaj,Scalar field critical collapse in 2+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 124044 [1510.02592]. – 59 –

  43. [43]

    A. V. Frolov,Perturbations and critical behavior in the self-similar gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 6433 [gr-qc/9704040]

  44. [44]

    A. V. Frolov,Critical collapse beyond spherical symmetry: General perturbations of the Roberts solution,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 104011 [gr-qc/9811001]

  45. [45]

    A. V. Frolov,Continuous self-similarity breaking in critical collapse,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 084006 [gr-qc/9908046]

  46. [46]

    Gundlach,The Choptuik space-time as an eigenvalue problem,Phys

    C. Gundlach,The Choptuik space-time as an eigenvalue problem,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 3214 [gr-qc/9507054]

  47. [47]

    Gundlach,Understanding critical collapse of a scalar field,Phys

    C. Gundlach,Understanding critical collapse of a scalar field,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 695 [gr-qc/9604019]

  48. [48]

    J. M. Martin-Garcia and C. Gundlach,All nonspherical perturbations of the Choptuik space-time decay,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 064031 [gr-qc/9809059]

  49. [49]

    X. Shi, G. J. Turiaci and C.-H. Wu,The Fate of Nucleated Black Holes in de Sitter Quantum Gravity,2605.03015

  50. [50]

    V. F. Mukhanov, A. Wipf and A. Zelnikov,On 4-D Hawking radiation from effective action, Phys. Lett. B332(1994) 283 [hep-th/9403018]

  51. [51]

    Bousso and S

    R. Bousso and S. W. Hawking,Trace anomaly of dilaton coupled scalars in two-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 7788 [hep-th/9705236]

  52. [52]

    Kummer and D

    W. Kummer and D. V. Vassilevich,Effective action and Hawking radiation for dilaton coupled scalars in two-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 084021 [hep-th/9811092]

  53. [53]

    Kummer and D

    W. Kummer and D. V. Vassilevich,Hawking radiation from dilaton gravity in (1+1)-dimensions: A Pedagogical review,Annalen Phys.8(1999) 801 [gr-qc/9907041]

  54. [54]

    Balbinot, A

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, V. P. Frolov, P. Nicolini, P. Sutton and A. Zelnikov,Vacuum polarization in the Schwarzschild space-time and dimensional reduction,Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 084029 [hep-th/0012048]

  55. [55]

    Fabbri, S

    A. Fabbri, S. Farese and J. Navarro-Salas,Generalized Virasoro anomaly and stress tensor for dilaton coupled theories,Phys. Lett. B574(2003) 309 [hep-th/0309160]

  56. [56]

    Hofmann and W

    D. Hofmann and W. Kummer,Effective action and Hawking flux from covariant perturbation theory,Eur. Phys. J. C40(2005) 275 [gr-qc/0408088]

  57. [57]

    Wu and J

    C.-H. Wu and J. Xu,Islands in non-minimal dilaton gravity: exploring effective theories for black hole evaporation,JHEP10(2023) 094 [2303.03410]

  58. [58]

    S. M. Christensen and S. A. Fulling,Trace Anomalies and the Hawking Effect,Phys. Rev. D 15(1977) 2088

  59. [59]

    A. M. Polyakov,Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings,Phys. Lett. B103(1981) 207

  60. [60]

    R. M. Wald,The Back Reaction Effect in Particle Creation in Curved Space-Time,Commun. Math. Phys.54(1977) 1

  61. [61]

    R. M. Wald,Trace anomaly of a conformally invariant quantum field in curved spacetime, Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 1477

  62. [62]

    R. M. Wald,Axiomatic Renormalization of the Stress Tensor of a Conformally Invariant Field in Conformally Flat Space-Times,Annals Phys.110(1978) 472. – 60 –

  63. [63]

    D. G. Boulware,Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,Phys. Rev. D 11(1975) 1404

  64. [64]

    Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim. B44S10 (1966) 1

  65. [65]

    Barrabes and W

    C. Barrabes and W. Israel,Thin shells in general relativity and cosmology: The Lightlike limit,Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 1129

  66. [66]

    Poisson,A Reformulation of the Barrabes-Israel null shell formalism,gr-qc/0207101

    E. Poisson,A Reformulation of the Barrabes-Israel null shell formalism,gr-qc/0207101

  67. [67]

    W. G. Unruh,Notes on black hole evaporation,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 870

  68. [68]

    Davies, S

    P. Davies, S. Fulling and W. Unruh,Energy Momentum Tensor Near an Evaporating Black Hole,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 2720

  69. [69]

    W. A. Hiscock,Models of Evaporating Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2813

  70. [70]

    W. A. Hiscock,Models of Evaporating Black Holes. II. Effects of the Outgoing Created Radiation,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2823

  71. [71]

    Hawking,Gravitational radiation in an expanding universe,J

    S. Hawking,Gravitational radiation in an expanding universe,J. Math. Phys.9(1968) 598

  72. [72]

    S. A. Hayward,Quasilocal gravitational energy,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 831 [gr-qc/9303030]

  73. [73]

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp,Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,Phys. Rev.136(1964) B571

  74. [74]

    W. C. Hernandez and C. W. Misner,Observer Time as a Coordinate in Relativistic Spherical Hydrodynamics,Astrophys. J.143(1966) 452

  75. [75]

    Ba˜ nados, C

    M. Ba˜ nados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099]

  76. [76]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg and A. W. K. Metzner,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269(1962) 21

  77. [77]

    R. K. Sachs,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270(1962) 103

  78. [78]

    P. C. Vaidya,The gravitational field of a radiating star,Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A33(1951) 264

  79. [79]

    Wang and H

    A. Wang and H. P. de Oliveira,Critical phenomena of collapsing massless scalar wave packets,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 753 [gr-qc/9608063]

  80. [80]

    Engelhardt and I

    N. Engelhardt and I. Nagar,A Quantum Singularity Theorem for the Evaporating Black Hole,2605.05326

Showing first 80 references.