REVIEW 3 cited by
Process Supervision-Guided Policy Optimization for Code Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) with unit test feedback has enhanced large language models' (LLMs) code generation, but relies on sparse rewards provided only after complete code evaluation, limiting learning efficiency and incremental improvements. When generated code fails all unit tests, no learning signal is received, hindering progress on complex tasks. To address this, we propose a Process Reward Model (PRM) that delivers dense, line-level feedback on code correctness during generation, mimicking human code refinement and providing immediate guidance. We explore various strategies for training PRMs and integrating them into the RL framework, finding that using PRMs both as dense rewards and for value function initialization significantly boosts performance. Our experimental results also highlight the effectiveness of PRMs in enhancing RL-driven code generation, especially for long-horizon scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond Binary: Turning Partial Success into Dense Verifiable Rewards for Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation
VeRPO turns partial test-suite success into dense, difficulty-weighted rewards for RL code generation, beating GRPO by up to 8.8 pass@1 points at negligible cost.
-
Improving LLM-Generated Code Quality with GRPO
Adding a hand-built code-quality score to the GRPO reward makes a 3B model produce code that blind raters prefer, but evidence rests on one model and a synthetic benchmark.
-
CRScore++: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Tool and AI Feedback for Code Review
A two-stage SFT+DPO pipeline using linter and code-smell tool outputs plus an LLM judge improves generated code review comments and appears to transfer from Python to Java and JavaScript, though the judge-based evalua...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.