Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 35 references

All-electrical creation and control of giant spin-galvanic effect in 1T-MoTe2/graphene heterostructures at room temperature

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A graphene/MoTe2 heterostructure converts spin current into a gate-switchable charge voltage at room temperature.

desk verdict A plausible room-temperature gate-tunable spin-galvanic signal in graphene/MoTe2, but the missing thermal control and parameter-dependent efficiency claims keep it from being fully convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09367 v2 pith:FOKUGCNF submitted 2019-08-25 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph

Anamul Md. Hoque , Dmitrii Khokhriakov , Bogdan Karpiak , Saroj P. Dash This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords spin-galvaniceffectinverseRashba-Edelsteingraphene/MoTe2heterostructurespin-to-chargeconversionproximity-inducedspin-orbitcouplinggate-controlledsignswitchingvanderWaalsWeylsemimetalMo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that a heterostructure of semimetallic MoTe2 and monolayer graphene converts an injected spin current into a measurable charge voltage at room temperature, through a proximity-induced inverse Rashba–Edelstein effect. The conversion signal is large—about $\Delta R_{\mathrm{SGE}}/I \approx 4.96\ \Omega$ in resistance units, with a lower-bound efficiency of $\alpha_{\mathrm{RE}} \approx 7.6\%$—and its sign reverses when a back-gate voltage moves the Fermi level across the charge neutrality point. That gate-controlled switching is interpreted as a consequence of the Rashba spin-split bands that graphene acquires from MoTe2: for the same spin texture, electrons and holes accumulate with opposite charge signs, reversing the induced charge current. The measurements use a non-local geometry with non-magnetic detection contacts, chosen because it avoids stray-Hall artifacts that can mimic spin-galvanic signals in local measurements. If correct, the result shows that an electric field alone can create and switch a spin-galvanic response in a van der Waals heterostructure at room temperature, a functionality relevant to spintronic memory and logic.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the inverse Rashba–Edelstein effect (IREE), the reciprocal of the Rashba–Edelstein effect: a spin accumulation in a Rashba spin-split band produces a charge current perpendicular to both the spin direction and the interface normal, $I_c \propto \hat{z} \times n_s$. In this device the Rashba splitting is not intrinsic to graphene but is induced by proximity to MoTe2, giving graphene spin-split conduction and valence bands with the same spin chirality. The non-local Hall-bar geometry separates spin injection (ferromagnetic contact) from detection (non-magnetic contacts), and the gate voltage tunes the Fermi level between electron- and hole-doped regimes, flipping the sign of the detected voltage because the same spin texture produces opposite charge accumulation for electrons and holes. The relation $V_{\mathrm{SGE}} \propto \hat{z} \times n_s$, the $\cos(\theta)$ angle dependence, and the absence of zero-field Hanle peaks together identify the signal as IREE rather than a bulk or proximity spin-Hall effect.

What would settle it

A control device identical except with the MoTe2 flake omitted, or with a non-magnetic injector contact, would settle the claim: if the same non-local voltage appears in either case, or if the signal fails to reverse when the injector magnetization is reversed, the spin-galvanic interpretation is wrong. Conversely, resolving a Hanle spin-precession peak near zero field in the heterostructure region would indicate out-of-plane spins and point toward a spin-Hall rather than Rashba–Edelstein mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the graphene/MoTe2 interface acts as a room-temperature spin-to-charge converter governed by the inverse Rashba–Edelstein effect (IREE). In the non-local measurement, a ferromagnetic Co/TiO2 contact injects spin into a graphene channel; the spins diffuse into the graphene/MoTe2 region, where the proximity-induced Rashba spin texture converts their accumulation into a transverse charge voltage detected by Ti/Au contacts. The paper reports $\Delta R_{\mathrm{SGE}}/I \approx 4.96\ \Omega$ at a bias current of $-80\ \mu\mathrm{A}$, a lower-bound conversion efficiency $\alpha_{\mathrm{RE}} \approx 7.6\%$, and, most distinctively, a reversal of the voltage sign as the gate sweeps through the charge neutrality point between hole and electron doping. Angle-dependent measurements follow a $\cos(\theta)$ dependence on the in-plane field direction, and the absence of Hanle peaks near zero field is presented as evidence that the accumulated spins are in-plane, ruling out a proximity spin-Hall origin. The sign change is reproduced in two devices, and control measurements indicate that it is not caused by a change in the injector's spin polarization.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumption that the non-local voltage detected by the non-magnetic contacts is generated by inverse Rashba–Edelstein conversion of in-plane spin accumulation inside the graphene/MoTe2 region, rather than by spurious local magnetotransport, thermal gradients, or out-of-plane spin-Hall signals.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Room-temperature, all-electrical spin-to-charge conversion with gate-controlled sign provides a building block for spin-orbit-torque magnetic random-access memory, where the write current direction could be set by a gate voltage rather than by reversing a magnetic field.
  • The lower-bound efficiency of 7.6%, about an order of magnitude above earlier graphene/TMD heterostructures, implies that much smaller charge currents could produce usable spin-orbit torques in devices built on this platform.
  • Because the effect appears in large-area CVD graphene, the mechanism is compatible with wafer-scale fabrication rather than requiring exfoliated crystals.
  • The Fermi-level-dependent sign reversal confirms that the proximity-induced spin texture in graphene is gate-tunable, so the same stacking principle could be used to build electrically reconfigurable spin logic circuits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the stated 7.6% efficiency is a lower bound; if the spin diffusion length inside the heterostructure were measured directly rather than borrowed from pristine graphene, the conversion efficiency could turn out substantially higher.
  • Editorial inference: the same gate-switching logic should be testable in other semimetal/TMD–graphene stacks with different band alignments, where the sign-change position relative to the charge neutrality point would map the relative strength of proximity Rashba versus intrinsic band hybridization.
  • Editorial inference: the strong spin relaxation that killed the Hanle signal in the heterostructure region could itself be engineered as a tunable spin sink, letting lateral spintronic circuits erase spin information with a gate pulse.
  • Editorial inference: a direct comparison of identical devices with and without MoTe2, and with MoTe2 thickness varied, would separate the interface proximity contribution from any bulk semimetal contribution to the spin-to-charge conversion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports nonlocal spin-to-charge conversion (inverse Rashba-Edelstein, IREE) in 1T'-MoTe2/graphene van der Waals heterostructures at room temperature. In a Hall-bar device, a spin current injected from a Co/TiO2 ferromagnetic contact diffuses into the graphene/MoTe2 region, and a nonlocal voltage VSGE is detected across Ti/Au contacts as a function of in-plane magnetic field, bias current, and back-gate voltage. The authors report ΔRSGE ≈ 4.96 Ω, estimate a lower-bound conversion efficiency αRE ≈ 7.6%, observe cosθ angular dependence of the signal, and demonstrate gate-controlled sign reversal near the charge neutrality point. They interpret these observations as proximity-induced Rashba-Edelstein spin-to-charge conversion with sign controlled by electron versus hole doping.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the result is significant: it would demonstrate room-temperature, gate-tunable IREE in a large-area CVD-graphene/MoTe2 heterostructure with a conversion efficiency larger than previous 2D systems, which is relevant for spin-orbit-torque memory and logic applications. The paper deserves credit for using nonmagnetic detectors to avoid stray Hall effects at the ferromagnetic detector, for providing angle-dependence and bias-polarity controls, for reporting measurements on two devices, and for explicitly stating assumptions and the lower-bound nature of the efficiency estimate. However, the central attribution to IREE rests on excluding thermoelectric and other spurious signals, and the quantitative claims rely on several unmeasured parameters; both are addressable with additional control experiments and sensitivity analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Spin-galvanic measurement geometry (Fig. 1a-d, Fig. 2)] The central claim that VSGE is an inverse Rashba-Edelstein signal is not uniquely established because a spin-dependent Peltier/Seebeck thermoelectric voltage in the same nonlocal geometry reproduces all three reported controls: it is linear in injection current, reverses with current polarity, follows the injector magnetization as cosθ, and shows no Hanle precession since no spin accumulation is involved. The gate-dependent sign reversal near the charge neutrality point (Fig. 4b) is precisely the expected signature of the graphene Seebeck coefficient changing sign at the CNP. The manuscript includes no nonmagnetic-injector control device, no direct measurement of S(Vg), and no second-harmonic thermal check, so the data do not exclude a thermal origin. This control is load-bearing for the conclusion that the effect is spin-galvanic.
  2. [Eq. (1) and efficiency estimate] The efficiency estimate αRE = 7.6% depends on assumed values P = 10% for the Co/TiO2 contact polarization and λG = 2.65 μm taken from pristine graphene, while the spin accumulation in the graphene/MoTe2 region is not directly measured (no spin signal is detected through the heterostructure). Since P and λG enter Eq. (1) multiplicatively and exponentially, the 'order of magnitude larger' comparison with other systems is not quantitatively secure without a sensitivity analysis or independent measurements. The text states this is a lower bound because the heterostructure spin diffusion length is shorter, but the bound also depends on the assumed P; please state the range of αRE consistent with plausible parameter values and add error bars to ΔRSGE.
  3. [Gate-dependent sign change (Fig. 3, Fig. 4)] The interpretation that the sign reversal at Vg ≈ 10-20 V reflects Rashba spin textures in conduction versus valence bands is imported from prior theory and used post-hoc; it is consistent with the data but not uniquely determined. Moreover, the gate dependence of the injector contact polarization is only partially controlled (Fig. S6 is cited but not shown in the main text). To support the claim that the sign change is inherent to IREE in the heterostructure, the authors should show the gate-dependent Hanle/spin-valve controls in the main text and discuss how a thermoelectric Seebeck sign change is excluded.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title and Abstract] The title uses '1T-MoTe2' while the text and abstract use '1T′-MoTe2'; please use the prime consistently.
  2. [Fig. 1d and Fig. 2b captions] The data are shifted and a linear background is subtracted; the subtraction procedure and raw traces should be described in the Methods or caption so the reader can assess the magnitude of the background relative to ΔVSGE.
  3. [Fig. 2c and Fig. 4b] These panels have no error bars; please add them or state the measurement uncertainty, especially because only two devices are reported.
  4. [Fig. 2a text] The phrase 'the measurements were manifested by varying the angle' is unclear; rephrase as 'the angle θ of the in-plane magnetic field was varied.'
  5. [References] Several references are cited as arXiv preprints (refs 12, 20, 21, 30, 35, 36); if published versions exist, cite them.
  6. [Notation] The symbols ΔVSGE and ΔRSGE are introduced in figure captions before their first use in the text; define them at first mention in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spin-galvanic measurement and efficiency estimate are independent of the IREE interpretation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is experimental. The central quantity ΔVSGE is a directly measured non-local voltage; ΔRSGE = ΔVSGE/I is its current-normalized value; and α_RE is computed from Eq. (1) using the measured signal together with stated parameters (P = 10%, λ_G = 2.65 µm, ρ_G = 1.6 kΩ, device geometry). No parameter in Eq. (1) is fitted to the spin-galvanic signal that Eq. (1) is used to interpret, and no result is a prediction of a data point that was itself used as an input. The gate-dependent sign change is interpreted with the Rashba spin-texture model of graphene/TMD heterostructures from prior independent theory, not by fitting that model to the data. Same-group references (refs. 25 and 30) appear only as background motivation and for the CVD graphene source; they do not supply the load-bearing proof of the inverse Rashba-Edelstein effect. The inference to IREE rests on the measured angle dependence, current-polarity reversal, absence of Hanle peaks, and gate dependence. A missing thermal or magnetotransport control, such as the graphene Seebeck coefficient changing sign near the charge neutrality point, would be a potential alternative interpretation or correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the authors do not construct the measured signal from the conclusion they draw. No step reduces by construction to its own input, so the paper is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is experimental and introduces no new particles or forces. The quantitative efficiency claim inherits uncertainty from assumed parameters: the spin polarization of the Co/TiO2 contact (10%) and the spin diffusion length of pristine graphene (2.65 µm). The qualitative gate-switching interpretation depends on theoretical Rashba spin-texture predictions for graphene/TMD interfaces and on the standard non-local spin signal model.

free parameters (3)
  • Spin polarization of Co/TiO2 injector P = 10% (assumed)
    Used in Eq. (1) to convert ΔRSGE to α_RE; not measured in this device, so the efficiency has unknown uncertainty.
  • Spin diffusion length in graphene λG = 2.65 µm
    Taken from pristine graphene because no spin signal is seen in the heterostructure; if shorter there, α_RE would be larger, which the paper notes.
  • Charge neutrality point of the heterostructure = between 10 V and 20 V
    Inferred from gate-dependent resistance of a mixed channel that includes pristine graphene; used to assign electron and hole regimes in the sign-change interpretation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Proximity to MoTe2 induces Rashba spin-split bands in graphene with the same spin chirality in conduction and valence bands.
    Imported from theoretical predictions (Refs 23, 26, 34) and invoked in Fig. 3a and the text to explain the gate-controlled sign change; not directly measured here.
  • domain assumption The non-local spin signal model in Eq. (1) describes spin injection and diffusion in the graphene channel.
    Taken from prior work (Ref 11) and used to convert the measured voltage into an efficiency; the model's validity is assumed.
  • domain assumption The measured VSGE arises solely from inverse Rashba-Edelstein conversion of in-plane spin accumulation, with no contribution from out-of-plane spin Hall or spurious effects.
    The paper argues from angle dependence and absence of Hanle peaks near B=0, but this is an interpretation rather than a direct measurement; see the paragraphs after Fig. 4.
  • domain assumption The multilayer MoTe2 is in the metallic 1T' phase at room temperature.
    Supported by Raman and transport data in SI (Figs S1, S2); used to assign the gate tunability to graphene rather than MoTe2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All-electrical creation and control of giant spin-galvanic effect in 1T-MoTe2/graphene heterostructures at room temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FOKUGCNF

@misc{pith2026190809367,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All-electrical creation and control of giant spin-galvanic effect in 1T-MoTe2/graphene heterostructures at room temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FOKUGCNF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09367}
}
read the original abstract

The ability to engineer new states of matter and to control their electronic and spintronic properties by electric fields is at the heart of the modern information technology and driving force behind recent advances in van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures of two-dimensional materials. Here, we exploit a proximity-induced Rashba-Edelstein (REE) effect in vdW heterostructures of Weyl semimetal candidate MoTe2 and CVD graphene, where an unprecedented gate-controlled switching of spin-galvanic effect emerges due to an efficient spin-to-charge conversion at room temperature. The magnitude of the measured spin-galvanic signal is found to be an order of magnitude larger than the other systems, giving rise to a giant REE. The magnitude and the sign of the spin-galvanic signal are shown to be strongly modulated by gate electric field near the charge neutrality point, which can be understood considering the spin textures of the Rashba spin-orbit coupling-induced spin-splitting in conduction and valence bands of the heterostructure. These findings open opportunities for utilization of gate-controlled switching of spin-galvanic effects in spintronic memory and logic technologies and possibilities for realization of new states of matter with novel spin textures in vdW heterostructures with gate-tunable functionalities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09367 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Giant proximity-induced spin-galvanic effect in graphene/MoTe2 van der Waals heterostructure at room temperature. (a,b) The spintronic device schematics with the measurement scheme and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) image (false color) consisting of graphene (gray) - MoTe2 (blue) heterostructure on Si/SiO2 substrate, ferromagnetic (FM) and non-magnetic (Ti/Au) contacts on graphene. The scale bar in SEM image is… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Panagopoulos, C

    Soumyanarayanan, A., Reyren, N., Fert, A. & Panagopoulos, C. Emergent phenomena induced by spin-orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces. Nature 539, 509–517 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Manipatruni, S. et al. Scalable energy-efficient magnetoelectric spin–orbit logic. Nature 565, 35–42 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Garello, K. et al. SOT-MRAM 300MM Integration for Low Power and Ultrafast Embedded Memories. in 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits 81–82 (IEEE, 2018). doi:10.1109/VLSIC.2018.8502269

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    C., Nitta, J., Frolov, S

    Manchon, A., Koo, H. C., Nitta, J., Frolov, S. M. & Duine, R. A. New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Nat. Mater. 14, 871–882 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C

    Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H. & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213– 1260 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Sánchez, J. C. R. et al. Spin-to-charge conversion using Rashba coupling at the interface between non-magnetic materials. Nat. Commun. 4, 2944 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Song, Q. et al. Observation of inverse Edelstein effect in Rashba-split 2DEG between SrTiO 3 and LaAlO 3 at room temperature. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602312 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Lesne, E. et al. Highly efficient and tunable spin-to-charge conversion through Rashba coupling at oxide interfaces. Nat. Mater. 15, 1261–1266 (2016)

    2016

Show all 35 references
  1. [10]

    Shao, Q. et al. Strong Rashba-Edelstein Effect-Induced Spin-Orbit Torques in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenide/Ferromagnet Bilayers. Nano Lett. 16, 7514–7520 (2016)

    2016

  2. [11]

    Safeer, C. K. et al. Room-Temperature Spin Hall Effect in Graphene/MoS 2 van der Waals Heterostructures. Nano Lett 19, 1074–1082 (2019)

    2019

  3. [12]

    Zhao, B. et al. Observation of Spin Hall Effect in Semimetal WTe2. doi:arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02113 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  4. [13]

    S., Kaverzin, A., Blah, P

    Ghiasi, T. S., Kaverzin, A., Blah, P. J. & van Wees, B. J. Charge-to-Spin Conversion by the Rashba-Edelstein Effect in 2D van der Waals Heterostructures up to Room Temperature. Nano Lett. acs.nanolett.9b01611 (2019). doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01611

    2019 doi

  5. [14]

    V., Charpentier, S

    Dankert, A., Geurs, J., Kamalakar, M. V., Charpentier, S. & Dash, S. P. Room temperature electrical detection of spin polarized currents in topological insulators. Nano Lett. 15, 7976–7981 (2015)

    2015

  6. [15]

    Mellnik, A. R. et al. Spin-transfer torque generated by a topological insulator. Nature 511, 449–451 (2014)

    2014

  7. [16]

    & Mertig, I

    Johansson, A., Henk, J. & Mertig, I. Edelstein effect in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 97, 085417 (2018)

    2018

  8. [17]

    & Yan, B

    Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Felser, C. & Yan, B. Strong Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect in the TaAs Family of Weyl Semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 146403 (2016)

    2016

  9. [18]

    Das, P. K. et al. Layer-dependent quantum cooperation of electron and hole states in the anomalous semimetal WTe2. Nat. Commun. 7, 10847 (2016)

    2016

  10. [19]

    Weber, A. P. et al. Spin-Resolved Electronic Response to the Phase Transition in MoTe 2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 156401 (2018)

    2018

  11. [20]

    Stiehl, G. M. et al. Layer-dependent spin-orbit torques generated by the centrosymmetric transition metal dichalcogenide $\beta$-MoTe$_2$. (2019). doi:arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01068 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  12. [21]

    MacNeill, D. et al. Control of spin–orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe2/ferromagnet bilayers. Nat. Phys. 13, 300–305 (2017)

    2017

  13. [22]

    Shi, S. et al. All-electric magnetization switching and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in WTe2/ferromagnet heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. (2019). doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0525-8

    2019 doi

  14. [23]

    W., Garcia, J

    Cummings, A. W., Garcia, J. H., Fabian, J. & Roche, S. Giant Spin Lifetime Anisotropy in Graphene Induced by Proximity Effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206601 (2017)

    2017

  15. [24]

    & Rossi, E

    Rodriguez-Vega, M., Schwiete, G., Sinova, J. & Rossi, E. Giant Edelstein effect in topological-insulator–graphene heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 96, 235419 (2017)

    2017

  16. [25]

    Khokhriakov, D. et al. Tailoring emergent spin phenomena in Dirac material heterostructures. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat9349 (2018)

    2018

  17. [26]

    & Ferreira, A

    Offidani, M., Milletarì, M., Raimondi, R. & Ferreira, A. Optimal Charge-to-Spin Conversion in Graphene on Transition- Metal Dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 196801 (2017)

    2017

  18. [27]

    Jiang, J. et al. Signature of type-II Weyl semimetal phase in MoTe 2. Nat. Commun. 8, 13973 (2017). 11

    2017

  19. [28]

    Deng, K. et al. Experimental observation of topological Fermi arcs in type-II Weyl semimetal MoTe 2. Nat. Phys. 12, 1105–1110 (2016)

    2016

  20. [29]

    Grzeszczyk, M. et al. Raman scattering of few-layers MoTe 2. 2D Mater. 3, 025010 (2016)

    2016

  21. [30]

    Khokhriakov, D., Karpiak, B., Hoque, A. M. & Dash, S. P. Two-Dimensional Spintronic Circuit Architectures on Large Scale Graphene. doi:arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.04151 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Karpiak, B. et al. 1D ferromagnetic edge contacts to 2D graphene/h-BN heterostructures. 2D Mater. 5, 014001 (2017)

    2017

  23. [32]

    & Maekawa, S

    Kimura, T., Otani, Y., Sato, T., Takahashi, S. & Maekawa, S. Room-Temperature Reversible Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 156601 (2007)

    2007

  24. [33]

    Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010)

    2010

  25. [34]

    & Raimondi, R

    Milletarì, M., Offidani, M., Ferreira, A. & Raimondi, R. Covariant Conservation Laws and the Spin Hall Effect in Dirac- Rashba Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246801 (2017)

    2017

  26. [35]

    Li, L. et al. Electrical Control of the Rashba-Edelstein Effect in a Graphene/2H-TaS2 Van der Waals Heterostructure at Room Temperature. doi:arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.10702 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Antonio Benítez, L. et al. Tunable room-temperature spin galvanic and spin Hall effects in van der Waals heterostructures. doi:arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07868 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.