pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23654 · v1 · pith:FQPGMNQAnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · nucl-th

Probing nuclear interactions \`a la Rutherford: Insights on ⁴He from α scattering

F. Cappuzzello , V. Soukeras , S. Bacca , D. Carbone , M. Cavallaro , L. C. Chamon , I. Lombardo , G. Orlandini
show 22 more authors
M. Viviani C. Agodi H.-W. Becker G. A. Brischetto S. Calabrese C. Ciampi M. Cicerchia M. Cinausero I. Ciraldo D. Dell'Aquila M. Fisichella C. Frosin A. Hacisalihoglu M. Hilcker A. Kievsky Y. Kucuk T. Marchi O. Sgouros A. Spatafora D. Torresi M. Vigilante A. Yildirim
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex nucl-th
keywords ^4He resonancealpha scatteringnuclear densitieselectron scatteringfew-body systemsopen quantum systemsnuclear interactionsspectral line shape
0
0 comments X

The pith

Alpha-alpha scattering data on the helium-4 resonance is consistent with current nuclear models when using the same densities as electron scattering studies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the first excited resonant state of the helium-4 nucleus through a new alpha scattering experiment with high sensitivity. It applies state-of-the-art analysis of the spectral line shape combined with reaction modeling that reuses the nuclear densities from prior electron scattering work. This approach yields a reasonable match to all observables under existing nuclear interaction frameworks. A sympathetic reader would care because it addresses a potential gap in understanding how nuclei behave in excited states, which affects models of nuclear stability and stellar processes. The result suggests the puzzle may lie in how we model open quantum systems rather than in the interactions themselves.

Core claim

By performing a high-sensitivity study of ^4He + ^4He scattering and analyzing the spectral line shape with phenomenological modeling that uses the same nuclear densities as electron-scattering studies, the full set of experimental observables is reasonably described within current nuclear-interaction physics, thereby highlighting the need for further advancing the modeling of few-body open quantum systems.

What carries the argument

Phenomenological reaction modeling that incorporates the same nuclear densities from electron-scattering studies to fit alpha-alpha scattering observables on the ^4He resonance.

If this is right

  • The resonance properties align with existing parametrizations of nuclear interactions without requiring new physics.
  • Consistency holds between electron scattering and alpha scattering when densities are shared.
  • The data do not indicate gaps in the basic nuclear interaction models for this system.
  • Advancement is needed specifically in treatments of few-body open quantum systems to resolve any remaining discrepancies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same consistency-testing method could be applied to resonances in other light nuclei to check model robustness across probes.
  • Better open-channel modeling might improve predictions for helium-burning reactions in stars.
  • If the modeling gap is closed, it could reduce uncertainties in calculations of nuclear response to external probes.

Load-bearing premise

The phenomenological reaction modeling that incorporates the same nuclear densities employed in electron-scattering studies is sufficiently accurate to allow a meaningful consistency test between the two classes of observables.

What would settle it

A measurement of the resonance line shape or cross sections in alpha scattering that deviates significantly from the predictions of the phenomenological model using the shared densities would falsify the claim of reasonable description.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23654 by A. Hacisalihoglu, A. Kievsky, A. Spatafora, A. Yildirim, C. Agodi, C. Ciampi, C. Frosin, D. Carbone, D. Dell'Aquila, D. Torresi, F. Cappuzzello, G. A. Brischetto, G. Orlandini, H.-W. Becker, I. Ciraldo, I. Lombardo, L. C. Chamon, M. Cavallaro, M. Cicerchia, M. Cinausero, M. Fisichella, M. Hilcker, M. Vigilante, M. Viviani, O. Sgouros, S. Bacca, S. Calabrese, T. Marchi, V. Soukeras, Y. Kucuk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Additional elastic scattering data were collected under experimental condi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nuclear interactions play a key role for the stability of atomic nuclei and stellar environments. Successful parametrization and models of these interactions, developed in the last decades, accurately reproduce all the proton and neutron scattering data, besides the properties of few-body nuclear systems. However, recent electron scattering results focusing on the first excited resonant state of $^4$He nucleus, reveal a puzzling situation suggesting potential gaps in our understanding of the nuclear phenomenology. Here, we report a new study of such $^4$He resonance by $^4$He + $^4$He scattering featuring data of unprecedented sensitivity and state-of-art analyses of the spectral line shape together with a phenomenological reaction modeling that incorporates the same nuclear densities employed in electron-scattering studies. Our analysis of the full set of experimental observables yields a reasonable description within the framework of current nuclear-interaction physics, thereby highlighting the need for further advancing the modeling of few-body open quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a new analysis of the first excited resonant state of ^4He via ^4He + ^4He scattering, using data of high sensitivity together with spectral line-shape analysis and a phenomenological reaction model that employs the identical nuclear densities from prior electron-scattering work. The central claim is that the full set of observables is reasonably described within existing nuclear-interaction frameworks, while underscoring the need for improved modeling of few-body open quantum systems.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would supply a valuable cross-probe consistency test between alpha scattering and electron scattering on the same ^4He resonance, using shared densities to reduce one source of model dependence. This could clarify the puzzling electron-scattering findings and affirm the broad applicability of current nuclear models while identifying specific gaps in few-body resonance treatments. The explicit linkage of the two classes of observables via common densities is a methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the analysis 'yields a reasonable description within the framework of current nuclear-interaction physics' is presented without any reported quantitative metrics (χ²/dof, resonance-parameter shifts with uncertainties, sensitivity to density variations, or direct comparison to the electron-scattering observables). This absence makes it impossible to judge whether the phenomenological reaction model reproduces the data or merely absorbs discrepancies flagged by the electron measurements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment and positive overall assessment of the work. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the analysis 'yields a reasonable description within the framework of current nuclear-interaction physics' is presented without any reported quantitative metrics (χ²/dof, resonance-parameter shifts with uncertainties, sensitivity to density variations, or direct comparison to the electron-scattering observables). This absence makes it impossible to judge whether the phenomenological reaction model reproduces the data or merely absorbs discrepancies flagged by the electron measurements.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is concise and does not quote explicit numerical metrics. The body of the manuscript does report χ²/dof values for the line-shape fits, extracted resonance parameters with uncertainties, and direct comparisons of the α+α observables to the electron-scattering results using the identical densities. To make the abstract claim more transparent, we will revise it to include a brief statement of the key quantitative indicators (e.g., overall χ²/dof and level of agreement within uncertainties). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; densities taken from independent electron-scattering literature

full rationale

The abstract states that the phenomenological reaction modeling incorporates nuclear densities from electron-scattering studies and that the analysis of alpha-scattering observables yields a reasonable description. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are visible in the provided text that would reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The densities are presented as external input, and the conclusion is framed as a consistency test rather than a self-defined result. This matches the default expectation of no significant circularity (score 0-2).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5855 in / 1098 out tokens · 25710 ms · 2026-05-25T02:28:28.311900+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The scattering ofαandβparticles by matter and the struc- ture of the atom.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science21, 669–688 (1911)

    Rutherford, E. The scattering ofαandβparticles by matter and the struc- ture of the atom.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science21, 669–688 (1911). URL https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14786440508637080

    work page 1911

  2. [2]

    The British Association Meeting at Edinburgh.Nature4, 261–278 (1871)

    News. The British Association Meeting at Edinburgh.Nature4, 261–278 (1871). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/004261a0

    work page doi:10.1038/004261a0

  3. [3]

    Clusters in nuclei.Scholarpedia (Ed

    Freer, M. Clusters in nuclei.Scholarpedia (Ed. N. Alamanos)5, 9652 (2010). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.9652

    work page doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.9652 2010

  4. [4]

    Iliadis, C.Nuclear Physics of Stars(Wiley, Weinheim, 2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Kamada, H.et al.Benchmark test calculation of a four-nucleon bound state. Phys. Rev. C64, 044001 (2001). 14

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/ fphy.2023.1129094

    Ekstr¨ om, A.et al.What is ab initio in nuclear theory?Frontiers in Physics 11(2023). URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/ fphy.2023.1129094

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    S., Pandharipande, V

    Pudliner, B. S., Pandharipande, V. R., Carlson, J. & Wiringa, R. B. Quantum monte carlo calculations ofA≤6 nuclei.Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4396–4399 (1995). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4396

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4396 1995

  8. [8]

    Wiringa, V .G.J

    Wiringa, R. B., Stoks, V. G. J. & Schiavilla, R. Accurate nucleon-nucleon poten- tial with charge-independence breaking.Phys. Rev. C51, 38–51 (1995). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.51.38

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.51.38 1995

  9. [9]

    & Meißner, U.-G

    Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W. & Meißner, U.-G. Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces.Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1773–1825 (2009)

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    & van Kolck, U

    Hammer, H.-W., K¨ onig, S. & van Kolck, U. Nuclear effective field theory: Status and perspectives.Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 025004 (2020). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.025004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025004 2020

  11. [11]

    Maris, P.et al.Light nuclei with semilocal momentum-space regularized chiral interactions up to third order.Phys. Rev. C103, 054001 (2021). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.054001 2021

  12. [12]

    & Girlanda, L

    Kievsky, A., Rosati, S., Viviani, M., Marcucci, L. & Girlanda, L. A High-precision variational approach to three- and four-nucleon bound and zero-energy scattering states.J. Phys. G35, 063101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Nature Phys.18, 1196–1200 (2022)

    Hu, B.et al.Ab initio predictions link the neutron skin of 208Pb to nuclear forces. Nature Phys.18, 1196–1200 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [18]

    A theoretical treatment of four-body resonances by using the complex scaling method.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2016, 123D01 (2016)

    Aoyama, S. A theoretical treatment of four-body resonances by using the complex scaling method.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2016, 123D01 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptw171

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw171 2016

  15. [21]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ 0375947468903795

    Frosch, R.et al.Inelastic electron scattering from 4He.Nuclear Physics A 110, 657–673 (1968). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ 0375947468903795

    work page 1968

  16. [22]

    Excitation of 4He by inelastic electron scattering at low momentum transfer.Physics Letters B31, 442–444 (1970)

    Walcher, T. Excitation of 4He by inelastic electron scattering at low momentum transfer.Physics Letters B31, 442–444 (1970). URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/0370269370901486

    work page arXiv 1970

  17. [25]

    Williams, L. E. Continuum resonances in He4(p, p ′ )He4∗.Phys. Rev.144, 815–822 (1966). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.144.815

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.144.815 1966

  18. [27]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0375947481906813

    Baumgartner, M.et al.Theα∗and the neutron scattering lengths of 3He.Nuclear Physics A368, 189–200 (1981). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0375947481906813

    work page arXiv 1981

  19. [28]

    & Hale, G

    Tilley, D., Weller, H. & Hale, G. Energy levels of light nuclei A = 4.Nuclear Physics A541, 1–104 (1992)

    work page 1992

  20. [30]

    Elhatisari, S.et al.Ab initio alpha–alpha scattering.Nature528, 111–114 (2015). 16

    work page 2015

  21. [31]

    & Meißner, U.-G

    Elhatisari, S., Hildenbrand, F. & Meißner, U.-G. Ab initio lattice study of neutron-alpha scattering with chiral forces at N3LO (2025). URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2507.08495. arXiv:2507.08495

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [32]

    & Navr´ atil, P

    Idini, A., Barbieri, C. & Navr´ atil, P. Ab initio optical potentials and nucleon scattering on medium mass nuclei.Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 092501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [33]

    Mercenne, A., Michel, N., Fern´ andez, J. P. L. & P loszajczak, M. Gamow shell model description of the 40Ca(d, p) transfer reaction.Phys. Rev. C107, L011603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [34]

    & Navr´ atil, P

    Kravvaris, K., Quaglioni, S., Hupin, G. & Navr´ atil, P. Ab initio framework for nuclear scattering and reactions induced by light projectiles.Physics Letters B 856, 138930 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [35]

    Rotureau, J., Danielewicz, P., Hagen, G., Nunes, F. M. & Papenbrock, T. Optical potential from first principles.Phys. Rev. C95, 024315 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [36]

    & Cavallaro, M

    Cappuzzello, F., Agodi, C., Carbone, D. & Cavallaro, M. The MAGNEX spec- trometer: Results and perspectives.Eur. Phys. J. A52, 167 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16167-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16167-1 2016

  27. [37]

    Dell’Aquila, D.et al.OSCAR: A new modular device for the identification and correlation of low energy particles.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment877, 227–237 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [38]

    Harakeh, M. N. & van der Woude, A.Giant Resonances: Fundamental High- Frequency Modes of Nuclear Excitation(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    work page 2001

  29. [39]

    Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts.Phys

    Fano, U. Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts.Phys. Rev.124, 1866–1878 (1961). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev. 124.1866

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev 1961

  30. [40]

    Luk’Yanchuk, B.et al.The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials.Nature Materials9, 707 – 715 (2010)

    work page 2010

  31. [41]

    URL https://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/science.1234407

    Ott, C.et al.Lorentz meets Fano in spectral line shapes: A universal phase and its laser control.Science340, 716–720 (2013). URL https://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/science.1234407

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1234407 2013

  32. [42]

    & Kivshar, Y

    Limonov, M., Rybin, M., Poddubny, A. & Kivshar, Y. Fano resonances in pho- tonics.Nature Photonics11, 543–554 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphoton.2017.142

    work page 2017

  33. [43]

    Paliwal, P., Blech, A., Koch, C. P. & Narevicius, E. Fano interference in quantum resonances from angle-resolved elastic scattering.Nature Communications12, 17 7249 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [44]

    Cavallaro, M.et al.Investigation of the 10Li shell inversion by neutron continuum transfer reaction.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 012701 (2017). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.012701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.012701 2017

  35. [48]

    Baroni, A.et al.Local chiral interactions, the tritium Gamow-Teller matrix element, and the three-nucleon contact term.Phys. Rev. C98, 044003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [49]

    & Chen, X

    Wang, R., Han, C. & Chen, X. Exploring the mass radius of 4He and implications for nuclear structure.Phys. Rev. C109, L012201 (2024). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.L012201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.l012201 2024

  37. [50]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900220313152

    Torresi, D.et al.An upgraded focal plane detector for the MAGNEX spectrom- eter.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment989, 164918 (2021). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900220313152

    work page 2021

  38. [51]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0168900210011241

    Cappuzzello, F.et al.A particle identification technique for large accep- tance spectrometers.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 621, 419–423 (2010). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0168900210011241

    work page 2010

  39. [52]

    & Cavallaro, M

    Cappuzzello, F., Carbone, D. & Cavallaro, M. Measuring the ions momentum vector with a large acceptance magnetic spectrometer.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment638, 74–82 (2011). URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0168900211003585

    work page 2011

  40. [53]

    & Van Isacker, P

    McVoy, K. & Van Isacker, P. Does the ground-state resonance of 10Li overlap neutron threshold?Nuclear Physics A576, 157–164 (1994)

    work page 1994

  41. [54]

    Sgouros, V

    O. Sgouros, V. Soukeras & A. Pakou. Multip : A multi purpose simulation monte carlo algorithm for two- and three-body reaction kinematics.Eur. Phys. J. A53, 165 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12359-5. 18

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12359-5 2017

  42. [55]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment637, 77–87 (2011)

    Cavallaro, M.et al.Transport efficiency in large acceptance spectrometers. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment637, 77–87 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [56]

    L., Phillips, G

    Russell, J. L., Phillips, G. C. & Reich, C. W. Scattering of alpha particles from helium.Phys. Rev.104, 135–142 (1956). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.104.135

    work page 1956

  44. [57]

    Heydenburg, N. P. & Temmer, G. M. Alpha-alpha scattering at low ener- gies.Phys. Rev.104, 123–134 (1956). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.104.123

    work page 1956

  45. [60]

    Tombrello, T. A. & Senhouse, L. S. Elastic scattering of alpha particles from helium.Phys. Rev.129, 2252–2258 (1963). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRev.129.2252

    work page 1963

  46. [61]

    Chien, W. S. & Brown, R. E. Study of theα+αsystem below 15 MeV (c.m.). Phys. Rev. C10, 1767–1784 (1974). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.10.1767

    work page 1974

  47. [63]

    J.et al.The scattering of alpha particles by helium.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Bredin, D. J.et al.The scattering of alpha particles by helium.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences251, 143–155 (1959). URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/100757

    work page 1959

  48. [64]

    Darriulat, P.Contribution ` a l’´ etude de l’interactionα−α. Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris (1965)

    work page 1965

  49. [66]

    & Blann, M

    Gutbrod, H., Winn, W. & Blann, M. Measurement and interpretation of heavy ion fusion excitation functions.Nuclear Physics A213, 267–284 (1973). 19

    work page 1973

  50. [67]

    Statistical model calculations in heavy ion reactions.Phys

    Gavron, A. Statistical model calculations in heavy ion reactions.Phys. Rev. C 21, 230–236 (1980). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.21.230

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.21.230 1980

  51. [68]

    Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions, and Structure of Matter

    Tarasov, O. & Bazin, D. Lise++: Radioactive beam production with in-flight separators.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms266, 4657–4664 (2008). Acknowledgments.We warmly acknowledge Prof. H. Lenske, Prof. N. Barnea, Prof. W. Leidemann and the late Prof. A. Vitturi for enlightening discu...

    work page 2008

  52. [69]

    (b) Same as in (a) but, for the transition matter densities

    (Hiyama et al.) are depicted with the blue solid, blue dashed, grey solid and grey dashed lines, respectively. (b) Same as in (a) but, for the transition matter densities. (c) Same as in (a) but, for the 0+ 2 state. (d) Calculated densityρ0+ 2 ,0+ 2 (r) denoted with the black solid line is compared with the [α×ρE(r)], rescaled so that α×ρE(r = 0) = ρ0+ 2 ...

    work page

  53. [70]

    The red solid lines in the figure represent the predictions of the standard Brazilian Nuclear Potential (BNP)

    at 53.4 and 63.9 MeV, similar incident energies with the present analysis, are emphasized with the magenta stars. The red solid lines in the figure represent the predictions of the standard Brazilian Nuclear Potential (BNP). The blue dashed lines were obtained considering the renormalization of the BNP through the NR and NI values discussed in Supplementa...

    work page

  54. [71]

    Satchler, G. R. Direct Nuclear Reactions(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983)

    work page 1983

  55. [72]

    & Gasques, L

    Chamon, L., Carlson, B. & Gasques, L. S˜ ao Paulo potential version 2 (SPP2) and Brazilian nuclear potential (BNP). Computer Physics Communications 267, 108061 (2021). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0010465521001739

    work page 2021

  56. [73]

    C., Gasques, L

    Chamon, L. C., Gasques, L. R. & Carlson, B. V. Approximate treatment of relativistic effects in the low-energy α+αscattering. Phys. Rev. C 84, 044607 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.044607

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.044607 2011

  57. [74]

    & De Vries, C

    De Vries, H., De Jager, C. & De Vries, C. Nuclear charge-density-distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 36, 495–536 (1987). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0092640X87900131

    work page arXiv 1987

  58. [75]

    & Love, W

    Satchler, G. & Love, W. Folding model potentials from realistic interactions for heavy-ion scattering. Physics Reports 55, 183–254 (1979). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370157379900814

    work page arXiv 1979

  59. [76]

    & Ihara, N

    Takigawa, N., Rumin, T. & Ihara, N. Coulomb interaction between spherical and deformed nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 61, 044607 (2000). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevC.61.044607

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.61.044607 2000

  60. [77]

    Chamon, L. C. & Morales-Botero, D. F. Folding-type coupling potentials in the context of the generalized rotation–vibration model. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 45, 035104 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6471/aaa8b5

    work page 2018

  61. [78]

    Hiyama, E., Gibson, B. F. & Kamimura, M. Four-body calculation of the first excited state of 4He using a realistic nn interaction: 4He(e,e ′ )4He(0+ 2 ) and the monopole sum rule. Phys. Rev. C 70, 031001 (2004). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.031001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.70.031001 2004

  62. [79]

    & Orlandini, G

    Bacca, S., Barnea, N., Leidemann, W. & Orlandini, G. Examination of the first excited state of 4He as a potential breathing mode. Phys. Rev. C 91, 024303 (2015). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.024303 2015

  63. [80]

    Viviani, M., Kievsky, A., Marcucci, L. E. & Girlanda, L. Study of the alpha- particle monopole transition form factor. Few Body Systems 65, 74 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-024-01940-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-024-01940-2 2024

  64. [81]

    & Lee, D

    Meißner, U.-G., Shen, S., Elhatisari, S. & Lee, D. Ab initio calculation of the alpha-particle monopole transition form factor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 062501 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.062501. 16

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.062501 2024

  65. [82]

    L., Phillips, G

    Russell, J. L., Phillips, G. C. & Reich, C. W. Scattering of alpha particles from helium. Phys. Rev. 104, 135–142 (1956). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.104.135

    work page 1956

  66. [83]

    Heydenburg, N. P. & Temmer, G. M. Alpha-alpha scattering at low ener- gies. Phys. Rev. 104, 123–134 (1956). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.104.123

    work page 1956

  67. [84]

    O., Briggs, G

    Nilson, R., Kerman, R. O., Briggs, G. R. & Jentschke, W. Alpha-alpha particle scattering in the energy range 12.3 to 22.9 MeV. Phys. Rev. 104, 1673–1680 (1956). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.104.1673

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.104.1673 1956

  68. [85]

    Bacher, A. D. et al. Observation of high-lying levels in 8Be from α−αelastic scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1331–1333 (1972). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.1331

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.29.1331 1972

  69. [86]

    Tombrello, T. A. & Senhouse, L. S. Elastic scattering of alpha particles from helium. Phys. Rev. 129, 2252–2258 (1963). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRev.129.2252

    work page 1963

  70. [87]

    Chien, W. S. & Brown, R. E. Study of the α+αsystem below 15 MeV (c.m.). Phys. Rev. C 10, 1767–1784 (1974). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.10.1767

    work page 1974

  71. [88]

    C., Carlson, B

    Chamon, L. C., Carlson, B. V. & Gasques, L. R. α+αscattering reexamined in the context of the s˜ ao paulo potential. Phys. Rev. C 83, 034617 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034617

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.034617 2011

  72. [89]

    Bredin, D. J. et al. The scattering of alpha particles by helium. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 251, 143–155 (1959). URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/100757

    work page 1959

  73. [90]

    Contribution ` a l’´ etude de l’interactionα−α

    Darriulat, P. Contribution ` a l’´ etude de l’interactionα−α. Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris (1965)

    work page 1965

  74. [91]

    Darriulat, P., Igo, G., Pugh, H. G. & Holmgren, H. D. Elastic scattering of alpha particles by helium between 53 and 120 MeV. Phys. Rev. 137, B315–B325 (1965). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.137.B315

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.137.b315 1965

  75. [92]

    Kamada, H. et al. Benchmark test calculation of a four-nucleon bound state. Phys. Rev. C 64, 044001 (2001)

    work page 2001

  76. [93]

    & Orlandini, G

    Bacca, S., Barnea, N., Leidemann, W. & Orlandini, G. Isoscalar monopole reso- nance of the alpha particle: A prism to nuclear hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 042503 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.042503. 17

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.042503 2013

  77. [94]

    Kegel, S. et al. Measurement of the α-particle monopole transition form factor challenges theory: A low-energy puzzle for nuclear forces? Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 152502 (2023). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.152502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.152502 2023

  78. [95]

    & P/suppress loszajczak, M

    Michel, N., Nazarewicz, W. & P/suppress loszajczak, M. Description of the proton-decaying 0+ 2 resonance of the αparticle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 242502 (2023). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.242502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.242502 2023

  79. [96]

    Yin, P. et al. α-particle monopole form factors within the ab initio no-core shell model. Phys. Rev. C 112, L031303 (2025). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/1pxs-xjtl

    work page 2025

  80. [97]

    & Hale, G

    Tilley, D., Weller, H. & Hale, G. Energy levels of light nuclei A = 4. Nuclear Physics A 541, 1–104 (1992)

    work page 1992

Showing first 80 references.