Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Fluid Antenna-Empowered Receive Spatial Modulation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Equipping a receive spatial modulation transmitter with a fluid antenna that activates several correlated ports at once substantially lowers BER, and cheap port selection and detection retain most of the gain.

desk verdict A well-executed, first integration of fluid antennas and receive spatial modulation, with honest reporting of its model-bound assumptions; the main caveats are the inherited FAS channel model and a Monte-Carlo-tuned detector threshold. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07362 v1 pith:FR2L2N77 submitted 2025-06-09 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Xinghao Guo , Yin Xu , Dazhi He , Cixiao Zhang , Hanjiang Hong , Kai-Kit Wong , Chan-Byoung Chae , Wenjun Zhang
show 1 more author
Yiyan Wu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT MSC 94A0594A15
keywords fluidantennareceivespatialmodulationportselectionprecodingcorrelationMIMOlow-complexitydetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes FA-RSM, a receive spatial modulation system in which the transmitter is a fluid antenna that simultaneously activates multiple ports. It claims that this setup substantially improves bit error rate over conventional RSM, and that the improvement survives when port selection and detection are done with low-complexity algorithms. The paper also provides theoretical evidence that activating more ports improves performance, but that the gain saturates as port correlation grows. The practical upshot is that fluid-antenna port selection can make RSM more reliable in the downlink without requiring exhaustive search at the transmitter or maximum-likelihood search at the receiver.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the reduction of optimal port selection to a trace-minimization problem: at high SNR, maximizing capacity is equivalent to minimizing $\mathrm{tr}\big((H_I H_I^H)^{-1}\big)$ over the activated port set $I$. The TMD algorithm solves this greedily by deleting one port at a time, using the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula to update the inverse in $O(N_r^2)$ per step, while MCE-TMD first removes highly correlated port pairs using only inner products and norms, then applies TMD on the remaining ports. On the detection side, the precoding structure makes the received signal concentrate on one receive antenna, so the two-stage MED picks the largest-energy received component and then demaps the symbol, with RTTD switching to MLD when the largest and second-largest energies are too close, as happens under strong noise with MMSE precoding.

What would settle it

Measure the actual spatial correlation between fluid-antenna ports in a prototype, then re-run the Fig. 2 BER comparison with that measured covariance instead of the $j_0$ model; if the FA-RSM gain over conventional RSM disappears or reverses, the central performance claim rests on the assumed correlation structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that placing a fluid antenna at the transmitter of a receive spatial modulation system, and activating several of its correlated ports at once, yields significantly lower BER than fixed-antenna RSM, while keeping the receiver friendly. The paper develops an optimal port selection rule based on capacity maximization, then shows that at high SNR this rule reduces to minimizing the trace of $(H_I H_I^H)^{-1}$, which can be solved greedily with rank-one updates. From this it derives two low-complexity port selectors, TMD and its correlation-assisted variant MCE-TMD, plus two low-complexity detectors: a two-stage maximum-energy detector (MED) for ZF precoding, and a ratio-threshold detector (RTTD) that restores near-ML performance under MMSE precoding. The theoretical analysis proves that the capacity loss from selecting fewer ports decreases as more ports are activated, with an SNR-independent upper bound under ZF precoding, and that the MMSE mean-square error similarly falls with more activated ports.

Load-bearing premise

The entire analysis assumes the fluid-antenna channel obeys the prescribed correlation model $\mathbf{H} = \check{\mathbf{H}} \mathbf{J}_t^{1/2}$ with $j_0(2\pi d/\lambda)$ port correlation and that the transmitter has perfect channel state information, so if real channels correlate differently or CSI is imperfect, the reported gains and saturation trends could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Downlink RSM can harvest spatial diversity from a compact fluid antenna with only a few extra selectable ports, avoiding the need for many conventional transmit antennas.
  • Port selection does not require exhaustive search: TMD matches the optimal capacity-based selection within roughly 0.2 dB (MMSE) and 0.4 dB (ZF) at a BER of $10^{-4}$, while MCE-TMD stays within about 0.6 dB (MMSE) and 1 dB (ZF) at lower complexity.
  • Activating more ports improves BER and lowers both the ZF capacity-loss bound and the MMSE MSE, but with diminishing returns whose strength is set by spatial correlation, giving a quantitative guide for choosing $N_a$ and the fluid-antenna footprint.
  • The receiver can detect near-optimally at $O(N_r + M)$ complexity: MED suffices for ZF precoding, while RTTD closes the MMSE gap by falling back to MLD only when the energy ratio is ambiguous.
  • The same capacity-loss upper bound and MSE formulas can be used to compare different fluid-antenna layouts before running full simulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If measured fluid-antenna channels deviate from the assumed $j_0(2\pi d/\lambda)$ correlation model, the saturation point and the relative gains of the selection algorithms could shift, so the strongest test is to rerun the comparisons with measured covariance matrices.
  • The RTTD threshold $\gamma = 0.6$ is chosen from Monte Carlo histograms at two SNR points; an SNR-adaptive or learned threshold could preserve near-ML performance over a wider operating range than a fixed threshold.
  • The trace-minimization decremental logic should carry over to generalized RSM and to systems with fluid antennas at both link ends, where the index dimension and port selection interact in a similar way.
  • Because the ZF capacity-loss upper bound is SNR-independent, port selection might be performable from statistical CSI in slowly varying channels, avoiding per-slot exhaustive computation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes FA-RSM, a downlink transmission scheme in which a transmitter equipped with a fluid antenna activates a subset of its ports and uses ZF or MMSE precoding to implement receive spatial modulation. The authors contribute an exhaustive capacity-based port-selection benchmark, a greedy trace-minimization decremental algorithm (TMD), a correlation-assisted low-complexity variant (MCE-TMD), a theoretical analysis of how the number of activated ports affects capacity and MSE, and two low-complexity detectors (MED and RTTD). Simulation results show that the proposed FA-RSM system substantially lowers BER relative to conventional RSM, that the suboptimal port-selection algorithms incur small losses, and that activating more ports yields diminishing returns because of spatial correlation.

Significance. The paper is clearly structured and addresses a relevant problem at the intersection of fluid antenna systems and spatial modulation. If the results hold, the TMD and MCE-TMD selection algorithms are simple and effective, and the theoretical monotonicity results (more ports do not decrease capacity or increase MSE) are correct. The simulations support the qualitative claims. However, the quantitative conclusions rest on a single correlated-Rayleigh FAS channel model, on perfect CSIT, and on a detector threshold tuned by Monte Carlo simulation for the default configuration; these limitations, together with the absence of code/data and of realistic CSIT overhead modeling, temper the strength of the contributions. The work is a solid incremental step that would benefit from additional robustness evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [III-B, Eqs. (19)-(21) and Algorithm 1] The Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury derivation is written for the wrong Gram matrix. Eq. (19) claims (H_{-i}^H H_{-i})^{-1} = (H^H H - h_i h_i^H)^{-1}, but H^H H is an N x N singular matrix when N > N_r, while the left side is (N-1) x (N-1). The correct identity is (H_{-i} H_{-i}^H)^{-1} = (H H^H - h_i h_i^H)^{-1}, with A = (H H^H)^{-1}. Consequently the numerator in Eq. (21) should read tr(A h_i h_i^H A) = ||A h_i||^2, not ||A h_i||. Because ||A h_i|| and ||A h_i||^2 give the same arg-min over i, Algorithm 1 still works, but the displayed derivation is formally incorrect and needs to be fixed.
  2. [V-B, Eqs. (38)-(39) and Fig. 8] The RTTD threshold gamma is selected as 0.6 from Monte Carlo histograms (Fig. 7) at two SNRs for the default configuration. The paper does not analyze how gamma should scale with SNR, N_a, N_r, the constellation size, or the port geometry, nor does it give the average complexity of RTTD, which invokes full MLD whenever r >= gamma. The claim that RTTD achieves 'near-optimal detection performance with low computational complexity' is therefore not fully supported; the authors should provide a sensitivity study of gamma and an average-complexity expression.
  3. [VI-A, Fig. 2] The headline comparison with 'traditional RSM' uses fixed antennas with no selection, whereas FA-RSM selects ports using CSIT over all N ports. The reported BER gains thus conflate the benefit of having more transmit ports with the benefit of antenna selection, and the overhead of obtaining CSIT for all N ports is not modeled. To make the performance claim more convincing, the authors should compare against RSM with an existing receive-antenna-selection algorithm under identical CSI assumptions, or explicitly frame the comparison as a selection-gain illustration.
  4. [II-A, Eqs. (1)-(3) and VI] All simulations and both low-complexity selection algorithms rely on the FAS channel model of [19], with j0 spatial correlation and perfect CSI. Since MCE-TMD explicitly pre-exploits this correlation structure, the reported gains and the saturation behavior could change under a different correlation kernel (e.g., 2D Jakes J0) or with channel estimation error. A robustness experiment with an alternative kernel or with CSI mismatch, even for one key figure, would substantially strengthen the generality of the conclusions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'an optimal algorithm from a capacity maximization perspective are proposed' has a subject-verb agreement error; it should read 'an optimal algorithm ... is proposed.'
  2. [III-D, Eq. (27)] The approximation O((N - N_b) N_b N_r) for MCE-TMD complexity is stated without qualification; it may not dominate the second-stage term O((N_b^2 - N_a^2) N_r^2) when N_r is large. The authors should state the parameter regime in which the approximation holds.
  3. [Fig. 4 and Fig. 5] The y-axis labels in Figs. 4 and 5 should include units or clarify that capacity loss is in bpcu and MSE is dimensionless; otherwise the reader cannot interpret the magnitudes.
  4. [References] Several references are cited with page ranges 'pp. 1-1' (e.g., [6], [7], [9], [12], [15], [37], [39]), indicating early-access versions; these should be updated to the final published pagination where available.
  5. [III-C, Algorithm 2] In step 3 of Algorithm 2, the inner product <h_{n(b)}, h_{\bar{n}(b)}> is used as a correlation metric, but the Euclidean norms of the columns are later used to decide which port to remove; a brief explanation of why the inner product (rather than a normalized correlation) is appropriate would improve clarity, as would a note on tie-breaking.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivations are supported by external theorems or evaluated against an external baseline, so the paper's claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain and found no step where a prediction is forced by definition or by a self-citation chain. The capacity-based port-selection criterion in Eqs. (14)-(15) is imported from the MIMO-FAS literature and used only as a design objective; it is not defined in terms of the later performance claims. The theoretical result that more activated ports improve capacity/MSE (Section IV) relies on the external Theorem and lemma of [41] plus standard matrix inequalities, not on the paper's own fitted values. The TMD and MCE-TMD algorithms are greedy heuristics whose quality is judged by BER against the optimal algorithm and against conventional RSM, both external metrics. The RTTD threshold gamma=0.6 is selected from Monte Carlo histograms of the ratio statistic rather than fitted to the BER curve itself, so the near-MLD BER result in Fig. 8 is an empirical outcome, not a construction artifact. Finally, the channel model in Eqs. (1)-(3) is borrowed from [19] as a stated modeling assumption; while [19] shares authors with this paper, it is a published external model with stated assumptions and is not an unverified uniqueness claim. All reported gains are conditional on that model, which limits generality but does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on a specific correlated Rayleigh channel model and perfect CSI; neither is independently validated here. The RTTD threshold and N_b are tuned design parameters. No new physical entities are introduced; FA-RSM is a system architecture over existing antenna and precoding concepts.

free parameters (2)
  • RTTD threshold gamma = 0.6
    Chosen from Monte Carlo histograms at SNR = -5 dB and 10 dB for the default configuration (Section V.B, Fig. 7). Detector performance and complexity trade-off depend on it.
  • MCE-TMD pre-selection size N_b = 12
    Hand-chosen number of ports kept after the correlation-based pre-selection stage in simulations (Section VI.B). It controls the trade-off between complexity and performance of MCE-TMD.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The FA channel is H = H_tilde J_t^(1/2), with correlation matrix entries j0(2*pi/lambda times distance) and i.i.d. Rayleigh entries in H_tilde.
    Introduced in Section II.A (Eqs. (1)-(3)) and inherited from [19]. All simulations and port-selection algorithms rely on this model.
  • domain assumption Perfect CSI at the transmitter is available for port selection and precoding.
    Assumed implicitly in Sections II.B-III; the algorithms compute H and update (H H^H)^-1 without estimation error.
  • domain assumption Gaussian-input capacity with equal power is a valid proxy for the achievable rate of RSM with discrete symbols and antenna indices.
    Used in Eq. (14) for optimal port selection; the paper does not derive a discrete-input mutual information for the SM signaling.
  • ad hoc to paper At high SNR, capacity maximization reduces to minimizing tr((H_I H_I^H)^-1).
    Stated approximation in Section III.B (Eqs. (16)-(17)) that motivates the TMD algorithm; it is only asymptotically exact.
  • standard math The capacity monotonicity C_I < C_hatI for nested port sets, and tr(D) > 0, taken from [41].
    Used in Section IV.A to establish that activating more ports improves capacity and to bound capacity loss.
  • standard math The MMSE MSE formula from [42].
    Used in Section IV.B, Eq. (32), to evaluate MMSE port selection without deriving a capacity loss.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluid Antenna-Empowered Receive Spatial Modulation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FR2L2N77

@misc{pith2026250607362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluid Antenna-Empowered Receive Spatial Modulation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FR2L2N77}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07362}
}
read the original abstract

Fluid antenna (FA), as an emerging antenna technology, fully exploits spatial diversity. This paper integrates FA with the receive spatial modulation (RSM) scheme and proposes a novel FA-empowered RSM (FA-RSM) system. In this system, the transmitter is equipped with an FA that simultaneously activates multiple ports to transmit precoded signals. We address three key challenges in the FA-RSM system: port selection, theoretical analysis, and detection. First, for port selection, an optimal algorithm from a capacity maximization perspective are proposed, followed by two low-complexity alternatives. Second, for theoretical analysis, performance evaluation metrics are provided for port selection, which demonstrate that increasing the number of activated ports enhances system performance. Third, regarding detection, two low-complexity detectors are proposed. Simulation results confirm that the FA-RSM system significantly outperforms the conventional RSM system. The proposed low-complexity port selection algorithms facilitate minimal performance degradation. Moreover, while activating additional ports improves performance, the gain gradually saturates due to inherent spatial correlation, highlighting the importance of effective port selection in reducing system complexity and cost. Finally, both proposed detectors achieve near-optimal detection performance with low computational complexity, emphasizing the receiver-friendly nature of the FA-RSM system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07362 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Block diagram of the proposed FA-RSM system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. BER performance of the FA-RSM system with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. BER performance comparison between traditional RSM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: MSE against SNR of FA-RSM with MMSE precoding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Histograms of the ratio r for the FA-RSM system with MMSE precoding over 107 trials: (a) SNR = -5 dB and (b) SNR = 10 dB. more significant as the spatial correlation strength increases, i.e., as W1 and W2 decrease. Therefore, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: BER performance against activated port number for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: BER performance of the FA-RSM system with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimization, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimization, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5541–5556, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Enhanced nonuniform constellations for high-capacity com- munications with low-complexity demappers,

    H. Hong, Y . Xu, Y . Wu, Y . Huang, N. Gao, D. He, H. Li, Y . Zhang, and W. Zhang, “Enhanced nonuniform constellations for high-capacity com- munications with low-complexity demappers,”IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 740–752, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [2]

    Spatially sparse precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    O. E. Ayach, S. Rajagopal, S. Abu-Surra, Z. Pi, and R. W. Heath, “Spatially sparse precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1499–1513, 2014

    2014

  4. [3]

    Detecting abrupt channel changes for IRS-assisted MIMO communication,

    R. Liu, Y . Xu, Y . Wu, D. He, W. Zhang, and C. W. Chen, “Detecting abrupt channel changes for IRS-assisted MIMO communication,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [4]

    A heterogeneous network transmission architecture based on NOMA for next-generation converged communications and broadcasting systems,

    X. Ou, H. Li, Y . Xu, D. He, W. Zhang, and Y . Wu, “A heterogeneous network transmission architecture based on NOMA for next-generation converged communications and broadcasting systems,”IEEE Trans. Broadcast., pp. 1–12, 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [5]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, 2021

    1950

  7. [6]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hardware designs,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, C. Wang, F. R. Ghadi, J. Zhang, J. Rao, R. Murch, P. Ram ´ırez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez, C.-B. Chae, and K.-F. Tong, “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hardware designs,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., pp. 1–1, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    Coded fluid antenna multiple access over fast fading channels,

    H. Hong, K.-K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, H. Shin, and Y . Zhang, “Coded fluid antenna multiple access over fast fading channels,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Liquid antennas: Past, present and future,

    Y . Huang, L. Xing, C. Song, S. Wang, and F. Elhouni, “Liquid antennas: Past, present and future,”IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag., vol. 2, pp. 473–487, 2021

    2021

  2. [9]

    Design and synthesis of antenna array with movable elements along semicircular paths,

    S. Basbug, “Design and synthesis of antenna array with movable elements along semicircular paths,”IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 3059–3062, 2017

    2017

  3. [10]

    A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,

    J. Zhang, J. Rao, Z. Li, Z. Ming, C.-Y . Chiu, K.-K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, and R. Murch, “A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,”IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag., pp. 1–1, 2024

    2024

  4. [11]

    Performance limits of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Performance limits of fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2469–2472, 2020

    2020

  5. [12]

    A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems,

    P. Ram ´ırez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez, and K.-K. Wong, “A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, 2024

    2024

  6. [13]

    Port selection for fluid antenna systems,

    Z. Chai, K.-K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Port selection for fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1180–1184, 2022

    2022

  7. [14]

    Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, 2024

    2024

  8. [15]

    Flexible antenna arrays for wireless communications: Modeling and performance evaluation,

    S. Yang, J. An, Y . Xiu, W. Lyu, B. Ning, Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, and C. Yuen, “Flexible antenna arrays for wireless communications: Modeling and performance evaluation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  9. [16]

    Performance analysis of FAS-aided backscatter communications,

    F. Rostami Ghadi, M. Kaveh, K.-K. Wong, and Y . Zhang, “Performance analysis of FAS-aided backscatter communications,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2412–2416, 2024

    2024

  10. [17]

    Physical layer security over fluid antenna sys- tems: Secrecy performance analysis,

    F. Rostami Ghadi, K.-K. Wong, F. Javier L ´opez-Mart´ınez, W. Kiat New, H. Xu, and C.-B. Chae, “Physical layer security over fluid antenna sys- tems: Secrecy performance analysis,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18 201–18 213, 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    On performance of RIS-aided fluid antenna systems,

    F. Rostami Ghadi, K.-K. Wong, W. K. New, H. Xu, R. Murch, and Y . Zhang, “On performance of RIS-aided fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2175–2179, 2024. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 20XX 12

    2024

  12. [20]

    Fluid antenna- assisted MIMO transmission exploiting statistical CSI,

    Y . Ye, L. You, J. Wang, H. Xu, K.-K. Wong, and X. Gao, “Fluid antenna- assisted MIMO transmission exploiting statistical CSI,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 223–227, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Transmit and receive antenna port selection for channel capacity maximization in fluid-MIMO systems,

    C. N. Efrem and I. Krikidis, “Transmit and receive antenna port selection for channel capacity maximization in fluid-MIMO systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3202–3206, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Optimiz- ing configuration selection in reconfigurable-antenna MIMO systems: Physics-inspired heuristic solvers,

    I. Krikidis, C. Psomas, A. Kumar Singh, and K. Jamieson, “Optimiz- ing configuration selection in reconfigurable-antenna MIMO systems: Physics-inspired heuristic solvers,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 8010–8023, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Spatial modulation,

    R. Y . Mesleh, H. Haas, S. Sinanovic, C. W. Ahn, and S. Yun, “Spatial modulation,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2228–2241, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Generalised spatial modulation,

    A. Younis, N. Serafimovski, R. Mesleh, and H. Haas, “Generalised spatial modulation,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Rec. 44th Asilomar Conf. Signals, Syst. Comput., 2010, pp. 1498–1502

    2010

  17. [25]

    Transmitter preprocessing aided spatial modulation for multiple-input multiple-output systems,

    L.-L. Yang, “Transmitter preprocessing aided spatial modulation for multiple-input multiple-output systems,” inProc. IEEE V eh. Technol. Conf. (Spring), 2011, pp. 1–5

    2011

  18. [26]

    Transmit precod- ing for receive spatial modulation using imperfect channel knowledge,

    A. Stavridis, S. Sinanovic, M. Di Renzo, and H. Haas, “Transmit precod- ing for receive spatial modulation using imperfect channel knowledge,” inProc. IEEE V eh. Technol. Conf. (Spring), 2012, pp. 1–5

    2012

  19. [27]

    Generalised pre-coding aided spatial modulation,

    R. Zhang, L.-L. Yang, and L. Hanzo, “Generalised pre-coding aided spatial modulation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 5434–5443, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Fast receive antenna subset selection for pre-coding aided spatial modulation,

    J. Zheng, “Fast receive antenna subset selection for pre-coding aided spatial modulation,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 317–320, 2015

    2015

  21. [29]

    Efficient receive antenna selection for pre-coding aided spatial modulation,

    P. Wen, X. He, Y . Xiao, P. Yang, R. Shi, and K. Deng, “Efficient receive antenna selection for pre-coding aided spatial modulation,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 416–419, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Novel receive antenna selection scheme for precoding-aided spatial modulation with lattice reduction,

    S. Kim, “Novel receive antenna selection scheme for precoding-aided spatial modulation with lattice reduction,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 3575, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Transmit antenna selection for precoding-aided spatial modu- lation,

    S. Kim, “Transmit antenna selection for precoding-aided spatial modu- lation,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 40 723–40 731, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Efficient transmit antenna selection for receive spatial modulation-based massive MIMO,

    S. Kim, “Efficient transmit antenna selection for receive spatial modulation-based massive MIMO,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 152 034– 152 044, 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    Corre- lation mitigation schemes for index-modulated fluid antenna systems,

    E. Faddoul, Y . Guo, G. M. Kraidy, C. Psomas, and I. Krikidis, “Corre- lation mitigation schemes for index-modulated fluid antenna systems,” inProc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), 2023, pp. 5324– 5329

    2023

  26. [34]

    Advanced channel coding designs for index-modulated fluid antenna systems,

    E. Faddoul, G. M. Kraidy, C. Psomas, and I. Krikidis, “Advanced channel coding designs for index-modulated fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 726–739, 2025

    2025

  27. [35]

    Fluid antenna index modulation communications,

    Y . Chen and T. Xu, “Fluid antenna index modulation communications,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1203–1207, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Position index modulation for fluid antenna system,

    H. Yang, H. Xu, K.-K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, R. Murch, S. Jin, and Y . Zhang, “Position index modulation for fluid antenna system,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16 773–16 787, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Index modulation for fluid antenna-assisted MIMO communications: System design and performance analysis,

    J. Zhu, G. Chen, P. Gao, P. Xiao, Z. Lin, and A. Quddus, “Index modulation for fluid antenna-assisted MIMO communications: System design and performance analysis,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Fluid antenna index modulation for MIMO systems: Robust transmission and low-complexity detection,

    X. Guo, Y . Xu, D. He, C. Zhang, H. Hong, K.-K. Wong, W. Zhang, and Y . Wu, “Fluid antenna index modulation for MIMO systems: Robust transmission and low-complexity detection,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04877

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Fluid antenna empowered index modulation for RIS-aided mmwave transmis- sions,

    J. Zhu, Q. Luo, G. Chen, P. Xiao, Y . Xiao, and K.-K. Wong, “Fluid antenna empowered index modulation for RIS-aided mmwave transmis- sions,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1635–1647, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan,Matrix computations. JHU press, 2013

    2013

  33. [41]

    Performance analysis and algorithm designs for transmit antenna selection in linearly precoded multiuser MIMO systems,

    P.-H. Lin and S.-H. Tsai, “Performance analysis and algorithm designs for transmit antenna selection in linearly precoded multiuser MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1698–1708, 2012

    2012

  34. [42]

    Linear transmit processing in MIMO communications systems,

    M. Joham, W. Utschick, and J. Nossek, “Linear transmit processing in MIMO communications systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 2700–2712, 2005

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.