InfoDense: Density-Aware Regional Decisive Replay for Memory-Efficient Incremental Face Forgery Detection

Baojin Huang; Guangcheng Wang; Hao Shen; Jikang Cheng; Renye Yan; Xueyi Zhang; Zhongyuan Wang

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 294 references

InfoDense: Density-Aware Regional Decisive Replay for Memory-Efficient Incremental Face Forgery Detection

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Replaying only the artifact-dense regions of a face, not the whole image, reduces memory and improves incremental deepfake detection while also cutting identity leakage from the replay buffer.

desk verdict The core idea is sound and interesting, but the reported SOTA comparisons are not auditable and two ablation tables contain copy errors; treat the numbers as unverified and ask for a re-run. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16873 v1 pith:FV3RYK75 submitted 2026-07-18 cs.CV

Jikang Cheng , Hao Shen , Xueyi Zhang , Guangcheng Wang , Zhongyuan Wang , Renye Yan , Baojin Huang This is my paper

classification cs.CV

keywords incrementalfaceforgerydetectionreplaystrategycatastrophicforgettingcross-domaingeneralizationCLIPdecisivepatchesmemory-efficientprivacy-preserving

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that face-forgery replay buffers waste limited memory on redundant whole-face images, and that storing only the artifact-dense regions of each face is enough to preserve the knowledge a detector needs. It proposes InfoDense, a three-stage strategy: it cuts each historical face into fan-shaped segments, scores every patch by its similarity to a forgery-representative CLIP text embedding, and stores the segment that concentrates the most decisive patches while remaining representative in latent space. Stored fragments are later fused onto current-task samples, with deliberate inter-task and intra-task mixing to avoid class and task bias. On two incremental deepfake protocols, InfoDense reports higher average AUC than recent replay baselines, a lower forgetting rate, and near-zero identity-retrieval recall for stored samples. A sympathetic reader will take this as evidence that spatial compression of replay data can simultaneously reduce memory, improve generalization, and mitigate a privacy risk.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the 'decisive patch' — a local image region whose CLIP embedding aligns most closely with forgery semantics. Around it, InfoDense builds three operations: InfoDense Cut uses a two-pointer scan over ClockMix fan-shaped segments to find the segment that covers the maximum number of decisive patches; InfoDense Select ranks segments by a weighted combination of latent-space centroid distance and decisive-patch count; InfoDense Fuse reconstructs unbiased training inputs by masking stored segments onto current-task images with inter-task and intra-task mixing. The underlying assumption is that forgery cues are redundant enough across the face that one compact, center-anch

What would settle it

Re-run the leading baselines (e.g., DFIL, SUR-LID) on the same CLIP ViT-L/14 backbone with the same replay-buffer byte budget and sample count; if their average AUC reaches or exceeds InfoDense's, the regional-selection strategy is not the source of the gain. Alternatively, swap the CLIP-similarity decisive-patch scorer for random scores while keeping the same cut-and-fuse pipeline; a non-drop would show density-awareness is not doing the work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

InfoDense's central claim is that facial forgery evidence is spatially concentrated and center-symmetric, so replaying an entire face is wasteful. The paper retains, for each historical face, only the fan-shaped segment with the largest number of 'decisive patches' — the top-10 CLIP image tokens most similar to a forgery-representative text embedding. Candidate segments are ranked by a weighted sum of cosine similarity to the task's feature centroid (representativeness) and decisive-patch count (information density), and the top-m are stored. At training time, stored segments are pasted onto current-task images with a binary mask, using four real/fake label combinations across tasks plus int

Load-bearing premise

The reported wins over prior methods rest on the assumption that those baselines would fare the same on the CLIP ViT-L/14 backbone under an identical replay-memory budget, which the paper does not itself re-run.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Under a fixed memory budget, storing 1/n-size segments enables roughly n times more historical samples to be replayed, which should reduce catastrophic forgetting for any replay-based continual detector.
Replay selection based on decisive patches steers the model toward intrinsic manipulation cues rather than dataset-specific background, which the paper shows as higher AUC on unseen diffusion and wild datasets.
Storing fragments instead of full faces reduces identity-retrieval recall to near zero, turning replay storage into a partial de-identification mechanism.
Global lossy compression (JPEG) degrades high-frequency forgery traces, whereas spatial compression preserves original pixels in decisive areas, so the paper's spatial-selection strategy dominates quality-compression at matched storage.
The fusion scheme's combination of inter-task and intra-task mixing prevents fusion-boundary shortcuts, as evidenced by the ablation that drops performance when only inter-task fusion is used.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The decisive-patch scoring depends on CLIP's text-image alignment and on the encoder having acquired some forgery awareness from earlier tasks; a natural test is whether using the detector's own attention or a non-CLIP local-artifact score changes the gains, which would separate the density prior from the backbone.
The main tables compare InfoDense's CLIP ViT-L/14 results against baselines reproduced from other architectures, so the incremental and cross-domain gaps may shrink if every method is re-run on the same backbone and the same byte budget; a direct re-implementation would settle how much of the gain is the regional-decisive strategy itself.
If the facial-redundancy hypothesis is right, similar regional-decisive replay should benefit other continual perception tasks with localized cues (e.g., forgery of documents, medical image artifacts), where full-image replay is also memory-inefficient.
The privacy argument is measured only by face-recognition retrieval; membership inference or attribute inference on fused samples could still leak identity, so the de-identification claim is narrower than 'privacy-safe'.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The thing to know: this is a plausible and well-motivated replay compression method for incremental face forgery detection, but the headline numbers should not be believed as reported. The paper stores only the most forgery-relevant fan-shaped segments of each face, selected with CLIP-based decisive-patch scoring plus latent representativeness, and fuses them into current-task images for replay. The motivation that full faces are redundant for replay is sensible, and the appendix makes a good-faith attempt to show that the pixel reduction translates into real byte savings.

What is actually new is the combination: CLIP-based patch scoring for localization, fan-shaped density-ranked segment selection, and cut-mix-style fusion all in one IFFD pipeline. I do not see that exact assembly in the cited prior work. Where the ablations are legible, they support the design choices: density-aware selection beats random and center selection, and the fusion strategy beats isolated self-fusion. The privacy leakage analysis is a useful addition.

The soft spots are real and load-bearing. Table 1 compares against published baseline numbers, not re-implementations on the same CLIP ViT-L/14 backbone, and it reports no replay memory budget or compression ratio for any row. The claimed gains over SUR-LID and GPL could therefore come from the stronger backbone or from storing more samples, not from regional replay. Worse, the copy errors are verifiable: in Table 2, Base(DFIL)'s cross-dataset row is identical to L-Bound's row from Table 1, not to DFIL's own cross-dataset row; in Table 3, Random's cross-dataset row is identical to ClockMix's row in Table 2. Those errors make the internal ablations unreliable as printed. No error bars and no code round out the auditability problem.

None of this kills the concept. The appendix directly addresses the circularity worry by noting the CLIP scorer is only used in later tasks after the model has some forgery awareness, which is acceptable as a replay-selection prior. The authors seem to know what the right experiments are; they just have not run the controlled version of the main comparison.

For peer review: yes, send it to a serious referee. The idea deserves evaluation, and the fixes are incremental rather than conceptual. I would not cite the numbers until they are reproduced under matched conditions, but I might cite the method idea. Worth a reading-group slot for a discussion of how much reproducibility matters in continual learning papers.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes InfoDense, a replay-based incremental face forgery detection (IFFD) method that stores only compact, forgery-decisive facial regions instead of full images. The pipeline consists of InfoDense Cut (CLIP-based localization of decisive patches and extraction of the fan-shaped segment containing the most such patches), InfoDense Select (ranking candidates by a weighted combination of latent-space representativeness and decisive-patch density), and InfoFuse (reconstructing training inputs by fusing stored segments with current-task samples, including inter-task and intra-task mixing). The authors report state-of-the-art results on a Protocol 1 benchmark: incremental average AUC 90.42 vs. 86.29 for SUR-LID, and cross-dataset average AUC 90.03 vs. 82.61 for GPL, while claiming substantial storage reduction and privacy benefits. The paper also includes ablations on compression strategies, selection strategies, fusion strategies, and storage-performance trade-offs.

Significance. The core idea — that regional decisive replay can reduce memory, increase replay diversity, and simultaneously improve cross-domain generalization — is well-motivated and potentially impactful for continual deepfake detection. The privacy analysis with ArcFace/CosFace retrieval is a useful and notable addition, and the proposed selection criterion in Eq. (4) is concrete and falsifiable. If the empirical claims are confirmed under controlled conditions, InfoDense would be a meaningful step toward memory-efficient and privacy-aware IFFD. However, the central empirical claim is currently not established: the main comparison is not controlled for backbone or replay budget, and the internal ablation tables contain apparent copy errors. These issues are load-bearing and must be addressed before the contribution can be assessed.

major comments (4)

[§3.2, Table 1] The headline comparison is not controlled. Implementation Details (§3.1) state that InfoDense uses a pre-trained CLIP ViT-L/14 backbone, but the table gives no information about the backbone, replay memory budget, or buffer size m for any baseline row. The text claims 'under the same memory budget,' but the budget is never specified. Because the baseline rows are taken from published papers (e.g., DFIL MM'23, SUR-LID CVPR'25) that use different architectures, the reported gains (+4.13 incremental, +7.42 cross-dataset vs. the best baselines) could reflect the stronger backbone or a larger replay count rather than the regional replay strategy. Please re-run all baselines on the same CLIP ViT-L/14 backbone with identical replay storage budget, training epochs, and optimizer, and report the budget explicitly.
[§3.3, Tables 2 and 3] The ablation tables contain apparent copy errors that make the internal evidence unreliable. In Table 2, the Base(DFIL) cross-dataset row (43.36, 88.31, 51.90, 63.87, 61.86) is identical to the L-Bound row of Table 1, not to DFIL's own row in Table 1 (76.53, 84.87, 70.01, 87.03, 79.61). In Table 3, the Random cross-dataset row is identical to the ClockMix row of Table 2 (83.40, 84.56, 73.78, 81.20, 80.58). These inconsistencies prevent the reader from verifying the claimed advantages of density-aware selection over random selection and of InfoDense over the DFIL baseline. Please correct the tables and re-verify all numbers.
[§2.2, Eq. (1)–(4); Appendix 7.2] The decisive-patch scorer (Eq. (1)) and the representativeness term (Eq. (4)) both use the same CLIP-based model f(·, θ_{t-1}) that is being incrementally trained. Appendix 7.2 confirms that the score is only used after the model has learned forgery-awareness from prior tasks, so the replay selection is not independent of the model's current inductive bias. This creates a self-reinforcing loop: the model selects fragments it already considers decisive, which may amplify dataset-specific artifacts rather than intrinsic forgery cues. The cross-domain generalization claim would be substantially strengthened by comparing against an independent localizer (e.g., zero-shot CLIP or a fixed Grad-CAM from a pre-trained backbone) and showing that the gains persist. Please add such an experiment or otherwise control for this effect.
[§3.1, Fig. 4; Appendix 2] The memory-efficiency claim is expressed only as a pixel-compression ratio n, but actual storage cost depends on the image encoding. Appendix 2 proposes a row-array encoding to make storage reduction 'strictly match' n%, but it is not stated whether the experiments in Fig. 4 and Tables 1–4 use this encoding or simply store masked/cropped images. Furthermore, the replay buffer size m is never specified in the main text. To make the efficiency claim auditable, please report actual storage in bytes (or the number of stored fragments per task) and state m for InfoDense and all baselines.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] The method is called 'InfoDense Fuse' in the abstract and Section 1, but 'InfoFuse' in Section 2.3. Please use one name consistently.
[§3.1, PD definition] The definition PD = M0 − MN is ambiguous: M0 and MN are described as average AUC in the base and final sessions, but it is unclear which datasets are included in these averages. Please define explicitly.
[§3.3, Table 2 caption] Table 2 is captioned 'Ablation study on compression strategies,' but the paragraph 'Impact of Regional Shapes and Patch Selection' refers to Table 2 for CutMix vs. ClockMix and CutMix+PD. Either the table or the paragraph should be retitled to avoid confusion.
[Appendix and text] There are stray '/uni0000...' strings in the manuscript (e.g., after Table 4 and in the appendix figure captions), which appear to be corrupted Unicode/PDF artifacts. These need to be removed in the production version.
[Reproducibility] No statement is provided about code or trained model release. For a paper whose central contribution is an algorithmic pipeline, a code-availability statement would be valuable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central empirical claim is grounded in external benchmark AUCs; the self-referential replay selection and nSeg metric are design-internal, not definitional predictions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a heuristic replay design (CLIP-based decisive-patch scoring, segment selection by representativeness and decisive-patch count, and fusion), and its headline claims are empirical AUC results on held-out frames and unseen datasets, not quantities that are definitionally equal to the method's inputs. The replay selector uses the same model that is later trained (Eqs. 1 and 4), which creates a self-reinforcing bias, but this does not force the reported test AUC: the model must still generalize to unselected test frames. The nSeg ablation compares the method against its own selection objective, so the finding that InfoDense has higher decisive-patch coverage is partially self-definitional, but the central conclusions are also supported by AUC, making this non-load-bearing. The uncontrolled backbone/memory-budget comparison and the apparent table copy errors are correctness/statistical-validity concerns, not circularity. Hyperparameter choices (K=10, λ=0.5) appear to have been selected using the same Protocol 1 evaluation, which is a test-set-selection risk, but the reported metrics are not fitted parameters renamed as predictions. Applying the prompt's strict standard of exhibiting a definitional reduction, no load-bearing circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The method adds a learned prompt token and a replay-selection criterion, both fit on the same data/benchmark; the central claim relies on several domain assumptions about facial redundancy, CLIP scoring, and baseline comparability.

free parameters (5)

K (number of decisive patches) = 10
Chosen via sensitivity analysis on Protocol 1 (Appendix Fig. 8) on the same benchmark used for main results; no separate validation split.
lambda (representativeness vs. density weight) = 0.5
Selected via ablation on the evaluation benchmarks (Appendix Table 6); tuned on the same data as the reported results.
n (compression ratio / fan angle divisor) = Unspecified for Table 1
Main results do not state the segment size; Fig. 4 sweeps n, so reported gains may reflect the best n rather than a fixed storage setting.
m (replay buffer size in segments) = Unspecified
Algorithm 1 takes m as input but the main paper never gives its value; storage budget across methods cannot be audited.
CLIP learnable prompt token / z_f = Learned via adapter, value not reported
The forgery-representative text embedding is produced by a trainable prompt and adapter, making it a fitted quantity whose exact form is not given.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Facial images contain substantial redundancy: discriminative forgery cues are concentrated in small regions, and the rest is irrelevant for replay.
This motivates cutting to 1/n segments (Sec. 2.1). It is empirically plausible and partially tested in Fig. 2, but not proven and could fail for some forgery types.
domain assumption CLIP cosine similarity between image patches and a text embedding is a valid forgery-decisive score.
Used in Eq. (1); relies on CLIP text-image alignment and on a separately trained adapter. The paper does not validate the score against ground-truth artifact masks.
domain assumption Baseline results in Table 1 are comparable to InfoDense despite possibly different backbones and memory budgets.
The paper uses CLIP ViT-L/14 and does not state baseline backbones or replay storage. Without this assumption, the SOTA comparison is invalid.
domain assumption 'Any inclusion of a fake segment implies the fused sample is fake' is a correct labeling rule.
Borrowed from ClockMix (a self-citation). If a fake fragment is blended onto a real face, labeling the composite fake may be reasonable but is a modeling choice.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of InfoDense: Density-Aware Regional Decisive Replay for Memory-Efficient Incremental Face Forgery Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FV3RYK75

@misc{pith2026260716873,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: InfoDense: Density-Aware Regional Decisive Replay for Memory-Efficient Incremental Face Forgery Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FV3RYK75}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16873}
}

read the original abstract

The rapid evolution of face forgery techniques has introduced an increasing variety of manipulations. Incremental Face Forgery Detection (IFFD), which incrementally adds new forgery data to fine-tune previously trained models, has emerged as a promising approach to handle evolving forgery threats. However, conventional replay-based IFFD methods suffer from catastrophic forgetting. Storing full historical images under limited memory often either fails to preserve subtle forgery cues or introduces domain bias, reducing the model's ability to learn intrinsic and transferable manipulation characteristics. In this paper, we propose a Density-Aware Regional Decisive replay strategy, termed InfoDense, to address these challenges. InfoDense prioritizes artifact-dense and forgery-critical regions, significantly reducing storage requirements while maintaining high-fidelity forgery evidence. We first introduce InfoDense Cut to localize decisive patches using CLIP-based embeddings. Then, InfoDense Select ranks candidate segments by combining latent-space representativeness and decisive patch counts, ensuring both diversity and information density in the replay buffer. Finally, InfoDense Fuse reconstructs unbiased training inputs by adaptively merging stored segments with current-task samples, enhancing knowledge retention and generalization. Extensive experiments on challenging incremental deepfake benchmarks demonstrate that InfoDense effectively mitigates catastrophic forgetting while improving cross-domain generalization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16873 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Performance impression on compressing redundant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The overall pipeline of the proposed InfoDense. We extract informative regional segments via a cut-and-select strategy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Storage-performance Pareto frontier under vary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Quantitative analysis of identity privacy protection. Top-1 and Top-3 recall rates denote the probability of retrieving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Performance comparison strictly aligned by the replay buffer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Robustness evaluation against test-time common image degradations across five progressive severity levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Visualization of InfoDense extraction. From left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: AA/AF results. 7.9 Privacy Analysis of Fused Training Samples Although InfoDense stores only fragmented facial regions, InfoFuse reconstructs complete training samples by combining historical fragments with current-task images. We therefore further examine whether th…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 27 linked inside Pith

[1]

Bousselham, W.; Boggust, A.; Chaybouti, S.; Strobelt, H.; and Kuehne, H. 2025. Legrad: An explainability method for vision transformers via feature formation sensitivity. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 20336--20345

2025
[2]

I.; Khvedchenya, E.; Parinov, A.; Druzhinin, M.; and Kalinin, A

Buslaev, A.; Iglovikov, V. I.; Khvedchenya, E.; Parinov, A.; Druzhinin, M.; and Kalinin, A. A. 2020. Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentations. Information, 11(2): 125

2020
[3]

Cao, J.; Ma, C.; Yao, T.; Chen, S.; Ding, S.; and Yang, X. 2022. End-to-End Reconstruction-Classification Learning for Face Forgery Detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4113--4122

2022
[4]

Chattopadhay, A.; Sarkar, A.; Howlader, P.; and Balasubramanian, V. N. 2018. Grad-cam++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks. In 2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV), 839--847. IEEE

2018
[5]

Chefer, H.; Gur, S.; and Wolf, L. 2021. Transformer interpretability beyond attention visualization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 782--791

2021
[6]

Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Song, Y.; Liu, L.; and Wang, J. 2022. Self-supervised learning of adversarial example: Towards good generalizations for deepfake detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 18710--18719

2022
[7]

Chen, S.; Yao, T.; Chen, Y.; Ding, S.; Li, J.; and Ji, R. 2021. Local relation learning for face forgery detection. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, 1081--1088

2021
[9]

Cheng, J.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, L.; Ai, J.; Zou, Q.; Li, C.; and Wang, Z. 2025 a . Stacking brick by brick: Aligned feature isolation for incremental face forgery detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 13927--13936

2025

Show all 294 references

[10]

Cheng, J.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Z.; and Li, C. 2024. Can we leave deepfake data behind in training deepfake detector? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 21979--21998

2024
[11]

Cheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, Q.; Yan, Z.; Liang, C.; Wang, Z.; and Li, C. 2025 b . Ed ˆ4: Explicit data-level debiasing for deepfake detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

2025
[12]

Cui, X.; Li, Y.; Luo, A.; Zhou, J.; and Dong, J. 2025 a . Forensics Adapter: Adapting CLIP for Generalizable Face Forgery Detection. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 19207--19217

2025
[13]

Cui, X.; Li, Y.; Luo, A.; Zhou, J.; and Dong, J. 2025 b . Forensics adapter: Adapting clip for generalizable face forgery detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 19207--19217

2025
[14]

Deng, J.; Guo, J.; Xue, N.; and Zafeiriou, S. 2019. Arcface: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4690--4699

2019
[16]

Dong, S.; Wang, J.; Ji, R.; Liang, J.; Fan, H.; and Ge, Z. 2023. Implicit identity leakage: The stumbling block to improving deepfake detection generalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3994--4004

2023
[17]

Guo, J.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, C.; Cao, D.; Lei, Z.; and Li, S. Z. 2020. Learning meta face recognition in unseen domains. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6163--6172

2020
[18]

Huang, B.; Wang, Z.; Yang, J.; Ai, J.; Zou, Q.; Wang, Q.; and Ye, D. 2023. Implicit Identity Driven Deepfake Face Swapping Detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4490--4499

2023
[19]

A.; and Afghah, F

Kashiani, H.; Talemi, N. A.; and Afghah, F. 2025. Freqdebias: Towards generalizable deepfake detection via consistency-driven frequency debiasing. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8775--8785. IEEE

2025
[20]

Kim, M.; Tariq, S.; and Woo, S. S. 2021. Cored: Generalizing fake media detection with continual representation using distillation. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 337--346

2021
[21]

Li, L.; Bao, J.; Zhang, T.; Yang, H.; Chen, D.; Wen, F.; and Guo, B. 2020 a . Face x-ray for more general face forgery detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 5001--5010

2020
[22]

Li, Y.; Chang, M.-C.; and Lyu, S. 2018. In ictu oculi: Exposing ai created fake videos by detecting eye blinking. In IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, 1--7

2018
[23]

Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Sun, P.; Qi, H.; and Lyu, S. 2020 b . Celeb-df: A large-scale challenging dataset for deepfake forensics. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3207--3216

2020
[24]

Li, Z.; and Hoiem, D. 2017. Learning without forgetting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 40(12): 2935--2947

2017
[25]

Liang, J.; Shi, H.; and Deng, W. 2022. Exploring disentangled content information for face forgery detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 128--145. Springer

2022
[26]

Luo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Schiele, B.; and Sun, Q. 2023. Class-incremental exemplar compression for class-incremental learning. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 11371--11380

2023
[28]

R.; and Andrew Gully, J

Nick Dufour, G. R.; and Andrew Gully, J. 2019. Deep Fake Detection Dataset. https://ai.googleblog.com/2019/09/contributing-data-to-deepfake-detection.html

2019
[29]

Pan, K.; Yin, Y.; Wei, Y.; Lin, F.; Ba, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Cavallaro, L.; and Ren, K. 2023. Dfil: Deepfake incremental learning by exploiting domain-invariant forgery clues. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 8035--8046

2023
[30]

Qian, Y.; Yin, G.; Sheng, L.; Chen, Z.; and Shao, J. 2020. Thinking in frequency: Face forgery detection by mining frequency-aware clues. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 86--103. Springer

2020
[31]

W.; Hallacy, C.; Ramesh, A.; Goh, G.; Agarwal, S.; Sastry, G.; Askell, A.; Mishkin, P.; Clark, J.; et al

Radford, A.; Kim, J. W.; Hallacy, C.; Ramesh, A.; Goh, G.; Agarwal, S.; Sastry, G.; Askell, A.; Mishkin, P.; Clark, J.; et al. 2021. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, 8748--8763. PMLR

2021
[32]

Rebuffi, S.-A.; Kolesnikov, A.; Sperl, G.; and Lampert, C. H. 2017. icarl: Incremental classifier and representation learning. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001--2010

2017
[33]

Rossler, A.; Cozzolino, D.; Verdoliva, L.; Riess, C.; Thies, J.; and Nie ner, M. 2019. Faceforensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1--11

2019
[34]

R.; Cogswell, M.; Das, A.; Vedantam, R.; Parikh, D.; and Batra, D

Selvaraju, R. R.; Cogswell, M.; Das, A.; Vedantam, R.; Parikh, D.; and Batra, D. 2017. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 618--626

2017
[35]

Shiohara, K.; and Yamasaki, T. 2022. Detecting deepfakes with self-blended images. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 18720--18729

2022
[36]

Sun, K.; Chen, S.; Yao, T.; Sun, X.; Ding, S.; and Ji, R. 2025. Continual face forgery detection via historical distribution preserving. International Journal of Computer Vision, 133(3): 1067--1084

2025
[37]

Sun, K.; Yao, T.; Chen, S.; Ding, S.; Li, J.; and Ji, R. 2022. Dual contrastive learning for general face forgery detection. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, 2316--2324

2022
[38]

Tian, J.; Yu, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, P.; Xiao, Z.; Han, J.; and Chai, Y. 2024. Dynamic mixed-prototype model for incremental deepfake detection. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 8129--8138

2024
[39]

Wang, C.; and Deng, W. 2021. Representative forgery mining for fake face detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 14923--14932

2021
[40]

Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Ji, X.; Gong, D.; Zhou, J.; Li, Z.; and Liu, W. 2018. CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognition. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 5265--5274

2018
[42]

Yan, S.; Xie, J.; and He, X. 2021. Der: Dynamically expandable representation for class incremental learning. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3014--3023

2021
[43]

Yan, Z.; Luo, Y.; Lyu, S.; Liu, Q.; and Wu, B. 2024 a . Transcending forgery specificity with latent space augmentation for generalizable deepfake detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8984--8994

2024
[44]

Yan, Z.; Wang, J.; Jin, P.; Zhang, K.-Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, S.; Yao, T.; Ding, S.; Wu, B.; and Yuan, L. 2025 a . Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 70268--70288

2025
[45]

Yan, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Jin, P.; Zhang, K.-Y.; Chen, S.; Yao, T.; Ding, S.; Wu, B.; and Yuan, L. 2025 b . Effort: Efficient orthogonal modeling for generalizable ai-generated image detection. In International Conference on Machine Learning

2025
[47]

Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, Y.; and Wu, B. 2023 a . UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detection. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 22412--22423

2023
[49]

Zhang, X.; Zhu, P.; Zhang, C.; Yan, Z.; Cheng, J.; Lao, M.; Cai, S.; and Guo, Y. 2025. Generalization-Preserved Learning: Closing the Backdoor to Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Deepfake Detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision...

2025
[50]

Zhao, H.; Zhou, W.; Chen, D.; Wei, T.; Zhang, W.; and Yu, N. 2021. Multi-attentional deepfake detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2185--2194

2021
[51]

Zhou, Y.; He, X.; Lin, K.; Fan, B.; Ding, F.; and Li, B. 2026. Simplicity Prevails: The Emergence of Generalizable AIGI Detection in Visual Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.01738

2026 arXiv
[52]

Zi, B.; Chang, M.; Chen, J.; Ma, X.; and Jiang, Y.-G. 2020. Wilddeepfake: A challenging real-world dataset for deepfake detection. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2382--2390

2020
[53]

FirstName LastName , title =
[54]

FirstName Alpher , title =
[55]

Journal of Foo , volume = 13, number = 1, pages =

FirstName Alpher and FirstName Fotheringham-Smythe , title =. Journal of Foo , volume = 13, number = 1, pages =
[56]

Journal of Foo , volume = 14, number = 1, pages =

FirstName Alpher and FirstName Fotheringham-Smythe and FirstName Gamow , title =. Journal of Foo , volume = 14, number = 1, pages =
[57]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

FirstName Alpher and FirstName Gamow , title =. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =
[58]

ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 papers , pages=

Face swapping: automatically replacing faces in photographs , author=. ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 papers , pages=

2008
[59]

IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Fast face-swap using convolutional neural networks , author=. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[60]

IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Everybody dance now , author=. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[61]

Acm Transactions on Graphics , volume=

Deferred neural rendering: Image synthesis using neural textures , author=. Acm Transactions on Graphics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

2019
[62]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

High-fidelity and arbitrary face editing , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[63]

IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security , pages=

Mesonet: a compact facial video forgery detection network , author=. IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security , pages=
[64]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

On the detection of digital face manipulation , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[65]

IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , pages=

Capsule-forensics: Using capsule networks to detect forged images and videos , author=. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , pages=
[66]

IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Faceforensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images , author=. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[67]

AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Exploiting fine-grained face forgery clues via progressive enhancement learning , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[68]

AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

F ^3 Net: fusion, feedback and focus for salient object detection , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[69]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[70]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognition , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[71]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Curricularface: adaptive curriculum learning loss for deep face recognition , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[72]

DeepFakes , author =
[73]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Face2face: Real-time face capture and reenactment of rgb videos , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[74]

Asian Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Fsnet: An identity-aware generative model for image-based face swapping , author=. Asian Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2018 , organization=

2018
[75]

arXiv 2018 , author=

Rsgan: Face swapping and editing using face and hair representation in latent spaces. arXiv 2018 , author=

2018
[76]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Towards open-set identity preserving face synthesis , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[77]

IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Fsgan: Subject agnostic face swapping and reenactment , author=. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[78]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.13457 , year=

Faceshifter: Towards high fidelity and occlusion aware face swapping , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.13457 , year=

1912 arXiv
[79]

ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Simswap: An efficient framework for high fidelity face swapping , author=. ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[80]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Information bottleneck disentanglement for identity swapping , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[81]

ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Spatiotemporal inconsistency learning for deepfake video detection , author=. ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[82]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Two-branch recurrent network for isolating deepfakes in videos , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2020 , organization=

2020
[83]

IEEE International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems , pages=

Multi-task learning for detecting and segmenting manipulated facial images and videos , author=. IEEE International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems , pages=
[84]

AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Dual contrastive learning for general face forgery detection , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[85]

ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Wilddeepfake: A challenging real-world dataset for deepfake detection , author=. ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[86]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 , year=

Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 , year=

arXiv
[87]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 , year=

Adam: A method for stochastic optimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 , year=

arXiv
[88]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[89]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop , pages=

Two-stream neural networks for tampered face detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop , pages=
[90]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Frequency-aware discriminative feature learning supervised by single-center loss for face forgery detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[91]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Leveraging frequency analysis for deep fake image recognition , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2020 , organization=

2020
[92]

ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Metric Learning for Anti-Compression Facial Forgery Detection , author=. ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[93]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Celeb-df: A large-scale challenging dataset for deepfake forensics , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[94]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07397 , year=

The deepfake detection challenge (dfdc) dataset , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07397 , year=

2006 arXiv
[95]

arXiv: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year=

RetinaFace: Single-stage Dense Face Localisation in the Wild , author=. arXiv: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year=
[96]

NeurIPS Workshop , year=

Automatic differentiation in pytorch , author=. NeurIPS Workshop , year=
[97]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Deep residual learning for image recognition , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[98]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

An Information Theoretic Approach for Attention-Driven Face Forgery Detection , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2022 , organization=

2022
[99]

AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Domain general face forgery detection by learning to weight , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[100]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2019 , organization=

2019
[101]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Generalizing face forgery detection with high-frequency features , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[102]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00656 , year=

Exposing deepfake videos by detecting face warping artifacts , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00656 , year=

arXiv
[103]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02510 , year=

Forensictransfer: Weakly-supervised domain adaptation for forgery detection , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02510 , year=

arXiv
[104]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Focal loss for dense object detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[105]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Spatial-phase shallow learning: rethinking face forgery detection in frequency domain , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[106]

Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

Visualizing data using t-SNE , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=
[107]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Domain generalization via invariant feature representation , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2013 , organization=

2013
[108]

International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: A deep learning approach , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=
[109]

AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Learning to generalize: Meta-learning for domain generalization , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[110]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Generalization-Preserved Learning: Closing the Backdoor to Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Deepfake Detection , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[111]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

UIA-ViT: Unsupervised inconsistency-aware method based on vision transformer for face forgery detection , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2022 , organization=

2022
[112]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Open set domain adaptation by backpropagation , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[113]

IEEE International Conference on Image Processing , pages=

Improved open set domain adaptation with backpropagation , author=. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing , pages=. 2019 , organization=

2019
[114]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

SDD-FIQA: unsupervised face image quality assessment with similarity distribution distance , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[115]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

CR-FIQA: face image quality assessment by learning sample relative classifiability , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[116]

IEEE Transactions on Information forensics and security , volume=

Learning face image quality from human assessments , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information forensics and security , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

2018
[117]

IEEE International Conference on Biometrics , pages=

Faceqnet: Quality assessment for face recognition based on deep learning , author=. IEEE International Conference on Biometrics , pages=. 2019 , organization=

2019
[118]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Magface: A universal representation for face recognition and quality assessment , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[119]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Data uncertainty learning in face recognition , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[120]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=. 2009 , organization=

2009
[121]

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , year=

FedForgery: generalized face forgery detection with residual federated learning , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , year=
[122]

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , volume=

Masked relation learning for deepfake detection , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[123]

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , year=

Constructing New Backbone Networks via Space-Frequency Interactive Convolution for Deepfake Detection , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , year=
[124]

IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing , year=

Making DeepFakes more spurious: evading deep face forgery detection via trace removal attack , author=. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing , year=
[125]

IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing , year=

Towards benchmarking and evaluating deepfake detection , author=. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing , year=. doi:10.1109/TDSC.2024.3369711 , publisher=

2024
[126]

IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing , year=

Diff-ID: An Explainable Identity Difference Quantification Framework for DeepFake Detection , author=. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing , year=. doi:10.1109/TDSC.2024.3364679 , publisher=

2024
[127]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Transcending forgery specificity with latent space augmentation for generalizable deepfake detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[128]

Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Preserving fairness generalization in deepfake detection , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[129]

Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages=

Improving fairness in deepfake detection , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages=
[130]

Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages=

An examination of fairness of ai models for deepfake detection , author=. Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages=
[131]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages=

DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages=
[132]

IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science , volume=

Towards measuring fairness in ai: the casual conversations dataset , author=. IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science , volume=
[133]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.05845 , year=

A comprehensive analysis of ai biases in deepfake detection with massively annotated databases , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.05845 , year=

arXiv
[134]

International Conference on Pattern Recognition , pages=

GBDF: gender balanced deepfake dataset towards fair deepfake detection , author=. International Conference on Pattern Recognition , pages=. 2022 , organization=

2022
[135]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02893 , year=

Invariant risk minimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02893 , year=

1907 arXiv
[136]

Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Core: Consistent representation learning for face forgery detection , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[137]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.08731 , year=

Distributionally robust neural networks for group shifts: On the importance of regularization for worst-case generalization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.08731 , year=

1911 arXiv
[138]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.12230 , year=

Coping with label shift via distributionally robust optimisation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.12230 , year=

2010 arXiv
[139]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

An investigation of why overparameterization exacerbates spurious correlations , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=
[140]

IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , pages=

Exploring racial bias within face recognition via per-subject adversarially-enabled data augmentation , author=. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , pages=
[141]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

What is the effect of importance weighting in deep learning? , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=
[142]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Can we leave deepfake data behind in training deepfake detector? , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[143]

IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , year=

Ed ˆ4: Explicit data-level debiasing for deepfake detection , author=. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , year=
[144]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Face x-ray for more general face forgery detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[145]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Thinking in frequency: Face forgery detection by mining frequency-aware clues , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2020 , organization=

2020
[146]

AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Local relation learning for face forgery detection , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[147]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Multi-attentional deepfake detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[148]

Deep Fake Detection Dataset , author =
[149]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Representative forgery mining for fake face detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[150]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

End-to-End Reconstruction-Classification Learning for Face Forgery Detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[151]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Learning meta face recognition in unseen domains , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[152]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Implicit Identity Driven Deepfake Face Swapping Detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[153]

IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detection , author=. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[154]

Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Implicit identity leakage: The stumbling block to improving deepfake detection generalization , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[155]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Exploring disentangled content information for face forgery detection , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2022 , organization=

2022
[156]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Self-supervised learning of adversarial example: Towards good generalizations for deepfake detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[157]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Detecting deepfakes with self-blended images , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[158]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Freqdebias: Towards generalizable deepfake detection via consistency-driven frequency debiasing , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=. 2025 , organization=

2025
[159]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

Forensics adapter: Adapting clip for generalizable face forgery detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=
[160]

International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

Effort: Efficient orthogonal modeling for generalizable ai-generated image detection , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=
[161]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=

A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification tasks , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[162]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Memory aware synapses: Learning what (not) to forget , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[163]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=
[164]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=

Learning without forgetting , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=
[165]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Supervised contrastive replay: Revisiting the nearest class mean classifier in online class-incremental continual learning , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[166]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

icarl: Incremental classifier and representation learning , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[167]

ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Cored: Generalizing fake media detection with continual representation using distillation , author=. ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[168]

ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Dfil: Deepfake incremental learning by exploiting domain-invariant forgery clues , author=. ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[169]

International Journal of Computer Vision , volume=

Continual face forgery detection via historical distribution preserving , author=. International Journal of Computer Vision , volume=
[170]

ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Dynamic mixed-prototype model for incremental deepfake detection , author=. ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[171]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Stacking brick by brick: Aligned feature isolation for incremental face forgery detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[172]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Continual learning with deep generative replay , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[173]

IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Always be dreaming: A new approach for data-free class-incremental learning , author=. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[174]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Ddgr: Continual learning with deep diffusion-based generative replay , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=
[175]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Sddgr: Stable diffusion-based deep generative replay for class incremental object detection , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[176]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[177]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502 , year=

Denoising diffusion implicit models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502 , year=

2010 arXiv
[178]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[179]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426 , year=

Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426 , year=

arXiv
[180]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year =

Celeb-df: A new dataset for deepfake forensics , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year =
[181]

IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Scalable diffusion models with transformers , author=. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[182]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13495 , year=

DF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detection , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13495 , year=

arXiv
[183]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18471 , year=

DiffusionFace: Towards a Comprehensive Dataset for Diffusion-Based Face Forgery Analysis , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18471 , year=

arXiv
[184]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01426 , year=

Deepfakebench: A comprehensive benchmark of deepfake detection , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01426 , year=

arXiv
[185]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=
[186]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Der: Dynamically expandable representation for class incremental learning , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[187]

International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention , pages=

U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation , author=. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention , pages=. 2015 , organization=

2015
[188]

Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
[189]

Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

Deep residual learning for image recognition , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
[190]

Information , volume=

Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentations , author=. Information , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

2020
[191]

IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Class-incremental exemplar compression for class-incremental learning , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[192]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06592 , year=

Memory replay with data compression for continual learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06592 , year=

arXiv
[193]

ED4: Explicit Data-Level Debiasing for Deepfake Detection , year=

Cheng, Jikang and Zhang, Ying and Zou, Qin and Yan, Zhiyuan and Liang, Chao and Wang, Zhongyuan and Li, Chen , journal=. ED4: Explicit Data-Level Debiasing for Deepfake Detection , year=
[194]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Legrad: An explainability method for vision transformers via feature formation sensitivity , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[195]

Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages=

Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages=
[196]

2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV) , pages=

Grad-cam++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks , author=. 2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV) , pages=. 2018 , organization=

2018
[197]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

Transformer interpretability beyond attention visualization , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
[198]

Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Arcface: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[199]

IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security , pages=

In ictu oculi: Exposing ai created fake videos by detecting eye blinking , author=. IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security , pages=
[200]

International conference on machine learning , pages=

Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2021 , organization=

2021
[201]

Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection , year=

Yan, Zhiyuan and Wang, Jiangming and Jin, Peng and Zhang, Ke-Yue and Liu, Chengchun and Chen, Shen and Yao, Taiping and Ding, Shouhong and Wu, Baoyuan and Yuan, Li , booktitle=. Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection , year=
[202]

Forensics Adapter: Adapting CLIP for Generalizable Face Forgery Detection , year=

Cui, Xinjie and Li, Yuezun and Luo, Ao and Zhou, Jiaran and Dong, Junyu , booktitle=. Forensics Adapter: Adapting CLIP for Generalizable Face Forgery Detection , year=
[203]

Simplicity Prevails: The Emergence of Generalizable AIGI Detection in Visual Foundation Models , year=

Zhou, Yue and He, Xinan and Lin, Kaiqing and Fan, Bing and Ding, Feng and Li, Bin , journal=. Simplicity Prevails: The Emergence of Generalizable AIGI Detection in Visual Foundation Models , year=
[204]

FirstName Alpher and FirstName Gamow , title =
[205]

Reinforcement learning in the era of large language models: Challenges and opportunities , author=
[206]

Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education

Clancey, William J. Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-83)
[207]

Classification Problem Solving

Clancey, William J. Classification Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
[208]

, title =

Robinson, Arthur L. , title =. 1980 , doi =. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/208/4447/1019.full.pdf , journal =

1980
[209]

New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry

Robinson, Arthur L. New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry. Science
[210]

Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =

Diane Warner Hasling and William J. Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =. Strategic explanations for a diagnostic consultation system , journal =. 1984 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80003-6 , url =

1984 doi
[211]

and Rennels, Glenn R

Hasling, Diane Warner and Clancey, William J. and Rennels, Glenn R. and Test, Thomas. Strategic Explanations in Consultation---Duplicate. The International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
[212]

Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

Rice, James. Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving
[213]

Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

Clancey, William J. Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue
[214]

The Engineering of Qualitative Models

Clancey, William J. The Engineering of Qualitative Models
[215]

2017 , eprint=

Attention Is All You Need , author=. 2017 , eprint=

2017
[216]

Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet

NASA. Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet
[217]

Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimization , booktitle=

Ahmed, Zafarali and Le Roux, Nicolas and Norouzi, Mohammad and Schuurmans, Dale , year=. Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimization , booktitle=
[218]

Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: From Single-Agent to Multiagent Domain , journal =

Hao, Jianye and Yang, Tianpei and Tang, Hongyao and Bai, Chenjia and Liu, Jinyi and Meng, Zhaopeng and Liu, Peng and Wang, Zhen , year =. Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: From Single-Agent to Multiagent Domain , journal =
[219]

Exploration via State Influence Modeling , booktitle =

Kang, Yongxin and Zhao, Enmin and Li, Kai and Xing, Junliang , year =. Exploration via State Influence Modeling , booktitle =
[220]

, booktitle =

Mohamed, Shakir and Rezende, Danilo Jimenez , year =. , booktitle =
[221]

Curiosity and motivation , journal =

Silvia, Paul J , year =. Curiosity and motivation , journal =
[222]

Intrinsic motivation and reinforcement learning , booktitle=

Barto, Andrew G , year=. Intrinsic motivation and reinforcement learning , booktitle=
[223]

Bellemare and Sriram Srinivasan and Georg Ostrovski and Tom Schaul and David Saxton and R

Marc G. Bellemare and Sriram Srinivasan and Georg Ostrovski and Tom Schaul and David Saxton and R. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages =. 2016 , title =

2016
[224]

Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Models , booktitle=

Ostrovski, Georg and Bellemare, Marc G and Den Oord, Aaron Van and Munos, Remi , year=. Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Models , booktitle=
[225]

Efros and Trevor Darrell , booktitle =

Deepak Pathak and Pulkit Agrawal and Alexei A. Efros and Trevor Darrell , booktitle =. Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Prediction , year =
[226]

Formal Theory of Creativity, Fun, and Intrinsic Motivation (1990–2010) , journal =

Schmidhuber, Jürgen , year =. Formal Theory of Creativity, Fun, and Intrinsic Motivation (1990–2010) , journal =

1990
[227]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Kim, Hyoungseok and Kim, Jaekyeom and Jeong, Yeonwoo and Levine, Sergey and Song, Hyun Oh , year=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=
[228]

Latent World Models for Intrinsically Motivated Exploration , booktitle =

Ermolov, Aleksandr and Sebe, Nicu , year =. Latent World Models for Intrinsically Motivated Exploration , booktitle =
[229]

2020 , author =

Towards High-Level Intrinsic Exploration in Reinforcement Learning , booktitle =. 2020 , author =

2020
[230]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages =

Jesse Mu and Victor Zhong and Roberta Raileanu and Minqi Jiang and Noah Goodman and Tim Rockt\". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages =. 2022 , title=

2022
[231]

Exploration via Elliptical Episodic Bonuses , booktitle=

Mikael Henaff and Roberta Raileanu and Minqi Jiang and Tim Rocktäschel , year=. Exploration via Elliptical Episodic Bonuses , booktitle=
[232]

The Importance of Non-Markovianity in Maximum State Entropy Exploration , booktitle =

Mutti, Mirco and De Santi, Riccardo and Restelli, Marcello , year =. The Importance of Non-Markovianity in Maximum State Entropy Exploration , booktitle =
[233]

2024 , title=

Zhang, Ruoqi and Luo, Ziwei and Sj. 2024 , title=

2024
[234]

Trust region policy optimization , booktitle=

Schulman, John and Levine, Sergey and Abbeel, Pieter and Jordan, Michael and Moritz, Philipp , year=. Trust region policy optimization , booktitle=
[235]

Proximal policy optimization algorithms , journal=

Schulman, John and Wolski, Filip and Dhariwal, Prafulla and Radford, Alec and Klimov, Oleg , year=. Proximal policy optimization algorithms , journal=
[236]

Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning , journal=

Mnih, Volodymyr and Kavukcuoglu, Koray and Silver, David and Graves, Alex and Antonoglou, Ioannis and Wierstra, Daan and Riedmiller, Martin , year=. Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning , journal=
[237]

Learning from delayed rewards , publisher=

Watkins, Christopher John Cornish Hellaby , year=. Learning from delayed rewards , publisher=
[238]

Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategies , booktitle =

Badia, Adria Puigdomenech and Sprechmann, Pablo and Vitvitskyi, Alex and Guo, Daniel and Piot, Bilal and Kapturowski, Steven and Tieleman, Olivier and Arjovsky, Martin and Pritzel, Alexander and Bolt, Andrew and others , year=. Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Stra...
[239]

Curiosity-driven exploration by self-supervised prediction , booktitle=

Pathak, Deepak and Agrawal, Pulkit and Efros, Alexei A and Darrell, Trevor , year=. Curiosity-driven exploration by self-supervised prediction , booktitle=
[240]

Large-scale Study of Curiosity-driven Learning , journal=

Burda, Yuri and Edwards, Harri and Pathak, Deepak and Storkey, Amos and Darrell, Trevor and Efros, Alexei A , year=. Large-scale Study of Curiosity-driven Learning , journal=
[241]

Entropy regularized reinforcement learning using large deviation theory , journal=

Arriojas, Argenis and Adamczyk, Jacob and Tiomkin, Stas and Kulkarni, Rahul V , year=. Entropy regularized reinforcement learning using large deviation theory , journal=
[242]

Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions , journal=

Ryan, Richard M and Deci, Edward L , year=. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions , journal=
[243]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Badia, Adri. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2020 , title=

2020
[244]

What is Intrinsic Motivation?

Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves and Kaplan, Frederic , year=. What is Intrinsic Motivation?. Frontiers in Neurorobotics , volume=
[245]

Kim, Woojun and Kim, Jeonghye and Sung, Youngchul , year=
[246]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Gallou. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2023 , title=

2023
[247]

Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning , journal=

Mnih, Volodymyr and Kavukcuoglu, Koray and Silver, David and Rusu, Andrei A and Veness, Joel and Bellemare, Marc G and Graves, Alex and Riedmiller, Martin and Fidjeland, Andreas K and Ostrovski, Georg and others , year=. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning ...
[248]

Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective , publisher=

Murphy, Kevin P , year=. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective , publisher=
[249]

A few useful things to know about machine learning , journal=

Domingos, Pedro , year=. A few useful things to know about machine learning , journal=
[250]

Exploration by Random Network Distillation , journal=

Burda, Yuri and Edwards, Harrison and Storkey, Amos and Klimov, Oleg , year=. Exploration by Random Network Distillation , journal=
[251]

Reflective Policy Optimization , journal=

Yaozhong Gan and Yan, Renye and Wu, Zhe and Xing, Junliang , year=. Reflective Policy Optimization , journal=
[252]

Reinforcement learning: An introduction , journal=

Sutton, Richard S and Barto, Andrew G , year=. Reinforcement learning: An introduction , journal=
[253]

Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming , publisher=

Puterman, Martin L , year=. Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming , publisher=
[254]

2018 , booktitle=

Oh, Junhyuk and Guo, Yijie and Singh, Satinder and Lee, Honglak , title=. 2018 , booktitle=

2018
[255]

Decoupling exploration and exploitation in reinforcement learning , year=

Sch. Decoupling exploration and exploitation in reinforcement learning , year=
[256]

2021 , journal=

Whitney, William F and Bloesch, Michael and Springenberg, Jost Tobias and Abdolmaleki, Abbas and Cho, Kyunghyun and Riedmiller, Martin , title=. 2021 , journal=

2021
[257]

2021 , booktitle=

Liu, Evan Z and Raghunathan, Aditi and Liang, Percy and Finn, Chelsea , title=. 2021 , booktitle=

2021
[258]

Gep-pg: Decoupling exploration and exploitation in deep reinforcement learning algorithms , year=

Colas, C. Gep-pg: Decoupling exploration and exploitation in deep reinforcement learning algorithms , year=. International conference on machine learning , pages=
[259]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03678 , year=

Reflective Policy Optimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03678 , year=

arXiv
[260]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Memory based trajectory-conditioned policies for learning from sparse rewards , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[261]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Unifying count-based exploration and intrinsic motivation , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[262]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Byol-explore: Exploration by bootstrapped prediction , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[263]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.11052 , year=

On bonus-based exploration methods in the arcade learning environment , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.11052 , year=

arXiv
[264]

Temporally-Extended

Will Dabney and Georg Ostrovski and Andre Barreto , booktitle=. Temporally-Extended. 2021 , url=

2021
[265]

International conference on machine learning , pages=

Guarantees for epsilon-greedy reinforcement learning with function approximation , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2022 , organization=

2022
[266]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

On Bonus Based Exploration Methods In The Arcade Learning Environment , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[267]

Information Fusion , volume=

Exploration in deep reinforcement learning: A survey , author=. Information Fusion , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

2022
[268]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Redeeming intrinsic rewards via constrained optimization , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[269]

nature , volume=

Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search , author=. nature , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

2016
[270]

DeepMind blog , volume=

Alphastar: Mastering the real-time strategy game starcraft ii , author=. DeepMind blog , volume=
[271]

Annual conference on artificial intelligence , pages=

Adaptive -greedy exploration in reinforcement learning based on value differences , author=. Annual conference on artificial intelligence , pages=. 2010 , organization=

2010
[272]

Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

Rainbow: Combining improvements in deep reinforcement learning , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=
[273]

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume=

Reinforcement learning for generative AI: State of the art, opportunities and open research challenges , author=. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume=
[274]

National Science Review , volume=

Opportunities and challenges of diffusion models for generative AI , author=. National Science Review , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[275]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13734 , year=

Understanding reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning of diffusion models: A tutorial and review , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13734 , year=

arXiv
[276]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01586 , year=

Diffusion models for future networks and communications: A comprehensive survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01586 , year=

arXiv
[277]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03645 , year=

Diwa: Diffusion policy adaptation with world models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03645 , year=

arXiv
[278]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08827 , year=

A survey of reinforcement learning for large reasoning models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08827 , year=

arXiv
[279]

Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , volume=

Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , author=. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , volume=. 1987 , publisher=

1987
[280]

, author=

Visualizing data using t-SNE. , author=. Journal of machine learning research , volume=
[281]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[282]

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Zhao, Enmin and Yan, Renye and Li, Jinqiu and Li, Kai and Xing, Junliang , title=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[283]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303 , year=

Ho, Jonathan and Chan, William and Saharia, Chitwan and Whang, Jay and Gao, Ruiqi and Gritsenko, Alexey and Kingma, Diederik P and Poole, Ben and Norouzi, Mohammad and Fleet, David J and others , title=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303 , year=

arXiv
[284]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Saharia, Chitwan and Chan, William and Saxena, Saurabh and Li, Lala and Whang, Jay and Denton, Emily L and Ghasemipour, Kamyar and Gontijo Lopes, Raphael and Karagol Ayan, Burcu and Salimans, Tim and others , title=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[285]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741 , year=

Nichol, Alex and Dhariwal, Prafulla and Ramesh, Aditya and Shyam, Pranav and Mishkin, Pamela and McGrew, Bob and Sutskever, Ilya and Chen, Mark , title=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741 , year=

arXiv
[286]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 , volume=

Ramesh, Aditya and Dhariwal, Prafulla and Nichol, Alex and Chu, Casey and Chen, Mark , title=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 , volume=

arXiv
[287]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

Zhou, Linqi and Du, Yilun and Wu, Jiajun , title=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=
[288]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Xu, Jiale and Wang, Xintao and Cheng, Weihao and Cao, Yan-Pei and Shan, Ying and Qie, Xiaohu and Gao, Shenghua , title=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[289]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Ho, Jonathan and Jain, Ajay and Abbeel, Pieter , title=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[290]

International conference on machine learning , pages=

Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2021 , organization=

2021
[291]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Variational diffusion models , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[292]

International conference on machine learning , pages=

Sohl-Dickstein, Jascha and Weiss, Eric and Maheswaranathan, Niru and Ganguli, Surya , title=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2015 , organization=

2015
[293]

A Bradford Book , year=

Reinforcement learning: An introduction , author=. A Bradford Book , year=
[294]

1989 , publisher=

Watkins, Christopher John Cornish Hellaby , title=. 1989 , publisher=

1989
[295]

Communications of the ACM , volume=

Tesauro, Gerald and others , title=. Communications of the ACM , volume=
[296]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Ho, Jonathan and Salimans, Tim and Gritsenko, Alexey and Chan, William and Norouzi, Mohammad and Fleet, David J , title=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[297]

Edward J Hu and yelong shen and Phillip Wallis and Zeyuan Allen-Zhu and Yuanzhi Li and Shean Wang and Lu Wang and Weizhu Chen , booktitle=. Lo. 2022 , url=

2022
[298]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09974 , year=

The Exploration-Exploitation Dilemma Revisited: An Entropy Perspective , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09974 , year=

arXiv
[299]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
[300]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Bousselham, W.; Boggust, A.; Chaybouti, S.; Strobelt, H.; and Kuehne, H. 2025. Legrad: An explainability method for vision transformers via feature formation sensitivity. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 20336--20345

2025

[2] [2]

I.; Khvedchenya, E.; Parinov, A.; Druzhinin, M.; and Kalinin, A

Buslaev, A.; Iglovikov, V. I.; Khvedchenya, E.; Parinov, A.; Druzhinin, M.; and Kalinin, A. A. 2020. Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentations. Information, 11(2): 125

2020

[3] [3]

Cao, J.; Ma, C.; Yao, T.; Chen, S.; Ding, S.; and Yang, X. 2022. End-to-End Reconstruction-Classification Learning for Face Forgery Detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4113--4122

2022

[4] [4]

Chattopadhay, A.; Sarkar, A.; Howlader, P.; and Balasubramanian, V. N. 2018. Grad-cam++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks. In 2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV), 839--847. IEEE

2018

[5] [5]

Chefer, H.; Gur, S.; and Wolf, L. 2021. Transformer interpretability beyond attention visualization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 782--791

2021

[6] [6]

Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Song, Y.; Liu, L.; and Wang, J. 2022. Self-supervised learning of adversarial example: Towards good generalizations for deepfake detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 18710--18719

2022

[7] [7]

Chen, S.; Yao, T.; Chen, Y.; Ding, S.; Li, J.; and Ji, R. 2021. Local relation learning for face forgery detection. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, 1081--1088

2021

[8] [9]

Cheng, J.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, L.; Ai, J.; Zou, Q.; Li, C.; and Wang, Z. 2025 a . Stacking brick by brick: Aligned feature isolation for incremental face forgery detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 13927--13936

2025