Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Linear Probe Penalties Reduce LLM Sycophancy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.00967 v1 pith:FZDSHQFG submitted 2024-12-01 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords behaviormodelrewardrlhfsycophancysycophanticfine-tuninghuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are often sycophantic, prioritizing agreement with their users over accurate or objective statements. This problematic behavior becomes more pronounced during reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), an LLM fine-tuning stage intended to align model outputs with human values. Instead of increasing accuracy and reliability, the reward model learned from RLHF often rewards sycophancy. We develop a linear probing method to identify and penalize markers of sycophancy within the reward model, producing rewards that discourage sycophantic behavior. Our experiments show that constructing and optimizing against this surrogate reward function reduces sycophantic behavior in multiple open-source LLMs. Our results suggest a generalizable methodology for reducing unwanted LLM behaviors that are not sufficiently disincentivized by RLHF fine-tuning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measuring and Detecting Harmful AI Sycophancy

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI chatbots reverse an initial stance to match user preferences in 5% to 56% of tested cases, and supervised detectors trained on a new 290,460-response benchmark can detect such reversals from response text alone, th...

  2. CausalT5k: Diagnosing Refusal and Failure Modes in Trustworthy Causal Reasoning Across Causal Rungs

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CausalT5k provides a 5,147-case diagnostic benchmark with trap taxonomy, pressure variants, and Utility/Safety metrics for causal reasoning in LLMs.

  3. Manipulation Attacks by Misaligned AI: Risk Analysis and Safety Case Framework

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A framework paper that adapts AI safety case methodology to the specific threat of manipulation attacks by internally deployed misaligned AI.

  4. LPASS: Linear Probes as Stepping Stones for vulnerability detection using compressed LLMs

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Linear probe accuracy on simple code metrics can guide layer pruning and roughly predict post-fine-tuning vulnerability detection performance, but several headline numbers in the abstract do not match the paper's own tables.

Pith tools