pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09982 · v1 · pith:G44ZVRV2new · submitted 2026-06-08 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Testing F-theory GUTs with the Axiverse

Michael Nee , Mario Reig , Timo Weigand This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords axionsF-theoryGUTsALPsaxiversethreshold correctionsD-instantonshypercharge flux
0
0 comments X

The pith

F-theory GUTs produce no axion-like particles with photon coupling-to-mass ratio above the QCD axion band in the geometric regime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that axion-like particles arising from hypercharge flux in F-theory GUTs obey a strict upper bound on their photon coupling divided by mass. This bound matches the QCD axion value up to a calculable coefficient of order one, and the coefficient stays small because D-instantons set ALP masses once gauge unification fixes the size of threshold corrections. The result follows in the controlled geometric regime where the alpha-prime expansion remains valid. A sympathetic reader would care because the bound turns F-theory GUTs into a falsifiable class of models: an observed ALP far above the QCD band would exclude them.

Core claim

Axions coupled to photons in F-theory GUTs satisfy g_aγ/m_a ≤ C (α_em / 2π) 1/(m_π f_π) with C a calculable coefficient. Topological GUT symmetry breaking by hypercharge flux generates ALPs without QCD coupling from non-universal holomorphic threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic functions. When gauge couplings approximately unify near the string scale, D-instantons whose actions are controlled by these corrections break the ALP shift symmetries and produce masses that keep every non-universal ALP well below the QCD axion prediction. No loopholes allow the ratio to become arbitrarily large inside regions of control for the effective action, so no ALP parametrically above the QCD axion ba

What carries the argument

Non-universal holomorphic threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic functions induced by hypercharge flux, which fix the D-instanton actions that generate ALP masses.

If this is right

  • The bound holds for all non-universal ALPs even when large threshold corrections force new incomplete GUT multiplets at intermediate scales.
  • Finding an ALP far above the QCD band rules out F-theory GUTs inside regimes where the effective theory is under control.
  • The same bound applies in field-theoretic and perturbative heterotic GUT constructions.
  • F-theory GUTs become directly testable by axion searches that measure the coupling-to-mass ratio.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Axion searches could distinguish F-theory GUTs from other string constructions that allow higher-ratio ALPs.
  • The result restricts the possible mass spectrum of the axiverse inside controlled F-theory compactifications.
  • Extensions of the analysis beyond the geometric regime would be needed to identify any remaining windows for large-ratio ALPs.

Load-bearing premise

Gauge couplings approximately unify near the string scale, which fixes the size of threshold corrections and thereby controls the D-instanton actions that generate ALP masses.

What would settle it

Discovery of an ALP with g_aγ/m_a significantly larger than the QCD axion value, for example through axion-induced cosmic birefringence.

read the original abstract

We show that axions coupled to photons in F-theory Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) satisfy the coupling-to-mass relation $g_{a\gamma}/m_a \leq C\, \frac{\alpha_{\rm em}}{2\pi}\frac{1}{m_\pi f_\pi}$, with $C$ a calculable coefficient. This bound is saturated for the QCD axion with $C = \mathcal{O}(1)$ and holds in field theoretic and perturbative heterotic GUT constructions. In F-theory, topological GUT symmetry breaking by hypercharge flux introduces axion-like particles (ALPs) coupled to photons without coupling to QCD. These ALPs arise from the non-universal holomorphic threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic functions induced by the hypercharge flux. When gauge couplings approximately unify near the string scale, as required in phenomenologically viable models, the shift symmetries of these ALPs are broken by D-instantons whose action is controlled by the size of the threshold corrections to the gauge couplings. Small corrections imply unsuppressed instantons and heavy ALPs. We compute the resulting axion potentials and show that the coupling-to-mass ratio $g_{a\gamma}/m_a$ for every non-universal ALP lies well below the QCD axion prediction. We consider possible loopholes to this result -- some of which could lead to $C\gg 1$ -- and argue that none of them allows for $g_{a\gamma}/m_a$ to be arbitrarily above the QCD axion prediction within regions of control for the effective action. The bound persists in models with large threshold corrections, where new incomplete GUT multiplets at intermediate energy scales are required. As a result, in the geometric regime, where the $\alpha'$ expansion is under control, no ALP parametrically above the QCD axion band exists. Our results make F-theory GUTs falsifiable: finding an ALP far above the QCD band, for example discovering axion-induced cosmic birefringence, rules out F-theory GUTs in regimes of control of the effective theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in F-theory GUTs with hypercharge flux breaking, non-universal ALPs arising from holomorphic threshold corrections to gauge kinetic functions obey the bound g_{aγ}/m_a ≤ C (α_em/(2π m_π f_π)) with C = O(1), saturated by the QCD axion. This follows because approximate gauge unification near the string scale keeps threshold corrections small, so that D-instanton actions are unsuppressed and ALP masses are not parametrically light. The authors compute the resulting axion potentials, show that every such ALP lies below the QCD band, and argue that candidate loopholes (decoupled cycles, large thresholds compensated by incomplete multiplets, effects outside the α' expansion) cannot produce C ≫ 1 while remaining inside the controlled geometric regime where the α' expansion holds. The result renders F-theory GUTs falsifiable by an ALP observation with parametrically large coupling-to-mass ratio.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable link between F-theory GUT model building and axion phenomenology. It converts the standard assumption of approximate unification into a sharp upper bound on ALP parameters, thereby offering a direct test (e.g., via cosmic birefringence) that can rule out entire classes of controlled F-theory constructions. The explicit mapping from threshold corrections to instanton actions and the systematic treatment of loopholes are strengths that increase the result's robustness. The paper thereby strengthens the interface between string-derived effective theories and observable axion physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and derivation of axion potentials] The central claim that D-instanton actions are controlled by the size of holomorphic threshold corrections (and hence cannot be parametrically suppressed while unification holds) is load-bearing; the manuscript should supply the explicit one-loop threshold formula used to relate the flux-induced non-universality to the instanton action in the geometric regime, together with the numerical size of the correction assumed for viable models.
  2. [Discussion of loopholes] The statement that none of the listed loopholes permits C ≫ 1 inside the controlled effective theory is central to the falsifiability claim. Each loophole (decoupled cycles, incomplete multiplets, non-perturbative effects outside α' control) requires a quantitative estimate showing that the resulting C remains O(1) or that the construction exits the geometric regime; a dedicated subsection with these estimates would make the argument inspectable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The coefficient C is introduced as 'calculable' but its explicit value for the non-universal ALPs (as opposed to the QCD axion) is not stated in the abstract; a short sentence giving the range obtained from the potential computation would improve clarity.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the axion-photon coupling g_{aγ} and the reference QCD scale m_π f_π should be defined at first use rather than assumed from the QCD axion literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation for minor revision. The comments are constructive and will improve the clarity of the central claims. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and derivation of axion potentials] The central claim that D-instanton actions are controlled by the size of holomorphic threshold corrections (and hence cannot be parametrically suppressed while unification holds) is load-bearing; the manuscript should supply the explicit one-loop threshold formula used to relate the flux-induced non-universality to the instanton action in the geometric regime, together with the numerical size of the correction assumed for viable models.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the one-loop threshold formula will make the load-bearing step more transparent. In the revised manuscript we will insert the standard holomorphic threshold correction formula (arising from the hypercharge flux integral over the matter curve) that relates the non-universality directly to the D-instanton action in the geometric regime. We will also add the numerical range of corrections (a few percent) that is required for approximate unification near the string scale in viable models, thereby quantifying the statement that the instanton action remains unsuppressed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of loopholes] The statement that none of the listed loopholes permits C ≫ 1 inside the controlled effective theory is central to the falsifiability claim. Each loophole (decoupled cycles, incomplete multiplets, non-perturbative effects outside α' control) requires a quantitative estimate showing that the resulting C remains O(1) or that the construction exits the geometric regime; a dedicated subsection with these estimates would make the argument inspectable.

    Authors: We concur that a dedicated subsection containing quantitative estimates for each loophole will strengthen the falsifiability argument. In the revision we will add such a subsection, supplying order-of-magnitude estimates that show: (i) for decoupled cycles the resulting C stays O(1) while unification is preserved; (ii) incomplete multiplets at intermediate scales that compensate large thresholds push the model outside the controlled geometric regime; and (iii) non-perturbative effects outside the α' expansion likewise violate the regime of validity of the effective action. These estimates will be presented explicitly so that the claim can be inspected. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained from threshold corrections and unification assumption

full rationale

The central bound follows directly from the holomorphic threshold corrections to gauge kinetic functions (induced by hypercharge flux) setting the D-instanton actions that generate ALP masses. Approximate unification near the string scale keeps those corrections small, yielding unsuppressed instantons and thus heavy ALPs with g_aγ/m_a below the QCD axion band. The paper explicitly enumerates and rules out candidate loopholes (decoupled cycles, large thresholds compensated by incomplete multiplets, non-perturbative effects) while remaining inside the controlled α' regime; none of these steps reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or definitional renaming. The result is therefore independent of the target observable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption of approximate gauge coupling unification near the string scale and on the standard effective-field-theory control in the geometric regime; these are not derived inside the paper but taken as input for viable models.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gauge couplings approximately unify near the string scale
    Invoked to ensure that threshold corrections remain small, thereby fixing D-instanton actions and ALP masses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5913 in / 1209 out tokens · 27834 ms · 2026-06-27T15:21:16.979846+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

193 extracted references · 96 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow,Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett.32(1974) 438–441. [2]Super-KamiokandeCollaboration, A. Takenaka et al.,Search for proton decay viap→e +π0 and p→µ +π0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I-IV, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 11 112011, [arXiv:2010.16098]

    arXiv 1974

  2. [2]

    Kawamura,Gauge symmetry breaking from extra space S**1 / Z(2), Prog

    Y. Kawamura,Gauge symmetry breaking from extra space S**1 / Z(2), Prog. Theor. Phys.103(2000) 613–619, [hep-ph/9902423]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    Kawamura,Triplet doublet splitting, proton stability and extra dimension, Prog

    Y. Kawamura,Triplet doublet splitting, proton stability and extra dimension, Prog. Theor. Phys.105 (2001) 999–1006, [hep-ph/0012125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  4. [4]

    Altarelli and F

    G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio,SU(5) grand unification in extra dimensions and proton decay, Phys. Lett. B511(2001) 257–264, [hep-ph/0102301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    L. J. Hall and Y. Nomura,Gauge unification in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 055003, [hep-ph/0103125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    Hebecker and J

    A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell,A Minimal S**1 / (Z(2) x Z-prime (2)) orbifold GUT, Nucl. Phys. B613(2001) 3–16, [hep-ph/0106166]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. J. Martinec, and R. Rohm,The Heterotic String, Phys. Rev. Lett.54 (1985) 502–505

    1985

  8. [8]

    Candelas, G

    P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten,Vacuum configurations for superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B258(1985) 46–74

    1985

  9. [9]

    Witten,Symmetry breaking patterns in superstring models, Nucl

    E. Witten,Symmetry breaking patterns in superstring models, Nucl. Phys. B258(1985) 75–100

    1985

  10. [10]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory. Vol. 2: Loop Amplitudes, Anomalies and Phenomenology. 7, 1988

    1988

  11. [11]

    McAllister and F

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo,Moduli Stabilization in String Theory,arXiv:2310.20559

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Blumenhagen, B

    R. Blumenhagen, B. Kors, D. Lust, and S. Stieberger,Four-dimensional String Compactifications with D-Branes, Orientifolds and Fluxes, Phys. Rept.445(2007) 1–193, [hep-th/0610327]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    L. E. Ibanez and A. M. Uranga, String theory and particle physics: An introduction to string phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, 2, 2012

    2012

  14. [14]

    Marchesano, B

    F. Marchesano, B. Schellekens, and T. Weigand, D-brane and F-theory Model Building. 2024. arXiv:2212.07443

    arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Marchesano, G

    F. Marchesano, G. Shiu, and T. Weigand,The Standard Model from String Theory: What Have We Learned?, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.74(2024), no. 1 113–140, [arXiv:2401.01939]

    arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Vafa,Evidence for F theory, Nucl

    C. Vafa,Evidence for F theory, Nucl. Phys. B469(1996) 403–418, [hep-th/9602022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  17. [17]

    Donagi and M

    R. Donagi and M. Wijnholt,Model Building with F-Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.15(2011), no. 5 1237–1317, [arXiv:0802.2969]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Beasley, J

    C. Beasley, J. J. Heckman, and C. Vafa,GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory - I, JHEP01 (2009) 058, [arXiv:0802.3391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Beasley, J

    C. Beasley, J. J. Heckman, and C. Vafa,GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory - II: Experimental Predictions, JHEP01(2009) 059, [arXiv:0806.0102]. – 41 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    Donagi and M

    R. Donagi and M. Wijnholt,Breaking GUT Groups in F-Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.15(2011), no. 6 1523–1603, [arXiv:0808.2223]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Buican, D

    M. Buican, D. Malyshev, D. R. Morrison, H. Verlinde, and M. Wijnholt,D-branes at Singularities, Compactification, and Hypercharge, JHEP01(2007) 107, [hep-th/0610007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    J. J. Heckman,Particle Physics Implications of F-theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 237–265, [arXiv:1001.0577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Weigand,Lectures on F-theory compactifications and model building, Class

    T. Weigand,Lectures on F-theory compactifications and model building, Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 214004, [arXiv:1009.3497]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    Weigand,F-theory, PoST ASI2017(2018) 016, [arXiv:1806.01854]

    T. Weigand,F-theory, PoST ASI2017(2018) 016, [arXiv:1806.01854]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Abe et al.,Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment — Detector Design and Physics Potential —,arXiv:1109.3262

    K. Abe et al.,Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment — Detector Design and Physics Potential —,arXiv:1109.3262

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig,Axion couplings in grand unified theories, JHEP10(2022) 141, [arXiv:2206.07053]

    arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig,Axion couplings in Orbifold GUTs,arXiv:2511.21830

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig,Axion couplings in heterotic string theory, JHEP02(2025) 188, [arXiv:2410.03820]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Reig and T

    M. Reig and T. Weigand,Testing the heterotic string with the axion-photon coupling, JHEP01(2026) 006, [arXiv:2509.08042]

    arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Y. Kahn, B. R. Safdi, and J. Thaler,Broadband and Resonant Approaches to Axion Dark Matter Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 14 141801, [arXiv:1602.01086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    A. ´A. Melc´ on et al.,Axion Searches with Microwave Filters: the RADES project, JCAP05(2018) 040, [arXiv:1803.01243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    J. L. Ouellet et al.,First Results from ABRACADABRA-10 cm: A Search for Sub-µeV Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019), no. 12 121802, [arXiv:1810.12257]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    D. J. E. Marsh, K.-C. Fong, E. W. Lentz, L. Smejkal, and M. N. Ali,Proposal to Detect Dark Matter using Axionic Topological Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 12 121601, [arXiv:1807.08810]

    arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    J. L. Ouellet et al.,Design and implementation of the ABRACADABRA-10 cm axion dark matter search, Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 5 052012, [arXiv:1901.10652]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Lawson, A

    M. Lawson, A. J. Millar, M. Pancaldi, E. Vitagliano, and F. Wilczek,Tunable axion plasma haloscopes, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 14 141802, [arXiv:1904.11872]

    arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Beurthey et al.,MADMAX Status Report,arXiv:2003.10894

    S. Beurthey et al.,MADMAX Status Report,arXiv:2003.10894

    arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    Sch¨ utte-Engel, et al.,Axion quasiparticles for axion dark matter detection, JCAP08(2021) 066, [arXiv:2102.05366]

    J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, et al.,Axion quasiparticles for axion dark matter detection, JCAP08(2021) 066, [arXiv:2102.05366]

    arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    C. P. Salemi et al.,Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter with ABRACADABRA-10 cm, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 8 081801, [arXiv:2102.06722]. [40]DMRadioCollaboration, L. Brouwer et al.,Projected sensitivity of DMRadio-m3: A search for the QCD axion below 1µeV, Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 10 103008, [arXiv:2204.13781]. [41]DMRadioCollaboration, L. Brouwer...

    arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Aja et al.,The Canfranc Axion Detection Experiment (CADEx): search for axions at 90 GHz with Kinetic Inductance Detectors, JCAP11(2022) 044, [arXiv:2206.02980]

    B. Aja et al.,The Canfranc Axion Detection Experiment (CADEx): search for axions at 90 GHz with Kinetic Inductance Detectors, JCAP11(2022) 044, [arXiv:2206.02980]

    arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    J. F. Bourhill, E. C. I. Paterson, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar,Searching for ultralight axions with twisted cavity resonators of anyon rotational symmetry with bulk modes of nonzero helicity, Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 5 052014, [arXiv:2208.01640]. [44]ALPHACollaboration, A. J. Millar et al.,Searching for dark matter with plasma haloscopes, Phys. Rev. D...

    arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    J. N. Benabou, J. W. Foster, Y. Kahn, B. R. Safdi, and C. P. Salemi,Lumped-element axion dark matter detection beyond the magnetoquasistatic limit, Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 3 035009, [arXiv:2211.00008]

    arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Berlin, et al.,Axion Dark Matter Detection by Superconducting Resonant Frequency Conversion, JHEP07(2020), no

    A. Berlin, et al.,Axion Dark Matter Detection by Superconducting Resonant Frequency Conversion, JHEP07(2020), no. 07 088, [arXiv:1912.11048]

    arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Giaccone et al.,Design of axion and axion dark matter searches based on ultra high Q SRF cavities, arXiv:2207.11346

    B. Giaccone et al.,Design of axion and axion dark matter searches based on ultra high Q SRF cavities, arXiv:2207.11346. [48]DMRadioCollaboration, A. AlShirawi et al.,Electromagnetic modeling and science reach of DMRadio-m3,arXiv:2302.14084

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Oshima, et al.,First results of axion dark matter search with DANCE, Phys

    Y. Oshima, et al.,First results of axion dark matter search with DANCE, Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 7 072005, [arXiv:2303.03594]. [50]DALICollaboration, J. De Miguel, et al.,Discovery prospects with the Dark-photons & Axion-like particles Interferometer, Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 6 062002, [arXiv:2303.03997]

    arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Ahyoune et al.,A Proposal for a Low-Frequency Axion Search in the 1–2µµeV Range and Below with the BabyIAXO Magnet, Annalen Phys.535(2023), no

    S. Ahyoune et al.,A Proposal for a Low-Frequency Axion Search in the 1–2µµeV Range and Below with the BabyIAXO Magnet, Annalen Phys.535(2023), no. 12 2300326, [arXiv:2306.17243]

    arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Alesini et al.,The future search for low-frequency axions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity experiment at Frascati National Laboratories, Phys

    D. Alesini et al.,The future search for low-frequency axions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity experiment at Frascati National Laboratories, Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101370, [arXiv:2309.00351]. [53]BREADCollaboration, S. Knirck et al.,First Results from a Broadband Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter in the 44 to 52µeV Range with a Coaxial Dis...

    arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Kalia, et al.,Ultralight dark matter detection with levitated ferromagnets, Phys

    S. Kalia, et al.,Ultralight dark matter detection with levitated ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 11 115029, [arXiv:2408.15330]

    arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Friel, J

    M. Friel, J. W. Gjerloev, S. Kalia, and A. Zamora,Search for ultralight dark matter in the SuperMAG high-fidelity dataset, Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 11 115036, [arXiv:2408.16045]

    arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Baryakhtar, L

    M. Baryakhtar, L. Rosenberg, and G. Rybka,Searching for the QCD Dark Matter Axion, arXiv:2504.10607

    arXiv

  50. [50]

    Ankel et al.,DMRadio-Core: A new approach for GUT-scale axion searches,arXiv:2604.16602

    V. Ankel et al.,DMRadio-Core: A new approach for GUT-scale axion searches,arXiv:2604.16602

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Esposito, K

    A. Esposito, K. C. Fong, and L. Hui,An ultra-broadband axion dark matter experiment, arXiv:2605.11078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Caputo, S

    A. Caputo, S. J. Witte, A. A. Philippov, and T. Jacobson,Pulsar Nulling and Vacuum Radio Emission from Axion Clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 16 161001, [arXiv:2311.14795]. – 43 –

    arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Regis, M

    M. Regis, M. Taoso, and J. Terol Calvo,Searching for axion-like particles with SPHEREx, JCAP05 (2025) 008, [arXiv:2412.12286]. [62]EPT ACollaboration, N. K. Porayko et al.,Searches for signatures of ultralight axion dark matter in polarimetry data of the European Pulsar Timing Array, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 6 062005, [arXiv:2412.02232]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    J. N. Benabou, et al.,Time-delayed gamma-ray signatures of heavy axions from core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 9 095029, [arXiv:2412.13247]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Ning and B

    O. Ning and B. R. Safdi,Leading Axion-Photon Sensitivity with NuSTAR Observations of M82 and M87, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 17 171003, [arXiv:2404.14476]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    O. Ning, K. Raman, and B. R. Safdi,Cosmological Neutron Stars Produce Diffuse Axion X-Ray Signatures,arXiv:2512.15849

    arXiv

  57. [57]

    A. G. De Marchi, O. Ning, and T. Xiao,Blazar Constraints on Axions through New Spectral Modulation Searches in 1ES 1959+650 & B2 1811+31,arXiv:2603.13480

    arXiv 1959

  58. [58]

    Terol Calvo, M

    J. Terol Calvo, M. Taoso, A. Caputo, M. Negro, and M. Regis,Searching for dark matter X-ray lines from the Large Magellanic Cloud with eROSITA,arXiv:2603.19109

    arXiv

  59. [59]

    Minami and E

    Y. Minami and E. Komatsu,New Extraction of the Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck 2018 Polarization Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020), no. 22 221301, [arXiv:2011.11254]

    arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    J. R. Eskilt and E. Komatsu,Improved constraints on cosmic birefringence from the WMAP and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization data, Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 6 063503, [arXiv:2205.13962]

    arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Diego-Palazuelos,Search for ultra-light axions with CMB polarization, 4, 2023.arXiv:2304.03647

    P. Diego-Palazuelos,Search for ultra-light axions with CMB polarization, 4, 2023.arXiv:2304.03647

    arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Galaverni, F

    M. Galaverni, F. Finelli, and D. Paoletti,Redshift evolution of cosmic birefringence in CMB anisotropies, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 8 083529, [arXiv:2301.07971]

    arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Diego-Palazuelos and E

    P. Diego-Palazuelos and E. Komatsu,Cosmic Birefringence from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6,arXiv:2509.13654

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Carralot, et al.,Is cosmic birefringence due to dark energy or dark matter? Simulation-based inference,arXiv:2602.12019

    F. Carralot, et al.,Is cosmic birefringence due to dark energy or dark matter? Simulation-based inference,arXiv:2602.12019

    arXiv

  65. [65]

    Alonso, D

    R. Alonso, D. Dimakou, and M. West,Fractional-charge hadrons and leptons to tell the Standard Model group apart, Phys. Lett. B863(2025) 139354, [arXiv:2404.03438]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Koren and A

    S. Koren and A. Martin,Fractionally charged particles at the energy frontier: The SM gauge group and one-form global symmetry, SciPost Phys.18(2025), no. 1 004, [arXiv:2406.17850]

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Koren and A

    S. Koren and A. Martin,Phenomenology of fractionally charged particles: Two reps are better than one, Nucl. Phys. B1021(2025) 117196, [arXiv:2507.16900]

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory, JHEP06(2006) 051, [hep-th/0605206]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  69. [69]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530, [arXiv:0905.4720]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Honecker and W

    G. Honecker and W. Staessens,On axionic dark matter in Type IIA string theory, Fortsch. Phys.62 (2014) 115–151, [arXiv:1312.4517]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    Petrossian-Byrne and G

    R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro,Open string axiverse, JHEP07(2025) 049, [arXiv:2503.16387]

    arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell, and A. Ringwald,The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology, JHEP10(2012) 146, [arXiv:1206.0819]. – 44 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  73. [73]

    Cicoli,Axion-like Particles from String Compactifications, in 9th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs, pp

    M. Cicoli,Axion-like Particles from String Compactifications, in 9th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs, pp. 235–242, 2013.arXiv:1309.6988

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    Demirtas, C

    M. Demirtas, C. Long, L. McAllister, and M. Stillman,The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse, JHEP04(2020) 138, [arXiv:1808.01282]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Hebecker, S

    A. Hebecker, S. Leonhardt, J. Moritz, and A. Westphal,Thraxions: Ultralight Throat Axions, JHEP 04(2019) 158, [arXiv:1812.03999]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    V. M. Mehta, et al.,Superradiance in string theory, JCAP07(2021) 033, [arXiv:2103.06812]

    arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, N. Righi, and A. Westphal,Fuzzy Dark Matter candidates from string theory, JHEP05(2022) 107, [arXiv:2110.02964]

    arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Carta, A

    F. Carta, A. Mininno, N. Righi, and A. Westphal,Thraxions: towards full string models, JHEP01 (2022) 082, [arXiv:2110.02963]

    arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Cicoli, A

    M. Cicoli, A. Schachner, and P. Shukla,Systematics of type IIB moduli stabilisation with odd axions, JHEP04(2022) 003, [arXiv:2109.14624]

    arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Demirtas, N

    M. Demirtas, N. Gendler, C. Long, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz,PQ axiverse, JHEP06(2023) 092, [arXiv:2112.04503]

    arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.