Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

EFTofLSS meets simulation-based inference: $\sigma_8$ from biased tracers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.03741 v2 pith:G5H6IJSW submitted 2023-10-05 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords likelihoodstatisticssummarycosmologicalcovarianceexpressionsinferencesimulation-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Cosmological inferences typically rely on explicit expressions for the likelihood and covariance of the data vector, which normally consists of a set of summary statistics. However, in the case of nonlinear large-scale structure, exact expressions for either likelihood or covariance are unknown, and even approximate expressions can become very cumbersome, depending on the scales and summary statistics considered. Simulation-based inference (SBI), in contrast, does not require an explicit form for the likelihood but only a prior and a simulator, thereby naturally circumventing these issues. In this paper, we explore how this technique can be used to infer $\sigma_8$ from a Lagrangian effective field theory (EFT) based forward model for biased tracers. The power spectrum and bispectrum are used as summary statistics to obtain the posterior of the cosmological, bias and noise parameters via neural density estimation. We compare full simulation-based inference with cases where the data vector is drawn from a Gaussian likelihood with sample and analytical covariances. We conclude that, for $k_{\text{max}}=0.1h\text{Mpc}^{-1}$ and $0.2h\text{Mpc}^{-1}$, the form of the covariance is more important than the non-Gaussianity of the likelihood, although this conclusion is expected to depend on the cosmological parameter inferred, the summary statistics considered and range of scales probed.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Galaxy stochasticity in EFT of large-scale structure reduces to nonlinear couplings of one Gaussian noise field, yielding a samplable field-level likelihood that stabilizes the inferred noise amplitude.

  2. PatchNet: A hierarchical approach for neural field-level inference from Quijote Simulations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Combining patch-level neural summaries with power spectrum and bispectrum extracts roughly as much cosmological information from dark matter simulations as wavelet statistics, apparently nearing the information limit ...

  3. Equivalence of the field-level inference and conventional analyses on large scales

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A joint power spectrum, bispectrum and trispectrum analysis achieves the same precision on the density amplitude as field-level inference for halos on large scales.

Pith tools