Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Evaluating Transport Protocols on 5G for Mobile Augmented Reality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.02859 v1 pith:G6AULIWY submitted 2020-06-04 cs.NI

Evaluating Transport Protocols on 5G for Mobile Augmented Reality

classification cs.NI
keywords performancequalitysignaltransportprotocolsadditionalappearsaugmented
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) mixes physical environments with user-interactive virtual annotations. Immersive MAR experiences are supported by computation-intensive tasks which rely on offloading mechanisms to ease device workloads. However, this introduces additional network traffic which in turn influences the motion-to-photon latency (a determinant of user-perceived quality of experience). Therefore, a proper transport protocol is crucial to minimise transmission latency and ensure sufficient throughput to support MAR performance. Relatedly, 5G, a potential MAR supporting technology, is widely believed to be smarter, faster, and more efficient than its predecessors. However, the suitability and performance of existing transport protocols in MAR in the 5G context has not been explored. Therefore, we present an evaluation of popular transport protocols, including UDP, TCP, MPEG-TS, RTP, and QUIC, with a MAR system on a real-world 5G testbed. We also compare with their 5G performance with LTE and WiFi. Our evaluation results indicate that TCP has the lowest round-trip-time on 5G, with a median of $15.09\pm0.26$ ms, while QUIC appears to perform better on LTE. Through an additional test with varying signal quality (specifically, degrading secondary synchronisation signal reference signal received quality), we discover that protocol performance appears to be significantly impacted by signal quality.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.