Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 159 references

Signatures of Black Hole Spin in Horizon-Scale Polarimetry

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Current Event Horizon Telescope polarimetric observations constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and the disk–jet connection more robustly than they constrain black hole spin magnitude or se

desk verdict A fair, useful review from the EHT polarimetry group: current data constrain flow and field properties more than spin, but the claim is partly model-library-limited, as the authors themselves note. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14218 v1 pith:GCDBOBGR submitted 2026-07-15 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords blackholesKerrpolarimetryaccretionmagneticfieldsrelativisticjetseventhorizonsverylongbaselineinterferometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review asks whether horizon-scale polarimetric images of supermassive black holes can determine the dimensionless spin parameter a*. The authors argue that spin enters the observed polarization through three distinguishable routes—photon propagation in the Kerr spacetime, electromagnetic boundary conditions at the horizon, and spin-dependent magnetized plasma dynamics—and that once these routes are separated, no single polarimetric feature maps uniquely to spin. Surveying current Event Horizon Telescope results for M87* and Sgr A*, they conclude that the data constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and elements of the disk–jet connection far more strongly than spin magnitude or sense. A sympathetic reader would care because this reframes spin inference as a consilience problem: robust spin claims require combining diagnostics with independent systematics rather than trusting any one observable, and future observing programs should be designed accordingly.

What carries the argument

The central object is the polarimetric image chain: VLBI correlations, Stokes I/Q/U/V images, compact descriptors, and the source model that connects them to spin. The key mechanism is the distinction between spin signatures arising from photon propagation in the Kerr spacetime and those mediated by horizon-threading magnetic fields and plasma dynamics. This distinction lets the paper decompose each candidate diagnostic—EVPA spiral handedness, β2 phase, near-horizon EVPA trends, photon-ring subimage polarization, jet light-cylinder structure—into a geometric part tied to the spacetime and a source part tied to the accretion flow. The βm coefficients, annular Fourier moments of the complex li

What would settle it

Concretely, re-run the M87* and Sgr A* model comparisons with a library that adds retrograde flows, varied electron thermodynamics, and self-consistent internal Faraday rotation; if the resulting posterior on a* is sharply peaked and shared by the β2 phase, the Q–U loop handedness, and the near-horizon EVPA trend, the central claim that spin is weakly constrained would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that current horizon-scale polarimetry does not yet provide reliable spin constraints. Spin information is encoded in polarization through three channels: the geometry of photon paths in the Kerr spacetime, the boundary conditions imposed by horizon-threading electromagnetic fields, and the magnetized plasma dynamics shaped by spin. The authors trace the full inference chain from VLBI correlations through Stokes images and compact summary statistics—such as the βm annular Fourier moments whose β2 mode captures the coherence and handedness of the ring-scale EVPA spiral—and show at each step how source assumptions and propagation effects can mimic or erase spin-dep

Load-bearing premise

The claim that spin is weakly constrained depends on the assumption that the GRMHD and semianalytic model libraries used for comparison adequately span the true source parameter space, including electron thermodynamics, Faraday treatment, magnetic flux state, and retrograde accretion; if those libraries are biased, the weak spin constraints could be an artifact of model coverage rather than of the data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper's conclusion is correct, no current EHT polarimetric observable can be cited as a standalone spin measurement; published spin values must be understood as conditional on model assumptions such as Faraday screen location, electron thermodynamics, and emission geometry.
  • The data do robustly constrain magnetic flux state (MAD vs SANE), magnetic-field geometry, inclination, and variability, so these quantities—not spin—should anchor source-model comparisons and can be used to test accretion physics.
  • Robust spin inference becomes a consilience test: conflicting spin answers from different diagnostics (e.g., β2 phase vs Q–U loop handedness) identify missing physics, while agreement across complementary systematics would justify a spin claim.
  • Long-baseline and space-based polarimetric observations targeting the photon ring and near-horizon EVPA are the most promising route to cleaner geometric spin constraints, but only if source polarization models and Faraday treatment are developed alongside them.
  • For jet-resolved sources, light-cylinder EVPA swings and helical-field handedness can constrain field-line angular velocity and possibly spin sign, but require assumptions about disk–jet alignment and the Faraday screen.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the Sgr A* high-spin solution from the external-screen treatment should not be quoted as a spin measurement; if the internal-rotation interpretation is correct, that solution disappears entirely, and the spread between the high-spin and low-to-intermediate-spin analyses maps the assumptions still to be fixed.
  • An extension of the consilience criterion: a decisive test would be to require the same spin direction from the horizon-scale β2 handedness and from the independent Q–U loop handedness in Sgr A*; agreement would strengthen spin claims, disagreement would localize the missing physics to the Faraday or emission model.
  • A testable extension suggested by the paper's logic: multifrequency full-Stokes monitoring at 86, 230, and 345 GHz can directly measure the frequency dependence of the rotation measure; if the depolarization and RM scaling follow the internal-rotation prediction, the external-screen derotation used in current spin fits is invalid.
  • The paper's emphasis on population studies implies that horizon-scale spin demographics will be dominated by modeling priors until libraries span retrograde flows, varied electron thermodynamics, and self-consistent Faraday treatment; otherwise, apparent population-level spin trends may be artifacts of library coverage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review article examines how black-hole spin is encoded in horizon-scale radio polarimetric images, with emphasis on the Event Horizon Telescope observations of M87* and Sgr A*. It lays out a measurement hierarchy from VLBI correlations through Stokes images and compact descriptors (EVPA, β_m, polarization fractions) to source properties and finally spin. The paper distinguishes spin signatures from photon propagation in the Kerr spacetime, from horizon-threading electromagnetic fields, and from magnetized plasma dynamics, and it surveys resolved horizon-scale polarization, jet-base/light-cylinder diagnostics, near-horizon EVPA/inner-shadow structure, and photon-ring/long-baseline signatures. The central conclusion is that current EHT polarimetric data constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and elements of the disk–jet connection more robustly than they constrain spin magnitude or sense, and that robust spin inference will require consilience across diagnostics with independent systematics.

Significance. If accepted, this review provides a valuable and timely synthesis of a rapidly evolving field. Its strengths are organizational clarity, an explicit separation of observables from model-dependent inference, and a balanced treatment of systematics: the paper repeatedly flags the prograde-only BHP II model family (§4.1), the external-screen requirement for the Sgr A* high-spin solution (§4.2), and the broader source-model priors (§5, item 3). It does not attempt a new derivation, but its contribution is synthetic and diagnostic. Table 1 and the Section 5 itemization give a concrete roadmap for future work. The paper also includes an original simulation figure (Figure 1) and reproduces key figures with permission. The central claim is carefully hedged in the body, though the abstract states it somewhat more tersely.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'Current Event Horizon Telescope observations constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and aspects of the disk–jet connection more robustly than they constrain spin magnitude or sense' is stronger than the body's carefully conditioned discussion. Consider adding a qualifier such as 'within current modeling frameworks' or 'given present model libraries,' since Sections 4.1–4.2 and Section 5 item 3 show that these non-spin constraints are themselves model-dependent.
  2. [§4.2] The total-intensity paragraph says the data 'disfavor ... retrograde disks,' while later the only Paper VIII-passing model is described as a*=0.94 with inclination i=150°. The word 'retrograde' can be read either as counter-alignment between black-hole spin and disk angular momentum or as sky-projected clockwise motion. A sentence clarifying which sense is meant would prevent confusion, especially since the clockwise/retrograde distinction is central to the Sgr A* discussion.
  3. [Figure 8 caption] For the Sgr A* panel, the caption labels the EHT constraint as 'derotated.' Since the derotation assumes an external Faraday screen, the caption should state this assumption explicitly so the plotted band is not misread as a raw observable.
  4. [§3.1, Fig. 1 caption] The text notes that Figure 1 is imaged for 'M87*-like parameters' with a 15 µas Gaussian blur. Since the same angular scale would not apply to Sgr A*, adding a sentence in the caption noting that the physical linear scale differs for the two sources would improve accessibility.
  5. [§2, Eq. (5)] The notation for the affine parameter s and the invariant Stokes vector is standard, but the text could state explicitly that Equation (5) is written in geometric units with c=G=1. This is a minor clarity issue.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the review's spin-weakness conclusion is conditional and flags model-library gaps; residual self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a review/synthesis article, not a derivation paper: it contains no new fit-to-data step, no new 'prediction' equation, and no claim that a quantity is derived from first principles within the paper. The central claim—that current EHT observations constrain field geometry, variability, orientation, flux state, and disk-jet connection more robustly than spin magnitude/sense—is an interpretation of external EHT analyses (e.g., EHT Papers VII/VIII) and of the authors' own published semianalytic/GRMHD programs. Where the paper makes a spin-sensitive statement, it explicitly conditions it on assumptions: BHP II 'restricts its model space to prograde accretion flows' and the arg(β2) comparison is made 'under assumptions about Faraday rotation and emission geometry' (Section 3.1, Fig. 8); Paper VIII's a*=0.94 solution requires 'at least 97% of the measured RM must be external' and the paper notes that if Faraday rotation is internal 'no sampled model passes all constraints' (Section 4.2). The authors list 'Source-model priors' as a named limitation (Section 5, item 3), so the model-coverage concern is flagged rather than hidden. No equation in the text equates a fitted parameter with a predicted observable by construction, and no load-bearing result is justified solely by a self-citation: the self-cited PWP/BHP/Gelles diagnostics are presented as model-dependent candidate signatures whose weakness is the paper's conclusion, not as external uniqueness theorems that force the conclusion. Thus the only caveat is citation-genetic (several spin diagnostics originate in the authors' own program), which is self-citation but not logical circularity. Score 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this review and no new entities are introduced. The load-bearing inputs are the standard GR and radiative-transfer framework plus the domain assumptions above, particularly the GRMHD library coverage and the Faraday-screen choice. The review explicitly flags these dependencies, so the ledger mainly records them rather than exposing hidden fits.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kerr spacetime uniquely describes the external geometry of an isolated spinning black hole; photon geodesics and parallel transport determine image-plane EVPA structure.
    Used throughout Sections 1 and 3; the review's spin diagnostics rely on the Kerr metric and lensing/parallel-transport formalism, including photon-ring and near-horizon EVPA behavior.
  • domain assumption At 230 GHz, low-luminosity accretion flows emit synchrotron radiation with Faraday rotation and conversion described by the invariant polarized radiative-transfer equation.
    Section 2; all EHT polarimetric interpretation and GRMHD ray-tracing assume this emission and transfer model.
  • domain assumption GRMHD simulation libraries (MAD/SANE states, electron thermodynamics prescriptions, Faraday treatment) adequately represent the true accretion-flow parameter space for model comparison.
    Sections 4.1-4.2 and 5; the conclusion that spin is weakly constrained follows from the spread across these libraries.
  • domain assumption The BHP II stationary inflow model, which relates magnetic pitch to spin and arg(beta_2), is a valid interpretive tool and excludes retrograde configurations.
    Section 3.1 and Figure 8; this self-cited prior result carries much of the spin-pitch argument in the review.
  • domain assumption For Sgr A*, the observed EVPA handedness can be determined by treating most Faraday rotation as an external screen, as in EHT Paper VIII; lower-frequency ALMA data instead favor internal rotation.
    Section 4.2; the high-spin solution a*=0.94 depends on this screen choice, so the spin conclusion is conditional on it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Signatures of Black Hole Spin in Horizon-Scale Polarimetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GCDBOBGR

@misc{pith2026260714218,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Signatures of Black Hole Spin in Horizon-Scale Polarimetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GCDBOBGR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14218}
}
read the original abstract

The angular momentum of a black hole, usually expressed in terms of a dimensionless "spin," both shapes the strong-field spacetime and provides a reservoir of rotational energy that can be exchanged with surrounding plasma. Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) has now begun to resolve polarized emission on event-horizon scales. We distinguish polarimetric signatures of spin arising primarily from photon propagation in the Kerr spacetime from those mediated by horizon-threading electromagnetic fields and magnetized plasma dynamics. We trace the inference from VLBI correlations through Stokes images and compact summary statistics to constraints on the source and, ultimately, on spin. Within this framework, we review diagnostics linked to horizon regularity and magnetic-field winding, magnetically arrested accretion, electromagnetic energy extraction, jet-base and light-cylinder structure, and horizon and photon-ring polarization. Current Event Horizon Telescope observations constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and aspects of the disk-jet connection more robustly than they constrain spin magnitude or sense. Future observing and modeling programs should prioritize combinations of polarimetric diagnostics with complementary systematics and test whether a common spin-dependent interpretation is supported across independent data products and plausible source models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14218 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative ray-traced GRMHD images of highly magnetized accretion flows for five different spins, blurred with a 15 µas Gaussian to simulate EHT resolution. The grayscale background encodes total intensity, tick directions denote the EVPA, and tick color gives the local linear-polarization fraction. The five models hint at a relationship between the polarimetric ob￾servables and the black hole spin and illustrat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic path from near-horizon magnetic fields to an observed polarized image. The local synchrotron polarization is determined by the magnetic field geometry in the emitting plasma, but relativistic propagation, parallel transport, and Faraday effects can rotate or depolarize the signal, so the observed EVPA pattern is a processed signature of the source rather than a direct magnetic-field map. Here we consider m… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Annular polarization modes used in the βm decomposition. The left panel shows pure azimuthal modes of P = Q + iU, and the right panel shows the special case m = 2 for several phases of β2. Radial, azimuthal, and handed spiral EVPA patterns are distinguished mainly by arg(β2) for a nearly face-on ring. Figure reproduced with permission from [55]. The βm coefficients are image-domain summaries rather than raw interfer… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Radial evolution of EVPA morphology in nearly face-on jet models. The curves show arg(β2) measured as a function of impact parameter b in units of rg for low- and high-spin cases. Large swings occur where the counterjet fades, where the magnetic field becomes azimuthal…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Near-horizon EVPA pattern predicted by the horizon-limit formula. The color maps show χ/π on the observer screen for a rapidly spinning black hole viewed at θo = 60◦ , with curves marking image tracks for several emission latitudes. Reproduced with permission from [125…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time-averaged decomposition of a simulated polarized image into the direct image (n = 0), the first lensed subimage (n = 1), and the full image, together with the corresponding visibility￾domain spiral phase. The figure illustrates how long-baseline polarimetry can dis…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Event Horizon Telescope polarimetric images of M87* and Sgr A* from the 2017 observations. The background grayscale maps show total intensity, line segments show EVPA, and segment color gives the resolved linear polarization fraction. Both sources show compact ring-lik…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between EHT constraints on arg(β2) and semianalytic model predictions from Wong et al. [56]. The purple bands show the BHP II stationary inflow model as a function of prograde spin, the gray distributions show GRMHD image results at discrete spins, and the h…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

159 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics.Physical Review Letters1963, 11, 237–238

    Kerr, R.P . Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics.Physical Review Letters1963, 11, 237–238. ADS Bibcode: 1963PhRvL..11..237K, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237

  2. [2]

    Testing the No-hair Theorem with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum

    Johannsen, T.; Psaltis, D. Testing the No-hair Theorem with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum. II. Black Hole Images. The Astrophysical Journal2010,718, 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/446

  3. [3]

    Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond.Living Rev

    Chrusciel, P .T.; Lopes Costa, J.; Heusler, M. Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond.Living Rev. Rel.2012,15, 7. _eprint: 1205.6112, https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2012-7

  4. [4]

    Astrophysical processes near black holes.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics1975,13, 381–422

    Eardley, D.M.; Press, W.H. Astrophysical processes near black holes.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics1975,13, 381–422. ADS Bibcode: 1975ARA&A..13..381E, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.13.090175.002121

  5. [5]

    Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation.The Astrophysical Journal1972,178, 347–370

    Bardeen, J.M.; Press, W.H.; Teukolsky, S.A. Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation.The Astrophysical Journal1972,178, 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1086/151796

  6. [6]

    Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1977,179, 433–456

    Blandford, R.D.; Znajek, R.L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1977,179, 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

  7. [7]

    Black hole electrodynamics and the Carter tetrad.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1977,179, 457–472

    Znajek, R.L. Black hole electrodynamics and the Carter tetrad.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1977,179, 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.3.457

  8. [8]

    A Measurement of the Electromagnetic Luminosity of a Kerr Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal 2004,611, 977–995

    McKinney, J.C.; Gammie, C.F. A Measurement of the Electromagnetic Luminosity of a Kerr Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal 2004,611, 977–995. ADS Bibcode: 2004ApJ...611..977M, https://doi.org/10.1086/422244

Show all 159 references
  1. [9]

    McKinney, J.C. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the jet formation and large-scale propagation from black hole accretion systems.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2006,368, 1561–1582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13 65-2966.2006.10256.x

  2. [10]

    Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2011,418, L79–L83

    Tchekhovskoy, A.; Narayan, R.; McKinney, J.C. Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2011,418, L79–L83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.20 11.01147.x

  3. [11]

    Growing supermassive black holes by chaotic accretion.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2006,373, L90–L92

    King, A.R.; Pringle, J.E. Growing supermassive black holes by chaotic accretion.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2006,373, L90–L92. ADS Bibcode: 2006MNRAS.373L..90K, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00249.x

  4. [12]

    Formation of supermassive black holes.Astronomy and Astrophysics Review2010,18, 279–315

    Volonteri, M. Formation of supermassive black holes.Astronomy and Astrophysics Review2010,18, 279–315. ADS Bibcode: 2010A&ARv..18..279V , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x

  5. [14]

    Insights into the astrophysics of supermassive black hole binaries from pulsar timing observations.Classical and Quantum Gravity2013,30, 224014

    Sesana, A. Insights into the astrophysics of supermassive black hole binaries from pulsar timing observations.Classical and Quantum Gravity2013,30, 224014. ADS Bibcode: 2013CQGra..30v4014S, https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/22/224014

  6. [15]

    Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2021,59, 117–154

    Reynolds, C.S. Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2021,59, 117–154. ADS Bibcode: 2021ARA&A..59..117R, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-035022

  7. [16]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; Balokovi´ c, M.; Barrett, J.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal2019...

  8. [17]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; Balokovi´ c, M.; Barrett, J.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring.The Astrophysical Journal2019,87...

  9. [18]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Algaba, J.C.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring.The Astrophysical Journal 2021,910, L12. https:...

  10. [19]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Algaba, J.C.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon. The Astrophysical Jour...

  11. [20]

    The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M 87

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M 87. I. Observations, calibration, imaging, and analysis.Astron...

  12. [21]

    Horizon-scale variability of M87* from 2017–2021 EHT observations.Astronomy & Astrophysics2025

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Albentosa-Ruíz, E.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Carlos Algaba, J.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; et al. Horizon-scale variability of M87* from 2017–2021 EHT observations.Astronomy & Astrophysics2025. https://d...

  13. [22]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the ...

  14. [23]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole....

  15. [24]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring.The Astrophysical Journal2024,964, L...

  16. [25]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Physical Interpretation of the Polarized Ring. The Astrophys...

  17. [26]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agarwal, D.; et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. Physical Review X2023,13...

  18. [27]

    Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3.Physical Review X2023, 13, 011048

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agarwal, D.; et al. Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3.Physical Review X2023, 13, 011048. ADS Bibcode: 2...

  19. [28]

    The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins, 2026

    Biscoveanu, S. The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins, 2026. ADS Bibcode: 2026arXiv260606209B, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06209

  20. [29]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background.The Astrophysical Journal2023,952, L37

    Agazie, G.; Anumarlapudi, A.; Archibald, A.M.; Baker, P .T.; Bécsy, B.; Blecha, L.; Bonilla, A.; Brazier, A.; Brook, P .R.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background.The Astroph...

  21. [30]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background.The Astrophysical Journal 2023,951, L8

    Agazie, G.; Anumarlapudi, A.; Archibald, A.M.; Arzoumanian, Z.; Baker, P .T.; Bécsy, B.; Blecha, L.; Brazier, A.; Brook, P .R.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background.The Astrophysical Journal 2023,951, L8. ADS Bibco...

  22. [32]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array

    EPTA Collaboration.; InPTA Collaboration.; Antoniadis, J.; Arumugam, P .; Arumugam, S.; Babak, S.; Bagchi, M.; Bak Nielsen, A.S.; Bassa, C.G.; Bathula, A.; et al. The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array. IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matt...

  23. [33]

    Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array.The Astrophysical Journal2023, 951, L6

    Reardon, D.J.; Zic, A.; Shannon, R.M.; Hobbs, G.B.; Bailes, M.; Di Marco, V .; Kapur, A.; Rogers, A.F.; Thrane, E.; Askew, J.; et al. Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array.The Astrophysical Journal2023, 951, L6. ADS Bibcode: ...

  24. [34]

    Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

    Agazie, G.; Antoniadis, J.; Anumarlapudi, A.; Archibald, A.M.; Arumugam, P .; Arumugam, S.; Arzoumanian, Z.; Askew, J.; Babak, S.; Bagchi, M.; et al. Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background. The Astrophysical Journ...

  25. [35]

    Publication Title: Measuring the Angular Momentum of Supermassive Black Holes ADS Bibcode: 2013mams.book.....B, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7771-6

    Brenneman, L.Measuring the Angular Momentum of Supermassive Black Holes; 2013. Publication Title: Measuring the Angular Momentum of Supermassive Black Holes ADS Bibcode: 2013mams.book.....B, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7771-6

  26. [36]

    Black Hole Spin via Continuum Fitting and the Role of Spin in Powering Transient Jets

    McClintock, J.E.; Narayan, R.; Steiner, J.F. Black Hole Spin via Continuum Fitting and the Role of Spin in Powering Transient Jets. Space Science Reviews2014,183, 295–322. ADS Bibcode: 2014SSRv..183..295M, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0003-9

  27. [37]

    Stellar-Mass Black Hole Spin Constraints from Disk Reflection and Continuum Modeling.The Astrophysical Journal2009,697, 900–912

    Miller, J.M.; Reynolds, C.S.; Fabian, A.C.; Miniutti, G.; Gallo, L.C. Stellar-Mass Black Hole Spin Constraints from Disk Reflection and Continuum Modeling.The Astrophysical Journal2009,697, 900–912. ADS Bibcode: 2009ApJ...697..900M, https://doi.org/10.1 088/0004-637X/697/1/900

  28. [38]

    Towards Precision Measurements of Accreting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Science Reviews2021, 217, 65

    Bambi, C.; Brenneman, L.W.; Dauser, T.; García, J.A.; Grinberg, V .; Ingram, A.; Jiang, J.; Liu, H.; Lohfink, A.M.; Marinucci, A.; et al. Towards Precision Measurements of Accreting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Science Reviews2021, 217, 65. ADS Bibcode...

  29. [39]

    Spin Demographics of Active Supermassive Black Holes: Updated Estimates from X-Ray Reflection and Future Opportunities.Galaxies 2026,14, 50

    Sisk-Reynés, J.M.; Reynolds, C.S.; Matthews, J.H.; Walton, D.J.; Piotrowska, J.M.; Steiner, J.F.; García, J.A.; Ricarte, A. Spin Demographics of Active Supermassive Black Holes: Updated Estimates from X-Ray Reflection and Future Opportunities.Galaxies 2026,14, 50. ADS Bibcode:...

  30. [40]

    The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch.Journal of Astronomical T elescopes, Instruments, and Systems2022,8, 026002

    Weisskopf, M.C.; Soffitta, P .; Baldini, L.; Ramsey, B.D.; O’Dell, S.L.; Romani, R.W.; Matt, G.; Deininger, W.D.; Baumgartner, W.H.; Bellazzini, R.; et al. The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch.Journal of Astronomical T elescopes, Instruments, and Systems20...

  31. [41]

    How Spatially Resolved Polarimetry Informs Black Hole Accretion Flow Models.Galaxies2023,11, 5

    Ricarte, A.; Johnson, M.D.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Palumbo, D.C.M.; Emami, R. How Spatially Resolved Polarimetry Informs Black Hole Accretion Flow Models.Galaxies2023,11, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11010005

  32. [42]

    Polarization Signatures from GRMHD Simulations of Black Hole Accretion, 2026

    Fragile, P .C.; Wielgus, M.; Prather, C. Polarization Signatures from GRMHD Simulations of Black Hole Accretion, 2026. ADS Bibcode: 2026arXiv260515166F, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.15166

  33. [43]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric.The Astrophysical Journal2022,93...

  34. [44]

    The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M87: II

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Albentosa-Ruíz, E.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; et al. The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M87: II. Model comparisons and theoretical interpretations...

  35. [45]

    PATOKA: Simulating Electromagnetic Observables of Black Hole Accretion.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2022, 259, 64

    Wong, G.N.; Prather, C.; Dhruv, V .; Ryan, B.R.; Mo´ scibrodzka, M.; Chan, C.k.; Joshi, A.V .; Yarza, R.; Ricarte, A.; Shiokawa, H.; et al. PATOKA: Simulating Electromagnetic Observables of Black Hole Accretion.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2022, 259, 64. https://...

  36. [46]

    Chael, A. Survey of radiative, two-temperature magnetically arrested simulations of the black hole M87* I: turbulent electron heating.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2025,537, 2496–2515. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf200

  37. [47]

    A Survey of General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Models for Black Hole Accretion Systems.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2025,277, 16

    Dhruv, V .; Prather, C.; Wong, G.N.; Gammie, C.F. A Survey of General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Models for Black Hole Accretion Systems.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2025,277, 16. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/adaea6

  38. [48]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IX. Detection of Near-horizon Circular Polarization.The Astrophysical Journal...

  39. [49]

    AthenaK: A Performance-portable Version of the Athena++ Adaptive Mesh Refinement Framework.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2026,283, 27

    Stone, J.M.; Mullen, P .D.; Fielding, D.; Grete, P .; Guo, M.; Kempski, P .; Most, E.R.; White, C.J.; Wong, G.N. AthenaK: A Performance-portable Version of the Athena++ Adaptive Mesh Refinement Framework.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2026,283, 27. https://doi.org/...

  40. [50]

    Mass Transport, Turbulent Mixing, and Inflow in Black Hole Accretion.The Astrophysical Journal2025,995, 119

    Wong, G.N.; Medeiros, L.; Stone, J.M. Mass Transport, Turbulent Mixing, and Inflow in Black Hole Accretion.The Astrophysical Journal2025,995, 119. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae14fd

  41. [51]

    Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow

    Narayan, R.; Igumenshchev, I.V .; Abramowicz, M.A. Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan2003,55, L69–L72. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/55.6.L69

  42. [52]

    General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2012,423, 3083–3117

    McKinney, J.C.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Blandford, R.D. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2012,423, 3083–3117. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21074.x

  43. [53]

    What really makes an accretion disc MAD.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2022,511, 2040–2051

    Begelman, M.C.; Scepi, N.; Dexter, J. What really makes an accretion disc MAD.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2022,511, 2040–2051. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3790

  44. [54]

    Black Hole Polarimetry I

    Chael, A.; Lupsasca, A.; Wong, G.N.; Quataert, E. Black Hole Polarimetry I. A Signature of Electromagnetic Energy Extraction. The Astrophysical Journal2023,958, 65. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acf92d

  45. [55]

    Discriminating Accretion States via Rotational Symmetry in Simulated Polarimetric Images of M87.The Astrophysical Journal2020,894, 156

    Palumbo, D.C.M.; Wong, G.N.; Prather, C. Discriminating Accretion States via Rotational Symmetry in Simulated Polarimetric Images of M87.The Astrophysical Journal2020,894, 156. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab86ac

  46. [56]

    Black Hole Polarimetry

    Wong, G.N.; Chael, A.; Lupsasca, A.; Quataert, E. Black Hole Polarimetry. II. The Connection between Spin and Polarization.The Astrophysical Journal2026,997, 113. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae20f3

  47. [57]

    Signatures of Black Hole Spin and Plasma Acceleration in Jet Polarimetry.The Astrophysical Journal2025,981, 204

    Gelles, Z.; Chael, A.; Quataert, E. Signatures of Black Hole Spin and Plasma Acceleration in Jet Polarimetry.The Astrophysical Journal2025,981, 204. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb1aa

  48. [58]

    Signatures of Black Hole Spin and Plasma Acceleration in Jet Polarimetry

    Gelles, Z.; Chael, A.; Quataert, E. Signatures of Black Hole Spin and Plasma Acceleration in Jet Polarimetry. II. Off-axis Jets.The Astrophysical Journal2026,1001, 206. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae5223

  49. [59]

    Universal polarimetric signatures of the black hole photon ring

    Himwich, E.; Johnson, M.D.; Lupsasca, A.; Strominger, A. Universal polarimetric signatures of the black hole photon ring. Physical Review D2020,101, 084020. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084020

  50. [60]

    Photon Ring Symmetries in Simulated Linear Polarization Images of Messier 87*.The Astrophysical Journal2022,929, 49

    Palumbo, D.C.M.; Wong, G.N. Photon Ring Symmetries in Simulated Linear Polarization Images of Messier 87*.The Astrophysical Journal2022,929, 49. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac59b4

  51. [61]

    Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2014,52, 529–588

    Yuan, F.; Narayan, R. Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2014,52, 529–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003

  52. [62]

    Numerical Calculation of Magnetobremsstrahlung Emission and Absorption Coefficients

    Leung, P .K.; Gammie, C.F.; Noble, S.C. Numerical Calculation of Magnetobremsstrahlung Emission and Absorption Coefficients. The Astrophysical Journal2011,737, 21. ADS Bibcode: 2011ApJ...737...21L, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/21

  53. [63]

    Understanding radio polarimetry

    Hamaker, J.P .; Bregman, J.D. Understanding radio polarimetry. III. Interpreting the IAU/IEEE definitions of the Stokes parameters. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series1996,117, 161–165. ADS Bibcode: 1996A&AS..117..161H

  54. [64]

    Publication Title: A Wiley-Interscience Publication ADS Bibcode: 1979rpa..book.....R

    Rybicki, G.B.; Lightman, A.P .Radiative processes in astrophysics; 1979. Publication Title: A Wiley-Interscience Publication ADS Bibcode: 1979rpa..book.....R. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 29 of 33

  55. [65]

    Propagation Effects in Magnetized Transrelativistic Plasmas.The Astrophysical Journal2008,688, 695–700

    Shcherbakov, R.V . Propagation Effects in Magnetized Transrelativistic Plasmas.The Astrophysical Journal2008,688, 695–700. ADS Bibcode: 2008ApJ...688..695S, https://doi.org/10.1086/592326

  56. [66]

    General relativistic polarized radiative transfer: building a dynamics-observations interface

    Shcherbakov, R.V .; Huang, L. General relativistic polarized radiative transfer: building a dynamics-observations interface. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2011,410, 1052–1063. ADS Bibcode: 2011MNRAS.410.1052S, https://doi.org/10.1 111/j.1365-2966.2010.17502.x

  57. [67]

    A public code for general relativistic, polarised radiative transfer around spinning black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2016,462, 115–136

    Dexter, J. A public code for general relativistic, polarised radiative transfer around spinning black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2016,462, 115–136. ADS Bibcode: 2016MNRAS.462..115D, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1526

  58. [68]

    Polarized Synchrotron Emissivities and Absorptivities for Relativistic Thermal, Power-law, and Kappa Distribution Functions.The Astrophysical Journal2016,822, 34

    Pandya, A.; Zhang, Z.; Chandra, M.; Gammie, C.F. Polarized Synchrotron Emissivities and Absorptivities for Relativistic Thermal, Power-law, and Kappa Distribution Functions.The Astrophysical Journal2016,822, 34. ADS Bibcode: 2016ApJ...822...34P , https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6...

  59. [69]

    Updated Transfer Coefficients for Magnetized Plasmas.The Astrophysical Journal2021,921, 17

    Marszewski, A.; Prather, C.; Joshi, A.V .; Pandya, A.; Gammie, C.F. Updated Transfer Coefficients for Magnetized Plasmas.The Astrophysical Journal2021,921, 17. ADS Bibcode: 2021ApJ...921...17M, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1b28

  60. [70]

    Comparison of Polarized Radiative Transfer Codes Used by the EHT Collaboration.The Astrophysical Journal2023,950, 35

    Prather, C.; Dexter, J.; Moscibrodzka, M.; Pu, H.Y.; Bronzwaer, T.; Davelaar, J.; Younsi, Z.; Gammie, C.F.; Gold, R.; Wong, G.N.; et al. Comparison of Polarized Radiative Transfer Codes Used by the EHT Collaboration.The Astrophysical Journal2023,950, 35. https://doi.org/10.384...

  61. [71]

    Black hole magnetic fields and their imprint on circular polarization images.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2021,505, 523–539

    Ricarte, A.; Qiu, R.; Narayan, R. Black hole magnetic fields and their imprint on circular polarization images.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2021,505, 523–539. ADS Bibcode: 2021MNRAS.505..523R, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1289

  62. [72]

    Circular Polarization of Simulated Images of Black Holes.The Astrophysical Journal2024,972, 135

    Joshi, A.V .; Prather, C.; Chan, C.k.; Wielgus, M.; Gammie, C.F. Circular Polarization of Simulated Images of Black Holes.The Astrophysical Journal2024,972, 135. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b51

  63. [73]

    The internal Faraday screen of Sagittarius A*.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,682, A97

    Wielgus, M.; Issaoun, S.; Martí-Vidal, I.; Emami, R.; Moscibrodzka, M.; Brinkerink, C.D.; Goddi, C.; Fomalont, E. The internal Faraday screen of Sagittarius A*.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,682, A97. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347772

  64. [74]

    The Polarized Image of a Synchrotron-emitting Ring of Gas Orbiting a Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal2021, 912, 35

    Narayan, R.; Palumbo, D.C.M.; Johnson, M.D.; Gelles, Z.; Himwich, E.; Chang, D.O.; Ricarte, A.; Dexter, J.; Gammie, C.F.; Chael, A.A.; et al. The Polarized Image of a Synchrotron-emitting Ring of Gas Orbiting a Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal2021, 912, 35. ADS Bibcode: 20...

  65. [75]

    Polarized image of equatorial emission in the Kerr geometry.Physical Review D2021,104, 044060

    Gelles, Z.; Himwich, E.; Johnson, M.D.; Palumbo, D.C.M. Polarized image of equatorial emission in the Kerr geometry.Physical Review D2021,104, 044060. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.044060

  66. [76]

    Unraveling Twisty Linear Polarization Morphologies in Black Hole Images.The Astrophysical Journal2023,950, 38

    Emami, R.; Ricarte, A.; Wong, G.N.; Palumbo, D.; Chang, D.; Doeleman, S.S.; Broderick, A.E.; Narayan, R.; Wielgus, M.; Blackburn, L.; et al. Unraveling Twisty Linear Polarization Morphologies in Black Hole Images.The Astrophysical Journal2023,950, 38. ADS Bibcode: 2023ApJ...95...

  67. [77]

    Supermassive Black Hole Spin Constraints from Polarimetry in an Equatorial Disk Model.The Astrophysical Journal2025,978, L4

    Palumbo, D.C.M. Supermassive Black Hole Spin Constraints from Polarimetry in an Equatorial Disk Model.The Astrophysical Journal2025,978, L4. ADS Bibcode: 2025ApJ...978L...4P , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad9bb4

  68. [78]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; Balokovi´ c, M.; Barrett, J.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration.The Astrophysical Journal2019,875, L3...

  69. [79]

    Calibration of mixed-polarization interferometric observations

    Martí-Vidal, I.; Roy, A.; Conway, J.; Zensus, A.J. Calibration of mixed-polarization interferometric observations. Tools for the reduction of interferometric data from elements with linear and circular polarization receivers.Astronomy and Astrophysics2016, 587, A143. ADS Bibco...

  70. [80]

    Demonstrating Photon Ring Existence with Single-baseline Polarimetry

    Palumbo, D.C.M.; Wong, G.N.; Chael, A.; Johnson, M.D. Demonstrating Photon Ring Existence with Single-baseline Polarimetry. The Astrophysical Journal2023,952, L31. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ace630

  71. [81]

    Polarization features of X-ray radiation emitted near black holes.The Astrophysical Journal 1980,235, 224–244

    Connors, P .A.; Piran, T.; Stark, R.F. Polarization features of X-ray radiation emitted near black holes.The Astrophysical Journal 1980,235, 224–244. ADS Bibcode: 1980ApJ...235..224C, https://doi.org/10.1086/157627

  72. [82]

    The Accretion of Matter by a Collapsing Star in the Presence of a Magnetic Field

    Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S.; Ruzmaikin, A.A. The Accretion of Matter by a Collapsing Star in the Presence of a Magnetic Field. Astrophysics and Space Science1974,28, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642237

  73. [83]

    Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows.The Astrophysical Journal2003,592, 1042–1059

    Igumenshchev, I.V .; Narayan, R.; Abramowicz, M.A. Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows.The Astrophysical Journal2003,592, 1042–1059. https://doi.org/10.1086/375769

  74. [84]

    Polarimetric Properties of Event Horizon Telescope Targets from ALMA.The Astrophysical Journal2021, 910, L14

    Goddi, C.; Martí-Vidal, I.; Messias, H.; Bower, G.C.; Broderick, A.E.; Dexter, J.; Marrone, D.P .; Moscibrodzka, M.; Nagai, H.; Algaba, J.C.; et al. Polarimetric Properties of Event Horizon Telescope Targets from ALMA.The Astrophysical Journal2021, 910, L14. ADS Bibcode: 2021A...

  75. [85]

    ALMA Polarimetry of Sgr A*: Probing the Accretion Flow from the Event Horizon to the Bondi Radius.The Astrophysical Journal2018,868, 101

    Bower, G.C.; Broderick, A.; Dexter, J.; Doeleman, S.; Falcke, H.; Fish, V .; Johnson, M.D.; Marrone, D.P .; Moran, J.M.; Moscibrodzka, M.; et al. ALMA Polarimetry of Sgr A*: Probing the Accretion Flow from the Event Horizon to the Bondi Radius.The Astrophysical Journal2018,868...

  76. [86]

    An Unambiguous Detection of Faraday Rotation in Sagittarius A*.The Astrophysical Journal2007,654, L57–L60

    Marrone, D.P .; Moran, J.M.; Zhao, J.H.; Rao, R. An Unambiguous Detection of Faraday Rotation in Sagittarius A*.The Astrophysical Journal2007,654, L57–L60. ADS Bibcode: 2007ApJ...654L..57M, https://doi.org/10.1086/510850. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1,...

  77. [87]

    Orbital motion near Sagittarius A*

    Wielgus, M.; Moscibrodzka, M.; Vos, J.; Gelles, Z.; Martí-Vidal, I.; Farah, J.; Marchili, N.; Goddi, C.; Messias, H. Orbital motion near Sagittarius A* . Constraints from polarimetric ALMA observations.Astronomy and Astrophysics2022,665, L6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244493

  78. [88]

    The Circular Polarization of Sagittarius A* at Submillimeter Wavelengths.The Astrophysical Journal2012,745, 115

    Muñoz, D.J.; Marrone, D.P .; Moran, J.M.; Rao, R. The Circular Polarization of Sagittarius A* at Submillimeter Wavelengths.The Astrophysical Journal2012,745, 115. ADS Bibcode: 2012ApJ...745..115M, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/115

  79. [89]

    Near-horizon Polarization as a Diagnostic of Black Hole Spacetime.The Astrophysical Journal2025,988, L51

    Hou, Y.; Huang, J.; Guo, M.; Mizuno, Y.; Chen, B. Near-horizon Polarization as a Diagnostic of Black Hole Spacetime.The Astrophysical Journal2025,988, L51. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adee09

  80. [90]

    A Study of the Accretion State of Magnetically Arrested Disks across Black Hole Spins for Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows.The Astrophysical Journal2024,962, 135

    Zhang, G.Q.; Bégué, D.; Pe’er, A.; Zhang, B.B. A Study of the Accretion State of Magnetically Arrested Disks across Black Hole Spins for Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows.The Astrophysical Journal2024,962, 135. ADS Bibcode: 2024ApJ...962..135Z, https://doi.org/10.3847/15...

  81. [91]

    Two-temperature, Magnetically Arrested Disc simulations of the jet from the supermassive black hole in M87.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2019,486, 2873–2895

    Chael, A.; Narayan, R.; Johnson, M.D. Two-temperature, Magnetically Arrested Disc simulations of the jet from the supermassive black hole in M87.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2019,486, 2873–2895. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz988

  82. [92]

    A parameter survey of Sgr A* radiative models from GRMHD simulations with self-consistent electron heating.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2020,494, 4168–4186

    Dexter, J.; Jiménez-Rosales, A.; Ressler, S.M.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Bauböck, M.; de Zeeuw, P .T.; Eisenhauer, F.; von Fellenberg, S.; Gao, F.; Genzel, R.; et al. A parameter survey of Sgr A* radiative models from GRMHD simulations with self-consistent electron heating.Monthly No...

  83. [93]

    Comparison of the ion-to-electron temperature ratio prescription: GRMHD simulations with electron thermodynamics.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2021, 506, 741–758

    Mizuno, Y.; Fromm, C.M.; Younsi, Z.; Porth, O.; Olivares, H.; Rezzolla, L. Comparison of the ion-to-electron temperature ratio prescription: GRMHD simulations with electron thermodynamics.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2021, 506, 741–758. ADS Bibcode: 2021MNR...

  84. [94]

    Using Machine Learning to link black hole accretion flows with spatially resolved polarimetric observables.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2023,520, 4867–4888

    Qiu, R.; Ricarte, A.; Narayan, R.; Wong, G.N.; Chael, A.; Palumbo, D. Using Machine Learning to link black hole accretion flows with spatially resolved polarimetric observables.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2023,520, 4867–4888. ADS Bibcode: 2023MNRAS.520.486...

  85. [95]

    Accretion Flow Morphology in Numerical Simulations of Black Holes from the ngEHT Model Library: The Impact of Radiation Physics.Galaxies2023,11, 38

    Chatterjee, K.; Chael, A.; Tiede, P .; Mizuno, Y.; Emami, R.; Fromm, C.; Ricarte, A.; Blackburn, L.; Roelofs, F.; Johnson, M.D.; et al. Accretion Flow Morphology in Numerical Simulations of Black Holes from the ngEHT Model Library: The Impact of Radiation Physics.Galaxies2023,...

  86. [96]

    Imaging bright-spots in the accretion flow near the black hole horizon of Sgr A*.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2005,363, 353–362

    Broderick, A.E.; Loeb, A. Imaging bright-spots in the accretion flow near the black hole horizon of Sgr A*.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2005,363, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09458.x

  87. [97]

    Detection of orbital motions near the last stable circular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*

    GRAVITY Collaboration.; Abuter, R.; Amorim, A.; Bauböck, M.; Berger, J.P .; Bonnet, H.; Brandner, W.; Clénet, Y.; Coudé Du Foresto, V .; de Zeeuw, P .T.; et al. Detection of orbital motions near the last stable circular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*. Astronomy and Astr...

  88. [98]

    Polarimetric signatures of hot spots in black hole accretion flows.Astronomy and Astrophysics2022,668, A185

    Vos, J.; Mo´ scibrodzka, M.A.; Wielgus, M. Polarimetric signatures of hot spots in black hole accretion flows.Astronomy and Astrophysics2022,668, A185. ADS Bibcode: 2022A&A...668A.185V , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244840

  89. [99]

    Polarized signatures of orbiting hot spots: Special relativity impact and probe of spacetime curvature.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,684, A194

    Vincent, F.H.; Wielgus, M.; Aimar, N.; Paumard, T.; Perrin, G. Polarized signatures of orbiting hot spots: Special relativity impact and probe of spacetime curvature.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,684, A194. ADS Bibcode: 2024A&A...684A.194V , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/...

  90. [100]

    Fitting the light curves of Sagittarius A* with a hot-spot model

    Yfantis, A.I.; Mo´ scibrodzka, M.A.; Wielgus, M.; Vos, J.T.; Jimenez-Rosales, A. Fitting the light curves of Sagittarius A* with a hot-spot model. Bayesian modeling of QU loops in the millimeter band.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,685, A142. ADS Bibcode: 2024A&A...685A.142Y, h...

  91. [101]

    Dynamical Inference from Polarized Light Curves of Sagittarius A<SUP>*</SUP>.The Astrophysical Journal2025,987, 152

    Ricarte, A.; Conroy, N.S.; Wielgus, M.; Palumbo, D.C.M.; Emami, R.; Chan, C.K. Dynamical Inference from Polarized Light Curves of Sagittarius A<SUP>*</SUP>.The Astrophysical Journal2025,987, 152. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add729

  92. [102]

    Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes.The Astrophysical Journal1976,207, 962–976

    Fishbone, L.G.; Moncrief, V . Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes.The Astrophysical Journal1976,207, 962–976. https://doi.org/10.1086/154565

  93. [103]

    The analytic theory of fluid disks orbiting the Kerr black hole.Astronomy and Astrophysics1978,63, 209–220

    Kozlowski, M.; Jaroszynski, M.; Abramowicz, M.A. The analytic theory of fluid disks orbiting the Kerr black hole.Astronomy and Astrophysics1978,63, 209–220

  94. [104]

    Efficiency of Magnetized Thin Accretion Disks in the Kerr Metric.The Astrophysical Journal1999,522, L57–L60

    Gammie, C.F. Efficiency of Magnetized Thin Accretion Disks in the Kerr Metric.The Astrophysical Journal1999,522, L57–L60. https://doi.org/10.1086/312207

  95. [105]

    Where Is the Inner Edge of an Accretion Disk around a Black Hole?The Astrophysical Journal2002, 573, 754–763

    Krolik, J.H.; Hawley, J.F. Where Is the Inner Edge of an Accretion Disk around a Black Hole?The Astrophysical Journal2002, 573, 754–763. ADS Bibcode: 2002ApJ...573..754K, https://doi.org/10.1086/340760

  96. [106]

    Where is the radiation edge in magnetized black hole accretion discs?Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2008,390, 21–38

    Beckwith, K.; Hawley, J.F.; Krolik, J.H. Where is the radiation edge in magnetized black hole accretion discs?Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2008,390, 21–38. ADS Bibcode: 2008MNRAS.390...21B, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.1 3710.x

  97. [107]

    Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars.The Astrophysical Journal1995, 452, 710

    Narayan, R.; Yi, I. Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars.The Astrophysical Journal1995, 452, 710. https://doi.org/10.1086/176343

  98. [108]

    Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon.The Astrophysical Journal2021,918, 6

    Chael, A.; Johnson, M.D.; Lupsasca, A. Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon.The Astrophysical Journal2021,918, 6. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac09ee. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 31 of 33

  99. [109]

    Sagittarius A* Accretion Flow and Black Hole Parameters from General Relativistic Dynamical and Polarized Radiative Modeling.The Astrophysical Journal2012,755, 133

    Shcherbakov, R.V .; Penna, R.F.; McKinney, J.C. Sagittarius A* Accretion Flow and Black Hole Parameters from General Relativistic Dynamical and Polarized Radiative Modeling.The Astrophysical Journal2012,755, 133. ADS Bibcode: 2012ApJ...755..133S, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6...

  100. [110]

    Faraday rotation in GRMHD simulations of the jet launching zone of M87.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2017,468, 2214–2221

    Mo´ scibrodzka, M.; Dexter, J.; Davelaar, J.; Falcke, H. Faraday rotation in GRMHD simulations of the jet launching zone of M87.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2017,468, 2214–2221. ADS Bibcode: 2017MNRAS.468.2214M, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx587

  101. [111]

    The impact of Faraday effects on polarized black hole images of Sagittarius A*.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2018,478, 1875–1883

    Jiménez-Rosales, A.; Dexter, J. The impact of Faraday effects on polarized black hole images of Sagittarius A*.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2018,478, 1875–1883. ADS Bibcode: 2018MNRAS.478.1875J, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1210

  102. [112]

    Polarization imaging of M 87 jets by general relativistic radiative transfer calculation based on GRMHD simulations.Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan2020,72, 32

    Tsunetoe, Y.; Mineshige, S.; Ohsuga, K.; Kawashima, T.; Akiyama, K. Polarization imaging of M 87 jets by general relativistic radiative transfer calculation based on GRMHD simulations.Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan2020,72, 32. ADS Bibcode: 2020PASJ...72...32...

  103. [113]

    Spacetime approach to force-free magnetospheres.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2014, 445, 2500–2534

    Gralla, S.E.; Jacobson, T. Spacetime approach to force-free magnetospheres.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2014, 445, 2500–2534. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1690

  104. [114]

    Jets in magnetically arrested hot accretion flows: geometry, power, and black hole spin-down.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2022,511, 3795–3813

    Narayan, R.; Chael, A.; Chatterjee, K.; Ricarte, A.; Curd, B. Jets in magnetically arrested hot accretion flows: geometry, power, and black hole spin-down.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2022,511, 3795–3813. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stac285

  105. [115]

    Kinematics of the jet in M 87 on scales of 100-1000 Schwarzschild radii

    Mertens, F.; Lobanov, A.P .; Walker, R.C.; Hardee, P .E. Kinematics of the jet in M 87 on scales of 100-1000 Schwarzschild radii. Astronomy and Astrophysics2016,595, A54. ADS Bibcode: 2016A&A...595A..54M, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628829

  106. [116]

    The Structure and Dynamics of the Subparsec Jet in M87 Based on 50 VLBA Observations over 17 Years at 43 GHz.The Astrophysical Journal2018,855, 128

    Walker, R.C.; Hardee, P .E.; Davies, F.B.; Ly, C.; Junor, W. The Structure and Dynamics of the Subparsec Jet in M87 Based on 50 VLBA Observations over 17 Years at 43 GHz.The Astrophysical Journal2018,855, 128. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaafcc

  107. [117]

    M 87: a cosmic laboratory for deciphering black hole accretion and jet formation

    Hada, K.; Asada, K.; Nakamura, M.; Kino, M. M 87: a cosmic laboratory for deciphering black hole accretion and jet formation. Astronomy and Astrophysics Review2024,32, 5. ADS Bibcode: 2024A&ARv..32....5H, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-024-00155-y

  108. [118]

    A Helical Magnetic Field in the Jet of 3C 273

    Asada, K.; Inoue, M.; Uchida, Y.; Kameno, S.; Fujisawa, K.; Iguchi, S.; Mutoh, M. A Helical Magnetic Field in the Jet of 3C 273. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan2002,54, L39–L43. ADS Bibcode: 2002PASJ...54L..39A, https://doi.org/10.1093/ pasj/54.3.L39

  109. [119]

    An Oversized Magnetic Sheath Wrapping around the Parsec-scale Jet in 3C 273.The Astrophysical Journal2021,910, 35

    Lisakov, M.M.; Kravchenko, E.V .; Pushkarev, A.B.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Savolainen, T.K.; Lister, M.L. An Oversized Magnetic Sheath Wrapping around the Parsec-scale Jet in 3C 273.The Astrophysical Journal2021,910, 35. ADS Bibcode: 2021ApJ...910...35L, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-43...

  110. [120]

    The magnetic field structure in CTA 102 from high-resolution mm-VLBI observations during the flaring state in 2016-2017.Astronomy and Astrophysics2019,622, A158

    Casadio, C.; Marscher, A.P .; Jorstad, S.G.; Blinov, D.A.; MacDonald, N.R.; Krichbaum, T.P .; Boccardi, B.; Traianou, E.; Gómez, J.L.; Agudo, I.; et al. The magnetic field structure in CTA 102 from high-resolution mm-VLBI observations during the flaring state in 2016-2017.Astr...

  111. [121]

    First polarization study of the M87 jet and active galactic nuclei at submillimeter wavelengths with ALMA

    Goddi, C.; Carlos, D.F.; Crew, G.B.; Matthews, L.D.; Messias, H.; Mus, A.; Martí-Vidal, I.; Albentosa-Ruíz, E.; De Laurentis, M.; Liuzzo, E.; et al. First polarization study of the M87 jet and active galactic nuclei at submillimeter wavelengths with ALMA. Astronomy and Astroph...

  112. [122]

    Helical Magnetic Field in the Acceleration-Collimation Zone of the M87 Jet.The Astrophysical Journal2026,996, L22

    Park, J.; Takahashi, K.; Toma, K.; Hada, K.; Nakamura, M.; Pu, H.Y.; Asada, K.; Ho, P .T.P .; Kino, M.; Kawashima, T.; et al. Helical Magnetic Field in the Acceleration-Collimation Zone of the M87 Jet.The Astrophysical Journal2026,996, L22. ADS Bibcode: 2026ApJ...996L..22P , h...

  113. [123]

    Determining the Jet Poloidal B Field and Black-Hole Rotation Directions in AGNs.Galaxies2018,6, 9

    Gabuzda, D. Determining the Jet Poloidal B Field and Black-Hole Rotation Directions in AGNs.Galaxies2018,6, 9. ADS Bibcode: 2018Galax...6....9G, https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6010009

  114. [124]

    Implications from the Velocity Profile of the M87 Jet: A Possibility of a Slowly Rotating Black Hole Magnetosphere.The Astrophysical Journal2022,939, 83

    Kino, M.; Takahashi, M.; Kawashima, T.; Park, J.; Hada, K.; Ro, H.; Cui, Y. Implications from the Velocity Profile of the M87 Jet: A Possibility of a Slowly Rotating Black Hole Magnetosphere.The Astrophysical Journal2022,939, 83. ADS Bibcode: 2022ApJ...939...83K, https://doi.o...

  115. [125]

    Black Hole Polarimetry III: Universal Polarization of Synchrotron Radiation at the Horizon, 2026

    Chael, A.; Lupsasca, A.; Wong, G.N.; Gelles, Z.; Quataert, E. Black Hole Polarimetry III: Universal Polarization of Synchrotron Radiation at the Horizon, 2026. ADS Bibcode: 2026arXiv260612518C, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12518

  116. [126]

    The Black Hole Explorer: Motivation and Vision

    Johnson, M.D.; Akiyama, K.; Baturin, R.; Bilyeu, B.; Blackburn, L.; Boroson, D.; Cardenas-Avendano, A.; Chael, A.; Chan, C.k.; Chang, D.; et al. The Black Hole Explorer: Motivation and Vision. June 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.12917

  117. [127]

    Spherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black Hole.General Relativity and Gravitation2003,35, 1909–1926

    Teo, E. Spherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black Hole.General Relativity and Gravitation2003,35, 1909–1926. https: //doi.org/10.1023/A:1026286607562

  118. [128]

    Lensing by Kerr black holes.Physical Review D2020,101, 044031

    Gralla, S.E.; Lupsasca, A. Lensing by Kerr black holes.Physical Review D2020,101, 044031. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 101.044031

  119. [129]

    Universal interferometric signatures of a black hole’s photon ring.Science Advances2020,6, eaaz1310

    Johnson, M.D.; Lupsasca, A.; Strominger, A.; Wong, G.N.; Hadar, S.; Kapec, D.; Narayan, R.; Chael, A.; Gammie, C.F.; Galison, P .; et al. Universal interferometric signatures of a black hole’s photon ring.Science Advances2020,6, eaaz1310. https: //doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz131...

  120. [130]

    A Beginner’s Guide to Black Hole Imaging and Associated Tests of General Relativity, 2024

    Lupsasca, A.; Mayerson, D.R.; Ripperda, B.; Staelens, S. A Beginner’s Guide to Black Hole Imaging and Associated Tests of General Relativity, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01290

  121. [131]

    Achromatic, spin-odd Kerr EVPA as a null Frenet-Serret torsion integral on the photon ring.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2025,544, 2172–2179

    Ökten, M.B. Achromatic, spin-odd Kerr EVPA as a null Frenet-Serret torsion integral on the photon ring.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2025,544, 2172–2179. ADS Bibcode: 2025MNRAS.544.2172O, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1883

  122. [132]

    Stochastic Optics: A Scattering Mitigation Framework for Radio Interferometric Imaging.The Astrophysical Journal 2016,833, 74

    Johnson, M.D. Stochastic Optics: A Scattering Mitigation Framework for Radio Interferometric Imaging.The Astrophysical Journal 2016,833, 74. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/74

  123. [133]

    The Physics of Pulsar Scintillation.Philosophical T ransactions of the Royal Society of London Series A1992,341, 151–165

    Narayan, R. The Physics of Pulsar Scintillation.Philosophical T ransactions of the Royal Society of London Series A1992,341, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1992.0090

  124. [134]

    The Optics of Refractive Substructure.The Astrophysical Journal2016,826, 170

    Johnson, M.D.; Narayan, R. The Optics of Refractive Substructure.The Astrophysical Journal2016,826, 170. https://doi.org/10.3 847/0004-637X/826/2/170

  125. [135]

    Prospects for the Detection of the Sgr A* Photon Ring with Next-generation Event Horizon Telescope Polarimetry.The Astrophysical Journal2024,970, L24

    Shavelle, K.M.; Palumbo, D.C.M. Prospects for the Detection of the Sgr A* Photon Ring with Next-generation Event Horizon Telescope Polarimetry.The Astrophysical Journal2024,970, L24. ADS Bibcode: 2024ApJ...970L..24S, https://doi.org/10.3847/2041 -8213/ad6000

  126. [136]

    Photon Ring Polarimetry with Next-generation Black Hole Imaging

    Tamar, A.; Palumbo, D.C.M. Photon Ring Polarimetry with Next-generation Black Hole Imaging. I. M87*.The Astrophysical Journal2024,977, 147. ADS Bibcode: 2024ApJ...977..147T, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8dd5

  127. [137]

    Reference Array and Design Consideration for the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope.Galaxies2023, 11, 107

    Doeleman, S.S.; Barrett, J.; Blackburn, L.; Bouman, K.L.; Broderick, A.E.; Chaves, R.; Fish, V .L.; Fitzpatrick, G.; Freeman, M.; Fuentes, A.; et al. Reference Array and Design Consideration for the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope.Galaxies2023, 11, 107. ADS Bibcode: 20...

  128. [138]

    First Very Long Baseline Interferometry Detections at 870 $\mu$m.The Astronomical Journal2024,168, 130

    Raymond, A.W.; Doeleman, S.S.; Asada, K.; Blackburn, L.; Bower, G.C.; Bremer, M.; Broguiere, D.; Chen, M.T.; Crew, G.B.; Dornbusch, S.; et al. First Very Long Baseline Interferometry Detections at 870 $\mu$m.The Astronomical Journal2024,168, 130. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3...

  129. [139]

    Fundamental physics opportunities with the next-generation Event Horizon Telescope.Living Reviews in Relativity 2025,28, 4

    Ayzenberg, D.; Blackburn, L.; Brito, R.; Britzen, S.; Broderick, A.E.; Carballo-Rubio, R.; Cardoso, V .; Chael, A.; Chatterjee, K.; Chen, Y.; et al. Fundamental physics opportunities with the next-generation Event Horizon Telescope.Living Reviews in Relativity 2025,28, 4. ADS ...

  130. [140]

    Expecta- tions for Horizon-Scale Supermassive Black Hole Population Studies with the ngEHT.Galaxies2022,10, 109

    Pesce, D.W.; Palumbo, D.C.M.; Ricarte, A.; Broderick, A.E.; Johnson, M.D.; Nagar, N.M.; Natarajan, P .; Gómez, J.L. Expecta- tions for Horizon-Scale Supermassive Black Hole Population Studies with the ngEHT.Galaxies2022,10, 109. ADS Bibcode: 2022Galax..10..109P , https://doi.o...

  131. [141]

    Ring Asymmetry and Spin in M87*.The Astrophysical Journal2026, 1000, 231

    Bernshteyn, V .; Conroy, N.S.; Bauböck, M.; Tiede, P .; Joshi, A.V .; Prather, C.; Gammie, C.F.; The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Albentosa-Ruíz, E.; et al. Ring Asymmetry and Spin in M87*.The Astrophysical Journal2026, 1000, 231. ADS Bibcode: 2026ApJ.....

  132. [142]

    Deep learning inference with the Event Horizon Telescope: III

    Janssen, M.; Chan, C.k.; Davelaar, J.; Wielgus, M. Deep learning inference with the Event Horizon Telescope: III. ZINGULARITY results from the 2017 observations and predictions for future array expansions.Astronomy and Astrophysics2025,698, A62. ADS Bibcode: 2025A&A...698A..62...

  133. [143]

    Semi-analytic studies of the accretion disk and magnetic field geometry in M 87*.Astronomy and Astrophysics2026,705, A166

    Saurabh.; Wielgus, M.; Tursunov, A.; Lobanov, A.P .; Emami, R. Semi-analytic studies of the accretion disk and magnetic field geometry in M 87*.Astronomy and Astrophysics2026,705, A166. ADS Bibcode: 2026A&A...705A.166S, https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/202556880

  134. [144]

    Dynamically important magnetic fields near the event horizon of Sgr A*.Astronomy & Astrophysics2020,643, A56

    Jiménez-Rosales, A.; Dexter, J.; Widmann, F.; Bauböck, M.; Abuter, R.; Amorim, A.; Berger, J.P .; Bonnet, H.; Brandner, W.; Clénet, Y.; et al. Dynamically important magnetic fields near the event horizon of Sgr A*.Astronomy & Astrophysics2020,643, A56. https://doi.org/10.1051/...

  135. [145]

    Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event horizon scale, dynamical probes for the mass of Sgr A*

    Gravity Collaboration.; Abuter, R.; Aimar, N.; Amaro Seoane, P .; Amorim, A.; Bauböck, M.; Berger, J.P .; Bonnet, H.; Bourdarot, G.; Brandner, W.; et al. Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event horizon scale, dynamical probes for the mass of Sgr A*. Astronomy and Ast...

  136. [146]

    Hot spots around Sagittarius A*: Joint fits to astrometry and polarimetry.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,691, A327

    Yfantis, A.I.; Wielgus, M.; Mo´ scibrodzka, M. Hot spots around Sagittarius A*: Joint fits to astrometry and polarimetry.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,691, A327. ADS Bibcode: 2024A&A...691A.327Y, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451884

  137. [147]

    Orbital polarimetric tomography of a flare near the Sagittarius A* supermassive black hole.Nature Astronomy2024,8, 765–773

    Levis, A.; Chael, A.A.; Bouman, K.L.; Wielgus, M.; Srinivasan, P .P . Orbital polarimetric tomography of a flare near the Sagittarius A* supermassive black hole.Nature Astronomy2024,8, 765–773. ADS Bibcode: 2024NatAs...8..765L, https://doi.org/10.1038/s4 1550-024-02238-3

  138. [148]

    Flares in the Galactic centre - II

    Najafi-Ziyazi, M.; Davelaar, J.; Mizuno, Y.; Porth, O. Flares in the Galactic centre - II. Polarization signatures of flares at mm- wavelengths.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2024,531, 3961–3972. ADS Bibcode: 2024MNRAS.531.3961N, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras...

  139. [149]

    Full-polarization millimeter wavelength variability of Sagittarius A* during the 2018 EHT campaign

    Albentosa-Ruiz, E.; Washington, J.E.; Marchili, N.; Martí-Vidal, I.; Goddi, C.; Wielgus, M.; Mus, A.; Ricarte, A.; Marrone, D.P .; Salas, L.D.S.; et al. Full-polarization millimeter wavelength variability of Sagittarius A* during the 2018 EHT campaign. Astronomy and Astrophysi...

  140. [150]

    Circular polarization images of Sgr A* for different magnetic field geometries, 2026

    Yin, H.; Chen, S.; Jing, J. Circular polarization images of Sgr A* for different magnetic field geometries, 2026. ADS Bibcode: 2026arXiv260415673Y, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.15673. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 33 of 33

  141. [151]

    Two- temperature treatments in magnetically arrested disc GRMHD simulations more accurately predict light curves of Sagittarius A*

    Salas, L.D.S.; Liska, M.T.P .; Markoff, S.B.; Chatterjee, K.; Musoke, G.; Porth, O.; Ripperda, B.; Yoon, D.; Mulaudzi, W. Two- temperature treatments in magnetically arrested disc GRMHD simulations more accurately predict light curves of Sagittarius A*. Monthly Notices of the ...

  142. [152]

    Estimating the Parameters of Sagittarius A*’s Accretion Flow Via Millimeter VLBI.The Astrophysical Journal2009,697, 45–54

    Broderick, A.E.; Fish, V .L.; Doeleman, S.S.; Loeb, A. Estimating the Parameters of Sagittarius A*’s Accretion Flow Via Millimeter VLBI.The Astrophysical Journal2009,697, 45–54. ADS Bibcode: 2009ApJ...697...45B, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/45

  143. [153]

    Evidence for Low Black Hole Spin and Physically Motivated Accretion Models from Millimeter-VLBI Observations of Sagittarius A*.The Astrophysical Journal2011,735, 110

    Broderick, A.E.; Fish, V .L.; Doeleman, S.S.; Loeb, A. Evidence for Low Black Hole Spin and Physically Motivated Accretion Models from Millimeter-VLBI Observations of Sagittarius A*.The Astrophysical Journal2011,735, 110. ADS Bibcode: 2011ApJ...735..110B, https://doi.org/10.10...

  144. [154]

    Modeling Seven Years of Event Horizon Telescope Observations with Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow Models.The Astrophysical Journal2016,820, 137

    Broderick, A.E.; Fish, V .L.; Johnson, M.D.; Rosenfeld, K.; Wang, C.; Doeleman, S.S.; Akiyama, K.; Johannsen, T.; Roy, A.L. Modeling Seven Years of Event Horizon Telescope Observations with Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow Models.The Astrophysical Journal2016,820, 137. A...

  145. [155]

    Polarization Observations of AGN Jets: Past and Future.Galaxies2022,10, 102

    Park, J.; Algaba, J.C. Polarization Observations of AGN Jets: Past and Future.Galaxies2022,10, 102. ADS Bibcode: 2022Galax..10..102P , https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies10050102

  146. [156]

    Mapping the Distribution of the Magnetic Field Strength along the NGC 315 Jet.The Astrophysical Journal2024,973, 100

    Kino, M.; Ro, H.; Takahashi, M.; Kawashima, T.; Park, J.; Hada, K.; Cui, Y. Mapping the Distribution of the Magnetic Field Strength along the NGC 315 Jet.The Astrophysical Journal2024,973, 100. ADS Bibcode: 2024ApJ...973..100K, https://doi.org/10.3 847/1538-4357/ad639f

  147. [157]

    Resolving the Inner Parsec of the Blazar J1924-2914 with the Event Horizon Telescope.The Astrophysical Journal2022, 934, 145

    Issaoun, S.; Wielgus, M.; Jorstad, S.; Krichbaum, T.P .; Blackburn, L.; Janssen, M.; Chan, C.k.; Pesce, D.W.; Gómez, J.L.; Akiyama, K.; et al. Resolving the Inner Parsec of the Blazar J1924-2914 with the Event Horizon Telescope.The Astrophysical Journal2022, 934, 145. ADS Bibc...

  148. [158]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Image of the Quasar NRAO 530.The Astrophysical Journal2023,943, 170

    Jorstad, S.; Wielgus, M.; Lico, R.; Issaoun, S.; Broderick, A.E.; Pesce, D.W.; Liu, J.; Zhao, G.Y.; Krichbaum, T.P .; Blackburn, L.; et al. The Event Horizon Telescope Image of the Quasar NRAO 530.The Astrophysical Journal2023,943, 170. ADS Bibcode: 2023ApJ...943..170J, https:...

  149. [159]

    Kilogauss magnetic field and jet dynamics in the quasar NRAO 530.Astronomy and Astrophysics2025,693, A9

    Lisakov, M.; Jorstad, S.; Wielgus, M.; Kravchenko, E.V .; Nikonov, A.S.; Cho, I.; Issaoun, S.; Algaba, J.C.; Krichbaum, T.P .; Bach, U.; et al. Kilogauss magnetic field and jet dynamics in the quasar NRAO 530.Astronomy and Astrophysics2025,693, A9. ADS Bibcode: 2025A&A...693A....

  150. [160]

    Event Horizon Telescope observations of the jet launching and collimation in Centaurus A.Nature Astronomy, Volume 5, p

    Janssen, M.; Falcke, H.; Kadler, M.; Ros, E.; Wielgus, M.; Akiyama, K.; Balokovi´ c, M.; Blackburn, L.; Bouman, K.L.; Chael, A.; et al. Event Horizon Telescope observations of the jet launching and collimation in Centaurus A.Nature Astronomy, Volume 5, p. 1017-10282021,5, 1017...

  151. [161]

    Evidence of a toroidal magnetic field in the core of 3C 84.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,686, L5

    Paraschos, G.F.; Debbrecht, L.C.; Kramer, J.A.; Traianou, E.; Liodakis, I.; Krichbaum, T.P .; Kim, J.Y.; Janssen, M.; Nair, D.G.; Savolainen, T.; et al. Evidence of a toroidal magnetic field in the core of 3C 84.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,686, L5. ADS Bibcode: 2024A&A...68...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.