Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipedia

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.01432 v2 pith:GGTISPOZ submitted 2023-03-02 cs.CL

WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipedia

classification cs.CL
keywords entailmentmodelsclaimwiceclaimsdatasetdatasetsevidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Textual entailment models are increasingly applied in settings like fact-checking, presupposition verification in question answering, or summary evaluation. However, these represent a significant domain shift from existing entailment datasets, and models underperform as a result. We propose WiCE, a new fine-grained textual entailment dataset built on natural claim and evidence pairs extracted from Wikipedia. In addition to standard claim-level entailment, WiCE provides entailment judgments over sub-sentence units of the claim, and a minimal subset of evidence sentences that support each subclaim. To support this, we propose an automatic claim decomposition strategy using GPT-3.5 which we show is also effective at improving entailment models' performance on multiple datasets at test time. Finally, we show that real claims in our dataset involve challenging verification and retrieval problems that existing models fail to address.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Deceptive Grounding: Entity Attribution Failure in Clinical Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Clinical RAG can attribute real evidence about drug Y to queried drug X at high rates under adversarial retrieval, a failure invisible to faithfulness and citation metrics but detectable by entity-attribution verification.