Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 30 references

NoticeLight: Embracing Socio-Technical Asymmetry through Tangible Peripheral Robotic Embodiment in Hybrid Collaboration

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a lamp-like robot, NoticeLight, can give remote participants a tangible presence in hybrid meetings through ambient light cues, without demanding co-located participants' focal attention.

desk verdict A well-scoped, honest design concept for an ambient robotic lamp in hybrid meetings; no data, so treat it as a position paper, not a result. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22125 v1 pith:GJZDPVA7 submitted 2025-06-27 cs.HC

Marie Altmann , Kimberly Hegemann , Ali Askari , Vineetha Rallabandi , Max Pascher , Jens Gerken This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords hybridcollaborationroboticembodimenttangibleinteractionpartially-distributedteamsperipheralawarenesscalmtechnologyproductiveasymmetryambientlightcommunication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This position paper tries to establish that the disadvantages remote participants face in hybrid meetings can be turned into a design resource instead of being erased. It introduces NoticeLight, a lamp-like robotic device that converts remote participants' digital actions into ambient light patterns in the co-located room. The intended effect is peripheral awareness: co-located participants notice remote presence, engagement, speaking balance, and attention requests without turning their focus away from the meeting. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach promises to give remote participants a persistent physical proxy in the room using comparatively simple hardware, rather than expensive telepresence installations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is aggregation plus abstraction: individual remote actions are folded into group-level, anonymous, non-traceable light patterns, and the device sits at the periphery of attention. Three named modules instantiate this: Mood Dynamics, a revolving LED writing to a UV-sensitive plane like an ECG line; Verbal Contribution Mosaic, an addressable RGB LED strip wrapped around a cone where color shades stand for speakers without persistent mapping; and Attention Grabbing, an RGB LED in a diffusing revolving case whose flashing accelerates over time or whose intensity grows with the number of requesters. The surrounding design principle is "productive asymmetry": instead of giving remote users a copy of co-located presence, the robot gives them a physical signaling channel that co-located participants do not have, inverting the usual imbalance.

What would settle it

In a controlled hybrid meeting with deliberate cross-talk and a scripted disagreement, have a remote participant trigger the attention-grab signal repeatedly and record whether co-located participants acknowledge it within a fixed window; near-zero acknowledgment rates would falsify the claim that the device creates awareness without demanding attention.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

NoticeLight is a roughly thirty-centimeter-tall, lamp-like robotic device placed on a meeting table, paired with a companion app used by remote participants. Its central claim is that abstracting remote participants' digital input into aggregated, anonymized light patterns creates what the authors call a "peripheral presence channel": co-located participants become aware of remote presence, engagement, speaking balance, and attention requests without shifting attention from the ongoing discussion. Three functions carry this claim. Mood Dynamics turns explicit agreement signals into a decaying sine-wave light pattern whose amplitude reflects the fraction of the remote group agreeing. Verbal Contribution Mosaic uses microphone-array voice diarization to render speaking-time distribution as colored segments whose sizes update every fifteen to thirty seconds. Attention Grabbing converts manual or automatic "I want to speak" signals into persistent or accelerating flashes that fade once the person has spoken. The device deliberately refuses to represent disagreement, to prevent anonymous misuse, and deliberately aggregates signals so that no individual can be traced.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim collapses if abstract, aggregated, anonymized light patterns are too subtle to notice or too vague to interpret during real, lively meetings, a risk the paper itself flags for heated discussions and noisy audio.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the concept works, remote participants' attempts to contribute remain visible even during screensharing or with cameras off, because the attention signal is physical and persistent in the room.
  • Speaking-time imbalance becomes visible at the group level, which could support more balanced turn-taking without the discomfort or surveillance risk of per-person metrics.
  • Because signals are intended to be aggregated and non-attributable, the device is positioned as a fit for established teams with existing social bonds; the paper notes that in large anonymous meetings such abstraction could enable disruptive signaling.
  • The deliberate exclusion of disagreement signaling means NoticeLight can carry approval and engagement but not dissent, a design choice that shapes the emotional content of the feedback it can convey.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same peripheral-presence channel could generalize beyond meetings to ambient awareness of remote colleagues' availability or workload in shared offices, a step the paper does not develop.
  • Editorial inference: the design implies a testable trade-off between abstractness and usability; one could vary aggregation granularity from group-level to identifiable and measure comprehension and trust in real meetings.
  • Editorial inference: because disagreement is deliberately filtered out, NoticeLight may bias the perceived meeting climate toward consensus; studies comparing decision quality with and without the device would reveal whether this matters.
  • Editorial inference: the attention-grab signal's persistence could create a queue-like pressure; an observational study could test whether co-located participants respond faster or simply habituate to repeated flashes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces NoticeLight, a conceptual tangible peripheral robotic device for hybrid workplace meetings. NoticeLight is intended to translate remote participants' digital actions into ambient light patterns in the co-located room, with three modules: Mood Dynamics (aggregated agreement as a decaying wave), Verbal Contribution Mosaic (speaking-time distribution as colored light segments), and Attention Grabber (a persistent signal that a remote participant wants to contribute). The design is framed around three principles—abstraction over replication, peripheral awareness, and productive asymmetry—and is explicitly positioned as a position paper rather than an empirical study. The authors state in Section 3.4 that the anticipated benefits are speculative and open to challenge, and they list technical and conceptual risks including voice diarization errors, de-anonymization, and the possibility that calm signals go unnoticed in heated discussions.

Significance. If the concept were validated, NoticeLight would be a meaningful contribution to CSCW and HRI by demonstrating how abstracted, aggregated robotic embodiment can support peripheral awareness and rebalance participation without replicating human presence or inducing surveillance concerns. The paper has several strengths: it offers a coherent design rationale grounded in relevant literature (e.g., Bjørn et al.'s asymmetry framing, calm technology, relatedness technologies); it explicitly acknowledges its own limitations, including the risk that signals may be too subtle or too abstract; and it proposes a concrete set of three modules with associated technical sketches. However, the central claims of fostering peripheral awareness and balanced participation are empirical and currently unsupported by any prototype, user study, or measured data. As a journal submission, the paper must either reframe these claims as design hypotheses or provide preliminary evidence; as it stands, the contribution is prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §3.4; §4] The abstract and conclusion state that NoticeLight 'fosters peripheral awareness and balanced participation without disrupting meeting flow or demanding cognitive overload,' but the paper presents no prototype, user study, or data, and Section 3.4 explicitly concedes that the 'anticipated benefits are speculative and open to challenge.' This central claim is load-bearing and currently unsubstantiated. The authors should either reposition the paper as a design exploration with testable hypotheses (and specify an evaluation protocol with metrics), or provide a proof-of-concept implementation and a formative study that at least measures the legibility and noticeability of the light patterns under realistic meeting conditions.
  2. [§3 (principles) vs. §3.3 (Attention Grabber)] There is an internal inconsistency between the stated principle that all signals are 'aggregated, anonymized representations... inherently non-traceable to specific individuals' (Section 3, third paragraph) and the Attention Grabber design, where 'If multiple participants perform an attention grab, the LED flashes in different colors for the different participants' (Section 3.3, final paragraph). A color-coded per-participant flash pattern directly enables individual attribution, contradicting the anonymity principle that is used to justify the design. The authors should either modify the Attention Grabber to use a single aggregated signal (e.g., intensity and pulse rate reflecting the number of requests) or explicitly justify and scope the exception to the anonymity principle.
  3. [§3.1 and §3.2] The mapping from raw input to perceptually meaningful output is underdefined, leaving several free parameters that are likely to determine success: the attention threshold duration for automatic attention grabs, the mosaic update window (15–30 seconds), the exponential decay rate for the mood wave, and the amplitude encoding of the percentage of remote participants who agree. The paper does not ground these parameters in prior ambient-display research or perceptual studies, and it does not state how they will be calibrated. Because the central mechanism depends on abstract light patterns being both noticeable and correctly interpretable, the authors should provide a rationale for these parameters, cite relevant prior work, or propose a calibration/co-design procedure that will be used to set them.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.2] The text reads 'perceveid from different viewpoints' and should be corrected to 'perceived from different viewpoints.'
  2. [§3 (third paragraph)] The phrase 'The NoticeLight initself is foremost envisioned' should be revised to 'NoticeLight itself is first envisioned' for clarity.
  3. [§2 (Related Work)] There are a few wording issues: 'unapplicable' should be 'inapplicable,' 'a quite unique and creative approach' could be simplified to 'a quite unique approach,' and 'which is may reduce benefits' should be 'which may reduce benefits.'
  4. [§3.1] The simile 'similar to a lifeline ECG visualization for a patient in a hospital' is missing a verb and should be rephrased, e.g., 'is similar to a lifeline ECG visualization for a patient in a hospital.'
  5. [§3.3] The sentence 'which visually encodes both the number of participants who made this request and the time that has passed since' appears to be a sentence fragment; it should be joined with the preceding or following sentence.
  6. [§3.2] The term 'on the x-Axis' has inconsistent capitalization and should be 'on the x-axis.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: NoticeLight is a position-paper concept with no fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citation chain forcing its conclusions; the only self-citation is background context, not load-bearing evidence.

full rationale

This is a conceptual position paper at a workshop, not an empirical or formal derivation. NoticeLight's central claims—that ambient light patterns can provide peripheral awareness, that aggregate anonymity avoids surveillance concerns, and that asymmetry can be treated as a productive design constraint—are design rationales and stated aspirations, not results derived from equations, fitted parameters, or benchmark predictions. There is no self-definitional relationship: the device's described behaviors (Mood Dynamics, Verbal Contribution Mosaic, Attention Grabbing) are specified as design concepts, and their intended effects (awareness without cognitive overload) are hypotheses, not outputs computed from the design specification. There is no renamed known result: the paper builds on TableBot, LumiTouch, and Bjørn et al.'s asymmetry framing, and NoticeLight is positioned as a novel combination rather than a relabeled existing system. The only self-citation is reference [7], a prior workshop paper by co-author Gerken and colleagues about structured and unstructured modes of agile hybrid work; it is cited in passing to characterize agile work contexts and does not supply any premise that NoticeLight's benefit claims depend on. The paper explicitly concedes in Section 3.4 that the concept is speculative and that key assumptions—such as calm visual signals being noticed in heated discussions—remain open risks. That concession underscores that the claims are untested, but untested is not circular. No load-bearing argument reduces to its own inputs, so the circularity score is low; the single non-load-bearing self-citation places it at 2 rather than 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about peripheral awareness, the productive use of asymmetry, the interpretability of abstract light signals, and the robustness of diarization. NoticeLight itself is an invented entity with no independent empirical evidence. The design parameters are hand-chosen and not fitted to data.

free parameters (3)
  • Attention threshold duration = not specified
    Section 3.3: the automatic attention signal triggers when a raised hand is active beyond a threshold duration; the threshold is a design choice without empirical grounding.
  • Mosaic update window = 15-30 seconds
    Section 3.2: the Verbal Contribution Mosaic updates every 15-30 seconds based on a moving window; the range is chosen by hand.
  • Exponential decay rate for mood wave = not specified
    Section 3.1: the agreement wave decays via an exponential decay function; neither the rate nor the mapping from percentage to amplitude is specified or fitted.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Peripheral awareness mechanisms support coordination without disrupting primary tasks
    Section 2.2 builds on calm technology [25] and relatedness technologies [20,21]; the whole concept assumes ambient cues are effective and low-load.
  • domain assumption Hybrid symmetry is unattainable and asymmetry can be productive design material
    Section 1 adopts Bjørn et al. [8]; the paper's 'productive asymmetry' foundation depends on accepting this empirical claim.
  • domain assumption Abstracted light patterns can be interpreted by co-located participants without training
    Sections 3.1-3.3 assume that wave amplitude, colored mosaic segments, and flashing rates convey meaning reliably; no comprehension study is provided.
  • domain assumption Speaker diarization and voice recognition are robust in real meeting audio
    Section 3.2 relies on a microphone array with diarization; Section 3.4 notes cross-talk and noise may pose challenges.
invented entities (2)
  • NoticeLight device
    purpose: tangible peripheral robotic embodiment that converts remote participants' digital actions into aggregated ambient light patterns
    The device is described through sketches and text only (Figures 1 and 2); no prototype, performance data, or user study exists.
  • Peripheral presence channel
    purpose: conceptual label for the low-cognitive-load awareness mechanism NoticeLight is said to create
    Introduced in Section 2.2 as an abstraction; it is not operationalized into measurable variables.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NoticeLight: Embracing Socio-Technical Asymmetry through Tangible Peripheral Robotic Embodiment in Hybrid Collaboration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GJZDPVA7

@misc{pith2026250622125,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NoticeLight: Embracing Socio-Technical Asymmetry through Tangible Peripheral Robotic Embodiment in Hybrid Collaboration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GJZDPVA7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22125}
}
read the original abstract

Hybrid collaboration has become a fixture in modern workplaces, yet it introduces persistent socio-technical asymmetries-especially disadvantaging remote participants, who struggle with presence disparity, reduced visibility, and limited non-verbal communication. Traditional solutions often seek to erase these asymmetries, but recent research suggests embracing them as productive design constraints. In this context, we introduce NoticeLight: a tangible, peripheral robotic embodiment designed to augment hybrid meetings. NoticeLight transforms remote participants' digital presence into ambient, physical signals -- such as mood dynamics, verbal contribution mosaics, and attention cues -- within the co-located space. By abstracting group states into subtle light patterns, NoticeLight fosters peripheral awareness and balanced participation without disrupting meeting flow or demanding cognitive overload. This approach aligns with emerging perspectives in human-robot synergy, positioning robots as mediators that reshape, rather than replicate, human presence. Our work thereby advances the discourse on how robotic embodiments can empower equitable, dynamic collaboration in the workplace.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22125 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The NoticeLight concept in various conceptual stages. a) an early drawing sketch of the device, b) a sketch of a possible companion app, also including a digital representation of the physical device and c) a more polished mockup of the concept as described in this paper Abstract Hybrid collaboration has become a fixture in modern workplaces, yet it introduces persistent socio-technical asymmetries-especially disadv… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) The Mood Dynamics approach with a revolving light-emitting diode directed on a UV-sensitive plane, b) Verbal Contribution Mosaic with addressable RGB LED strip, c) Attention Grabber with a single RGB LED in a diffusing revolving case • Abstraction over replication: Instead of attempting to recreate face-to-face cues digitally, Notice￾Light abstracts and aggregates information into ambient patterns that convey ess… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Johansen, GroupWare: Computer Support for Business Teams, The Free Press, USA, 1988

    R. Johansen, GroupWare: Computer Support for Business Teams, The Free Press, USA, 1988

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    Neumayr, B

    T. Neumayr, B. Saatci, S. Rintel, C. N. Klokmose, M. Augstein, What was Hybrid? A Systematic Review of Hybrid Collaboration and Meetings Research, 2022. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.06172, arXiv:2111.06172 [cs]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Saatçi, K

    B. Saatçi, K. Akyüz, S. Rintel, C. N. Klokmose, (Re)Configuring Hybrid Meetings: Moving from User-Centered Design to Meeting-Centered Design, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29 (2020) 769–794. URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10606-020-09385-x. doi: 10. 1007/s10606-020-09385-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10606-020-09385-x 2020

  4. [4]

    A. Tang, M. Boyle, S. Greenberg, Understanding and Mitigating Display and Presence Disparity in Mixed Presence Groupware, J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol. 37 (2005). URL: http://www.jrpit.acs.org. au/jrpit/JRPITVolumes/JRPIT37/JRPIT37.2.193.pdf

    work page 2005

  5. [6]

    Kuzminykh, S

    A. Kuzminykh, S. Rintel, Classification of Functional Attention in Video Meetings, in: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 2020, pp. 1–13. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376546. doi: 10.1145/3313831. 3376546

    arXiv 2020

  6. [7]

    Effert, F

    J.-S. Effert, F. Mörike, J. Gerken, Un-/strukturierte Modi hybrider Arbeit in agilen Kollabo- rationsnetzwerken, in: Mensch und Computer 2023 - Workshopband, GI, 2023. URL: https: //dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/42112. doi:10.18420/MUC2023-MCI-WS10-484

    work page doi:10.18420/muc2023-mci-ws10-484 2023

  7. [8]

    Bjørn, J

    P. Bjørn, J. Busboom, M. Duckert, S. Bødker, I. Shklovski, E. Hoggan, K. Dunn, Q. Mu, L. Barkhuus, N. Boulus-Rødje, Achieving Symmetry in Synchronous Interaction in Hybrid Work is Impossible, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (2024) 3648617. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/ 10.1145/3648617. doi:10.1145/3648617

    work page doi:10.1145/3648617 2024

  8. [9]

    Dörrenbächer, R

    J. Dörrenbächer, R. Ringfort-Felner, R. Neuhaus, M. Hassenzahl, Meaningful Futures with Robots—Designing a New Coexistence, 1 ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2022. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003287445. doi:10.1201/9781003287445

    arXiv 2022

Show all 30 references
  1. [10]

    P. Torres Pereira Carrion, Virtual Reality For Remote Work: Exploring The Acceptance Of VR Technology For Meetings And Business-Related Contexts, Doutor Em Design, Pontificia Universi- dade Catolica do Rio De Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.17771...

    2021 doi

  2. [11]

    Oehring, M

    F. Oehring, M. A. Feufel, F. Mörike, Virtuelle Flurgespräche und Status-Updates: Zusammenarbeit in avatar-basierten Arbeitsumgebungen, Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 77 (2023) 243–256. URL: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41449-023-00356-8. doi:10.1007/s41449-023-00356-8

    2023 doi

  3. [12]

    J. E. Grønbæk, B. Saatçi, C. F. Griggio, C. N. Klokmose, MirrorBlender: Supporting Hybrid Meetings with a Malleable Video-Conferencing System, in: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Yokohama Japan, 2021, pp. 1–13. URL: https: //d...

    2021

  4. [13]

    Desai, K

    M. Desai, K. M. Tsui, H. A. Yanco, C. Uhlik, Essential features of telepresence robots, in: 2011 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications, IEEE, Woburn, MA, USA, 2011, pp. 15–20. URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5753474/. doi:10.1109/TEPRA.2011.5753474

    2011

  5. [14]

    I. Rae, G. Venolia, J. C. Tang, D. Molnar, A Framework for Understanding and Designing Telepresence, in: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Coop- erative Work & Social Computing, ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 2015, pp. 1552–1566. URL: https://dl.acm.org/d...

    2015

  6. [15]

    Dybboe, J

    M. Dybboe, J. Ellemose, A. L. Vastrup, A. Boudouraki, S. Rintel, M. G. Petersen, J. E. S. Grønbæk, C. N. Klokmose, TableBot: Getting a Handle on Hybrid Collaboration by Negotiating Control of a Tabletop Telepresence Robot, in: Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, A...

    2024

  7. [16]

    Yasuoka, T

    M. Yasuoka, T. Miyata, M. Nakatani, Y. Taoka, N. Hamaguchi, How Remote-Controlled Avatars Are Accepted in Hybrid Workplace, in: N. A. Streitz, S. Konomi (Eds.), Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions, volume 14036, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023, pp. 295–307....

    2023 doi

  8. [17]

    Panda, L

    P. Panda, L. Tankelevitch, B. Spittle, K. Inkpen, J. Tang, S. Junuzovic, Q. Qi, P. Sweeney, A. D. Wilson, W. A. Buxton, A. Sellen, S. Rintel, Hybridge: Bridging Spatiality for Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meetings, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8 (2024...

    2024 doi

  9. [18]

    Arntz, C

    A. Arntz, C. Straßmann, S. Völker, S. C. Eimler, Collaborating eye to eye: Effects of workplace design on the perception of dominance of collaboration robots, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 9 (2022) 999308. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2022.999308/full...

    2022

  10. [19]

    URL: https://data

    European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions., Human–robot interaction: what changes in the workplace?, Publications Office, LU, 2024. URL: https://data. europa.eu/doi/10.2806/601796

    2024 doi

  11. [20]

    Hassenzahl, S

    M. Hassenzahl, S. Heidecker, K. Eckoldt, S. Diefenbach, U. Hillmann, All You Need is Love: Current Strategies of Mediating Intimate Relationships through Technology, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19 (2012) 1–19. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2395131.2395...

    2012

  12. [21]

    Wenhart, R

    C. Wenhart, R. Ringfort-Felner, T. Wallbaum, M. Amidi, R. Albers, M. Hassenzahl, Relatedness technologies: An online compendium and systematic review, in: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’25, Association for Computing Machinery...

    2025

  13. [22]

    Q. Mu, M. Borowski, J. E. S. Grønbæk, S. Bødker, E. Hoggan, Whispering Through Walls: Towards Inclusive Backchannel Communication in Hybrid Meetings, in: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 2024, pp. 1–16. URL: https: ...

    2024

  14. [23]

    Chang, B

    A. Chang, B. Resner, B. Koerner, X. Wang, H. Ishii, LumiTouch: an emotional communication device, in: CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Seattle Washington, 2001, pp. 313–314. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/634067.634252. doi:10.1145/ 6...

    2001

  15. [24]

    M. K. Rasmussen, N. Lehoux, I. Ocnarescu, P. G. Krogh, I’ll knock you when i’m ready...: reflecting on media richness beyond bandwidth and imitation, in: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’12, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, US...

    2012

  16. [25]

    Weiser, J

    M. Weiser, J. S. Brown, Designing Calm Technology, PowerGrid Journal 1 (1996) 75–85

    1996

  17. [26]

    H. M. Camarillo-Abad, J. Alfredo Sánchez, O. Starostenko, Organizing Knowledge on Nonver- bal Communication Mediated Through Haptic Technology, in: P. H. Ruiz, V. Agredo-Delgado (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction, volume 1114, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, pp....

    2019 doi

  18. [27]

    Bissinger, A

    B. Bissinger, A. Beer, C. Märtin, M. Fellmann, Emotion Recognition via Facial Expressions to Improve Virtual Communication in Videoconferences, in: M. Kurosu, A. Hashizume (Eds.), Human- Computer Interaction, volume 14012, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023, pp. 151–163. ...

    2023 doi

  19. [28]

    Ahmed, V

    I. Ahmed, V. Harjunen, G. Jacucci, E. Hoggan, N. Ravaja, M. M. Spapé, Reach out and touch me: effects of four distinct haptic technologies on affective touch in virtual reality, in: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ICMI ’16, Assoc...

    2016

  20. [29]

    Kuzminykh, S

    A. Kuzminykh, S. Rintel, Low Engagement As a Deliberate Practice of Remote Participants in Video Meetings, in: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 2020, pp. 1–9. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3334480....

    2020

  21. [30]

    Bai, X.-L

    Z. Bai, X.-L. Zhang, Speaker recognition based on deep learning: An overview, Neural Networks 140 (2021) 65–99. URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0893608021000848. doi:10. 1016/j.neunet.2021.03.004

    2021

  22. [31]

    Saatçi, R

    B. Saatçi, R. Rädle, S. Rintel, K. O’Hara, C. Nylandsted Klokmose, Hybrid Meetings in the Modern Workplace: Stories of Success and Failure, in: H. Nakanishi, H. Egi, I.-A. Chounta, H. Takada, S. Ichimura, U. Hoppe (Eds.), Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing, volume...

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.