Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FANNO: Augmenting High-Quality Instruction Data with Open-Sourced LLMs Only

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.01323 v1 pith:GL4KQU53 submitted 2024-08-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords fannoinstructiondatadatasetshigh-qualityllmsannotationgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Instruction fine-tuning stands as a crucial advancement in leveraging large language models (LLMs) for enhanced task performance. However, the annotation of instruction datasets has traditionally been expensive and laborious, often relying on manual annotations or costly API calls of proprietary LLMs. To address these challenges, we introduce FANNO, a fully autonomous, open-sourced framework that revolutionizes the annotation process without the need for pre-existing annotated data. Utilizing a Mistral-7b-instruct model, FANNO efficiently produces diverse and high-quality datasets through a structured process involving document pre-screening, instruction generation, and response generation. Experiments on Open LLM Leaderboard and AlpacaEval benchmark show that the FANNO can generate high-quality data with diversity and complexity for free, comparable to human-annotated or cleaned datasets like Alpaca-GPT4-Cleaned.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Small Language Models: Architectures, Techniques, Evaluation, Problems and Future Adaptation

    cs.CL 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of small language models that organizes known methods into taxonomies but adds no new models, data, or validated benchmarks.

Pith tools