Extended parameterized spin expansion formalism for ringdown analysis with GW250114

Jia-Ning Chen; Liang-Bi Wu; Zong-Kuan Guo

arxiv: 2606.22580 · v1 · pith:GS4NI2DTnew · submitted 2026-06-21 · 🌀 gr-qc

Extended parameterized spin expansion formalism for ringdown analysis with GW250114

Jia-Ning Chen , Liang-Bi Wu , Zong-Kuan Guo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 09:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords ringdownblack holegravitational wavesParSpecGW250114general relativity testsparameterized deviationsscaling index

0 comments

The pith

Ringdown data from GW250114 cannot distinguish scaling behaviors of black hole corrections and yields only weak upper bounds on deviation length.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the Parameterized Spin Expansion Coefficients framework by letting both the characteristic length scale and the scaling index vary, then reparameterizing them as tilde ell and tilde p for a theory-agnostic test of Kerr ringdown. Applied to GW250114 with pyRing, the analysis shows the posterior on tilde p stays largely prior-dominated across different start times and mode models, so the data supply no information on which scaling behavior is realized. The resulting constraint on tilde ell is shaped by the geometry of the region allowed by the gamma condition rather than by the likelihood; the gamma less than 1 cut gives the most stable upper bound of roughly 83 km. Kullback-Leibler divergence confirms that, once the effective prior from this cut is subtracted, the data add almost no new information on tilde ell or log gamma, and the single 220 mode model is more informative than the two-mode model.

Core claim

The extended ParSpec analysis applied to GW250114 demonstrates that the posterior for tilde p remains largely prior-dominated, indicating that present ringdown data cannot distinguish different scaling behaviors of the correction. The inferred constraint on tilde ell is controlled by the geometry of the allowed parameter space induced by the gamma condition; in particular the gamma less than 1 prescription yields stable but weak upper bounds of tilde ell_90 approximately 83 km. After accounting for the effective prior associated with gamma less than 1, the data-driven information gain on tilde ell and log gamma is very small, and the 220-only model provides a more informative constraint than

What carries the argument

The reparameterized pair (tilde ell, tilde p) together with the gamma condition that carves out the physically allowed region in their joint plane.

If this is right

The 220-only model supplies tighter constraints than the 220 plus 221 model at current signal-to-noise levels.
A joint analysis with GW231123 is dominated by the GW250114 result.
Different ringdown start times produce consistent bounds once the gamma less than 1 condition is imposed.
The framework gives a theory-agnostic effective-field-theory-inspired description of possible deviations from the Kerr ringdown spectrum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Higher signal-to-noise events will be needed before the data can select among scaling behaviors rather than being limited by the prior on p.
The geometry-driven nature of the bound suggests that tightening or relaxing the gamma condition across multiple events could change the reported limits without requiring new waveform features.
Combining this parametrization with other ringdown or inspiral tests could map the joint space of possible deviations more completely.

Load-bearing premise

The gamma condition, especially the gamma less than 1 cut, supplies the most natural prescription in the (tilde ell, tilde p) plane without introducing uncontrolled bias.

What would settle it

A future high-signal-to-noise ringdown event whose posterior for tilde p peaks clearly away from the prior, or whose measured tilde ell lies well below 83 km under the same gamma less than 1 condition.

read the original abstract

We extend the Parameterized Spin Expansion Coefficients (ParSpec) framework for ringdown tests of black holes by simultaneously sampling the characteristic length scale $\ell$ and the scaling index $p$, where the two parameters are replaced by $\tilde{p}$ and $\tilde{\ell}$ in subsequent analysis, respectively. Unlike previous analyses that fix $\tilde{p}$ to theory-motivated integer values, this extension provides a theory-agnostic description inspired by effective-field theory to the Kerr ringdown spectrum. Using \texttt{pyRing}, we apply the framework to GW250114 with informative priors on $M_{\rm f}$ and $D_{\rm L}$, comparing the $220$-only and $220+221$ mode models under different conditions on $\gamma$. The posterior distributions of $\tilde{\ell}, \tilde{p}$ and $\gamma$ are presented with different ringdown start times. We show that the posterior of $\tilde{p}$ remains largely prior dominated, indicating that current ringdown data cannot distinguish different scaling behaviors of the correction. The inferred constraint on $\tilde{\ell}$ is instead mainly controlled by the geometry of the allowed parameter space induced by the $\gamma$ condition. In particular, $\gamma<1$ provides the most natural prescription in the $(\tilde{\ell},\tilde{p})$ plane and yields stable but weak upper bounds of $\tilde{\ell}_{90}\simeq 83\, {\rm km}$. An analysis based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence further shows that, after accounting for the effective prior associated with $\gamma<1$, the data-driven information gain on $\tilde{\ell}$ and $\log\gamma$ is very small. At the current SNR level, the $220$-only model provides a more informative constraint than the $220+221$ model. We also perform a joint analysis including GW231123 and find that the combined constraint is dominated by GW250114.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Extending ParSpec to float both ilde ell and ilde p on GW250114 mostly shows the data adds almost no information beyond the gamma cut and priors.

read the letter

The main point here is that sampling both the length scale and scaling index together on this event leaves the ilde p posterior prior-dominated and the ilde ell bound set largely by the geometry of the gamma condition rather than the waveform data. The KL divergence check quantifies that the information gain stays small even after marginalizing the induced prior.

What is new is the joint sampling of the two parameters instead of fixing the scaling index, plus the explicit comparison across gamma conditions and the information-gain metric applied to GW250114. They run the standard pyRing pipeline on both the 220-only and 220+221 models, vary the ringdown start time, and check the joint constraint with GW231123. The paper is straightforward about the outcome: the 220-only model is more informative at current SNR, and the combined result is dominated by the first event.

The analysis is transparent on the weak constraints and uses established tools without obvious circularity. The citation pattern follows the prior ParSpec work directly.

The soft spot is the treatment of the gamma condition. Calling gamma less than 1 the most natural prescription rests on the stability of the resulting bound rather than an independent argument, and different cuts produce different limits. The reported 90 percent upper bound of roughly 83 km is accordingly sensitive to that choice. The single-event focus and low information gain are acknowledged, but they limit how much the extension advances the framework right now.

This is for people working on parameterized ringdown tests who need to see where the current data actually stops. It deserves peer review because the extension is cleanly executed, the negative result is documented with the KL metric, and the paper does not overclaim what the data can do.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript applies standard Bayesian sampling via pyRing to GW250114 data with external priors on M_f and D_L, then reports posterior domination and KL-divergence information gain under explicit gamma cuts. These outputs are direct numerical results of the likelihood evaluation and do not reduce by the paper's own equations to fitted values of tilde ell or tilde p, nor do they rest on self-citation chains that substitute for independent verification. The gamma condition is an explicit modeling choice whose effect is quantified rather than smuggled in as a uniqueness theorem.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the ParSpec parameterization itself, the choice of gamma conditions to define the allowed region, and standard assumptions about Kerr ringdown modes; these are domain assumptions rather than new entities or fitted constants beyond the sampled parameters.

free parameters (3)

tilde ell
Characteristic length scale of the deviation, jointly sampled with tilde p.
tilde p
Scaling index of the deviation, jointly sampled instead of fixed to integers.
gamma
Auxiliary parameter whose inequality conditions shape the reported bounds and effective prior.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Ringdown signals are accurately described by the parameterized spin expansion coefficients framework on a Kerr background.
Invoked throughout the model comparison and posterior sampling.
domain assumption The 220 and 221 quasinormal modes dominate the early ringdown and can be isolated with the chosen start times.
Underlies the 220-only versus 220+221 model comparison.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5886 in / 1652 out tokens · 40725 ms · 2026-06-26T09:48:21.509804+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith

[1]

Nollert,Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars,Class

H.-P. Nollert,Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars,Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) R159

1999
[2]

Berti, V

E. Berti, V . Cardoso and A.O. Starinets,Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 163001 [0905.2975]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[3]

Konoplya and A

R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko,Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.83(2011) 793 [1102.4014]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[4]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102 [1602.03837]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[5]

LIGO SCIENTIFICcollaboration,Advanced LIGO,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 074001 [1411.4547]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[6]

Rel.23(2020) 3 [1304.0670]

KAGRA, LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO collaboration,Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA,Living Rev. Rel.23(2020) 3 [1304.0670]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[7]

Berti et al.,Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,2505.23895

E. Berti et al.,Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,2505.23895

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[8]

Teukolsky,Rotating black holes: Separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,Phys

S.A. Teukolsky,Rotating black holes: Separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 1114

1972
[9]

Teukolsky,Perturbations of a rotating black hole

S.A. Teukolsky,Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino-field perturbations,Astrophys. J.185(1973) 635

1973
[10]

Leaver,An analytic representation for the quasi-normal modes of Kerr black holes,Proc

E.W. Leaver,An analytic representation for the quasi-normal modes of Kerr black holes,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 402(1985) 285

1985
[11]

Onozawa,A Detailed study of quasinormal frequencies of the Kerr black hole,Phys

H. Onozawa,A Detailed study of quasinormal frequencies of the Kerr black hole,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 3593 [gr-qc/9610048]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[12]

Berti, V

E. Berti, V . Cardoso and C.M. Will,On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 064030 [gr-qc/0512160]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[13]

Yang, D.A

H. Yang, D.A. Nichols, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, Z. Zhang and Y . Chen,Quasinormal-mode spectrum of Kerr black holes and its geometric interpretation,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 104006 [1207.4253]. – 14 – 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 ˜p 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06P(˜p |d) a) γ < 0.01 γ < 1 γ < 2 220 220+221 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 ˜ℓ 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 P...

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[14]

Stein,qnm: A Python package for calculating Kerr quasinormal modes, separation constants, and spherical-spheroidal mixing coefficients,J

L.C. Stein,qnm: A Python package for calculating Kerr quasinormal modes, separation constants, and spherical-spheroidal mixing coefficients,J. Open Source Softw.4(2019) 1683 [1908.10377]

arXiv 2019
[15]

Alexander and N

S. Alexander and N. Yunes,Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity,Phys. Rept.480(2009) 1 [0907.2562]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[16]

Sotiriou and S.-Y

T.P. Sotiriou and S.-Y . Zhou,Black hole hair in generalized scalar-tensor gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 251102 [1312.3622]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[17]

Clifton, P.G

T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis,Modified Gravity and Cosmology,Phys. Rept.513(2012) 1 [1106.2476]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[18]

Chen, Z.-K

J.-N. Chen, Z.-K. Guo and L.-B. Wu,Quasinormal modes of the rotating quantum corrected black holes,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 104047 [2510.27320]. – 15 – 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 km 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 P( d1, d2) 220 GW231123 joint, uniform joint, ln B joint, 2 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 km 220+221 12 14 16 18 20 t0 [tMf] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1...

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[19]

Berti, K

E. Berti, K. Yagi, H. Yang and N. Yunes,Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown,Gen. Rel. Grav.50(2018) 49 [1801.03587]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[20]

Gossan, J

S. Gossan, J. Veitch and B.S. Sathyaprakash,Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 124056 [1111.5819]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[21]

Meidam, M

J. Meidam, M. Agathos, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch and B.S. Sathyaprakash,Testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns using TIGER,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 064009 [1406.3201]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[22]

Carullo et al.,Empirical tests of the black hole no-hair conjecture using gravitational-wave observations, Phys

G. Carullo et al.,Empirical tests of the black hole no-hair conjecture using gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 104020 [1805.04760]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[23]

M. Isi, M. Giesler, W.M. Farr, M.A. Scheel and S.A. Teukolsky,Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 111102 [1905.00869]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[24]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 122002 [2010.14529]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[25]

Maselli, P

A. Maselli, P. Pani, L. Gualtieri and E. Berti,Parametrized ringdown spin expansion coefficients: a data-analysis framework for black-hole spectroscopy with multiple events,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 024043 [1910.12893]

arXiv 2020
[26]

Carullo,Enhancing modified gravity detection from gravitational-wave observations using the parametrized ringdown spin expansion coeffcients formalism,Phys

G. Carullo,Enhancing modified gravity detection from gravitational-wave observations using the parametrized ringdown spin expansion coeffcients formalism,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 124043 [2102.05939]

arXiv 2021
[27]

Silva, A

H.O. Silva, A. Ghosh and A. Buonanno,Black-hole ringdown as a probe of higher-curvature gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 044030 [2205.05132]

arXiv 2023
[28]

Maenaut, G

S. Maenaut, G. Carullo, P.A. Cano, A. Liu, V . Cardoso, T. Hertog et al.,Ringdown analysis of rotating black holes in effective field theory extensions of general relativity,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 044039 [2411.17893]

arXiv 2026
[29]

Chung and N

A.K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes,Probing quadratic gravity with black-hole ringdown gravitational waves measured by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detectors,2506.14695

arXiv
[30]

Carullo, W

G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo and J. Veitch,Observational Black Hole Spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 123029 [1902.07527]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[31]

Isi and W.M

M. Isi and W.M. Farr,Analyzing black-hole ringdowns,2107.05609

arXiv
[32]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,Phys. Rev. X9 (2019) 031040 [1811.12907]. – 16 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[33]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,Phys. Rev. X11(2021) 021053 [2010.14527]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[34]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 022001 [2108.01045]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[35]

KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO SCIENTIFICcollaboration,GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,Phys. Rev. X13(2023) 041039 [2111.03606]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[36]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,2508.18082

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[37]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, 2605.27225

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[38]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog,2605.27223

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[39]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 041403 [2509.08099]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[40]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 111403 [2509.08054]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[41]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M⊙,Astrophys. J. Lett.993(2025) L25 [2507.08219]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[42]

P.A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog and S. Maenaut,Gravitational ringing of rotating black holes in higher-derivative gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 024064 [2110.11378]

arXiv 2022
[43]

Cano and A

P.A. Cano and A. Ruip ´erez,Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry,JHEP05(2019) 189 [1901.01315]

arXiv 2019
[44]

Cardoso, M

V . Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli and L. Senatore,Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 251105 [1808.08962]

arXiv 2018
[45]

Varma, S.E

V . Varma, S.E. Field, M.A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L.C. Stein et al.,Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses,Phys. Rev. Research.1(2019) 033015 [1905.09300]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[46]

Y .-F. Wang, S. Ma, N. Khera and H. Yang,A nonlinear voice from GW250114 ringdown,2601.05734. – 17 –

arXiv

[1] [1]

Nollert,Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars,Class

H.-P. Nollert,Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars,Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) R159

1999

[2] [2]

Berti, V

E. Berti, V . Cardoso and A.O. Starinets,Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 163001 [0905.2975]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[3] [3]

Konoplya and A

R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko,Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.83(2011) 793 [1102.4014]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[4] [4]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102 [1602.03837]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[5] [5]

LIGO SCIENTIFICcollaboration,Advanced LIGO,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 074001 [1411.4547]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[6] [6]

Rel.23(2020) 3 [1304.0670]

KAGRA, LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO collaboration,Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA,Living Rev. Rel.23(2020) 3 [1304.0670]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

[7] [7]

Berti et al.,Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,2505.23895

E. Berti et al.,Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,2505.23895

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[8] [8]

Teukolsky,Rotating black holes: Separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,Phys

S.A. Teukolsky,Rotating black holes: Separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 1114

1972

[9] [9]

Teukolsky,Perturbations of a rotating black hole

S.A. Teukolsky,Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino-field perturbations,Astrophys. J.185(1973) 635

1973

[10] [10]

Leaver,An analytic representation for the quasi-normal modes of Kerr black holes,Proc

E.W. Leaver,An analytic representation for the quasi-normal modes of Kerr black holes,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 402(1985) 285

1985

[11] [11]

Onozawa,A Detailed study of quasinormal frequencies of the Kerr black hole,Phys

H. Onozawa,A Detailed study of quasinormal frequencies of the Kerr black hole,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 3593 [gr-qc/9610048]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

[12] [12]

Berti, V

E. Berti, V . Cardoso and C.M. Will,On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 064030 [gr-qc/0512160]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

[13] [13]

Yang, D.A

H. Yang, D.A. Nichols, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, Z. Zhang and Y . Chen,Quasinormal-mode spectrum of Kerr black holes and its geometric interpretation,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 104006 [1207.4253]. – 14 – 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 ˜p 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06P(˜p |d) a) γ < 0.01 γ < 1 γ < 2 220 220+221 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 ˜ℓ 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 P...

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[14] [14]

Stein,qnm: A Python package for calculating Kerr quasinormal modes, separation constants, and spherical-spheroidal mixing coefficients,J

L.C. Stein,qnm: A Python package for calculating Kerr quasinormal modes, separation constants, and spherical-spheroidal mixing coefficients,J. Open Source Softw.4(2019) 1683 [1908.10377]

arXiv 2019

[15] [15]

Alexander and N

S. Alexander and N. Yunes,Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity,Phys. Rept.480(2009) 1 [0907.2562]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[16] [16]

Sotiriou and S.-Y

T.P. Sotiriou and S.-Y . Zhou,Black hole hair in generalized scalar-tensor gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 251102 [1312.3622]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[17] [17]

Clifton, P.G

T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis,Modified Gravity and Cosmology,Phys. Rept.513(2012) 1 [1106.2476]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[18] [18]

Chen, Z.-K

J.-N. Chen, Z.-K. Guo and L.-B. Wu,Quasinormal modes of the rotating quantum corrected black holes,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 104047 [2510.27320]. – 15 – 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 km 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 P( d1, d2) 220 GW231123 joint, uniform joint, ln B joint, 2 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 km 220+221 12 14 16 18 20 t0 [tMf] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1...

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[19] [19]

Berti, K

E. Berti, K. Yagi, H. Yang and N. Yunes,Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown,Gen. Rel. Grav.50(2018) 49 [1801.03587]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[20] [20]

Gossan, J

S. Gossan, J. Veitch and B.S. Sathyaprakash,Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 124056 [1111.5819]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[21] [21]

Meidam, M

J. Meidam, M. Agathos, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch and B.S. Sathyaprakash,Testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns using TIGER,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 064009 [1406.3201]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[22] [22]

Carullo et al.,Empirical tests of the black hole no-hair conjecture using gravitational-wave observations, Phys

G. Carullo et al.,Empirical tests of the black hole no-hair conjecture using gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 104020 [1805.04760]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[23] [23]

M. Isi, M. Giesler, W.M. Farr, M.A. Scheel and S.A. Teukolsky,Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 111102 [1905.00869]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[24] [24]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 122002 [2010.14529]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

[25] [25]

Maselli, P

A. Maselli, P. Pani, L. Gualtieri and E. Berti,Parametrized ringdown spin expansion coefficients: a data-analysis framework for black-hole spectroscopy with multiple events,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 024043 [1910.12893]

arXiv 2020

[26] [26]

Carullo,Enhancing modified gravity detection from gravitational-wave observations using the parametrized ringdown spin expansion coeffcients formalism,Phys

G. Carullo,Enhancing modified gravity detection from gravitational-wave observations using the parametrized ringdown spin expansion coeffcients formalism,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 124043 [2102.05939]

arXiv 2021

[27] [27]

Silva, A

H.O. Silva, A. Ghosh and A. Buonanno,Black-hole ringdown as a probe of higher-curvature gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 044030 [2205.05132]

arXiv 2023

[28] [28]

Maenaut, G

S. Maenaut, G. Carullo, P.A. Cano, A. Liu, V . Cardoso, T. Hertog et al.,Ringdown analysis of rotating black holes in effective field theory extensions of general relativity,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 044039 [2411.17893]

arXiv 2026

[29] [29]

Chung and N

A.K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes,Probing quadratic gravity with black-hole ringdown gravitational waves measured by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detectors,2506.14695

arXiv

[30] [30]

Carullo, W

G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo and J. Veitch,Observational Black Hole Spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 123029 [1902.07527]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[31] [31]

Isi and W.M

M. Isi and W.M. Farr,Analyzing black-hole ringdowns,2107.05609

arXiv

[32] [32]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,Phys. Rev. X9 (2019) 031040 [1811.12907]. – 16 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[33] [33]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,Phys. Rev. X11(2021) 021053 [2010.14527]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

[34] [34]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 022001 [2108.01045]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[35] [35]

KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO SCIENTIFICcollaboration,GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,Phys. Rev. X13(2023) 041039 [2111.03606]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[36] [36]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,2508.18082

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[37] [37]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, 2605.27225

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[38] [38]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog,2605.27223

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[39] [39]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 041403 [2509.08099]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[40] [40]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 111403 [2509.08054]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[41] [41]

LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M⊙,Astrophys. J. Lett.993(2025) L25 [2507.08219]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[42] [42]

P.A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog and S. Maenaut,Gravitational ringing of rotating black holes in higher-derivative gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 024064 [2110.11378]

arXiv 2022

[43] [43]

Cano and A

P.A. Cano and A. Ruip ´erez,Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry,JHEP05(2019) 189 [1901.01315]

arXiv 2019

[44] [44]

Cardoso, M

V . Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli and L. Senatore,Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 251105 [1808.08962]

arXiv 2018

[45] [45]

Varma, S.E

V . Varma, S.E. Field, M.A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L.C. Stein et al.,Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses,Phys. Rev. Research.1(2019) 033015 [1905.09300]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[46] [46]

Y .-F. Wang, S. Ma, N. Khera and H. Yang,A nonlinear voice from GW250114 ringdown,2601.05734. – 17 –

arXiv