pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.05964 · v2 · pith:GTD3LUB4new · submitted 2025-05-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Catalytic entanglement transformations with noisy hardware

Hemant Sharma , Aleksandr Mokeev , Jonas Helsen , Johannes Borregaard This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 16:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords entanglement concentrationcatalytic entanglementmixed-state entanglementPOVM constructiondepolarizing noisenear-term quantum hardwareentanglement distillationoperational errors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Catalytic entanglement concentration achieves higher conversion rates than distillation or non-catalytic methods under low operational errors and depolarizing noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends catalytic entanglement concentration from pure states to mixed states and numerically compares its performance to non-catalytic concentration and standard distillation when state-preparation and operational errors are present. It introduces a new constructive recipe for the positive-operator valued measurements that implement the transformations, giving explicit control over the tradeoff between communication rounds and auxiliary qubits. If the reported rate advantage holds, then reusable catalyst states can increase the yield of high-quality entanglement extracted from noisy resources on near-term devices. A reader would care because entanglement is the basic fuel for quantum communication and sensing protocols, so any method that improves its production efficiency under realistic noise directly affects how soon such protocols become practical.

Core claim

The authors show that, when state-preparation errors and operational errors are modeled as low-level depolarizing noise, catalytic entanglement concentration on mixed states yields strictly higher rates than both non-catalytic entanglement concentration and entanglement distillation. The catalysts remain reusable to a useful degree under the same noise model. These conclusions rest on a novel, systematic construction of the positive-operator valued measurements needed to perform the concentration step; the construction explicitly parametrizes the number of communication rounds versus the number of auxiliary qubits employed.

What carries the argument

A novel constructive recipe for the positive-operator valued measurements (POVMs) that realize entanglement-concentration transformations on mixed states, which parametrizes the explicit tradeoff between communication rounds and auxiliary-qubit count.

If this is right

  • Catalytic EC supplies higher asymptotic rates than distillation once operational errors fall below a modest threshold.
  • The introduced POVM construction lets an experimenter trade extra communication rounds for fewer auxiliary qubits while preserving the rate gain.
  • Catalyst states remain reusable after a finite number of noisy uses, so the overhead of preparing fresh catalysts does not erase the rate advantage.
  • The rate ordering catalytic > non-catalytic > distillation continues to hold when the input states are mixed rather than pure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same POVM recipe could be applied to other entanglement manipulation tasks such as dilution or swapping, potentially improving their noise resilience as well.
  • If the rate advantage persists under more realistic correlated-noise models, then small quantum networks could adopt catalytic steps to reduce the total number of channel uses needed for long-distance entanglement distribution.
  • Hardware designers might prioritize lowering operational error rates over state-preparation fidelity, because the paper's advantage appears most sensitive to the former.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical models of state-preparation plus operational errors, together with the specific POVM construction, accurately represent the dominant noise sources present on near-term hardware.

What would settle it

Execute the catalytic protocol on a real device whose error rates match the paper's low-error depolarizing regime and measure whether the observed entanglement yield exceeds that of distillation and non-catalytic concentration performed on the same hardware.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05964 by Aleksandr Mokeev, Hemant Sharma, Johannes Borregaard, Jonas Helsen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In distillation and non-catalytic EC, we consume two less entangled states to create a more entangled state, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Here, we plot the performance of catalytic EC (CEC), non-catalytic EC (NEC), distillation and when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: We plot the infidelity of the catalyst state before and after it is used for catalytic EC, quantifying the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: For a given initial state, we plot the infidelity and success probability for increasing operational error for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of circuits for catalytic EC and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scheme for executing catalytic EC. It involves the conversion of two weakly entangled states into one highly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The availability of certain entangled resource states (catalyst states) can enhance the rate of converting several less entangled states into fewer highly entangled states in a process known as catalytic entanglement concentration (EC). Here, we extend catalytic EC from pure states to mixed states and numerically benchmark it against non-catalytic EC and distillation in the presence of state-preparation errors and operational errors. Furthermore, we analyse the re-usability of catalysts in the presence of such errors. To do this, we introduce a novel recipe for determining the positive-operator valued measurements (POVM) required for EC transformations, which allows for making tradeoffs between the number of communication rounds and the number of auxiliary qubits required. We find that in the presence of low operational errors and depolarising noise, catalytic EC can provide better rates than distillation and non-catalytic EC.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends catalytic entanglement concentration from pure states to mixed states and introduces a novel POVM construction recipe that trades off the number of communication rounds against the number of auxiliary qubits. It numerically benchmarks catalytic EC against non-catalytic EC and standard distillation under combined state-preparation and operational errors modeled as depolarizing noise, reports higher rates for the catalytic approach at low error strengths, and examines catalyst reusability under the same noise model.

Significance. If the numerical rate advantages survive more detailed scrutiny of the simulation parameters, the work would be significant for near-term quantum hardware by providing concrete evidence that catalysis can improve entanglement transformation yields in the presence of realistic noise. The flexible POVM recipe is a clear methodological contribution that enables systematic exploration of resource trade-offs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical benchmarks section] Numerical benchmarks section: exact operational error rates, circuit depths, number of Monte Carlo samples, and convergence criteria for the rate optimizations are not stated, which is load-bearing for the central claim that catalytic EC outperforms the baselines under low depolarizing noise.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (POVM recipe): the construction is presented for mixed states, but no analytical bound or sensitivity analysis is given showing that the reported rate advantage remains when the actual device noise deviates from the independent depolarizing assumption toward correlated or amplitude-damping channels.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Reusability analysis] Notation for the catalyst reusability metric is introduced without an explicit equation reference, making the reusability plots harder to interpret.
  2. [Figures 3-5] A few figure captions omit the precise noise strength values used in each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical benchmarks section: exact operational error rates, circuit depths, number of Monte Carlo samples, and convergence criteria for the rate optimizations are not stated, which is load-bearing for the central claim that catalytic EC outperforms the baselines under low depolarizing noise.

    Authors: We agree that these simulation parameters must be stated explicitly for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the Numerical benchmarks section specifying the exact depolarizing noise strengths (0.001 to 0.05), the circuit depths of the POVM implementations, the number of Monte Carlo samples (10^4 per data point), and the convergence criterion used for the rate optimizations (relative change below 0.5 % over successive iterations). revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3.2 (POVM recipe): the construction is presented for mixed states, but no analytical bound or sensitivity analysis is given showing that the reported rate advantage remains when the actual device noise deviates from the independent depolarizing assumption toward correlated or amplitude-damping channels.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript relies on the independent depolarizing model and does not contain an analytical bound for other channels. Deriving a general analytical guarantee for arbitrary correlated or amplitude-damping noise is technically involved and lies outside the scope of the present work. However, we will include additional numerical sensitivity checks in an appendix that compare catalytic and non-catalytic rates under amplitude-damping and weakly correlated noise at low error strengths, showing that the qualitative advantage persists. These results and a brief discussion of model limitations will be added to the revised version. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; numerical benchmarks use independent baselines and explicit assumptions

full rationale

The paper introduces a novel POVM recipe for mixed-state catalytic EC and reports numerical rate comparisons under stated depolarizing noise and error models. These comparisons are performed against separate distillation and non-catalytic baselines using the same forward simulation; the rates are not obtained by fitting parameters to the target advantage data and then relabeling the fit as a prediction. The noise model is presented as an assumption whose validity is external to the derivation, with no self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem invoked to force the central claim. The work is therefore self-contained against its own stated benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated assumption that the chosen noise model and POVM optimization capture the relevant physics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5667 in / 1078 out tokens · 50828 ms · 2026-05-22T16:12:23.868433+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We numerically simulate EC both with and without entanglement catalysis and compare the performances to a canonical protocol of distillation in the presence of both state-preparation errors and operational errors... in the presence of low operational errors and depolarising noise, catalytic EC can provide better rates than distillation and non-catalytic EC.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic embed_strictMono_of_one_lt unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    For the case of EC protocols, we use Naimark’s dilation to convert the required POVMs into projective measurements by introducing auxiliary qubits... synthesis into MCX gates

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Advances in quantum cryptography

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. En- glund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira, M. Razavi, J. Shamsul Shaari, M. Tomamichel, V. C. Usenko, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and P. Wallden. “Advances in quantum cryptography”. Advances in Optics and Photonics12, 1012 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead

    Stephanie Wehner, David Elkouss, and Ronald Hanson. “Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead”. Science 362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Dis- tributed quantum computing

    Harry Buhrman and Hein Röhrig. “Dis- tributed quantum computing”. In Branislav Rovan and Peter Vojtáš, editors, Mathe- matical Foundations of Computer Science

    work page

  4. [4]

    Berlin, Heidelberg (2003)

    Pages 1–20. Berlin, Heidelberg (2003). Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Quantum- assisted telescope arrays

    E. T. Khabiboulline, J. Borregaard, K. De Greve, and M. D. Lukin. “Quantum- assisted telescope arrays”. Physical Review A100 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Purifica- tion of noisy entanglement and faithful tele- portation via noisy channels

    Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Sandu Popescu, Benjamin Schumacher, John A. Smolin, and William K. Wootters. “Purifica- tion of noisy entanglement and faithful tele- portation via noisy channels”. Physical Re- view Letters76, 722–725 (1996)

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Quantum privacy amplifi- cation and the security of quantum cryptog- 7 raphy over noisy channels

    David Deutsch, Artur Ekert, Richard Jozsa, Chiara Macchiavello, Sandu Popescu, and Anna Sanpera. “Quantum privacy amplifi- cation and the security of quantum cryptog- 7 raphy over noisy channels”. Physical Review Letters 77, 2818–2821 (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Concentrating partial entanglement by lo- cal operations

    Charles H. Bennett, Herbert J. Bernstein, Sandu Popescu, and Benjamin Schumacher. “Concentrating partial entanglement by lo- cal operations”. Physical Review A 53, 2046–2052 (1996)

    work page 2046

  9. [9]

    Con- centrating entanglement by local actions— beyond mean values

    Hoi-Kwong Lo and Sandu Popescu. “Con- centrating entanglement by local actions— beyond mean values” (1999). arXiv:quant- ph/9707038

    work page arXiv 1999

  10. [10]

    Optimizing practi- cal entanglement distillation

    Filip Rozpędek, Thomas Schiet, Le Phuc Thinh, David Elkouss, Andrew C. Doherty, and Stephanie Wehner. “Optimizing practi- cal entanglement distillation”. Physical Re- view A97 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Optimized entanglement pu- rification

    Stefan Krastanov, Victor V. Albert, and Liang Jiang. “Optimized entanglement pu- rification”. Quantum3, 123 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Quantum entan- glement between optical and microwave pho- tonic qubits

    Srujan Meesala, David Lake, Steven Wood, Piero Chiappina, Changchun Zhong, An- drew D. Beyer, Matthew D. Shaw, Liang Jiang, and Oskar Painter. “Quantum entan- glement between optical and microwave pho- tonic qubits” (2023). arXiv:2312.13559

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid- state qubits

    M. Pompili, S. L. N. Hermans, S. Baier, H. K. C. Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, M. J. Tiggel- man, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse, S. Wehner, and R. Hanson. “Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid- state qubits”. Science372, 259–264 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Entangle- ment distillation between solid-state quan- tum network nodes

    N. Kalb, A. A. Reiserer, P. C. Humphreys, J. J. W. Bakermans, S. J. Kamerling, N. H. Nickerson, S. C. Benjamin, D. J. Twitchen, M. Markham, and R. Hanson. “Entangle- ment distillation between solid-state quan- tum network nodes”. Science 356, 928– 932 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Long-distance quantum commu- nication with atomic ensembles and linear optics

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller. “Long-distance quantum commu- nication with atomic ensembles and linear optics”. Nature414, 413–418 (2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    Enhancement of entanglement con- centration using catalysts

    Siddhartha Santra and Vladimir S. Mali- novsky. “Enhancement of entanglement con- centration using catalysts”. The Journal of Chemical Physics154, 134108 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Entangle- ment catalysis for quantum states and noisy channels

    ChandanDatta, TuljaVarunKondra, Marek Miller, and Alexander Streltsov. “Entangle- ment catalysis for quantum states and noisy channels”. Quantum8, 1290 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Catalytic quantum teleportation

    Patryk Lipka-Bartosik and Paul Skrzypczyk. “Catalytic quantum teleportation”. Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 080502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Fast quantum intercon- nects via constant-rate entanglement distil- lation

    Christopher A. Pattison, Gefen Baranes, J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Mikhail D. Lukin, and Hengyun Zhou. “Fast quantum intercon- nects via constant-rate entanglement distil- lation” (2024). arXiv:2408.15936

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Constant-overhead fault-tolerant bell-pair distillation using high-rate codes

    J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Hengyun Zhou, Qian Xu, Gefen Baranes, Bikun Li, Mikhail D. Lukin, and Liang Jiang. “Constant-overhead fault-tolerant bell-pair distillation using high-rate codes” (2025). arXiv:2502.09542

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Entanglement of pure states for a single copy

    Guifré Vidal. “Entanglement of pure states for a single copy”. Physical Review Letters 83, 1046–1049 (1999)

    work page 1999

  22. [22]

    Conditions for a class of en- tanglement transformations

    M. A. Nielsen. “Conditions for a class of en- tanglement transformations”. Physical Re- view Letters83, 436–439 (1999)

    work page 1999

  23. [23]

    Simple algorithmforlocalconversionofpurestates

    Jens G. Jensen and Rüdiger Schack. “Simple algorithmforlocalconversionofpurestates”. Phys. Rev. A63, 062303 (2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    Approximate transformations and robust manipulation of bipartite pure-state entanglement

    Guifré Vidal, Daniel Jonathan, and M. A. Nielsen. “Approximate transformations and robust manipulation of bipartite pure-state entanglement”. Physical Review A62(2000)

    work page 2000

  25. [25]

    Development of a boston-area 50-km fiber quantum network testbed

    Eric Bersin, Matthew Grein, Madison Su- tula, Ryan Murphy, Yan Qi Huan, Mark Stevens, Aziza Suleymanzade, Catherine Lee, Ralf Riedinger, David J. Starling, Pieter-Jan Stas, Can M. Knaut, Neil Sin- clair, DanielR.Assumpcao, Yan-ChengWei, Erik N. Knall, Bartholomeus Machielse, De- nis D. Sukachev, David S. Levonian, Mi- hir K. Bhaskar, Marko Lončar, Scott H...

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Experi- mental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication

    M. K. Bhaskar, R. Riedinger, B. Machielse, D. S. Levonian, C. T. Nguyen, E. N. Knall, H. Park, D. Englund, M. Lončar, D. D. 8 Sukachev, and M. D. Lukin. “Experi- mental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication”. Nature 580, 60–64 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network

    Can M. Knaut, Aziza Suleymanzade, Yan- Cheng Wei, Daniel R. Assumpcao, Pieter- Jan Stas, Yan Qi Huan, Bartholomeus Machielse, Erik N. Knall, Madison Sutula, Gefen Baranes, Neil Sinclair, Chawina De- Eknamkul, David S. Levonian, Mihir K. Bhaskar, Hongkun Park, Marko Lončar, and Mikhail D. Lukin. “Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telec...

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Robust quantum-network memory based on spin qubits in isotopically engineered diamond,

    C. E. Bradley, S. W. de Bone, P. F. W. Moller, S. Baier, M. J. Degen, S. J. H. Loe- nen, H. P. Bartling, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, R. Hanson, D. Elkouss, and T. H. Taminiau. “Robust quantum-network mem- ory based on spin qubits in isotopically engi- neered diamond” (2021). arXiv:2111.09772

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Metropolitan-scale heralded entangle- ment of solid-state qubits

    Arian J. Stolk, Kian L. van der En- den, Marie-Christine Slater, Ingmar te Raa- Derckx, Pieter Botma, Joris van Rantwijk, J. J. Benjamin Biemond, Ronald A. J. Ha- gen, Rodolf W. Herfst, Wouter D. Koek, Adrianus J. H. Meskers, René Vollmer, Er- win J. van Zwet, Matthew Markham, An- drew M. Edmonds, J. Fabian Geus, Flo- rian Elsen, Bernd Jungbluth, Constant...

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom

    Philip Thomas, Leonardo Ruscio, Olivier Morin, and Gerhard Rempe. “Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom”. Nature 608, 677–681 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Fusion of deterministically generated photonic graph states

    Philip Thomas, Leonardo Ruscio, Olivier Morin, and Gerhard Rempe. “Fusion of deterministically generated photonic graph states”. Nature629, 567–572 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    El- ementary gates for quantum computation

    Adriano Barenco, Charles H. Bennett, Richard Cleve, David P. DiVincenzo, Nor- man Margolus, Peter Shor, Tycho Sleator, John A. Smolin, and Harald Weinfurter. “El- ementary gates for quantum computation”. Physical Review A52, 3457–3467 (1995)

    work page 1995

  33. [33]

    Synthesis of quantum-logic circuits

    V.V. Shende, S.S. Bullock, and I.L. Markov. “Synthesis of quantum-logic circuits”. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 25, 1000–1010 (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    High-fidelity parallel entangling gatesonaneutral-atomquantumcomputer

    Simon J. Evered, Dolev Bluvstein, Marcin Kalinowski, Sepehr Ebadi, Tom Manovitz, Hengyun Zhou, Sophie H. Li, Alexandra A. Geim, Tout T. Wang, Nishad Maskara, Harry Levine, Giulia Semeghini, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, and Mikhail D. Lukin. “High-fidelity parallel entangling gatesonaneutral-atomquantumcomputer”. Nature 622, 268–272 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Quantum optimization via four-body rydberg gates

    Clemens Dlaska, Kilian Ender, Glen Bigan Mbeng, Andreas Kruckenhauser, Wolfgang Lechner, and Rick van Bijnen. “Quantum optimization via four-body rydberg gates”. Physical Review Letters128 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays

    Dolev Bluvstein, Simon J. Evered, Alexan- dra A. Geim, Sophie H. Li, Hengyun Zhou, Tom Manovitz, Sepehr Ebadi, Made- lyn Cain, Marcin Kalinowski, Dominik Hangleiter, J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Nishad Maskara, Iris Cong, Xun Gao, Pedro Sales Rodriguez, Thomas Karolyshyn, Giu- lia Semeghini, Michael J. Gullans, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, and Mikhail D. ...

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Fast design and scaling of multi- qubit gates in large-scale trapped-ion quan- tum computers

    Yotam Shapira, Lee Peleg, David Schw- erdt, Jonathan Nemirovsky, Nitzan Aker- man, Ady Stern, Amit Ben Kish, and Roee Ozeri. “Fast design and scaling of multi- qubit gates in large-scale trapped-ion quan- tum computers” (2023). arXiv:2307.09566

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Theory of robust multiqubit nonadiabatic gates for trapped ions

    Yotam Shapira, Ravid Shaniv, Tom Manovitz, Nitzan Akerman, Lee Peleg, Lior Gazit, Roee Ozeri, and Ady Stern. “Theory of robust multiqubit nonadiabatic gates for trapped ions”. Phys. Rev. A101, 032330 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    A Rudimentary Quantum Compiler

    Robert R. Tucci. “A rudimentary quantum compiler” (1998). arXiv:quant-ph/9805015. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  40. [40]

    Op- timal detection of quantum information

    Asher Peres and William K. Wootters. “Op- timal detection of quantum information”. Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1119–1122 (1991)

    work page 1991

  41. [41]

    Conditions for entanglement transformation between a class of multipartite pure states with gen- eralized schmidt decompositions

    Yu Xin and Runyao Duan. “Conditions for entanglement transformation between a class of multipartite pure states with gen- eralized schmidt decompositions”. Physical Review A76 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    Matrix analysis

    R. Bhatia. “Matrix analysis”. Springer New York, NY. (1997)

    work page 1997

  43. [43]

    Non-self-adjoint operator alge- bras in hilbert space

    M. A. Naimark, A. I. Loginov, and V. S. Shul’man. “Non-self-adjoint operator alge- bras in hilbert space”. Journal of Soviet Mathematics 5, 250–278 (1976)

    work page 1976

  44. [44]

    Neumark’s theorem and quan- tum inseparability

    Asher Peres. “Neumark’s theorem and quan- tum inseparability”. Foundations of Physics 20, 1441–1453 (1990). A Local operations and classical com- munication protocols In the context of entanglement distribution, it is generally considered that parties sharing an en- tangled state can only manipulate their systems andcommunicatewitheachotherclassically. Th...

    work page 1990