Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

This Prompt is Measuring <MASK>: Evaluating Bias Evaluation in Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.12757 v1 pith:GYTFJTRH submitted 2023-05-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords biasmodelslanguagemeasureanalyseevaluatingmeasurementpossible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bias research in NLP seeks to analyse models for social biases, thus helping NLP practitioners uncover, measure, and mitigate social harms. We analyse the body of work that uses prompts and templates to assess bias in language models. We draw on a measurement modelling framework to create a taxonomy of attributes that capture what a bias test aims to measure and how that measurement is carried out. By applying this taxonomy to 90 bias tests, we illustrate qualitatively and quantitatively that core aspects of bias test conceptualisations and operationalisations are frequently unstated or ambiguous, carry implicit assumptions, or be mismatched. Our analysis illuminates the scope of possible bias types the field is able to measure, and reveals types that are as yet under-researched. We offer guidance to enable the community to explore a wider section of the possible bias space, and to better close the gap between desired outcomes and experimental design, both for bias and for evaluating language models more broadly.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Generative AI Ethics Playbook

    cs.CY 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A structured playbook that collects existing guidance, checklists, and case studies to help generative AI practitioners identify and mitigate ethical harms across six lifecycle stages.

Pith tools