pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26184 · v1 · pith:H36YOAIYnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Measuring Asteroid Rotation Periods Using the KMTNet Bulge Survey Data

Haitao Huang , Hongjing Yang , Chung-Uk Lee , Qiyue Qian , Jun Tian , Tianjun Gan , Shude Mao , Weicheng Zang
show 1 more author
Dong-Jin Kim
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 01:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords asteroid rotation periodsKMTNetlightcurvesGalactic bulge surveyarchival photometryspin ratesasteroid database
0
0 comments X

The pith

KMTNet bulge survey data supplies reliable rotation periods for 96 asteroids including 84 new ones.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that high-cadence archival observations from the KMTNet Galactic bulge survey can be mined for asteroid lightcurves. Photometric measurements on bright asteroids in a single square-degree field from the 2018 season produced reliable rotation periods for 96 objects, 84 of them without prior published lightcurves. The measured spin rates match those already listed in the Asteroid Lightcurve Database. The same approach applied across the full existing ~12 square-degree KMTNet dataset could deliver reliable periods for more than 5,500 asteroids.

Core claim

We performed photometric measurements of bright asteroids (V < 20 mag) identified within a one-square-degree field during the 2018 KMTNet bulge season. We derived reliable rotation periods for 96 asteroids, including 84 objects without previously published lightcurves. The reliable spin-rates of the asteroids in our sample are broadly consistent with those reported in the Asteroid Lightcurve Database. This archival mining approach can be readily extended to a much larger KMTNet footprint, and the existing ~12 deg² high-cadence KMTNet dataset has the potential to yield reliable rotation periods (U ≥ 2+) for more than 5,500 asteroids.

What carries the argument

Photometric extraction of asteroid lightcurves from high-cadence KMTNet bulge survey images to determine rotation periods

If this is right

  • The derived periods are broadly consistent with values in the Asteroid Lightcurve Database.
  • The method can be extended across the full ~12 deg² high-cadence KMTNet dataset.
  • This would produce reliable periods (U ≥ 2+) for more than 5,500 asteroids.
  • The approach substantially expands the current database of asteroid rotational properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same archival technique could be tested on other wide-field high-cadence surveys to increase the total number of known asteroid periods.
  • A larger sample of measured periods would enable statistical comparisons of spin properties across different asteroid populations or size ranges.
  • Combining these periods with shape or orbital data from other sources could support improved models of asteroid dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The photometric measurements performed on bright asteroids (V < 20 mag) identified in the one-square-degree field are sufficiently accurate and free of contamination to allow reliable period determination.

What would settle it

Targeted follow-up observations of a substantial fraction of the 96 asteroids that yield rotation periods differing significantly from those derived here.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26184 by Chung-Uk Lee, Dong-Jin Kim, Haitao Huang, Hongjing Yang, Jun Tian, Qiyue Qian, Shude Mao, Tianjun Gan, Weicheng Zang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distribution of Asteroid Observation Counts in the Pilot Dataset. trailed PSF fitting for each exposure to obtain the posi￾tion (x, y) and flux f. Using the fitted positions across multiple exposures within the same observational night, we refine the velocity estimate, update the motion ker￾nel, and repeat the fitting process. This iterative pro￾cedure continues until the velocity converges, ensuring that … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the difference image and the trailed PSF photometry for asteroid (4362) Carlisle. Rows from top to bottom are: original KMTNet SSO images, difference images, zoomed cutouts of the difference images, residuals after subtracting the asteroid’s trailed PSF, and the resulting lightcurve, respectively. Columns from left to right show five different epochs. The asteroid (4362) Carlisle is marked … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Folded lightcurve (left) and the normalized χ 2 distribution as a function of frequency (right) for asteroid with rotation￾period quality code U = 3. Only the first panels are shown here to illustrate the format; the remaining panels are provided in Appendix B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase-folded lightcurve and the normalized χ 2 distribution as a function of frequency for asteroid (15699) Lyytinen. Panel (a) shows the folded lightcurve, (b) presents the normalized χ 2 distribution as a function of frequency, and (c) is a zoom-in of panel (b) around the best-fit frequency. The two dashed lines indicate the LCDB (left) frequency and our measured period (right). 0 50 100 150 <15 15-16 16… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Asteroid number distribution of I-band magnitude, grouped in quality codes. The gray and black colors represent the rotation periods of U ≥ 2+ and U < 2+ groups, respectively. The fraction listed above each magnitude bin indicates the fraction of U ≥ 2+ objects. exhibit extremely short rotation periods. Nevertheless, the near-continuous temporal coverage enabled by the multi-site observations of KMTNet, to… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The magnitude–period two-dimensional distribution of asteroids with reliable rotation periods derived in this work, compared with those from the LCDB-BASIC (Warner et al. 2009). The gray dashed line indicates the asteroid spin barrier at ∼2.2 h. for those already classified as less reliable, the reported period values themselves may not be accurate. A future study over a larger area could help resolve this… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Density distribution of the asteroid spin frequency of U ≥ 2+ asteroids derived from this work compared to that of the LCDB U ≥ 2+ asteroids. The top axis showing the corresponding rotation period. highlighting the considerable potential of the KMTNet archive for asteroid rotational studies. In addition, asteroids that are observed over multi￾ple seasons constitute a particularly valuable subsam￾ple. For t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Folded lightcurves (left) and normalized χ 2 as a function of frequency (right) for asteroids with rotation period quality code U = 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Folded lightcurves (left) and normalized χ 2 as a function of frequency (right) for asteroids with rotation period quality code U = 3- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Continued (U = 3-) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Continued (U = 3-) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Folded lightcurves (left) and normalized χ 2 as a function of frequency (right) for asteroids with rotation period quality code U = 2+ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Continued (U = 2+) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Continued (U = 2+) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Continued (U = 2+) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Continued (U = 2+) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Since 2015, the Korea Microlensing Telescope Network (KMTNet) has conducted high-cadence, near-continuous observations of the Galactic bulge for nearly nine months each year from three sites in Chile, South Africa, and Australia, and its wide field of view provides a unique opportunity to extract asteroid lightcurves from archival survey data. In this work, we performed photometric measurements of bright asteroids ($V< 20$~mag) identified within a one-square-degree field during the 2018 KMTNet bulge season. We derived reliable rotation periods for 96 asteroids, including 84 objects without previously published lightcurves. The reliable spin-rates of the asteroids in our sample are broadly consistent with those reported in the Asteroid Lightcurve Database. This archival mining approach can be readily extended to a much larger KMTNet footprint, and the existing $\sim12$~deg$^2$ high-cadence KMTNet dataset has the potential to yield reliable rotation periods (U $\geq 2+$) for more than 5,500 asteroids, substantially expanding the current database of asteroid rotational properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that photometric measurements of bright asteroids (V<20 mag) in a 1 deg² field from the 2018 KMTNet bulge survey yield reliable rotation periods for 96 asteroids (84 previously unpublished), with spin rates broadly consistent with the Asteroid Lightcurve Database (ALCDB); it further extrapolates that the full ~12 deg² high-cadence KMTNet dataset could deliver U≥2+ periods for >5500 asteroids.

Significance. If the photometric accuracy and contamination control hold, the archival-mining approach would provide a low-cost route to substantially enlarge the sample of asteroid rotation periods, enabling better statistical studies of spin distributions and collisional evolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the 96 periods are 'reliable' and 'broadly consistent' with the ALCDB is presented without error bars on the derived periods, without per-object quality metrics, without exclusion criteria for unreliable fits, and without any injected-source recovery tests or neighbor-flux diagnostics. This directly undermines the central claim that the lightcurves are free of blending or background-subtraction artifacts in crowded bulge fields.
  2. [Discussion or extrapolation paragraph] The extrapolation to >5500 asteroids from the 1 deg² test field assumes the same success rate applies across the full ~12 deg² dataset; no quantitative assessment of field-to-field variations in crowding, seeing, or asteroid density is provided to support the scaling.
minor comments (2)
  1. Add a table (or supplementary table) listing the 96 asteroids, their derived periods, uncertainties, U-ratings, and comparison to ALCDB entries so that readers can assess the consistency claim directly.
  2. Clarify the exact photometric pipeline (aperture vs. PSF photometry, background subtraction method) and the adopted magnitude precision threshold for period fitting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the 96 periods are 'reliable' and 'broadly consistent' with the ALCDB is presented without error bars on the derived periods, without per-object quality metrics, without exclusion criteria for unreliable fits, and without any injected-source recovery tests or neighbor-flux diagnostics. This directly undermines the central claim that the lightcurves are free of blending or background-subtraction artifacts in crowded bulge fields.

    Authors: The manuscript body details the period determination via Lomb-Scargle and the U quality code adopted from the ALCDB, along with the selection of the 96 objects that meet U ≥ 2+. We agree the abstract is too terse on these points and will revise it to reference the quality assessment and consistency checks described in Sections 3 and 4. Injected-source recovery tests were not performed in this pilot study; the external validation against the ALCDB serves as the primary check for blending artifacts, though we can add an explicit caveat if the editor prefers. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Discussion or extrapolation paragraph] The extrapolation to >5500 asteroids from the 1 deg² test field assumes the same success rate applies across the full ~12 deg² dataset; no quantitative assessment of field-to-field variations in crowding, seeing, or asteroid density is provided to support the scaling.

    Authors: The 1 deg^{2} field was chosen as representative of the high-cadence bulge survey conditions. We accept that a quantitative assessment of variations would strengthen the claim and will add a short paragraph in the revised discussion noting the typical ranges of seeing and crowding across the KMTNet fields, while rephrasing the >5500 figure as an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a firm prediction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: data-driven period extraction validated externally

full rationale

The paper reports photometric extraction and period fitting on KMTNet survey images for 96 asteroids, with direct comparison to the independent ALCDB catalog for consistency checks. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to derive the reported periods or the 5,500-object extrapolation; the central results rest on standard lightcurve analysis applied to archival data and external validation rather than any self-referential reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Relies on standard assumptions of photometric accuracy and asteroid identification in survey data; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Photometric measurements of V<20 mag asteroids in KMTNet data yield lightcurves suitable for period determination.
    Invoked when claiming reliable periods from the extracted lightcurves.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5756 in / 1106 out tokens · 27783 ms · 2026-06-26T01:33:10.951706+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Warner and Alan W

    Brian D. Warner and Alan W. Harris and Petr Pravec , keywords =. The asteroid lightcurve database , journal =. 2009 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.02.003 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.02.003 2009

  2. [2]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Xu, Xiaoyun and Wang, Xiaobing and Muinonen, Karri and Penttilä, Antti and Luo, Nanping and Gu, Shenghong and Sun, Leilei and Xu, Fukun and Liu, Yisi and Xiang, Yue and Cao, Dongtao and Wang, Jianhua , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad765 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad765 2023

  3. [3]

    1989 , issn =

    Photoelectric observations of asteroids 3, 24, 60, 261, and 863 , journal =. 1989 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(89)90015-8 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90015-8 1989

  4. [4]

    2020 , month =

    Yeh, Ting-Shuo and Li, Bin and Chang, Chan-Kao and Zhao, Hai-Bin and Ji, Jiang-Hui and Lin, Zhong-Yi and Ip, Wing-Huen , title =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9a32 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9a32 2020

  5. [5]

    2000 , issn =

    Fast and Slow Rotation of Asteroids , journal =. 2000 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2000.6482 , url =

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.2000.6482 2000

  6. [6]

    On the detectability of lightcurves of Kuiper belt objects , journal =

    Pedro Lacerda and Jane Luu , keywords =. On the detectability of lightcurves of Kuiper belt objects , journal =. 2003 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00019-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0019-1035(02)00019-2 2003

  7. [7]

    2022 , month =

    Tian, Jun and Zhao, Hai-Bin and Li, Bin , title =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac977d , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac977d 2022

  8. [8]

    I-General theory and new inversion schemes , author=

    Interpretation of lightcurves of atmosphereless bodies. I-General theory and new inversion schemes , author=. Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 259, no. 1, p. 318-332. , volume=

  9. [9]

    II-Practical aspects of inversion , author=

    Interpretation of lightcurves of atmosphereless bodies. II-Practical aspects of inversion , author=. Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 259, no. 1, p. 333-340. , volume=

  10. [10]

    Shape models of asteroids based on lightcurve observations with BlueEye600 robotic observatory , journal =

    Josef Ďurech and Josef Hanuš and Miroslav Brož and Martin Lehký and Raoul Behrend and Pierre Antonini and Stephane Charbonnel and Roberto Crippa and Pierre Dubreuil and Gino Farroni and Gilles Kober and Alain Lopez and Federico Manzini and Julian Oey and Raymond Poncy and Claudine Rinner and René Roy , keywords =. Shape models of asteroids based on lightc...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.07.005 2018

  11. [11]

    1989 , publisher=

    Asteroids II (Tucson, AZ , author=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  12. [12]

    Pravec and A.W

    P. Pravec and A.W. Harris and D. Vokrouhlický and B.D. Warner and P. Kušnirák and K. Hornoch and D.P. Pray and D. Higgins and J. Oey and A. Galád and Š. Gajdoš and L. Kornoš and J. Világi and M. Husárik and Yu.N. Krugly and V. Shevchenko and V. Chiorny and N. Gaftonyuk and W.R. Cooney and J. Gross and D. Terrell and R.D. Stephens and R. Dyvig and V. Reddy...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.05.012 2008

  13. [13]

    2015 , month =

    Asteroids IV (Tucson, AZ) , author =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816532131-ch027 , publisher=

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816532131-ch027 2015

  14. [14]

    1992 , issn =

    Small main-belt asteroid lightcurve survey , journal =. 1992 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(92)90184-9 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90184-9 1992

  15. [15]

    The Thousand Asteroid Light Curve Survey , journal =

    Joseph Masiero and Robert Jedicke and Josef Ďurech and Stephen Gwyn and Larry Denneau and Jeff Larsen , keywords =. The Thousand Asteroid Light Curve Survey , journal =. 2009 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.06.012 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.06.012 2009

  16. [16]

    Earth, Moon, and Planets , volume=

    The EURONEAR lightcurve survey of near earth asteroids , author=. Earth, Moon, and Planets , volume=. 2017 , publisher=. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11038-017-9506-9 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11038-017-9506-9 2017

  17. [17]

    Warner and Alan W

    Brian D. Warner and Alan W. Harris , keywords =. Using sparse photometric data sets for asteroid lightcurve studies , journal =. 2011 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.10.007 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.10.007 2011

  18. [18]

    and Pál, A

    Molnár, L. and Pál, A. and Sárneczky, K. and Szabó, R. and Vinkó, J. and Szabó, Gy. M. and Kiss, Cs. and Hanyecz, O. and Marton, G. and Kiss, L. L. , title =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa1a1 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa1a1 2018

  19. [19]

    Szabó and Thomas Müller and Victor Ali-Lagoa and Róbert Szabó and József Vinkó and Krisztián Sárneczky and Csilla E

    Gábor Marton and Csaba Kiss and László Molnár and András Pál and Anikó Farkas-Takács and Gyula M. Szabó and Thomas Müller and Victor Ali-Lagoa and Róbert Szabó and József Vinkó and Krisztián Sárneczky and Csilla E. Kalup and Anna Marciniak and Rene Duffard and László L. Kiss , keywords =. Light curves of ten Centaurs from K2 measurements , journal =. 2020...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113721 2020

  20. [20]

    and Mommert, M

    McNeill, A. and Mommert, M. and Trilling, D. E. and Llama, J. and Skiff, B. , title =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab5223 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab5223 2019

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Pál, András and Szakáts, Róbert and Kiss, Csaba and Bódi, Attila and Bognár, Zsófia and Kalup, Csilla and Kiss, László L. and Marton, Gábor and Molnár, László and Plachy, Emese and Sárneczky, Krisztián and Szabó, Gyula M. and Szabó, Róbert , title =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab64f0 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab64f0 2020

  22. [22]

    and Laher, Russ and Masci, Frank and Levitan, David and Surace, Jason and Cheng, Yu-Chi and Ip, Wing-Huen and Kinoshita, Daisuke and Helou, George and Prince, Thomas A

    Waszczak, Adam and Chang, Chan-Kao and Ofek, Eran O. and Laher, Russ and Masci, Frank and Levitan, David and Surace, Jason and Cheng, Yu-Chi and Ip, Wing-Huen and Kinoshita, Daisuke and Helou, George and Prince, Thomas A. and Kulkarni, Shrinivas , title =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/75 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/75 2015

  23. [23]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Cordwell, A J and Rattenbury, N J and Bannister, M T and Cowan, P and The MOA Collaboration: and Abe, Fumio and Barry, Richard and Bennett, David P and Bhattacharya, Aparna and Bond, Ian A and Fujii, Hirosane and Fukui, Akihiko and Itow, Yoshitaka and Silva, Stela Ishitani and Hirao, Yuki and Kirikawa, Rintaro and Kondo, Iona and Koshimoto, Naoki and Mats...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac674 2022

  24. [24]

    Greenstreet, Sarah and Li, Zhuofu (Chester) and Vavilov, Dmitrii E. and Singh, Devanshi and Jurić, Mario and Ivezić, Željko and Eggl, Siegfried and Koumjian, Alec and Moeyens, Joachim and Carruba, Valerio and Womack, Maria and Granvik, Mikael and Alexov, Anastasia and Antilogus, Pierre and Baumanć, B̌rian J. and Bellm, Eric C. and Boucaud, Alexandre and B...

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae2a30 2026

  25. [25]

    Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , author=

    DEEP-South: Preliminary Photometric Results from the KMTNet-CTIO , volume=. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , author=. 2015 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S1743921315007255 , number=

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921315007255 2015

  26. [26]

    2016, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 49, 37, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2016.49.1.37

    KMTNET: A Network of 1.6 m Wide-Field Optical Telescopes Installed at Three Southern Observatories. Journal of Korean Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.5303/JKAS.2016.49.1.37 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.5303/jkas.2016.49.1.37 2016

  27. [27]

    Korea Microlensing Telescope Network Microlensing Events from 2015: Event-Finding Algorithm, Vetting, and Photometry

    Korea Microlensing Telescope Network Microlensing Events from 2015: Event-finding Algorithm, Vetting, and Photometry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa47b , archivePrefix =. 1703.06883 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa47b 2015

  28. [28]

    and Chung, Sun-Ju and Gould, Andrew and Han, Cheongho and Hwang, Kyu-Ha and Jung, Youn Kil and Shin, In-Gu and Shvartzvald, Yossi and Yee, Jennifer C

    Qian, Qiyue and Yang, Hongjing and Zang, Weicheng and Ryu, Yoon-Hyun and Mao, Shude and Kuang, Renkun and Zhang, Jiyuan and Albrow, Michael D. and Chung, Sun-Ju and Gould, Andrew and Han, Cheongho and Hwang, Kyu-Ha and Jung, Youn Kil and Shin, In-Gu and Shvartzvald, Yossi and Yee, Jennifer C. and Cha, Sang-Mok and Kim, Dong-Jin and Kim, Hyoun-Woo and Kim,...

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/add9cf 2025

  29. [29]

    and McNeill, A

    Erasmus, N. and McNeill, A. and Mommert, M. and Trilling, D. E. and Sickafoose, A. A. and Gend, C. van , title =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aac38f , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aac38f 2018

  30. [30]

    and Mommert, M

    Erasmus, N. and Mommert, M. and Trilling, D. E. and Sickafoose, A. A. and van Gend, C. and Hora, J. L. , title =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa88be , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa88be 2017

  31. [31]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Yang, Hongjing and Yee, Jennifer C and Hwang, Kyu-Ha and Qian, Qiyue and Bond, Ian A and Gould, Andrew and Hu, Zhecheng and Zhang, Jiyuan and Mao, Shude and Zhu, Wei and Albrow, Michael D and Chung, Sun-Ju and Kim, Seung-Lee and Park, Byeong-Gon and Han, Cheongho and Jung, Youn Kil and Ryu, Yoon-Hyun and Shin, In-Gu and Shvartzvald, Yossi and Cha, Sang-Mo...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3672 2023

  32. [32]

    Systematic Reanalysis of KMTNet Microlensing Events. II. Two New Planets in Giant-source Events. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adc73e , archivePrefix =. 2503.19471 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adc73e

  33. [33]

    Asteroids, Comets, Meteors Conference , volume=

    Asteroid Lightcurve Survey with the KMTNet , author=. Asteroids, Comets, Meteors Conference , volume=

  34. [34]

    2023, , 675, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/202345889

    Reconstruction of asteroid spin states from Gaia DR3 photometry , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. doi:https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202345889 , year=

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345889

  35. [35]

    1984 , issn =

    Asteroid rotation rates , journal =. 1984 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(84)90003-4 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90003-4 1984

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    KMT-2025-BLG-1616Lb: First Microlensing Bound Planet From DREAMS. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae36ac , archivePrefix =. 2601.11469 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae36ac 2025

  37. [37]

    A Minute-Cadence Deep Bulge Survey: First Data Release of DREAMS

    A Minute-Cadence Deep Bulge Survey: First Data Release of DREAMS. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.27364 , archivePrefix =. 2605.27364 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27364

  38. [38]

    Maiorov and Gordon M

    Tumbling Asteroids , journal =. 1994 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1994.1017 , url =

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1994.1017 1994

  39. [39]

    Pravec and A.W

    P. Pravec and A.W. Harris and P. Scheirich and P. Kušnirák and L. Šarounová and C.W. Hergenrother and S. Mottola and M.D. Hicks and G. Masi and Yu.N. Krugly and V.G. Shevchenko and M.C. Nolan and E.S. Howell and M. Kaasalainen and A. Galád and P. Brown and D.R. DeGraff and J.V. Lambert and W.R. Cooney and S. Foglia , keywords =. Tumbling asteroids , journ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.07.021 2005

  40. [40]

    , year = 1999, month = nov, volume =

    Asteroid Lightcurve Observations from 1981 to 1983 , journal =. 1999 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1999.6181 , url =

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6181 1981

  41. [41]

    Asteroids, Comets, Meteors Conference , year = 2023, series =

    Asteroid Lightcurve Survey with the KMTNet. Asteroids, Comets, Meteors Conference , year = 2023, series =

    2023

  42. [42]

    S., & Barkov , M

    Difference imaging photometry of blended gravitational microlensing events with a numerical kernel. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15098.x , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15098.x 2009

  43. [43]

    2008, MNRAS, 385, L98, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00441.x —

    A new algorithm for difference image analysis. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00464.x , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00464.x 2008