REVIEW 4 cited by
Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in handling complex tasks requiring both extensive knowledge and reasoning abilities. However, the existing LLM inference pipeline operates as an opaque process without explicit separation between knowledge retrieval and reasoning steps, making the model's decision-making process unclear and disorganized. This ambiguity can lead to issues such as hallucinations and knowledge forgetting, which significantly impact the reliability of LLMs in high-stakes domains. In this paper, we propose a new inference paradigm that decomposes the complex inference process into two distinct and clear actions: (1) memory recall: which retrieves relevant knowledge, and (2) reasoning: which performs logical steps based on the recalled knowledge. To facilitate this decomposition, we introduce two special tokens memory and reason, guiding the model to distinguish between steps that require knowledge retrieval and those that involve reasoning. Our experiment results show that this decomposition not only improves model performance but also enhances the interpretability of the inference process, enabling users to identify sources of error and refine model responses effectively. The code is available at https://github.com/MingyuJ666/Disentangling-Memory-and-Reasoning.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Chain of Methodologies: Scaling Test Time Computation without Training
A prompt framework that interleaves methodology selection with reasoning steps improves LLM math and QA accuracy when combined with a Python interpreter, but the benefit of the methodology selection itself is small an...
-
Thinking Before You Speak: A Proactive Test-time Scaling Approach
TBYS inserts generated situation-and-goal insights between reasoning steps and reports math accuracy gains, but the insight library is filtered using test-set answers.
-
Interaction as Intelligence: Deep Research With Human-AI Partnership
A human-in-the-loop deep research system with transparent, interruptible interaction is claimed to outperform commercial baselines, but the evidence is weakened by small samples and biased instructions.
-
A Survey on Latent Reasoning
A survey that organizes latent reasoning methods into vertical recurrence, horizontal recurrence, and infinite-depth diffusion, arguing that silent reasoning can beat explicit chain-of-thought.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.