REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding Data Movement in AMD Multi-GPU Systems with Infinity Fabric
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Modern GPU systems are constantly evolving to meet the needs of computing-intensive applications in scientific and machine learning domains. However, there is typically a gap between the hardware capacity and the achievable application performance. This work aims to provide a better understanding of the Infinity Fabric interconnects on AMD GPUs and CPUs. We propose a test and evaluation methodology for characterizing the performance of data movements on multi-GPU systems, stressing different communication options on AMD MI250X GPUs, including point-to-point and collective communication, and memory allocation strategies between GPUs, as well as the host CPU. In a single-node setup with four GPUs, we show that direct peer-to-peer memory accesses between GPUs and utilization of the RCCL library outperform MPI-based solutions in terms of memory/communication latency and bandwidth. Our test and evaluation method serves as a base for validating memory and communication strategies on a system and improving applications on AMD multi-GPU computing systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Characterizing Compute-Communication Overlap in GPU-Accelerated Distributed Deep Learning: Performance and Power Implications
Overlapping computation and communication in distributed GPU training slows compute kernels by up to 40% and raises power use, while remaining faster than sequential execution.
-
Apple vs. Oranges: Evaluating the Apple Silicon M-Series SoCs for HPC Performance and Efficiency
Apple Silicon M-Series chips achieve up to 2.9 FP32 TFLOPS and over 200 GFLOPS per watt, making them energy-efficient but low-absolute-performance HPC options.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.