REVIEW 1 cited by
Can Generative Pre-trained Language Models Serve as Knowledge Bases for Closed-book QA?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent work has investigated the interesting question using pre-trained language models (PLMs) as knowledge bases for answering open questions. However, existing work is limited in using small benchmarks with high test-train overlaps. We construct a new dataset of closed-book QA using SQuAD, and investigate the performance of BART. Experiments show that it is challenging for BART to remember training facts in high precision, and also challenging to answer closed-book questions even if relevant knowledge is retained. Some promising directions are found, including decoupling the knowledge memorizing process and the QA finetune process, forcing the model to recall relevant knowledge when question answering.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
WisdomBot: Tuning Large Language Models with Artificial Intelligence Knowledge
Fine-tuning Chinese LLMs on Bloom's Taxonomy-guided AI textbook instruction data plus retrieval augmentation improves performance on the authors' tests and on C-Eval, though evidence is weakened by circular GPT-4 eval...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.