REVIEW 6 cited by
DeepNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000 Layers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective method to stabilize extremely deep Transformers. Specifically, we introduce a new normalization function (DeepNorm) to modify the residual connection in Transformer, accompanying with theoretically derived initialization. In-depth theoretical analysis shows that model updates can be bounded in a stable way. The proposed method combines the best of two worlds, i.e., good performance of Post-LN and stable training of Pre-LN, making DeepNorm a preferred alternative. We successfully scale Transformers up to 1,000 layers (i.e., 2,500 attention and feed-forward network sublayers) without difficulty, which is one order of magnitude deeper than previous deep Transformers. Remarkably, on a multilingual benchmark with 7,482 translation directions, our 200-layer model with 3.2B parameters significantly outperforms the 48-layer state-of-the-art model with 12B parameters by 5 BLEU points, which indicates a promising scaling direction.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Dynamic Parameterization Is Not Dynamic Inference
Dynamic parameterization alone does not establish dynamic inference or computational savings, as demonstrated by a frozen-controller audit on FeatureGate and MUDDPythia.
-
When Does Sparsity Mitigate the Curse of Depth in LLMs
Implicit and explicit sparsity reduce residual-stream variance and improve layer effectiveness metrics, enabling a depth-scaling recipe with about 4.6 points higher downstream accuracy.
-
Multi-Head Attention Residuals
Splitting the depth-routing query into per-subspace heads (a parameter-free reshape) improves Transformer validation loss at 100M–1B and mid-training at 8B.
-
AutoNorm: Understanding Adaptive Normalization in Transformers through Differentiable Gating
Gate-freezing after warm-up stabilizes differentiable LN/DyT selection in Transformers, helping non-stationary NLP tasks while remaining competitive on vision.
-
The Algorithm Is Not the Behavior: Learned Priors Override Look-Ahead in a Chess-Playing Neural Network
The paper demonstrates non-monotonic move-policy dynamics in a chess transformer, but its abstract claims a causal safety-prior override result that never appears in the body.
-
Taming Transformer Without Using Learning Rate Warmup
A spectral-norm ratio rule on the optimizer shrinks per-layer learning rates when weight updates are too large, letting Transformers train without warmup.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.