Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Anisotropic Multi-Q Order in CoxTaS2

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A new zero-field optical rotation pins the low-temperature magnetic order of Co0.32TaS2 to an anisotropic (2+1)Q spin texture, overturning the proposed 3Q picture.

desk verdict Careful optical work and a genuinely new (2+1)Q proposal, but the uniqueness claim rests on an unflagged assumption about the mM2 order parameter that the neutron data do not actually test. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12588 v1 pith:HKEUI2PH submitted 2025-07-16 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jonathon Kruppe , Josue Rodriguez , Catherine Xu , James Analytis , Joseph Orenstein , Veronika Sunko This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords anomalousmagneto-birefringencemulti-QmagneticorderscalarspinchiralityHalleffectmagneto-opticalKerrCoxTaS2intercalatedtransitionmetaldichalcogenides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using neutron scattering together with three polarization-resolved optical probes, this paper determines the magnetic ground state of the layered antiferromagnet Co0.32TaS2. The key new evidence is anomalous magneto-birefringence: a spontaneous rotation of the principal optical axes that appears in zero field, whose sign is set by the sign of the cooling field. Symmetry analysis of that effect rules out the previously proposed threefold-symmetric 3Q order and identifies the low-temperature phase as an anisotropic (2+1)Q state, in which the magnetic modulation at one wavevector belongs to a different irreducible representation than the modulations at the other two. The paper shows that this non-coplanar state carries scalar spin chirality for all values of its order parameters, giving a concrete mechanism for the anomalous Hall effect observed in this phase.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a symmetry-classification pipeline that starts from the neutron-selected irreducible representations mM2 (out-of-plane spins) and mM4 (in-plane spins) of the parent crystal space group, writes the candidate order as $(a_1;a_2;a_3\,|\,b_1;b_2;b_3)$, and enumerates the magnetic space groups each combination generates. Each candidate is then filtered by whether it allows birefringence, magneto-optical Kerr rotation, and anomalous magneto-birefringence (AMB), a spontaneous zero-field rotation of the principal optical axes whose sign follows the cooling field and which has the symmetry of off-diagonal linear magneto-birefringence; this last filter is what separates $(a;0,0\,|\,0;b,c)$ from the $b=c$ alternative. The same machinery evaluates scalar spin chirality through the fictitious flux $\mathbf{b} \propto (a_2b_1b_3-a_3b_1b_2-a_1b_2b_3)\hat{z}$, showing that the (2+1)Q state supports chiral Berry-phase response for every parameter value.

What would settle it

A direct falsification would come from polarized neutron or resonant magnetic x-ray diffraction below $T_{N2}$: if out-of-plane spin moments at the other two symmetry-related ordering wavevectors appear or grow as the sample cools into the low-temperature phase, the mM2 order is not $(a;0,0)$, and the alternative structures 5.13 and 1.1 remain consistent with all current measurements.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $T < T_{N2}$ phase of Co0.32TaS2 is a non-coplanar antiferromagnet with magnetic space group 4.7 (a symmetry class in the standard magnetic space-group catalogue) and combined order parameter $(a;0,0\,|\,0;b,c)$: a single-wavevector out-of-plane component in the mM2 irreducible representation coexists with a two-component in-plane order in mM4 at the other two wavevectors. Because $b$ and $c$ are unequal, the state breaks the threefold rotational symmetry that the earlier 3Q proposal preserved, which is why birefringence appears already at $T_{N1}$ and why the principal axes can rotate below $T_{N2}$. The paper argues that this is the only structure consistent with neutron scattering, birefringence, the Kerr effect, and the newly observed anomalous magneto-birefringence, and that its scalar spin chirality is nonzero for generic amplitudes, giving the anomalous Hall effect a concrete microscopic source.

Load-bearing premise

The uniqueness of the proposed (2+1)Q structure rests on the assumption that the out-of-plane spin order below the second transition remains a pure single-wavevector $(a;0,0)$ pattern; the neutron intensity does evolve smoothly through that transition, but smoothness alone does not prove that no additional components appear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The previously proposed threefold-symmetric 3Q ground state of Co0.32TaS2 is incompatible with the measured birefringence and is ruled out by the optical data.
  • The (2+1)Q state extends the classification of multi-Q antiferromagnets: the wavevectors active in a coherent multi-Q order need not all belong to the same irreducible representation.
  • Because scalar spin chirality is nonzero for all values of the (2+1)Q order parameters, the anomalous Hall effect in this material can be accounted for by the Berry-phase mechanism without fine-tuning the amplitudes.
  • The anisotropy of the (2+1)Q order makes it directly coupled to uniaxial strain, so strain should tune the chiral texture and hence the Hall response.
  • The new anomalous magneto-birefringence should have a dc transport counterpart in the symmetric off-diagonal resistivity tensor, an effect the paper identifies as a target for future measurements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not pursue this, but the sign-reversible rotation of the principal axes gives an all-optical, non-contact way to image time-reversed antiferromagnetic domains in this material.
  • Because the uniqueness of the proposed MSG 4.7 assumes the out-of-plane order stays $(a;0,0)$ below $T_{N2}$, a polarized neutron or resonant x-ray search for additional out-of-plane components at the other symmetry-related wavevectors would directly test whether alternative structures 5.13 and 1.1 can be excluded.
  • The same symmetry-based filtering of neutron-selected irreps by multiple optical tensor symmetries could be applied to other intercalated transition-metal dichalcogenides, where neutron scattering alone has left the multi-Q versus single-Q ambiguity unresolved.
  • Should the predicted symmetric off-diagonal dc resistivity appear with the same field-cooling sign memory as the AMB, it would tightly couple the new optical effect to the chirality-induced Berry phase; a null result would point to a different origin for the birefringence-axis rotation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports magneto-optical measurements (thermally-modulated polarization rotation) on Co0.32TaS2, observing birefringence in both magnetic phases, MOKE only in the low-temperature phase, and a spontaneous rotation of the birefringence axes (anomalous magneto-birefringence, AMB) below T_N2. Combining these observations with published neutron scattering data and symmetry analysis using Isotropy and the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, the authors conclude that the low-temperature phase is an anisotropic multi-Q state with order parameter (a;0,0|0;b,c) belonging to magnetic space group 4.7, which they term (2+1)Q order and which supports scalar spin chirality. They also assign the high-temperature phase to a 1Q mM2 structure (MSG 19.29). The paper introduces AMB as a new symmetry-sensitive probe and argues that the previously proposed 3Q structure is inconsistent with the optical data.

Significance. If the central conclusion holds, the paper constitutes a significant advance in the identification of multi-Q magnetic order in intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides, resolving the low-temperature structure of Co0.32TaS2 and expanding the classification of multi-Q phases to anisotropic (2+1)Q states. The symmetry analysis is transparent and reproducible: the tables of magnetic space groups and their optical properties (Tables S3–S6) are presumably generated by standard tools, and the optical extraction procedure is described in detail in the supplementary material. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction of a dc transport analogue of AMB. However, the uniqueness of the proposed MSG 4.7 structure rests on an unverified assumption about the persistence of the mM2 order parameter, and the high-temperature phase assignment has a similar gap. These issues do not invalidate the experimental discoveries but do undermine the strength of the central structural claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV, Table S6] The uniqueness of MSG 4.7 depends on the assertion that the mM2 order parameter remains exactly (a;0,0) below T_N2. The only support given is the smooth evolution of the mM2 scattering intensity through the transition. This is not sufficient: different mM2 arms correspond to different symmetry-equivalent M-point reflections, and multi-domain averaging can mask arm-specific changes. If additional mM2 components condense, the combined order parameter would fall into MSG 5.13 (a;a,0|b;b,-c) or MSG 1.1 (a;b,c|d;e,f), both of which already allow birefringence, MOKE and off-diagonal AMB according to Table S6. The manuscript does not flag this assumption as an uncertainty, so the central claim that (a;0,0|0;b,c) is the only structure consistent with all available data is not established. Please either provide a direct test of the persistence of (a;0,0) (e.g., separate analysis of the two M-point reflections below T_N2) or explicitly state this as a working assumption and soften the uniqueness claim accordingly.
  2. [Section S2 B 1, Table S4] For the high-temperature phase, Table S4 shows that MSGs 19.29 (a;0,0), 20.36 (a;a,0) and 4.10 (a;b,0) are all compatible with the observed birefringence and absence of MOKE, yet the text concludes 1Q order (19.29) without explicitly ruling out the two 2Q structures. The citation of Ref. [28] is not sufficient in the context of a paper whose stated method is to combine neutron and optical data. Please provide the argument (e.g., relative intensities of the two M-point reflections, or a specific domain-averaging argument) that excludes 20.36 and 4.10, or state that the HT assignment is inherited from Ref. [28] and is therefore not independently established by the present analysis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 2] The panels in Fig. 2 report θ_K, θ_B and φ_0 with no error bars or statistical uncertainty; since these quantities are extracted by integrating temperature derivatives per Eqs. (S6)–(S9), a statement of systematic uncertainty would help readers judge the significance of the claimed rotation of φ_0.
  2. [Section III] The term 'anomalous magneto-birefringence' is used for the zero-field rotation of the principal axes, but the analogy with MOKE/AHE would be clearer if the paper explicitly noted that AMB is the time-reversal-odd part of the birefringence tensor, as opposed to the time-reversal-even birefringence that already exists in the HT phase.
  3. [Eq. (2) and Eq. (S13)] The main-text expression for the scalar spin chirality, Eq. (2), omits the prefactor (1 - t_⊥/t_∥) that appears in Eq. (S13). Please state that the expression is given up to this positive factor, or define t_⊥ and t_∥ in the main text.
  4. [Title of Ref. [37]] The supplementary material reference [37] is titled 'Discovery of 2Q+1Q Order...' while the main text consistently uses '(2+1)Q'; please unify the notation to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the magnetic-structure assignment is a symmetry-based selection among externally computed MSGs using measured optical responses; the one underdetermined step (mM2 persists as (a;0,0) below TN2) is an evidentiary assumption, not a definitional or fitted reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external evidence. Neutron data fix the propagation vectors and identify the irreps mM2 and mM4 using the external Isotropy tool; the Bilbao MAGNDATA server enumerates the candidate magnetic space groups; the measured birefringence, MOKE, and anomalous magneto-birefringence then filter these candidates by their symmetry-allowed optical tensors. The SSC flux expression (Eq. 2 and Eq. S13) is derived analytically from the order-parameter coefficients and reduces to the known 3Q result in the appropriate limit; it is not fitted to the target conclusion. Self-citations [37, 40, 41, 47] point to methodological details, prior Jones-matrix formalism, a multimodal-analysis approach, and an outlook connection, none of which carries the load-bearing uniqueness claim. The uniqueness claim instead rests on external neutron-scattering papers and on crystallographic databases that do not depend on the present authors. The only logical weakness is the assumption that the mM2 order parameter remains exactly (a;0,0) below TN2, inferred from the smooth evolution of the neutron scattering intensity; if that assumption were relaxed, structures such as 5.13 and 1.1 would also satisfy the optical constraints. This is an underdetermination or evidence-strength concern, not a circular reduction, since no equation is defined in terms of the conclusion and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an inference from symmetry constraints, not a parameterized fit. The only inputs are the crystal structure, prior neutron data, and the observed optical effects. No free parameters are introduced; the order parameter coefficients (a,b,c) are physical degrees of freedom, not fit parameters. The weakest link is the assumption that the mM2 order remains exactly (a;0,0).

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Co_0.32TaS2 belongs to the parent space group P6_322 (no. 182), the same as Co_1/3TaS2.
    The irrep decomposition and MSG search in the SI start from this space group. If vacancy disorder lowered the effective symmetry, the set of candidate structures would change. Stated in Section IV and SI S2.
  • domain assumption The neutron scattering data of Refs. [27] and [37] correctly identify the active irreps (mM2 for out-of-plane, mM4 for in-plane) and the propagation vectors for the sample studied here.
    The paper does not present new neutron data; the structural conclusions rely on prior scattering results being applicable to the x=0.32 crystals used in the optical measurements. Section IV first paragraph.
  • domain assumption The optical response is described by a Jones matrix with linear birefringence and MOKE only, as in Eq. (S3), with setup artifacts subtracted via thermal modulation.
    The extraction of theta_B, theta_K, and phi_0, and therefore the AMB observation, depends on this model. The SI (Section S1) provides the background-subtraction protocol but assumes no higher-order optical anisotropies.
  • standard math Off-diagonal anomalous magneto-birefringence has the same symmetry as the piezomagnetic tensor Lambda_xyz, as implemented in MAGNDATA.
    This mapping is the basis for selecting MSG 4.7. It is a standard group-theoretical identification (see SI S2B2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anisotropic Multi-Q Order in CoxTaS2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKEUI2PH

@misc{pith2026250712588,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anisotropic Multi-Q Order in CoxTaS2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKEUI2PH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12588}
}
abstract

The cobalt-intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide Co$_x$TaS$_2$ hosts a rich landscape of magnetic phases that depend sensitively on $x$. While the stoichiometric compound with $x=1/3$ exhibits a single magnetic transition, samples with $x\leq 0.325$ display two transitions with an anomalous Hall effect (AHE) emerging in the lower temperature phase. Here, we resolve the spin structure in each phase by employing a suite of magneto-optical probes that include the discovery of anomalous magneto-birefringence -- a spontaneous time-reversal sensitive rotation of the principal optic axes. A symmetry-based analysis identifies the AHE-active phase as an anisotropic (2+1)\textbf{Q} state, in which magnetic modulation at one wavevector (\textbf{Q}) differs in symmetry from that at the remaining two. The (2+1)\textbf{Q} state naturally exhibits scalar spin chirality as a mechanism for the AHE and expands the classification of multi-Q magnetic phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12588 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Crystal structure of Co0.32TaS2 top and side view. (b) Image of large single crys￾tals. (c) Zero-field and field-cooled magnetization as a function of temperature. The temperature dependence of the moment reveals two transitions at 36 K (HT phase) and 26 K (LT phase). (d) Anomalous Hall conductivity turns on in the LT phase. (e) Schematic of optical setup for mea￾suring polarization rotation (Θ) as a function of… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Temperature dependence of thermally-modulated (a) MOKE, (b) birefringence and (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Results of symmetry analysis combining neutron scattering and optics for both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Batista, and Je-Geun Park

    Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Chaebin Kim, Yeochan An, Yoon-Gu Kang, Maxim Avdeev, Romain Sibille, Kazuki Iida, Ryoichi Kajimoto, Ki Hoon Lee, Woori Ju, En-Jin Cho, Han-Jin Noh, Myung Joon Han, Shang-Shun Zhang, Cristian D. Batista, and Je-Geun Park. Tetra- hedral triple-Q magnetic ordering and large spontaneous Hall conductivity in the metallic triangula...

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nature Nanotechnology, 11(3):231–241, March 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [2]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(1):015005, February 2018. 11

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Wadley, B

    P. Wadley, B. Howells, J. ˇZelezn´ y, C. Andrews, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, V. Nov´ ak, K. Olejn ´ ık, F. Maccherozzi, S. S. Dhesi, S. Y. Martin, T. Wagner, J. Wunderlich, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, J. Kuneˇ s, J. S. Chauhan, M. J. Grzybowski, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, B. L. Gallagher, and T. Jungwirth. Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet. Sci...

    work page 2016

  5. [4]

    Nair, Eran Maniv, Caolan John, Spencer Doyle, J

    Nityan L. Nair, Eran Maniv, Caolan John, Spencer Doyle, J. Orenstein, and James G. An- alytis. Electrical switching in a magnetically intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide. Nature Materials, 19(2):153–157, February 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    Murphy, Shannon C

    Eran Maniv, Ryan A. Murphy, Shannon C. Haley, Spencer Doyle, Caolan John, Ariel Maniv, Sanath K. Ramakrishna, Yun-Long Tang, Peter Ercius, Ramamoorthy Ramesh, Arneil P. Reyes, Jeffrey R. Long, and James G. Analytis. Exchange bias due to coupling between coexisting antiferromagnetic and spin-glass orders. Nature Physics, 17(4):525–530, April 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    Nair, Shannon C

    Eran Maniv, Nityan L. Nair, Shannon C. Haley, Spencer Doyle, Caolan John, Stefano Cabrini, Ariel Maniv, Sanath K. Ramakrishna, Yun-Long Tang, Peter Ercius, Ramamoorthy Ramesh, Yaroslav Tserkovnyak, Arneil P. Reyes, and James G. Analytis. Antiferromagnetic switching driven by the collective dynamics of a coexisting spin glass. Science Advances, 7(2):eabd84...

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    Haley, Eran Maniv, Shan Wu, Tessa Cookmeyer, Susana Torres-Londono, Meera Aravinth, Nikola Maksimovic, Joel Moore, Robert J

    Shannon C. Haley, Eran Maniv, Shan Wu, Tessa Cookmeyer, Susana Torres-Londono, Meera Aravinth, Nikola Maksimovic, Joel Moore, Robert J. Birgeneau, and James G. Analytis. Long-range, non-local switching of spin textures in a frustrated antiferromagnet. Nature Communications, 14(1):4691, August 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 57 references
  1. [8]

    Antiferromagnetic Spintronics in Magnetic Memory Devices

    Weijian Qi, Hui Zhang, Lu Chen, Ao Du, Dongyao Zheng, Yinan Xiao, Daming Tian, Fengxia Hu, Baogen Shen, Jirong Sun, and Weisheng Zhao. Antiferromagnetic Spintronics in Magnetic Memory Devices. IEEE Transactions on Materials for Electron Devices, 1:23–35, 2024

    2024

  2. [9]

    Altermagnetism with non-collinear spins

    Sang-Wook Cheong and Fei-Ting Huang. Altermagnetism with non-collinear spins. npj Quantum Materials, 9(1):1–6, January 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    MacDonald

    Hua Chen, Qian Niu, and A.H. MacDonald. Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from Noncollinear Antiferromagnetism. Physical Review Letters, 112(1):017205, January 2014

    2014

  4. [11]

    Non-collinear antiferromagnets and the anomalous hall effect

    J¨ urgen K¨ ubler and Claudia Felser. Non-collinear antiferromagnets and the anomalous hall effect. Europhysics Letters, 108(6):67001, 2014

    2014

  5. [12]

    Anomalous Hall effect inκ-type organic antiferromagnets

    Makoto Naka, Satoru Hayami, Hiroaki Kusunose, Yuki Yanagi, Yukitoshi Motome, and Hi- 12 toshi Seo. Anomalous Hall effect inκ-type organic antiferromagnets. Physical Review B, 102(7):075112, August 2020

    2020

  6. [13]

    Huiying Liu, Jianzhou Zhao, Yue-Xin Huang, Weikang Wu, Xian-Lei Sheng, Cong Xiao, and Shengyuan A. Yang. Intrinsic Second-Order Anomalous Hall Effect and Its Application in Compensated Antiferromagnets. Physical Review Letters, 127(27):277202, December 2021

    2021

  7. [14]

    Anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnetic perovskites

    Makoto Naka, Yukitoshi Motome, and Hitoshi Seo. Anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnetic perovskites. Physical Review B, 106(19):195149, November 2022

    2022

  8. [15]

    Physical Review B, 107(15):155126, April 2023

    Thi Phuong Thao Nguyen and Kunihiko Yamauchi.Ab initioprediction of anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnetic CaCrO 3. Physical Review B, 107(15):155126, April 2023

    2023

  9. [16]

    Assaad, and Jeroen Van Den Brink

    Toshihiro Sato, Sonia Haddad, Ion Cosma Fulga, Fakher F. Assaad, and Jeroen Van Den Brink. Altermagnetic Anomalous Hall Effect Emerging from Electronic Correlations. Physical Review Letters, 133(8):086503, August 2024

    2024

  10. [17]

    Emergent phenomena with broken parity-time sym- metry: Odd-order versus even-order effects

    Sang-Wook Cheong and Fei-Ting Huang. Emergent phenomena with broken parity-time sym- metry: Odd-order versus even-order effects. Physical Review B, 109(10):104413, March 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    Altermagnetism classification

    Sang-Wook Cheong and Fei-Ting Huang. Altermagnetism classification. npj Quantum Materials, 10(1):1–6, April 2025

    2025

  12. [19]

    Large topolog- ical Hall effect in the non-collinear phase of an antiferromagnet

    Christoph S¨ urgers, Gerda Fischer, Patrick Winkel, and Hilbert v L¨ ohneysen. Large topolog- ical Hall effect in the non-collinear phase of an antiferromagnet. Nature Communications, 5(1):3400, March 2014

    2014

  13. [20]

    Large anomalous Hall effect in a non- collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature

    Satoru Nakatsuji, Naoki Kiyohara, and Tomoya Higo. Large anomalous Hall effect in a non- collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature, 527(7577):212–215, November 2015

    2015

  14. [21]

    Suzuki, R

    T. Suzuki, R. Chisnell, A. Devarakonda, Y.-T. Liu, W. Feng, D. Xiao, J. W. Lynn, and J. G. Checkelsky. Large anomalous Hall effect in a half-Heusler antiferromagnet. Nature Physics, 12(12):1119–1123, December 2016

    2016

  15. [22]

    Ghimire, Helmuth Berger, Oksana Zaharko, Fengcheng Wu, J

    Giulia Tenasini, Edoardo Martino, Nicolas Ubrig, Nirmal J. Ghimire, Helmuth Berger, Oksana Zaharko, Fengcheng Wu, J. F. Mitchell, Ivar Martin, L´ aszl´ o Forr´ o, and Alberto F. Morpurgo. Giant anomalous Hall effect in quasi-two-dimensional layered antiferromagnet Co 1/3NbS2. ...

    2020

  16. [23]

    Nayak, Julia Erika Fischer, Yan Sun, Binghai Yan, Julie Karel, Alexander C

    Ajaya K. Nayak, Julia Erika Fischer, Yan Sun, Binghai Yan, Julie Karel, Alexander C. Ko- marek, Chandra Shekhar, Nitesh Kumar, Walter Schnelle, J¨ urgen K¨ ubler, Claudia Felser, and Stuart S. P. Parkin. Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in 1...

    2016

  17. [24]

    MacDonald, Jairo Sinova, Satoru Nakatsuji, and Tomas Jungwirth

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Allan H. MacDonald, Jairo Sinova, Satoru Nakatsuji, and Tomas Jungwirth. Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets. Nature Reviews Materials, 7(6):482–496, June 2022

    2022

  18. [25]

    Anomalous Hall effect and topological Hall effect in the noncollinear antiferromagnet V 0.3NbS2

    Huan Wang, Xiao-Ping Ma, Xiang-Yu Zeng, Jing Gong, Jun-Fa Lin, Xiao-Yan Wang, Zheng- Yi Dai, Kun Han, Yi-Ting Wang, and Tian-Long Xia. Anomalous Hall effect and topological Hall effect in the noncollinear antiferromagnet V 0.3NbS2. Physical Review B, 107(13):134436, April 2023

    2023

  19. [26]

    Field-tunable toroidal moment and anomalous Hall effect in non- collinear antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Co 1/3TaS2

    Pyeongjae Park, Yoon-Gu Kang, Junghyun Kim, Ki Hoon Lee, Han-Jin Noh, Myung Joon Han, and Je-Geun Park. Field-tunable toroidal moment and anomalous Hall effect in non- collinear antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Co 1/3TaS2. npj Quantum Materials, 7(1):1–7, April 2022

    2022

  20. [27]

    Takagi, R

    H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M.-T. Suzuki, Y. Yanagi, M. Hi- rayama, N. D. Khanh, K. Karube, H. Saito, D. Hashizume, R. Kiyanagi, Y. Tokura, R. Arita, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki. Spontaneous topological Hall effect induced by non-coplanar anti- ferromag...

    2023

  21. [29]

    McCandless, Michi-To Suzuki, Zhijun Xu, Yang Zhao, Tom Fennell, Yoshimitsu Kohama, Julia Y

    Mayukh Kumar Ray, Mingxuan Fu, Youzhe Chen, Taishi Chen, Takuya Nomoto, Shiro Sakai, Motoharu Kitatani, Motoaki Hirayama, Shusaku Imajo, Takahiro Tomita, Akito Sakai, Daisuke Nishio-Hamane, Gregory T. McCandless, Michi-To Suzuki, Zhijun Xu, Yang Zhao, Tom Fennell, Yoshimitsu K...

    2025

  22. [30]

    D. A. Mayoh, J. Bouaziz, A. E. Hall, J. B. Staunton, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrishnan. Giant topological and planar Hall effect in Cr 1 / 3 NbS 2. Physical Review Research, 4(1):013134, February 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Batista, and Je-Geun Park

    Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Chaebin Kim, Yeochan An, Kazuki Iida, Ryoichi Kajimoto, 14 Sakib Matin, Shang-Shun Zhang, Cristian D. Batista, and Je-Geun Park. Contrasting dy- namical properties of single-Q and triple-Q magnetic orderings in a triangular lattice antifer- romagn...

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Haley, Sophie F

    Shan Wu, Zhijun Xu, Shannon C. Haley, Sophie F. Weber, Arani Acharya, Eran Maniv, Yiming Qiu, A.A. Aczel, Nicholas S. Settineri, Jeffrey B. Neaton, James G. Analytis, and Robert J. Birgeneau. Highly Tunable Magnetic Phases in Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Fe1/3+δNbS2. Physic...

    2022

  25. [33]

    Composition dependence of bulk properties in the Co- intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide Co 1/3TaS2

    Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Chaebin Kim, Yeochan An, Maxim Avdeev, Kazuki Iida, Ryoichi Kajimoto, and Je-Geun Park. Composition dependence of bulk properties in the Co- intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide Co 1/3TaS2. Physical Review B, 109(6):L060403, February 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    S. S. P. Parkin and R. H. Friend. 3dtransition-metal intercalates of the niobium and tantalum dichalcogenides. I. Magnetic properties. Philosophical Magazine B, 41(1):65–93, January 1980

    1980

  27. [35]

    Spin chirality, berry phase, and anomalous hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnet

    Y Taguchi, Yoshizawa Oohara, H Yoshizawa, N Nagaosa, and Y Tokura. Spin chirality, berry phase, and anomalous hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnet. Science, 291(5513):2573–2576, 2001

    2001

  28. [36]

    Unified theory of the anoma- lous and topological Hall effects with phase-space Berry curvatures

    Nishchhal Verma, Zachariah Addison, and Mohit Randeria. Unified theory of the anoma- lous and topological Hall effects with phase-space Berry curvatures. Science Advances, 8(45):eabq2765, November 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Supplementary Material for Discovery of 2Q+1Q Order in Co0.32TaS2, 2025

    Jonathon Kruppe, Josue Rodriguez, Catherine Xu, Joseph Orenstein, James Analytis, and Veronika Sunko. Supplementary Material for Discovery of 2Q+1Q Order in Co0.32TaS2, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    Nair, Wen- qin Chen, Dylan Rees, J¨ orn W

    Arielle Little, Changmin Lee, Caolan John, Spencer Doyle, Eran Maniv, Nityan L. Nair, Wen- qin Chen, Dylan Rees, J¨ orn W. F. Venderbos, Rafael M. Fernandes, James G. Analytis, and Joseph Orenstein. Three-state nematicity in the triangular lattice antiferromagnet Fe 1/3TaS2. N...

    2020

  31. [39]

    Torchinsky, Fazel Tafti, and Joseph Oren- stein

    Yue Sun, Changmin Lee, Hung-Yu Yang, Darius H. Torchinsky, Fazel Tafti, and Joseph Oren- stein. Mapping domain-wall topology in the magnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi. Physical Review B, 104(23):235119, December 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Sunko, Y

    V. Sunko, Y. Sun, M. Vranas, C. C. Homes, C. Lee, E. Donoway, Z.-C. Wang, S. Balguri, M. B. Mahendru, A. Ruiz, B. Gunn, R. Basak, S. Blanco-Canosa, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, F. Tafti, A. Frano, and J. Orenstein. Spin-carrier coupling induced ferromagnetism and giant 15 resistiv...

    2023

  33. [41]

    Donoway, T.V

    E. Donoway, T.V. Trevisan, A. Liebman-Pel´ aez, R.P. Day, K. Yamakawa, Y. Sun, J.R. Soh, D. Prabhakaran, A.T. Boothroyd, R.M. Fernandes, J.G. Analytis, J.E. Moore, J. Orenstein, and V. Sunko. Multimodal Approach Reveals the Symmetry-Breaking Pathway to the Broken Helix in EuIn...

    2024

  34. [42]

    V. V. Eremenko, N. F. Kharchenko, L. I. Beliy, and O. P. Tutakina. Birefringence of the antiferromagnetic crystals linear in a magnetic field. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 15-18:791–792, January 1980

    1980

  35. [43]

    V Eremenko and N

    V. V Eremenko and N. F Kharchenko. Magneto-optics of antiferromagnets. Physics Reports, 155(6):379–401, November 1987

    1987

  36. [44]

    N. F. Kharchenko. The linear magneto-optic effect as a manifestation of a higher order magnetoelectric effect. Ferroelectrics, 162(1):173–189, January 1994

    1994

  37. [45]

    Gallego, Jesus Etxebarria, Luis Elcoro, Emre S

    Samuel V. Gallego, Jesus Etxebarria, Luis Elcoro, Emre S. Tasci, and J. Manuel Perez-Mato. Automatic calculation of symmetry-adapted tensors in magnetic and non-magnetic materials: a new tool of the Bilbao Crystallographic Server.Acta Crystallographica Section A, 75(3):438– 44...

    2019

  38. [46]

    Electrical control of topological 3Q state in an intercalated van der Waals anti- ferromagnet, September 2024

    Junghyun Kim, Kaixuan Zhang, Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Hyuncheol Kim, and Je- Geun Park. Electrical control of topological 3Q state in an intercalated van der Waals anti- ferromagnet, September 2024. arXiv:2409.02710

    2024

  39. [47]

    Griffin, Joel E

    Veronika Sunko, Chunxiao Liu, Marc Vila, Ilyoun Na, Yuchen Tang, Vladyslav Kozii, Sin´ ead M. Griffin, Joel E. Moore, and Joseph Orenstein. Linear magneto-conductivity as a DC probe of time-reversal symmetry breaking, October 2023. arXiv:2310.15631

    2023

  40. [48]

    Magnetic structure of Co 1/3 NbS2 and Co 1/3 TaS2

    S S P Parkin, E A Marseglia, and P J Brown. Magnetic structure of Co 1/3 NbS2 and Co 1/3 TaS2. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 16(14):2765–2778, May 1983

    1983

  41. [49]

    V. S. Maryasin and M. E. Zhitomirsky. Triangular Antiferromagnet with Nonmagnetic Impu- rities. Physical Review Letters, 111(24):247201, December 2013

    2013

  42. [50]

    Collective impurity effects in the Heisenberg triangular antiferromagnet

    V S Maryasin and M E Zhitomirsky. Collective impurity effects in the Heisenberg triangular antiferromagnet. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 592:012112, March 2015

    2015

  43. [51]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky, Vijay B. Shenoy, and Roderich Moessner. Defect-induced spin textures in magnetic solids. Physical Review B, 111(18):184414, 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    Rodr ´ ıguez-Nieva, Matthias S

    Linda Ye, Yue Sun, Veronika Sunko, Joaqu ´ ın F. Rodr ´ ıguez-Nieva, Matthias S. Ikeda, Thana- 16 pat Worasaran, Matthew E. Sørensen, Maja D. Bachmann, Joseph Orenstein, and Ian R. Fisher. Elastocaloric signatures of symmetric and antisymmetric strain-tuning of quadrupo- lar a...

    2023

  45. [53]

    H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell. Isotropy software suite.https://iso.byu. edu. Accessed: 2025-01-13. 17 METHODS A. Sample Growth High quality single crystals of Co xTaS2 were grown by a two-step procedure. First, a precursor was prepared. The elements were combin...

    2025

  46. [54]

    Out-of-plane spins There are two magnetic irreps consistent with out-of-plane spins,q 0.32 = 0.5 and the parent space group: mM 2 and mM 3 (Table S1). In Fig. S2 we plot the spin arrangement and the neutron scattering intensity for component 2 of each of them (components 1 and...

  47. [55]

    There are now four possible irreps, and we find that only mM 4 is consistent with the observed scattering pattern

    In-plane spins We repeat the procedure for in-plane spins (Fig S3, Table S2). There are now four possible irreps, and we find that only mM 4 is consistent with the observed scattering pattern. Figure S3. In-plane spins. For each irrep mM 1 - mM 4, we show (a) the lattice of Co...

  48. [56]

    High temperature phase Now that we know the relevant irreps, we can identify the magnetic structures, starting with the high temperature state. Again, we use Isotropy [53]: SET MAGNETIC VALUE PARENT 182 SETTING MILLER-LOVE VALUE IRREP M2 SHOW SUBGROUP SHOW BASIS SHOW ORIGIN SH...

  49. [57]

    S2 B 1 for the low temperature phase

    Low temperature phase We repeat the procedure of Sec. S2 B 1 for the low temperature phase. An important difference is that we now have two coupled order parameters which correspond to two irreps: mM2 and mM4. The relevant Isotropy [53] commands are given below, and the list o...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.