Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Examining Temporal Bias in Abusive Language Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.14146 v1 pith:HNH5K446 submitted 2023-09-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords languageabusivebiastemporaldetectionmodelsdataperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of abusive language online has become an increasingly pervasive problem that damages both individuals and society, with effects ranging from psychological harm right through to escalation to real-life violence and even death. Machine learning models have been developed to automatically detect abusive language, but these models can suffer from temporal bias, the phenomenon in which topics, language use or social norms change over time. This study aims to investigate the nature and impact of temporal bias in abusive language detection across various languages and explore mitigation methods. We evaluate the performance of models on abusive data sets from different time periods. Our results demonstrate that temporal bias is a significant challenge for abusive language detection, with models trained on historical data showing a significant drop in performance over time. We also present an extensive linguistic analysis of these abusive data sets from a diachronic perspective, aiming to explore the reasons for language evolution and performance decline. This study sheds light on the pervasive issue of temporal bias in abusive language detection across languages, offering crucial insights into language evolution and temporal bias mitigation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hatevolution: What Static Benchmarks Don't Tell Us

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Static hate speech benchmarks rank models differently from time-sensitive evaluations, with correlation coefficients near zero or negative, so high benchmark scores do not guarantee robustness to language change.

Pith tools