Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Out-distribution aware Self-training in an Open World Setting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.12372 v1 pith:HOXQCB66 submitted 2020-12-21 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords dataawareout-distributionself-trainingunlabeledworldfurtherlabeled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Learning heavily depends on large labeled datasets which limits further improvements. While unlabeled data is available in large amounts, in particular in image recognition, it does not fulfill the closed world assumption of semi-supervised learning that all unlabeled data are task-related. The goal of this paper is to leverage unlabeled data in an open world setting to further improve prediction performance. For this purpose, we introduce out-distribution aware self-training, which includes a careful sample selection strategy based on the confidence of the classifier. While normal self-training deteriorates prediction performance, our iterative scheme improves using up to 15 times the amount of originally labeled data. Moreover, our classifiers are by design out-distribution aware and can thus distinguish task-related inputs from unrelated ones.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Out-of-distribution data supervision towards biomedical semantic segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Med-OoD adds background-only 'OOD' patches from the ID dataset as negative samples with zero-mask Dice loss, claiming modest gains on Lizard but an internally inconsistent 76.1% mIoU for the OOD-only case.

Pith tools