REVIEW 3 cited by
Analysing Gender Bias in Text-to-Image Models using Object Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This work presents a novel strategy to measure bias in text-to-image models. Using paired prompts that specify gender and vaguely reference an object (e.g. "a man/woman holding an item") we can examine whether certain objects are associated with a certain gender. In analysing results from Stable Diffusion, we observed that male prompts generated objects such as ties, knives, trucks, baseball bats, and bicycles more frequently. On the other hand, female prompts were more likely to generate objects such as handbags, umbrellas, bowls, bottles, and cups. We hope that the method outlined here will be a useful tool for examining bias in text-to-image models.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Learning AI Auditing: A Case Study of Teenagers Auditing a Generative AI Model
Teenagers can carry out a full AI audit of a real product and reach conclusions that largely match expert analysis, while adding new concerns like age bias.
-
VideoGuard: Protecting Video Content from Unauthorized Editing
VideoGuard adds joint, motion-aware perturbations to videos to block unauthorized diffusion-model editing.
-
Can we Debias Social Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images? Examining Text-to-Image Outputs and User Perceptions
A rubric-based Social Stereotype Index shows prompt refinement lowers measured stereotypes in text-to-image outputs, but users often still prefer the stereotypical versions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.