Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning for Stock Selection Based on High Frequency Price-Volume Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.02502 v1 pith:HRKKVUKG submitted 2019-11-06 q-fin.CP cs.LG

classification q-fin.CPcs.LG
keywords modeldatastockreturnexpectedfeatureshigh-frequencyimprovements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training a practical and effective model for stock selection has been a greatly concerned problem in the field of artificial intelligence. Even though some of the models from previous works have achieved good performance in the U.S. market by using low-frequency data and features, training a suitable model with high-frequency stock data is still a problem worth exploring. Based on the high-frequency price data of the past several days, we construct two separate models-Convolution Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory-which can predict the expected return rate of stocks on the current day, and select the stocks with the highest expected yield at the opening to maximize the total return. In our CNN model, we propose improvements on the CNNpred model presented by E. Hoseinzade and S. Haratizadeh in their paper which deals with low-frequency features. Such improvements enable our CNN model to exploit the convolution layer's ability to extract high-level factors and avoid excessive loss of original information at the same time. Our LSTM model utilizes Recurrent Neural Network'advantages in handling time series data. Despite considerable transaction fees due to the daily changes of our stock position, annualized net rate of return is 62.27% for our CNN model, and 50.31% for our LSTM model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Alternative Loss Function in Evaluation of Transformer Models

    q-fin.CP 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Transformer models with the MADL loss are claimed to beat LSTM and buy-and-hold on six assets, but the non-differentiable loss makes the described training impossible.

Pith tools