The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2308.12646 · v1 · pith:HRKW2CHR · submitted 2023-08-24 · cs.HC · cs.GR· cs.LG

The GENEA Challenge 2023: A large scale evaluation of gesture generation models in monadic and dyadic settings

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:HRKW2CHRrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.HC cs.GRcs.LG
keywords motionspeechagentappropriatenesschallengehuman-likenessinterlocutordyadic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper reports on the GENEA Challenge 2023, in which participating teams built speech-driven gesture-generation systems using the same speech and motion dataset, followed by a joint evaluation. This year's challenge provided data on both sides of a dyadic interaction, allowing teams to generate full-body motion for an agent given its speech (text and audio) and the speech and motion of the interlocutor. We evaluated 12 submissions and 2 baselines together with held-out motion-capture data in several large-scale user studies. The studies focused on three aspects: 1) the human-likeness of the motion, 2) the appropriateness of the motion for the agent's own speech whilst controlling for the human-likeness of the motion, and 3) the appropriateness of the motion for the behaviour of the interlocutor in the interaction, using a setup that controls for both the human-likeness of the motion and the agent's own speech. We found a large span in human-likeness between challenge submissions, with a few systems rated close to human mocap. Appropriateness seems far from being solved, with most submissions performing in a narrow range slightly above chance, far behind natural motion. The effect of the interlocutor is even more subtle, with submitted systems at best performing barely above chance. Interestingly, a dyadic system being highly appropriate for agent speech does not necessarily imply high appropriateness for the interlocutor. Additional material is available via the project website at https://svito-zar.github.io/GENEAchallenge2023/ .

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.