Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.01348 v1 pith:HWL27OOV submitted 2019-10-03 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords distillationknowledgeteachersefficacyfindmakemodelsoften
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present a thorough evaluation of the efficacy of knowledge distillation and its dependence on student and teacher architectures. Starting with the observation that more accurate teachers often don't make good teachers, we attempt to tease apart the factors that affect knowledge distillation performance. We find crucially that larger models do not often make better teachers. We show that this is a consequence of mismatched capacity, and that small students are unable to mimic large teachers. We find typical ways of circumventing this (such as performing a sequence of knowledge distillation steps) to be ineffective. Finally, we show that this effect can be mitigated by stopping the teacher's training early. Our results generalize across datasets and models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Distilled Pretraining: A modern lens of Data, In-Context Learning and Test-Time Scaling

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Distilled pretraining improves test-time scaling via generation diversity but impairs induction-head-based in-context learning, with the trade-off explained by a bigram model analysis.

Pith tools