Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Prediction Intervals and Confidence Regions for Symbolic Regression Models based on Likelihood Profiles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.06454 v1 pith:HWTO6WOL submitted 2022-09-14 cs.LG cs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.NE
keywords regressionmodelslikelihoodprofilessymboliccalculationconfidencedecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Symbolic regression is a nonlinear regression method which is commonly performed by an evolutionary computation method such as genetic programming. Quantification of uncertainty of regression models is important for the interpretation of models and for decision making. The linear approximation and so-called likelihood profiles are well-known possibilities for the calculation of confidence and prediction intervals for nonlinear regression models. These simple and effective techniques have been completely ignored so far in the genetic programming literature. In this work we describe the calculation of likelihood profiles in details and also provide some illustrative examples with models created with three different symbolic regression algorithms on two different datasets. The examples highlight the importance of the likelihood profiles to understand the limitations of symbolic regression models and to help the user taking an informed post-prediction decision.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring Multi-view Symbolic Regression methods in physical sciences

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Benchmarking four multi-view symbolic regression packages on five real scientific datasets shows all find accurate compact models; parameter limits and shared constants emerge as key design features.

Pith tools