From RAGs to riches: Utilizing large language models to write documents for clinical trials

Casper van Langen; Christoph Meier; Gaetan Rensonnet; Ilyass El-Mansouri; Nigel Markey

From RAGs to riches: Utilizing large language models to write documents for clinical trials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.16406 v2 pith:I77AOTH2 submitted 2024-02-26 cs.CL

Nigel Markey , Ilyass El-Mansouri , Gaetan Rensonnet , Casper van Langen , Christoph Meier This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CL

keywords httpslinkpubmedarticlebeenclinicaldocumentsjournal

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments

read the original abstract

This manuscript has now been published: - Link to article on journal website: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17407745251320806 - Pubmed link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40013826/

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Towards Automated Situation Awareness: A RAG-Based Framework for Peacebuilding Reports
cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A dynamic RAG pipeline generates situation awareness reports for peacebuilding from GDELT, ACLED, ReliefWeb, and World Bank data, evaluated by NLP metrics, UNDP experts, and LLM judges.
Can artificial intelligence predict clinical trial outcomes?
cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

A comparison of LLMs and HINT for clinical trial outcome prediction that is undermined by data leakage and post-hoc exclusions.

Pith tools