Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LiDAR: Sensing Linear Probing Performance in Joint Embedding SSL Architectures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.04000 v1 pith:IATS3PHB submitted 2023-12-07 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords architectureslidarrankrepresentationslineartaskanalysisapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Joint embedding (JE) architectures have emerged as a promising avenue for acquiring transferable data representations. A key obstacle to using JE methods, however, is the inherent challenge of evaluating learned representations without access to a downstream task, and an annotated dataset. Without efficient and reliable evaluation, it is difficult to iterate on architectural and training choices for JE methods. In this paper, we introduce LiDAR (Linear Discriminant Analysis Rank), a metric designed to measure the quality of representations within JE architectures. Our metric addresses several shortcomings of recent approaches based on feature covariance rank by discriminating between informative and uninformative features. In essence, LiDAR quantifies the rank of the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) matrix associated with the surrogate SSL task -- a measure that intuitively captures the information content as it pertains to solving the SSL task. We empirically demonstrate that LiDAR significantly surpasses naive rank based approaches in its predictive power of optimal hyperparameters. Our proposed criterion presents a more robust and intuitive means of assessing the quality of representations within JE architectures, which we hope facilitates broader adoption of these powerful techniques in various domains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time to Embed: Unlocking Foundation Models for Time Series with Channel Descriptions

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CHARM is a 7M-parameter self-supervised embedding model for multivariate time series that uses channel descriptions to beat specialized baselines on forecasting, classification, and anomaly detection.

  2. InsideSSL: Understanding Self-Supervised Speech Representations using a Model-Centric Perspective

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    InsideSSL analyzes self-supervised speech models layer-by-layer using entropy, curvature, robustness metrics, and a cross-layer Generative Compatibility Matrix, finding that training objectives induce distinct compres...

  3. IConE: Batch Independent Collapse Prevention for Self-Supervised Representation Learning

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    IConE prevents representation collapse in self-supervised learning by aligning views to a globally regularized per-instance embedding table, making training stable down to batch size 1.

Pith tools