pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.07356 · v2 · pith:IFOTZHR4new · submitted 2025-04-10 · 🪐 quant-ph

Asymptotically tight security analysis of quantum key distribution based on universal source compression

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 21:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum key distributionphase error correctionuniversal source compressionRényi entropypermutation symmetryfinite-size securitycollective attacksconvex optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A virtual protocol using universal source compression with quantum side information enables asymptotically tight security proofs for permutation-symmetric quantum key distribution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that conventional phase error correction in QKD cannot reach the asymptotically optimal key rate when failure probability is estimated from the phase error rate. By constructing a virtual protocol based on universal source compression with quantum side information for fixed-length i.i.d. cases and extending it to adaptive lengths under joint random variable restrictions, the authors tightly bound the failure probability of phase error correction. Combined with reduction to collective attacks, this reduces the security of any permutation-symmetrizable QKD protocol to estimating one conditional Rényi entropy, which is solved by convex optimization. A sympathetic reader would care because this closes the gap between finite-size security proofs and the theoretical limit, allowing practical protocols to claim higher key rates without sacrificing rigor.

Core claim

The security of any permutation-symmetrizable QKD protocol reduces to the estimation problem of a single conditional Rényi entropy via a virtual universal source compression protocol with quantum side information, which tightly evaluates the phase error correction failure probability and yields asymptotically optimal key rates when combined with the collective-attack reduction.

What carries the argument

Virtual protocol of universal source compression with quantum side information, first built for fixed-length i.i.d. setups and extended to adaptive-length setups while preserving restrictions from joint random variables.

If this is right

  • Finite-size security proofs for permutation-symmetric protocols now achieve the same asymptotic key rate as the ideal collective-attack analysis.
  • The failure probability of phase error correction receives a tight bound instead of a loose estimate based on the phase error rate.
  • Security analysis for any permutation-symmetrizable protocol collapses to a single convex optimization problem over conditional Rényi entropy.
  • Adaptive-length protocols can be handled without losing the asymptotic tightness property.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same compression technique might be adapted to analyze protocols that are only approximately symmetric after suitable post-processing.
  • Numerical solvers for the convex optimization could be integrated into existing QKD security libraries to produce tighter finite-size bounds in practice.
  • If the joint-random-variable restrictions can be relaxed, the method might apply to a broader class of adaptive QKD setups beyond those considered here.

Load-bearing premise

The QKD protocol must be permutation-symmetric or symmetrizable, and the virtual compression protocol must extend to adaptive lengths while keeping the necessary restrictions on possible states from joint random variables.

What would settle it

For a concrete permutation-symmetric protocol such as BB84, compute the key rate from the new convex optimization of conditional Rényi entropy and check whether it approaches the known asymptotic Devetak-Winter bound as the block size tends to infinity; any persistent gap would falsify the tightness claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.07356 by Masato Koashi, Shinichiro Yamano, Takaya Matsuura, Toshihiko Sasaki, Yui Kuramochi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic picture of the classical source compression with quantum side informa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The schematics of how the phase error correction (PEC) protocol works in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the key rates with the conventional PEC-type analysis and our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Practical quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols require a finite-size security proof. The phase error correction (PEC) approach is one of the general strategies for security analyses that has successfully proved finite-size security for many protocols. However, the conventional PEC approach cannot achieve the asymptotically optimal key rate in general, as long as the failure probability of PEC is estimated through the phase error rate. In this work, we propose a new PEC-type strategy that can provably achieve the asymptotically optimal key rate. The key piece for this is a virtual protocol based on universal source compression with quantum side information, which is of independent interest. A universal source compression with quantum side information protocol is first constructed for fixed-length independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.)~setups and then extended to adaptive-length setups with the restrictions on possible states imposed by joint random variables. Combined with the reduction method to collective attacks, this enables us to tightly evaluate the failure probability of PEC for permutation-symmetric QKD protocols, and thus leads to asymptotically tight analyses. As a result, the security of any permutation-symmetrizable QKD protocol gets reduced to the estimation problem of a single conditional R\'enyi entropy, which can be efficiently solved by a convex optimization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new phase-error-correction (PEC) strategy for finite-size security proofs of permutation-symmetric (or symmetrizable) QKD protocols. It constructs a virtual protocol based on universal source compression with quantum side information, first for fixed-length i.i.d. states and then extended to adaptive-length setups under joint-random-variable restrictions, and combines this with the collective-attack reduction to show that the PEC failure probability can be tightly bounded by a single conditional Rényi entropy that is computable via convex optimization, thereby achieving asymptotically optimal key rates.

Significance. If the central reduction holds, the work supplies a general, computationally tractable route to asymptotically tight finite-size analyses for a wide class of QKD protocols, removing the sub-optimality that arises when PEC failure is bounded only through the phase-error rate. The virtual compression protocol itself may be of independent interest for other quantum information tasks involving side information.

major comments (2)
  1. [adaptive-length extension (post-fixed-length construction)] The extension of the universal source compression protocol from fixed-length i.i.d. to adaptive-length setups (described after the fixed-length construction) must preserve the joint-random-variable restrictions that underwrite the tight PEC failure bound. The skeptic note correctly identifies that any relaxation of these restrictions under adaptivity could introduce additional correlations that loosen the o(1) terms, undermining the claim that the failure probability remains asymptotically tight and that the security analysis reduces to a single convex optimization.
  2. [reduction to collective attacks combined with adaptive extension] The reduction to collective attacks is invoked to evaluate the PEC failure probability, yet the manuscript does not explicitly verify that the adaptive-length virtual protocol still satisfies the state restrictions required for the collective-attack reduction to remain valid without additional error terms that would prevent asymptotic tightness.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise relationship between “permutation-symmetric” (title) and “permutation-symmetrizable” (abstract) and state whether the convex-optimization reduction applies to both classes with identical tightness.
  2. The abstract states that the conditional Rényi entropy estimation “can be efficiently solved by a convex optimization,” but no explicit statement of the optimization problem (variables, objective, constraints) appears in the provided summary; include the formulation in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and for highlighting the need for explicit verification in the adaptive-length extension. We address each major comment below. Clarifications will be added to the manuscript to strengthen the presentation without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [adaptive-length extension (post-fixed-length construction)] The extension of the universal source compression protocol from fixed-length i.i.d. to adaptive-length setups (described after the fixed-length construction) must preserve the joint-random-variable restrictions that underwrite the tight PEC failure bound. The skeptic note correctly identifies that any relaxation of these restrictions under adaptivity could introduce additional correlations that loosen the o(1) terms, undermining the claim that the failure probability remains asymptotically tight and that the security analysis reduces to a single convex optimization.

    Authors: The adaptive-length extension is constructed precisely by imposing the same joint-random-variable restrictions on the possible states as in the fixed-length i.i.d. case. This is done by defining the virtual protocol such that the compression maps respect the joint distribution constraints at each step, preventing the introduction of extraneous correlations. Consequently, the o(1) terms in the PEC failure probability bound remain unaffected, preserving asymptotic tightness and the reduction to a single conditional Rényi entropy. We will add an explicit verification paragraph immediately after the adaptive-length construction, including a short argument showing why the restrictions are inherited without relaxation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [reduction to collective attacks combined with adaptive extension] The reduction to collective attacks is invoked to evaluate the PEC failure probability, yet the manuscript does not explicitly verify that the adaptive-length virtual protocol still satisfies the state restrictions required for the collective-attack reduction to remain valid without additional error terms that would prevent asymptotic tightness.

    Authors: The collective-attack reduction is applied to the output of the virtual protocol, and the joint-random-variable restrictions ensure that the resulting states remain permutation-symmetric and within the class for which the reduction holds exactly (i.e., without extra error terms). The adaptive construction does not alter the symmetry properties or introduce states outside this class. We will insert a dedicated verification subsection that explicitly confirms compatibility between the adaptive virtual protocol and the collective-attack reduction, demonstrating that the failure-probability bound stays asymptotically tight. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on explicit construction and standard information-theoretic reductions

full rationale

The paper explicitly constructs a virtual protocol for universal source compression with quantum side information first in the fixed-length i.i.d. case, then extends it to adaptive-length setups while preserving joint-random-variable restrictions on states. This construction is combined with an existing reduction to collective attacks to bound PEC failure probability. The final reduction of protocol security to estimation of one conditional Rényi entropy (solved by convex optimization) follows directly from these steps and standard entropy properties; it does not redefine any quantity in terms of itself, rename a fitted parameter as a prediction, or rest on a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is assumed without external verification. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no steps that reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard properties of Rényi entropies and source coding theorems with quantum side information, plus the assumption that permutation symmetry allows reduction to collective attacks. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Properties of conditional Rényi entropy and universal source compression with quantum side information hold for the relevant quantum states.
    Invoked in the construction of the virtual protocol and its extension to adaptive lengths.
  • domain assumption Permutation-symmetric protocols can be reduced to collective attacks for security analysis.
    Used to enable tight evaluation of PEC failure probability.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5767 in / 1417 out tokens · 25489 ms · 2026-05-22T21:13:48.012080+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Universal quantum resource distillation via composite generalised quantum Stein's lemma

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Optimal universal distillation rates for quantum resources are achieved without any knowledge of the input state via a composite extension of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma.

  2. Rigorous Security Proofs for Practical Quantum Key Distribution

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rigorous security proofs for variable-length QKD, phase-error bounding with imperfect detectors, marginal-constrained entropy accumulation, and authentication reductions place practical QKD on firmer mathematical ground.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Depending on the key extraction, test, or trash, Bob may change measurement bases

    Alice generates a random alphabet ˆ a ∈ X A, prepares the state |ψˆa⟩ ˜B, sends it to Bob, and Bob performs a measurement to obtain an outcome. Depending on the key extraction, test, or trash, Bob may change measurement bases. Alice and Bob repeat this quantum communication ntot times. 15

  2. [2]

    key extraction

    (Sifting) Alice or Bob announces the label “key extraction”, “test”, or “trash” for each round, the success/failure of the filtering (i.e., post-selection) for each key-extraction round, and the value of the random variable obtained in the test rounds, which is denoted by ˆΞtest. Then, they perform the sifting XA → X A′ and obtain ˆnsift-bit sifted keys ˆ...

  3. [3]

    (Information reconciliation) Depending on the bit error rate of the channel, Alice sends Bob a ˆKEC-bit syndrome by consuming ˆKEC-bit of preshared secret key, and Bob performs the bit error correction on his sifted key ˆksift B according to the sent syndrome to obtain a reconciled key ˆkrec B

  4. [4]

    (Privacy amplification) Alice and Bob determine the embedding XA′ ,→ X , where |X | is a prime power. Alice randomly chooses a hash function ˆH from the dual 2-universal family Hd(ˆnsift, ˆΞtest) of surjective linear hash functions with the field F|X | and acts it on her sifted key to obtain the final key ˆkfin A := ˆksift A ˆH of the length ˆnfin, where ...

  5. [5]

    Alice and Bob repeat this quantum communication ntot times

    Alice prepares an entangled state |Ψ⟩A ˜B :=P a∈XA |XA|−1/2 |a⟩A |ψa⟩ ˜B, sends the system ˜B to Bob, and Bob keeps the received quantum system B. Alice and Bob repeat this quantum communication ntot times

  6. [6]

    key extraction

    (Sifting) Alice or Bob announces the label “key extraction”, “test”, or “trash” for each round. For the rounds in which “test” is chosen, Alice performs the Z-basis measurement on her system A and Bob performs the same measurement as that in the actual protocol to obtain the random variable ˆΞtest. For the rounds in which “trash” is chosen, Alice measures...

  7. [7]

    (Information reconciliation) Alice sends Bob a ˆKEC-bit random bits

  8. [8]

    (Privacy amplification) Alice defines the ˆ nsift-qudit system K ˆnsift with dim HK = |X | by performing an isometry C⊗ˆnsift A′→KA′, where CA′→KA′ is defined as CA′→KA′ := X z∈XA′ |z⟩K |z⟩⟨z|A′ . (76) (Note that the bases of the systems A′ and K are related by the embedding XA′ ,→ X determined in the actual protocol.) For the dual 2-universal family Hd(ˆ...

  9. [9]

    For each of the ntot communication rounds, Alice generates a random bit ˆ a and sends the state |ψˆa⟩ to Bob. Bob performs a measurement with a POVM{|ψ⊥ 1 ⟩⟨ψ⊥ 1 | /2, |ψ⊥ 0 ⟩⟨ψ⊥ 0 | /2, I− |ψ⊥ 0 ⟩⟨ψ⊥ 0 | /2 − | ψ⊥ 1 ⟩⟨ψ⊥ 1 | /2} and obtains an outcome 0, 1, or failure, respectively, where |ψ⊥ a ⟩ := α |e0⟩ − (−1)aβ |e1⟩. The round in which Bob’s measurem...

  10. [10]

    extr”, “test

    Alice randomly determines which communication round is used as key extraction, test, or trash, and announces it. Depending on the announced label “extr”, “test”, or “trash”, where “extr” is a shorthand of key extraction, Alice and Bob perform one of the following operations. (extr) Bob announces which rounds are “success”. Alice and Bob keep the bit value...

  11. [11]

    Depending on the estimated bit error rate, Alice sends Bob the ˆKEC-bit syndrome information

    (Information reconciliation) From the numbers ˆ nsift, ˆnsuc, and ˆnerr, Alice estimates the bit error rate. Depending on the estimated bit error rate, Alice sends Bob the ˆKEC-bit syndrome information. Bob performs a bit-error correction accordingly and obtains a reconciled key

  12. [12]

    Alice performs the hash function ˆH randomly chosen from the dual 2-universal family of surjective linear hash functions and obtains the final key

    (Privacy amplification) From the numbers ˆnsift, ˆnsuc, and ˆnerr, Alice determines the length ˆnfin of the final key and thus the amount of privacy amplification. Alice performs the hash function ˆH randomly chosen from the dual 2-universal family of surjective linear hash functions and obtains the final key. Alice sends ˆH to Bob, and Bob performs it on...

  13. [13]

    Bob performs a filtering operation F(ρ) = X i=0,1 FiρF † i , (127) where Fi := |i⟩⟨ψ⊥ i⊕1|B / √ 2 with a binary summation ⊕

    For each of the ntot communication rounds, Alice generates a stateP a∈{0,1} 2−1/2 |a⟩A |ψa⟩ ˜B and keeps the system A while sending the system ˜B to Bob. Bob performs a filtering operation F(ρ) = X i=0,1 FiρF † i , (127) where Fi := |i⟩⟨ψ⊥ i⊕1|B / √ 2 with a binary summation ⊕. The map F here is the CP map, and the unfiltered event is regarded as a failur...

  14. [14]

    extr”, “test

    Alice randomly determines which communication round is used as key extraction, test, or trash, and announces it. Depending on the announced label “extr”, “test”, or “trash”, where “extr” is a shorthand of key extraction, Alice and Bob perform one of the following operations. (extr) Bob announces which rounds are “success”. Alice and Bob keep their qubits ...

  15. [15]

    Depending on the estimated bit error rate, Alice sends Bob a ˆKEC-bit random bits

    From the numbers ˆnsift, ˆnsuc, and ˆnerr, Alice estimates the bit error rate. Depending on the estimated bit error rate, Alice sends Bob a ˆKEC-bit random bits

  16. [16]

    1 n nX i=1 ˆXi ≤ p # ≤ 2−nD(p∥Tr[ρM]). (137) Since the binary relative entropy D(p∥q) is monotone increasing for q when q > p with a fixed p, we have Pr ˆXi∼{Tr[ρ(1−M)],Tr[ρM]}

    From the numbers ˆ nsift, ˆnsuc, and ˆnerr, Alice determines the length ˆ nfin of the final key. Alice acts the unitary U( ˆH) on her sifted-key qubits and measures the last ˆnsift − ˆnfin qubits in the X bases, where ˆH is randomly chosen from the dual 2-universal family of surjective linear hash functions. Depending on the measurement outcomes as well a...

  17. [17]

    & Chau, H

    Lo, H.-K. & Chau, H. F. Unconditional Security of Quantum Key Distribution over Arbitrarily Long Distances. Science 283, 2050–2056 (1999). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ science.283.5410.2050

  18. [18]

    Shor, P. W. & Preskill, J. Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 441–444 (2000). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85. 441

  19. [19]

    Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity

    Koashi, M. Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity. New Journal of Physics 11, 045018 (2009). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045018

  20. [20]

    Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Theoretical Computer Science 560, 7–11 (2014). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0304397514004241. Theoretical Aspects of Quantum Cryptography - celebrating 30 years of BB84

  21. [21]

    Proof of unconditional security of six-state quantum key distribution scheme

    Lo, H.-K. Proof of unconditional security of six-state quantum key distribution scheme. Quantum Information and Computation 1, 81–94 (2001). URL https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/ 1360294721891177984

  22. [22]

    & Imoto, N

    Tamaki, K., Koashi, M. & Imoto, N. Unconditionally Secure Key Distribution Based on Two Nonorthogonal States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 167904 (2003). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.90.167904

  23. [23]

    & Renes, J

    Boileau, J.-C., Tamaki, K., Batuwantudawe, J., Laflamme, R. & Renes, J. M. Unconditional Security of a Three State Quantum Key Distribution Protocol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 040503 (2005). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.040503

  24. [25]

    SECURITY OF QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION

    RENNER, R. SECURITY OF QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION. International Journal of Quantum Information 06, 1–127 (2008). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908003256

  25. [26]

    & Renner, R

    Tomamichel, M., Schaffner, C., Smith, A. & Renner, R. Leftover Hashing Against Quantum Side Information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 57, 5524–5535 (2011)

  26. [27]

    Department of Combinatorics, U., Optimization & of Waterloo

    Stinson, D., of Waterloo. Department of Combinatorics, U., Optimization & of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics, U. Universal Hash Families and the Leftover Hash Lemma, and Applications to Cryp- tography and Computing . Research report (University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics) (Fac- ulty of Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 2001). URL https://book...

  27. [28]

    & Winter, A

    Devetak, I. & Winter, A. Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 461, 207–235 (2005). URL https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspa.2004.1372. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspa.2004.1372

  28. [29]

    Physical Review A33(5), 2913–2927 (1986)

    Furrer, F. Reverse-reconciliation continuous-variable quantum key distribution based on the uncertainty principle. Phys. Rev. A 90, 042325 (2014). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 90.042325

  29. [30]

    Leftover Hashing From Quantum Error Correction: Unifying the Two Approaches to the Security Proof of Quantum Key Distribution

    Tsurumaru, T. Leftover Hashing From Quantum Error Correction: Unifying the Two Approaches to the Security Proof of Quantum Key Distribution. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 66, 3465–3484 (2020)

  30. [31]

    Equivalence of Three Classical Algorithms With Quantum Side Information: Privacy Amplification, Error Correction, and Data Compression

    Tsurumaru, T. Equivalence of Three Classical Algorithms With Quantum Side Information: Privacy Amplification, Error Correction, and Data Compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 68, 1016–1031 (2022)

  31. [32]

    & Winter, A

    Devetak, I. & Winter, A. Classical data compression with quantum side information. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042301 (2003). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042301

  32. [33]

    Renes, J. M. Duality of privacy amplification against quantum adversaries and data compression with 37 quantum side information. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 467, 1604–1623 (2010). URL https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa. 2010.0445. Publisher: Royal Society

  33. [34]

    Renes, J. M. & Renner, R. One-Shot Classical Data Compression With Quantum Side Information and the Distillation of Common Randomness or Secret Keys. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 58, 1985–1991 (2012)

  34. [35]

    P., Datta, N

    Cheng, H.-C., Hanson, E. P., Datta, N. & Hsieh, M.-H. Non-Asymptotic Classical Data Compression With Quantum Side Information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 67, 902–930 (2021)

  35. [36]

    Renes, J. M. Achievable error exponents of data compression with quantum side information and com- munication over symmetric classical-quantum channels. In 2023 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW), 170–174 (2023)

  36. [37]

    J., Colbeck, R., Yu, L

    Coles, P. J., Colbeck, R., Yu, L. & Zwolak, M. Uncertainty Relations from Simple Entropic Properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 210405 (2012). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108. 210405

  37. [38]

    Electro nic transport in two-dimensional graphene

    Coles, P. J., Berta, M., Tomamichel, M. & Wehner, S. Entropic uncertainty relations and their applica- tions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015002 (2017). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys. 89.015002

  38. [39]

    & Zurek, W

    Ollivier, H. & Zurek, W. H. Quantum Discord: A Measure of the Quantumness of Correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2001). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901

  39. [40]

    Postselection Technique for Quantum Channels with Applications to Quantum Cryptography

    Christandl, M., K¨ onig, R. & Renner, R. Postselection Technique for Quantum Channels with Applica- tions to Quantum Cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 020504 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.020504

  40. [41]

    & Renner, R

    Fawzi, O. & Renner, R. Quantum Conditional Mutual Information and Approximate Markov Chains. Communications in Mathematical Physics 340, 575–611 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00220-015-2466-x

  41. [42]

    & Koashi, M

    Matsuura, T., Yamano, S., Kuramochi, Y., Sasaki, T. & Koashi, M. Tight concentration inequalities for quantum adversarial setups exploiting permutation symmetry. Quantum 8, 1540 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-11-27-1540

  42. [43]

    & Tan, E

    Nahar, S., Tupkary, D., Zhao, Y., L¨ utkenhaus, N. & Tan, E. Y.-Z. Postselection Technique for Optical Quantum Key Distribution with Improved de Finetti Reductions. PRX Quantum 5, 040315 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.040315

  43. [44]

    Bennett, C. H. Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121–3124 (1992). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3121

  44. [45]

    Duality between source coding with quantum side information and c-q channel coding

    Cheng, H.-C., Hanson, E. P., Datta, N. & Hsieh, M.-H. Duality between source coding with quantum side information and c-q channel coding (2018). 1809.11143

  45. [46]

    Universal Coding for Classical-Quantum Channel

    Hayashi, M. Universal Coding for Classical-Quantum Channel. Communications in Mathematical Physics 289, 1087–1098 (2009). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0825-1

  46. [47]

    & Tomamichel, M

    Beigi, S. & Tomamichel, M. Lower Bounds on Error Exponents via a New Quantum Decoder (2023). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09014. 2310.09014

  47. [48]

    & Ogawa, T

    Mosonyi, M. & Ogawa, T. Strong Converse Exponent for Classical-Quantum Channel Coding. Communications in Mathematical Physics 355, 373–426 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00220-017-2928-4

  48. [49]

    A Group Theoretic Approach to Quantum Information (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017)

    Hayashi, M. A Group Theoretic Approach to Quantum Information (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-45241-8

  49. [50]

    & NAUENBERG, M

    ITZYKSON, C. & NAUENBERG, M. Unitary Groups: Representations and Decompositions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 95–120 (1966). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.38.95

  50. [51]

    & Hiai, F

    Mosonyi, M. & Hiai, F. On the Quantum R´ enyi Relative Entropies and Related Capacity Formulas. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 57, 2474–2487 (2011)

  51. [52]

    & Wehner, S

    K¨ onig, R. & Wehner, S. A Strong Converse for Classical Channel Coding Using Entangled Inputs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 070504 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103. 070504

  52. [53]

    Physical Review Letters 85(10), 2200–2203 (2000)

    Sharma, N. & Warsi, N. A. Fundamental Bound on the Reliability of Quantum Information Transmis- sion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 080501 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 110.080501

  53. [54]

    & Hsieh, M.-H

    Cheng, H.-C., Gao, L. & Hsieh, M.-H. Properties of Noncommutative R´ enyi and Augustin Information. 38 Communications in Mathematical Physics 390, 501–544 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00220-022-04319-8

  54. [55]

    The Generalized Stochastic Likelihood Decoder: Random Coding and Expurgated Bounds

    Merhav, N. The Generalized Stochastic Likelihood Decoder: Random Coding and Expurgated Bounds. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 63, 5039–5051 (2017)

  55. [56]

    Renes, J. M. Tight lower bound on the error exponent of classical-quantum channels (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11118. 2407.11118

  56. [57]

    & Hayashi, M

    Tomamichel, M. & Hayashi, M. A Hierarchy of Information Quantities for Finite Block Length Analysis of Quantum Tasks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 59, 7693–7710 (2013)

  57. [58]

    & Hayashi, M

    Tsurumaru, T. & Hayashi, M. Dual Universality of Hash Functions and Its Applications to Quantum Cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 59, 4700–4717 (2013)

  58. [59]

    Durt, B.-G

    DURT, T., ENGLERT, B.-G., BENGTSSON, I. & ˙ZYCZKOWSKI, K. ON MUTUALLY UNBIASED BASES. International Journal of Quantum Information 08, 535–640 (2010). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1142/S0219749910006502. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749910006502

  59. [60]

    & Renner, R

    M¨ uller-Quade, J. & Renner, R. Composability in quantum cryptography. New Journal of Physics 11, 085006 (2009). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/8/085006

  60. [61]

    Digital Quantum Information Processing with Continuous-Variable Systems (Springer Nature, 2023)

    Matsuura, T. Digital Quantum Information Processing with Continuous-Variable Systems (Springer Nature, 2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8288-0

  61. [62]

    & Tsurumaru, T

    Hayashi, M. & Tsurumaru, T. More Efficient Privacy Amplification With Less Random Seeds via Dual Universal Hash Function. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 62, 2213–2232 (2016)

  62. [63]

    & Koashi, M

    Zhou, H., Sasaki, T. & Koashi, M. Numerical method for finite-size security analysis of quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033126 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.4.033126

  63. [64]

    Lin, S. M. & Tomamichel, M. Investigating properties of a family of quantum R´ enyi diver- gences. Quantum Information Processing 14, 1501–1512 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11128-015-0935-y

  64. [65]

    & Hayashi, M

    Tomamichel, M., Berta, M. & Hayashi, M. Relating different quantum generaliza- tions of the conditional R´ enyi entropy. Journal of Mathematical Physics 55, 082206 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4892761. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4892761/15618300/082206 1 online.pdf

  65. [66]

    Precise Evaluation of Leaked Information with Secure Randomness Extraction in the Presence of Quantum Attacker

    Hayashi, M. Precise Evaluation of Leaked Information with Secure Randomness Extraction in the Presence of Quantum Attacker. Communications in Mathematical Physics 333, 335–350 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-2174-y

  66. [67]

    & Koashi, M

    Matsuura, T., Sasaki, T. & Koashi, M. Refined security proof of the round-robin differential-phase- shift quantum key distribution and its improved performance in the finite-sized case. Phys. Rev. A 99, 042303 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.042303

  67. [68]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(301), 13–30 (1963), http://www.jstor.org/stable/2282952

    Hoeffding, W. Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables. Journal of the Amer- ican Statistical Association 58, 13–30 (1963). URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2282952. Full publication date: Mar., 1963

  68. [69]

    & Koashi, M

    Matsuura, T., Maeda, K., Sasaki, T. & Koashi, M. Finite-size security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with digital signal processing. Nature Communications 12, 252 (2021). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19916-1

  69. [70]

    Sanov, I. N. On the probability of large deviations of random magnitudes. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 42(84), 11–44 (1957)

  70. [71]

    Sanov property, generalized I-projection and a conditional limit theorem

    Csisz´ ar, I. Sanov property, generalized I-projection and a conditional limit theorem. The Annals of Probability 12, 768 (1984)

  71. [72]

    Improved asymptotic key rate of the B92 protocol

    Matsumoto, R. Improved asymptotic key rate of the B92 protocol. In 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory , 351–353 (2013)

  72. [73]

    & Uyematsu, T

    Sasaki, H., Matsumoto, R. & Uyematsu, T. Key rate of the B92 quantum key distribution protocol with finite qubits. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) , 696–699 (2015)

  73. [74]

    & Boyd, S

    Diamond, S. & Boyd, S. CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research (2016). URL https://stanford.edu/~boyd/papers/pdf/ cvxpy_paper.pdf. To appear

  74. [75]

    & Renner, R

    Dupuis, F., Fawzi, O. & Renner, R. Entropy Accumulation. Communications in Mathematical Physics 379, 867–913 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03839-5 . 39

  75. [76]

    & Renner, R

    Metger, T., Fawzi, O., Sutter, D. & Renner, R. Generalised entropy accumulation. In 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) , 844–850 (2022)

  76. [77]

    & Renner, R

    Metger, T. & Renner, R. Security of quantum key distribution from generalised entropy accumulation. Nature Communications 14, 5272 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40920-8

  77. [78]

    Arqand, A., Hahn, T. A. & Tan, E. Y. Z. Generalized R´ enyi entropy accumulation theorem and general- ized quantum probability estimation (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05912. 2405.05912

  78. [79]

    & L¨ utkenhaus, N

    George, I., Lin, J. & L¨ utkenhaus, N. Numerical calculations of the finite key rate for general quantum key distribution protocols. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013274 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013274

  79. [80]

    & Fawzi, O

    Brown, P., Fawzi, H. & Fawzi, O. Computing conditional entropies for quantum correlations. Nature Communications 12, 575 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20018-1

  80. [81]

    Matrix Analysis

    Bhatia, R. Matrix Analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer New York, 1997)