REVIEW 4 cited by
A simple yet effective baseline for non-attributed graph classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Graphs are complex objects that do not lend themselves easily to typical learning tasks. Recently, a range of approaches based on graph kernels or graph neural networks have been developed for graph classification and for representation learning on graphs in general. As the developed methodologies become more sophisticated, it is important to understand which components of the increasingly complex methods are necessary or most effective. As a first step, we develop a simple yet meaningful graph representation, and explore its effectiveness in graph classification. We test our baseline representation for the graph classification task on a range of graph datasets. Interestingly, this simple representation achieves similar performance as the state-of-the-art graph kernels and graph neural networks for non-attributed graph classification. Its performance on classifying attributed graphs is slightly weaker as it does not incorporate attributes. However, given its simplicity and efficiency, we believe that it still serves as an effective baseline for attributed graph classification. Our graph representation is efficient (linear-time) to compute. We also provide a simple connection with the graph neural networks. Note that these observations are only for the task of graph classification while existing methods are often designed for a broader scope including node embedding and link prediction. The results are also likely biased due to the limited amount of benchmark datasets available. Nevertheless, the good performance of our simple baseline calls for the development of new, more comprehensive benchmark datasets so as to better evaluate and analyze different graph learning methods. Furthermore, given the computational efficiency of our graph summary, we believe that it is a good candidate as a baseline method for future graph classification (or even other graph learning) studies.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Graph Contrastive Learning versus Untrained Baselines: The Role of Dataset Size
Graph contrastive learning's advantage over untrained and handcrafted baselines is size-dependent: baselines win on small datasets, GCL wins modestly past a few thousand graphs, then plateaus.
-
Enhancing the Utility of Higher-Order Information in Relational Learning
Graph-level GNNs with new hypergraph-based encodings beat hypergraph-specific GNNs on several benchmarks, and the encodings provably increase expressivity beyond graph-level encodings.
-
Towards Faithful Graph Explanations with Synergistic Edge Effects via Granular Balls
SeeExplainer explains GNN predictions by decomposing graphs into granular balls and selecting substructures whose removal changes predictions, but its reported stability and fidelity advantages are largely definitiona...
-
Feature Construction Using Network Control Theory and Rank Encoding for Graph Machine Learning
Average controllability and histogram rank encoding improve GNN graph classification on some unattributed social network datasets, with mixed results on others.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.