Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Study of possible systematics in the L*X - Ta* correlation of Gamma Ray Bursts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1101.1676 v1 pith:IHSID6B5 submitted 2011-01-09 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords correlationgrbsredshiftsampleanalysisburstscanonicalcorrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are the most energetic sources in the universe and among the farthest known astrophysical sources. These features make them appealing candidates as standard candles for cosmological applications so that studying the physical mechanisms for the origin of the emission and correlations among their observable properties is an interesting task. We consider here the luminosity L*X - break time Ta* (hereafter LT) correlation and investigate whether there are systematics induced by selection effects or redshift dependent calibra- tion. We perform this analysis both for the full sample of 77 GRBs with known redshift and for the subsample of GRBs having canonical X-ray light curves, hereafter called U0095 sample. We do not find any systematic bias thus con- firming the existence of physical GRB subclasses revealed by tight correlations of their afterglow properties. Furthermore, we study the possibility of applying the LT correlation as a redshift estimator both for the full distribution and for the canonical lightcurves. The large uncertainties and the non negligible intrin- sic scatter make the results not so encouraging, but there are nevertheless some hints motivating a further analysis with an increased U0095 sample.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Model-independent calibration of Gamma-Ray Bursts with neural networks

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Neural networks calibrate 2D and 3D Dainotti relations on the Platinum GRB sample via ANN-driven MCMC to produce a model-independent Hubble diagram with reduced scatter.

  2. The Machine Learning to reconstruct GRB lightcurves

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A conference summary of the authors' prior work, reporting that model-based gap filling reduces GRB light-curve fitting uncertainties without new data or validation.

  3. Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    astro-ph.CO 2022-03 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper reviews cosmological tensions including the H0 and S8 discrepancies and explores new physics models that could explain them.

  4. Supernovae Ia, high-redshift probes, and the Hubble tension: current status and future perspectives

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of the authors' own binned supernova analyses reporting a mild redshift-dependent Hubble constant, plus a discussion of high-redshift probes.

Pith tools