Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

REALTALK: A 21-Day Real-World Dataset for Long-Term Conversation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13270 v1 pith:IIQOOCVV submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords long-termpersonareal-worlddialoguedialoguesinteractionsuserbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Long-term, open-domain dialogue capabilities are essential for chatbots aiming to recall past interactions and demonstrate emotional intelligence (EI). Yet, most existing research relies on synthetic, LLM-generated data, leaving open questions about real-world conversational patterns. To address this gap, we introduce REALTALK, a 21-day corpus of authentic messaging app dialogues, providing a direct benchmark against genuine human interactions. We first conduct a dataset analysis, focusing on EI attributes and persona consistency to understand the unique challenges posed by real-world dialogues. By comparing with LLM-generated conversations, we highlight key differences, including diverse emotional expressions and variations in persona stability that synthetic dialogues often fail to capture. Building on these insights, we introduce two benchmark tasks: (1) persona simulation where a model continues a conversation on behalf of a specific user given prior dialogue context; and (2) memory probing where a model answers targeted questions requiring long-term memory of past interactions. Our findings reveal that models struggle to simulate a user solely from dialogue history, while fine-tuning on specific user chats improves persona emulation. Additionally, existing models face significant challenges in recalling and leveraging long-term context within real-world conversations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MMEB-V3: Measuring the Performance Gaps of Omni-Modality Embedding Models

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    On 190 tasks and a 12-direction cross-modal diagnostic, seven embedding models frequently fail to honor explicit target-modality instructions: retrieval is biased toward the query modality and instruction-induced shif...

  2. LMEB: Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark

    cs.CL 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    LMEB is a new benchmark that evaluates embedding models on long-horizon memory retrieval and shows this skill is largely orthogonal to traditional passage-retrieval performance.

  3. Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    MemoryAgentBench is a new multi-turn benchmark assessing four memory competencies in LLM agents—accurate retrieval, test-time learning, long-range understanding, and selective forgetting—showing that existing methods ...

  4. Compute Globally, Materialize Locally: The Memory Contract of Sparse Event-KV

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Source-omitted event KV rows can carry compact upstream state (semantic materialization); deliberate answer-free carriers raise recovery from 6% to 51% on Qwen3-8B, while passive natural mentions do not.

Pith tools