Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Symbolic Knowledge Distillation: from General Language Models to Commonsense Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.07178 v2 pith:IJEZZQAO submitted 2021-10-14 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords commonsensemodelsknowledgemodelgenerallanguagedistilldistillation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The common practice for training commonsense models has gone from-human-to-corpus-to-machine: humans author commonsense knowledge graphs in order to train commonsense models. In this work, we investigate an alternative, from-machine-to-corpus-to-machine: general language models author these commonsense knowledge graphs to train commonsense models. Our study leads to a new framework, Symbolic Knowledge Distillation. As with prior art in Knowledge Distillation (Hinton et al., 2015), our approach uses larger models to teach smaller models. A key difference is that we distill knowledge symbolically-as text-in addition to the neural model. We also distill only one aspect-the commonsense of a general language model teacher, allowing the student to be a different type, a commonsense model. Altogether, we show that careful prompt engineering and a separately trained critic model allow us to selectively distill high-quality causal commonsense from GPT-3, a general language model. Empirical results demonstrate that, for the first time, a human-authored commonsense knowledge graph is surpassed by our automatically distilled variant in all three criteria: quantity, quality, and diversity. In addition, it results in a neural commonsense model that surpasses the teacher model's commonsense capabilities despite its 100x smaller size. We apply this to the ATOMIC resource, and share our new symbolic knowledge graph and commonsense models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CaseEdit: Enhancing Localized Commonsense Reasoning via Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing in Small Parameter Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CaseEdit supplies 900 household-object commonsense edits with 3,600 multiple-choice questions and reports that AlphaEdit beats ROME, MEND, MEMIT, and MEMIT-CSK at preserving unrelated knowledge in a 3B model.

  2. Prompt Engineering Guidelines for Using Large Language Models in Requirements Engineering

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature review and three expert interviews yield a proposed mapping of prompt engineering guideline themes onto five requirements engineering activities, with no empirical validation of the mapping.

Pith tools