Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers

As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 12 of 12 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2607.29274.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2607.29274 v1

Coverage vector

measured 12 of 12 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.492647Z

measured 13 of 13 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-04T22:38:10.161728Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-04T22:38:10.338215Z

Reference resolution

12 of 12 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved12
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation a792f21c-c9a0-4113-a764-433c12f92c40 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Unresolved cited work

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:12.826604Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 673ae0f9-0809-4d7f-bcfc-37612f9bc258 · outbound

This paper cites Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:12.873427Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation dd27a251-0455-46f0-a463-1536140c4ef6 · outbound

This paper cites Gilardi, M.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Gilardi, M

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:12.946161Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9664da98-6e47-449e-ac37-88e30918f897 · outbound

This paper cites Great Models Think Alike and this Undermines AI Oversight.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Great Models Think Alike and this Undermines AI Oversight

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.027463Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4531c188-a4f0-488a-89c9-158b83af1761 · outbound

This paper cites Behavioral Analysis of Information Salience in Large Language Models.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Behavioral Analysis of Information Salience in Large Language Models

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.088001Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 0ddc6f45-88e6-4e93-93bf-b9bac1c69eb6 · outbound

This paper cites Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remark

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.152597Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4052d9e6-17e9-4d54-8d05-1e053e8d5a39 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Unresolved cited work

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.190445Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4ce661e1-482d-4e0c-9f5c-afbe61539fec · outbound

This paper cites Kleinberg and M.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Kleinberg and M

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.273956Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3e5da9e5-0ff2-4557-b1c9-2c7fceb95fb3 · outbound

This paper cites Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization?.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization?

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.304954Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 186afe68-d465-4be1-9b47-a35ceef07821 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Unresolved cited work

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.383717Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 373395e0-76df-4816-afaf-20b33efc5331 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Unresolved cited work

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.427143Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b5ee8390-b019-4969-adb0-fdedacb5e644 · outbound

This paper cites Measuring Alignment With Reader Highlights Net of Position and Length.

Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers Measuring Alignment With Reader Highlights Net of Position and Length

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T10:20:13.492647Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

Observation 590ebf92-5e13-49b6-95b9-b58a8b9ffdd3 · inbound

Floor, Ceiling, and the Fusion Gap: How Much of Crowd Reading Attention Can Machines Predict? cites this paper.

Floor, Ceiling, and the Fusion Gap: How Much of Crowd Reading Attention Can Machines Predict? Language Models Agree With Each Other, Not With Readers

Reference 1

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-04T22:38:10.341865Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.