Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Spin-split magnon bands induce pure spin current in insulating altermagnets

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spin-split magnon bands in a honeycomb altermagnet generate a pure transverse spin current under a temperature gradient, with a predicted spin-splitting angle near 3.3 degrees and an effective spin-splitter torque field near 2 mT.

desk verdict Solid model-level physics with a fixable but important error in the switching estimate; the intrinsic/extrinsic decomposition is the real contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04274 v1 pith:ISS4I2OB submitted 2025-07-06 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

Sankar Sarkar , Amit Agarwal This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords altermagnetismmagnonspincurrentNernsteffectSeebeckspin-splittertorquequantumkinetictheoryBerrycurvaturehoneycombantiferromagnet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Altermagnets have spin-split electronic bands with zero net magnetization, and this paper asks whether their magnon (spin-wave) bands can carry useful spin currents without any charge motion. It develops a quantum-kinetic treatment of thermally driven magnon transport that splits the spin-current response into a scattering-dependent extrinsic part and a Berry-curvature intrinsic part, then applies it to a collinear honeycomb antiferromagnet with anisotropic next-nearest-neighbor exchange and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. The central result is that the spin-split magnon bands act as a magnonic spin-splitter: a temperature gradient along certain directions produces a pure transverse spin current, with no accompanying particle or energy current. For a parameter set the paper calls realistic, the predicted spin-splitting angle is about 3.3 degrees and the torque on an adjacent ferromagnet corresponds to an effective magnetic field of about 2 mT, exceeding typical permalloy anisotropy fields. If correct, this provides a dissipationless, thermally driven route to magnetization switching in insulating altermagnets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-sublattice bosonic magnon Hamiltonian on a honeycomb lattice, $$H_k = \begin{pmatrix} J'+\gamma_A(k) & JS\gamma(k)\\ JS\gamma(k)^* & J'+\gamma_B(k)\end{pmatrix},$$ with sublattice-dependent anisotropic next-nearest-neighbor couplings and a $z$-directed Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya term $D_z$. After a Bogoliubov transformation the magnon energies are $\varepsilon_n = \sqrt{h_0^2 - h_x^2 - h_y^2} + s_n h_z$ with $s_\alpha=+1$, $s_\beta=-1$, so the spin splitting is $\Delta\varepsilon = 2h_z = \gamma_A - \gamma_B$. This identity carries the argument: it makes the two bands carry opposite spin with different velocities and Berry curvatures, which produces the transverse pure spin current. The response is computed from a density-matrix quantum kinetic equation with relaxation-time scattering and a thermal vector potential, giving an extrinsic conductivity $\sigma_{\rm ext}^{ab}\propto\tau$ and an intrinsic one $\sigma_{\rm int}^{ab}\propto\tau^0$.

What would settle it

Measure the transverse spin current from a 1 K/nm temperature gradient at 100 K in a candidate insulating altermagnet by depositing a Pt strip and detecting the inverse spin Hall voltage. The model predicts a spin current density of about $0.64\times10^{-5}$ J/m$^2$ (effective torque field about 2 mT); a vanishing signal or one more than an order of magnitude smaller would falsify the claimed parameter set and switching feasibility.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that altermagnetic spin splitting alone can convert a longitudinal thermal gradient into a pure transverse spin current carried by magnons, and that this current is large enough to switch a ferromagnet. In the proposed honeycomb-lattice model, the two magnon modes α and β carry opposite spin and split in energy by Δε(k) = γ_A(k) − γ_B(k), which is nonzero even without Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction because of anisotropic sublattice exchange. The authors show the thermal spin-current conductivity separates into an extrinsic Drude-like term proportional to the relaxation time (arising purely from the anisotropic exchange) and an intrinsic, scattering-independent term from Berry curvature (which requires DMI). The extrinsic term dominates numerically. The transverse spin current is exactly pure for temperature gradients along high-symmetry directions, and its magnitude translates into a spin-splitter torque with an effective field of roughly 2 mT on a 5 nm permalloy layer.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the parameter set $\{J, J_1, \delta J, K, D_z\} = \{12.4, -5.48, 0.8, -0.3, 0.3\}$ meV describes a real insulating altermagnet, together with the linear-spin-wave approximation that magnons are non-interacting and the response is measured well below the Néel temperature; if the actual exchange and DMI values differ, the 3.3-degree angle and 2 mT field could change substantially.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A temperature gradient along the $x$ or $y$ axis of the proposed honeycomb altermagnet produces a pure transverse spin current: the transverse magnon particle and energy currents vanish while the spin current stays finite.
  • The extrinsic Drude-like contribution dominates the spin Nernst conductivity, so the response is robust even when the DMI is weak; the non-relativistic anisotropic exchange alone already creates the spin-splitting angle.
  • The estimated spin-splitter torque, an effective field of about 2 mT for a 1 K/nm gradient at 100 K, exceeds the roughly 0.25 mT anisotropy field of permalloy, indicating that thermally driven magnetization switching is feasible.
  • The altermagnetic spin-splitting angle and the spin Seebeck conductivity both have four-fold angular symmetry and are complementary: the Seebeck response is largest where the spin-splitting angle is smallest, so rotating the thermal gradient selects between the two effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not tie its parameter set to a specific compound; extracting the anisotropic exchange and DMI parameters from first principles for a candidate material such as MnTe, MnSe, MnPSe$_3$, or CrSb would turn the 3.3-degree angle and 2 mT field into testable material-specific predictions.
  • Because the extrinsic spin-Nernst conductivity scales linearly with the relaxation time while the intrinsic part does not, a disorder or temperature series separating the two channels would directly test the decomposition; the model predicts the extrinsic channel dominates, so the field-torque signal should track the magnon lifetime.
  • The Haldane-model analogy for the DMI suggests a handle for tuning: by engineering the DMI phase pattern one might drive the magnon bands through a topological transition, adding a quantized edge contribution on top of the bulk spin-splitter effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a quantum kinetic theory for thermally driven magnon spin currents in insulating altermagnets, separating the response into Berry-curvature-driven intrinsic and Drude-like extrinsic contributions. The framework is applied to a collinear honeycomb antiferromagnet with anisotropic next-nearest-neighbor exchange and a z-component Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. The authors report spin-split magnon bands, an altermagnetic spin-splitting angle of about 3.3 degrees, a pure transverse spin current, and estimate a spin-splitter torque with an effective field of about 2 mT, which they argue can switch a permalloy layer.

Significance. If the theoretical framework is sound, the paper provides a useful and clean decomposition of magnon spin currents into intrinsic and extrinsic parts and extends the concept of altermagnetic spin splitting to magnon transport. The distinction between non-relativistic exchange-driven extrinsic response and DMI-driven intrinsic Berry-curvature response is physically insightful and supported by the model symmetry. The manuscript is carefully organized, and the analytic derivations are mostly transparent; I checked the apparent factor-of-two discrepancy between Eq. (24) and Eq. (9) and found that it is resolved by the sign convention s_beta = -1 and the identity Omega_alpha = Omega_beta. The main quantitative claim, however, is undermined by a unit conversion error in Sec. VI, and the parameter set is not tied to a specific material, making the headline switching prediction unsupported as it stands.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. VI] The torque estimate contains a factor-of-10 units error. The authors state that a temperature gradient of 1 K/nm at T = 100 K gives nabla_y T / T = 0.01 Angstrom^-1, but 1 K/nm = 0.1 K/Angstrom, so the reduced gradient is (0.1 K/Angstrom)/(100 K) = 0.001 Angstrom^-1. Consequently the spin current density should be J^{z;x} approximately 0.64 x 10^-6 J/m^2 rather than 0.64 x 10^-5 J/m^2, and the effective field becomes B_eff approximately 0.2 mT, which is below the 0.25 mT permalloy anisotropy field quoted by the authors. The claim in the abstract and Sec. VI that the torque is suitable for magnetization switching is therefore not supported by the presented numbers.
  2. [Secs. III and VI] The quantitative predictions (ASSA approximately 3.3 degrees and B_eff approximately 2 mT) rest on the parameter set {J, J1, delta_J, K, D_z} = {12.4, -5.48, 0.8, -0.3, 0.3} meV with a = 1 Angstrom, which is described as realistic but is not derived from or benchmarked against any specific altermagnet. Since the lattice constant and exchange/DMI values enter the band structure and the 2D-to-3D conversion, the headline numbers are not robust. The authors should either map the model to a concrete material (e.g., MnTe, CrSb, or MnPSe3) or explicitly present the results as a model study with a reasonable parameter range and sensitivity analysis, and avoid overstating realistic parameters in the abstract.
  3. [Sec. IV] The statement that the extrinsic spin Nernst conductivity vanishes when delta_J = 0 is not immediately obvious because Eq. (20) shows that nonzero D_z alone produces spin splitting. If this cancellation is due to a symmetry of the delta_J = 0 model, the symmetry should be stated explicitly; if it was verified numerically, the DMI-only case should be shown in Fig. 2 or in the text. This point is load-bearing for the attribution of the extrinsic response to non-relativistic altermagnetic exchange rather than to DMI.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (24)] Please state explicitly that Omega_alpha = Omega_beta is used when reducing Eq. (9) to Eq. (24); this would preempt the apparent factor-of-2 discrepancy noted by readers.
  2. [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3] The units of the plotted conductivities are not defined in the captions. Please state the units (e.g., (hbar/2e) microA and (hbar/2e) microA/Angstrom) and specify the conversion from 2D to 3D quantities.
  3. [Sec. VI] The claim that the transverse spin current is pure (no accompanying magnon or energy current) is stated but not demonstrated with a figure or equation. Please provide the transverse magnon/energy current calculation or a symmetry argument.
  4. [Sec. III] The lattice constant a = 1 Angstrom is smaller than typical honeycomb magnets (usually 2-4 Angstrom); a physical value would change the wave-vector scale and the 2D-to-3D conversion. Please justify this choice or use a material-specific lattice constant.
  5. [Abstract and Sec. VI] The words strong and sizable are not quantified; after correcting the units error, the effective field is below the quoted anisotropy field, so the language should be adjusted to match the corrected result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the transport predictions follow from the model Hamiltonian and the quantum kinetic equations are re-derived in Appendix A.

full rationale

Walked the derivation chain. The model Hamiltonian (Eq. 10) is an input; the magnon dispersion (Eq. 18), spin splitting (Eq. 20), Berry curvature (Eq. 22), and spin Nernst/Seebeck conductivities (Eqs. 23-24, 29-30) are derived from it. The ASSA angle (Eq. 27) is defined by the ratio of computed spin currents and is a derived output, not fitted to the target. The torque estimate (Sec. VI) uses the computed conductivity with stated parameters; even if the parameter choice is not material-specific and the unit conversion is questionable, that is a correctness or parametric-risk issue, not circularity. The quantum kinetic framework cites the authors' earlier work [29-33], but the essential first-order density matrix is re-derived in Appendix A from the Liouville equation and standard external references ([34,36,37]), so the self-citations are not load-bearing. No step of the derivation defines X in terms of Y or renames a fitted input as a prediction. Thus no circular step can be exhibited with the required quotes.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chosen spin model with several hand-picked parameters and on standard approximations (linear spin wave theory, relaxation time). No new particles or forces are introduced, but the quantitative predictions are tied to the chosen parameter set.

free parameters (7)
  • J (nearest-neighbor exchange) = 12.4 meV
    Chosen as a realistic energy scale; not derived from a specific material.
  • J1 (isotropic NNN exchange) = -5.48 meV
    Chosen by hand to set the magnon band structure.
  • delta_J (anisotropic NNN exchange splitting) = 0.8 meV
    Controls the altermagnetic magnon spin splitting; chosen ad hoc.
  • K (single-ion anisotropy) = -0.3 meV
    Chosen to stabilize collinear order.
  • D_z (Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction) = 0.3 meV (used in Fig. 1f and other figures)
    Sets the intrinsic Berry-curvature response; chosen ad hoc.
  • tau (relaxation time) = unspecified
    Appears in all extrinsic conductivities but no numerical value is given.
  • a (lattice constant) = 1 angstrom
    Sets the Brillouin zone scale; chosen for convenience.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Linear spin wave theory via Holstein-Primakoff transformation, neglecting magnon-magnon interactions
    Used throughout Section III to derive the magnon Hamiltonian; valid only at low magnon density.
  • domain assumption Relaxation-time approximation with a momentum-independent tau
    Introduced in Eq. (1); the authors state momentum dependence does not change qualitative results, but no proof is given.
  • domain assumption Dilute impurity approximation tau * omega_np >> 1
    Used in Section II.B to simplify response functions and obtain Eq. (8).
  • domain assumption The two magnon modes have identical eigenvectors and thus identical Berry curvature
    Stated in Eq. (21) and used in Eq. (24); this simplifies the spin Nernst expression.
  • ad hoc to paper The anisotropic NNN exchange pattern represents altermagnetism
    The paper assumes the symmetry pattern with the C2||My relation but does not derive it from a specific crystal structure.
  • ad hoc to paper DMI appears only on NNN bonds and has only a z-component
    Motivated by preserving collinearity, but not derived from microscopic considerations for a specific altermagnet.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-split magnon bands induce pure spin current in insulating altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ISS4I2OB

@misc{pith2026250704274,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-split magnon bands induce pure spin current in insulating altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ISS4I2OB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04274}
}
read the original abstract

Altermagnets offer a promising platform for dissipationless spin transport by combining zero net magnetization with spontaneous non-relativistic spin splitting. However, their magnonic transport properties remain largely unexplored. Here, we develop a quantum-kinetic theory for thermally driven magnon currents that cleanly separates Berry-curvature-driven intrinsic contributions from Drude-like scattering-dependent terms. Applying this framework to a collinear honeycomb antiferromagnet with anisotropic next-nearest-neighbor exchange and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, we reveal spin-split magnon bands that support both intrinsic and extrinsic spin Nernst and Seebeck currents. For realistic parameters, we predict a sizable magnon spin-splitting angle (about 3.3 degrees) and a pure transverse spin current capable of exerting a strong spin-splitter torque suitable for magnetization switching.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.04274 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) illustrates the spin splitting ∆ε = εα − εβ at the M-point of the Brillouin zone as a function of the parameters (δJ, Dz ). The splitting vanishes for δJ = 0, indicating a transition from the altermagnetic phase to the conventional antiferromagnetic phase with DMI. The corresponding extrinsic spin Nernst conductivity is presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Schematic of the original coordinate system ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anisotropic vacancy-induced magnetization textures in altermagnets

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A vacancy generically induces anisotropic magnetization textures in altermagnets whose multipolar form factor encodes the altermagnetic order, visible in classical systems under transverse field and in quantum systems...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (B2) Here, S± i = Sx i ± iSy i are spin raising/lowering opera- tors

    Nearest-Neighbor Interaction The NN term is given by, HNN = J X ⟨i∈A,j∈B⟩ Si · Sj = J X ⟨i∈A,j∈B⟩ Sz i Sz j + 1 2 (S+ i S− j + S− i S+ j ) . (B2) Here, S± i = Sx i ± iSy i are spin raising/lowering opera- tors. We apply HP transformations for a collinear anti- ferromagnet with spins aligned along ±z. Using the HP transformations, the NN Hamiltonian become...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction and DMI The NNN term can be expressed as HNNN = HNNN,A + HNNN,B , (B6) with HNNN,A = 1 2 6X m=1 X i∈A [JmASi · Si+δm + DmA · (Si × Si+δm)] , HNNN,B = 1 2 6X m=1 X i∈B JmBSi · Si+δ′m + DmB · (Si × Si+δ′m) . (B7) In the main text, we have assumed that the NNN ex- change couplings satisfies the following relations: for sub- ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    (B16) Here, K <0 ensures a collinear antiferromagnetic ground state

    Anisotropy T erm The anisotropy term simplifies to, Haniso = K X i [(Sz iA)2 + (Sz iB)2] = −2SK X k [a† kak + b† kbk] . (B16) Here, K <0 ensures a collinear antiferromagnetic ground state

    work page

  4. [4]

    The momentum resolved matrix Hamiltonian Hk is given by, Hk = J ′ + γA(k) J Sγ(k) J Sγ(k)∗ J ′ + γB(k) , (B17) with J ′ = 3J S− 2KS

    T otal Momentum-Space Hamiltonian Combining all the terms, H = HN N+ HN N N+ Haniso = P k ψ† k Hk ψk, where ψ† k = [ a† k bk]. The momentum resolved matrix Hamiltonian Hk is given by, Hk = J ′ + γA(k) J Sγ(k) J Sγ(k)∗ J ′ + γB(k) , (B17) with J ′ = 3J S− 2KS . The structure factors are, γA(k) = 2S 3X m=1 [JmA (cos(k · δm) − 1) − Dz sin(k · δm)] , γB(k) = ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (10) as a spin analog of the Haldane model for electrons [71]

    Similarity to the Haldane Model for electrons In this subsection, we reinterpret the spin Hamiltonian in Eq. (10) as a spin analog of the Haldane model for electrons [71]. In the spin model, the anisotropic NNN exchange and DMI introduce complex phase factors anal- ogous to complex direction-dependent hopping terms in the Haldane model. To understand this...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Spin- tronics: Fundamentals and applications,

    Igor ˇZuti´ c, Jaroslav Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, “Spin- tronics: Fundamentals and applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323–410 (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    Spintronics,

    S.D. Bader and S.S.P. Parkin, “Spintronics,” Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics 1, 71–88 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Review on spintronics: Princi- ples and device applications,

    Atsufumi Hirohata et al., “Review on spintronics: Princi- ples and device applications,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 509, 166711 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Valenzuela, Eiji Saitoh, and Takashi Kimura, Spin Current (Oxford University Press, 2012)

    Sadamichi Maekawa, Sergio O. Valenzuela, Eiji Saitoh, and Takashi Kimura, Spin Current (Oxford University Press, 2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter, Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics (OUP Ox- ford, 2001)

    S. Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter, Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics (OUP Ox- ford, 2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    Antiferromagnetic spintronics,

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, “Antiferromagnetic spintronics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Magnon spintronics,

    Andrii V Chumak, Vitaliy I Vasyuchka, Alexander A Serga, and Burkard Hillebrands, “Magnon spintronics,” Nature physics 11, 453–461 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Spin nernst effect of magnons in collinear antiferromagnets,

    Ran Cheng, Satoshi Okamoto, and Di Xiao, “Spin nernst effect of magnons in collinear antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217202 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Magnon spin nernst effect in antiferromagnets,

    Vladimir A. Zyuzin and Alexey A. Kovalev, “Magnon spin nernst effect in antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217203 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Introduction to antiferromagnetic magnons,

    Sergio M. Rezende, Antonio Azevedo, and Roberto L. Rodr ´ ıguez-Su´ arez, “Introduction to antiferromagnetic magnons,” Journal of Applied Physics 126, 151101 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Theory of the spin seebeck effect in antiferromagnets,

    S. M. Rezende, R. L. Rodr ´ ıguez-Su´ arez, and A. Azevedo, “Theory of the spin seebeck effect in antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 014425 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Pure spin current in antiferromagnetic insula- tors,

    Ka Shen, “Pure spin current in antiferromagnetic insula- tors,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 094423 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Theory of magnon- driven spin seebeck effect,

    Jiang Xiao, Gerrit E. W. Bauer, Ken-chi Uchida, Eiji Saitoh, and Sadamichi Maekawa, “Theory of magnon- driven spin seebeck effect,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 214418 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Magnon spin-current theory for the longitudinal spin-seebeck effect,

    S. M. Rezende et al., “Magnon spin-current theory for the longitudinal spin-seebeck effect,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 014416 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Ob- servation of longitudinal spin-seebeck effect in magnetic insulators,

    Ken-ichi Uchida, Hiroto Adachi, Takeru Ota, Hiroyasu Nakayama, Sadamichi Maekawa, and Eiji Saitoh, “Ob- servation of longitudinal spin-seebeck effect in magnetic insulators,” Applied Physics Letters 97 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    Topological magnons in a kagome-lattice spin system with xxz and 13 dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions,

    Ranjani Seshadri and Diptiman Sen, “Topological magnons in a kagome-lattice spin system with xxz and 13 dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 134411 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Altermagnetism: A chemical perspective,

    Shannon S. Fender, Oscar Gonzalez, and D. Kwabena Bediako, “Altermagnetism: A chemical perspective,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147, 2257– 2274 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Structure, control, and dynamics of altermag- netic textures,

    O Gomonay, VP Kravchuk, R Jaeschke-Ubiergo, KV Yer- shov, T Jungwirth, L ˇSmejkal, J van den Brink, and J Sinova, “Structure, control, and dynamics of altermag- netic textures,” npj Spintronics 2, 35 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Efficient spin seebeck and spin nernst effects of magnons in altermagnets,

    Qirui Cui, Bowen Zeng, Ping Cui, Tao Yu, and Hongxin Yang, “Efficient spin seebeck and spin nernst effects of magnons in altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. B 108, L180401 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy,

    Juraj Krempask` y, LˇSmejkal, SW D’souza, M Hajlaoui, G Springholz, K Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a, F Alarab, PC Constantinou, V Strocov, D Usanov, et al., “Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy,” Nature 626, 517–522 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Chiral split magnon in al- termagnetic mnte,

    Zheyuan Liu, Makoto Ozeki, Shinichiro Asai, Shinichi Itoh, and Takatsugu Masuda, “Chiral split magnon in al- termagnetic mnte,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry,” Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Two- dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a min- imal microscopic model,

    Bjørnulf Brekke, Arne Brataas, and Asle Sudbø, “Two- dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a min- imal microscopic model,” Phys. Rev. B 108, 224421 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Atom- istic spin dynamics simulations of magnonic spin seebeck and spin nernst effects in altermagnets,

    Markus Weißenhofer and Alberto Marmodoro, “Atom- istic spin dynamics simulations of magnonic spin seebeck and spin nernst effects in altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 094427 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Broken kramers degeneracy in alter- magnetic mnte,

    Suyoung Lee et al., “Broken kramers degeneracy in alter- magnetic mnte,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Multicomponent magneto-orbital order and magneto-orbitons in monolayer vcl3,

    Luigi Camerano, Adolfo O. Fumega, Gianni Profeta, and Jose L. Lado, “Multicomponent magneto-orbital order and magneto-orbitons in monolayer vcl3,” Nano Letters 25, 4825–4831 (2025), pMID: 39960815

    2025

  25. [33]

    Multiferroic nematic d-wave altermagnetism driven by orbital-order on the honeycomb lattice,

    Luigi Camerano, Adolfo O. Fumega, Jose L. Lado, Alessandro Stroppa, and Gianni Profeta, “Multiferroic nematic d-wave altermagnetism driven by orbital-order on the honeycomb lattice,” (2025), arXiv:2503.19987 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Intrinsic nonlinear thermal hall trans- port of magnons: A quantum kinetic theory approach,

    Harsh Varshney, Rohit Mukherjee, Arijit Kundu, and Amit Agarwal, “Intrinsic nonlinear thermal hall trans- port of magnons: A quantum kinetic theory approach,” Phys. Rev. B 108, 165412 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Quantum kinetic theory of nonlinear thermal current,

    Harsh Varshney, Kamal Das, Pankaj Bhalla, and Amit Agarwal, “Quantum kinetic theory of nonlinear thermal current,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 235419 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Intrinsic non- linear nernst and seebeck effect,

    Harsh Varshney and Amit Agarwal, “Intrinsic non- linear nernst and seebeck effect,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11108 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Symmetry-driven intrinsic nonlinear pure spin hall ef- fect,

    Sayan Sarkar, Sunit Das, and Amit Agarwal, “Symmetry-driven intrinsic nonlinear pure spin hall ef- fect,” (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Light-induced nonlinear resonant spin magne- tization,

    Sayan Sarkar, Sunit Das, Debottam Mandal, and Amit Agarwal, “Light-induced nonlinear resonant spin magne- tization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12142 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Quantum kinetic theory of thermoelectric and thermal transport in a mag- netic field,

    Akihiko Sekine and Naoto Nagaosa, “Quantum kinetic theory of thermoelectric and thermal transport in a mag- netic field,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 155204 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Interband coherence response to electric fields in crystals: Berry-phase contributions and disorder effects,

    Dimitrie Culcer, Akihiko Sekine, and Allan H. MacDon- ald, “Interband coherence response to electric fields in crystals: Berry-phase contributions and disorder effects,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 035106 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Nonlinear optics,

    Robert W Boyd, Alexander L Gaeta, and Enno Giese, “Nonlinear optics,” in Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Springer, 2008) pp. 1097–1110

    2008

  34. [42]

    Thermal vector potential theory of trans- port induced by a temperature gradient,

    Gen Tatara, “Thermal vector potential theory of trans- port induced by a temperature gradient,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 196601 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Layer hall effect in a 2d topological axion antiferromagnet,

    Anyuan Gao, Yu-Fei Liu, Chaowei Hu, Jian-Xiang Qiu, Christian Tzschaschel, Barun Ghosh, Sheng-Chin Ho, Damien B´ erub´ e, Rui Chen, Haipeng Sun,et al., “Layer hall effect in a 2d topological axion antiferromagnet,” Nature 595, 521–525 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Berry cur- vature dipole senses topological transition in a moir´ e superlattice,

    Subhajit Sinha, Pratap Chandra Adak, Atasi Chakraborty, Kamal Das, Koyendrila Debnath, LD Varma Sangani, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Umesh V Waghmare, Amit Agarwal, et al., “Berry cur- vature dipole senses topological transition in a moir´ e superlattice,” Nature Physic...

    2022

  37. [45]

    Quantum geometry induced third-order non- linear transport responses,

    Debottam Mandal, Sanjay Sarkar, Kamal Das, and Amit Agarwal, “Quantum geometry induced third-order non- linear transport responses,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 195131 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric,

    Kamal Das, Shibalik Lahiri, Rhonald Burgos Atencia, Dimitrie Culcer, and Amit Agarwal, “Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric,” Phys. Rev. B 108, L201405 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Thermal generation of spin current in an antiferromag- net,

    S. Seki, T. Ideue, M. Kubota, Y. Kozuka, R. Takagi, M. Nakamura, Y. Kaneko, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, “Thermal generation of spin current in an antiferromag- net,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 266601 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Rotational mo- tion of magnons and the thermal hall effect,

    Ryo Matsumoto and Shuichi Murakami, “Rotational mo- tion of magnons and the thermal hall effect,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 184406 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferro- magnets,

    Ryo Matsumoto and Shuichi Murakami, “Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferro- magnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 197202 (2011)

    2011

  42. [50]

    Theory of the spin seebeck effect,

    Hiroto Adachi, Ken-ichi Uchida, Eiji Saitoh, and Sadamichi Maekawa, “Theory of the spin seebeck effect,” Reports on Progress in Physics 76, 036501 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    Quantum kinetic theory of nonlinear optical cur- rents: Finite fermi surface and fermi sea contributions,

    Pankaj Bhalla, Kamal Das, Amit Agarwal, and Dimitrie Culcer, “Quantum kinetic theory of nonlinear optical cur- rents: Finite fermi surface and fermi sea contributions,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 165131 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Resonant second-harmonic generation as a probe of quantum geometry,

    Pankaj Bhalla, Kamal Das, Dimitrie Culcer, and Amit Agarwal, “Resonant second-harmonic generation as a probe of quantum geometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 227401 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Band geometry induced electro-optic effect and polar- ization rotation,

    M. Maneesh Kumar, Sanjay Sarkar, and Amit Agarwal, “Band geometry induced electro-optic effect and polar- ization rotation,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 125401 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Templates for magnetic symmetry and altermagnetism in hexagonal mnte,

    S. W. Lovesey, D. D. Khalyavin, and G. van der Laan, “Templates for magnetic symmetry and altermagnetism in hexagonal mnte,” Phys. Rev. B 108, 174437 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    The spin-wave theory of antiferromagnet- ics,

    Ryogo Kubo, “The spin-wave theory of antiferromagnet- ics,” Phys. Rev. 87, 568–580 (1952)

    1952

  48. [56]

    Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antifer- 14 romagnetic ruo2,

    Shutaro Karube, Takahiro Tanaka, Daichi Sugawara, Naohiro Kadoguchi, Makoto Kohda, and Junsaku Nitta, “Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antifer- 14 romagnetic ruo2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet ruo 2,

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, “Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet ruo 2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Antiferromagnet-based magnonic spin-transfer torque,

    Ran Cheng, Di Xiao, and Jian-Gang Zhu, “Antiferromagnet-based magnonic spin-transfer torque,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 020408 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism,

    Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Libor ˇSmejkal, Karel V´ yborn´ y, Yuta Yahagi, Jairo Sinova, Tom´ a ˇ s Jungwirth, and Jakub ˇZelezn´ y, “Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Separation of inverse altermag- netic spin-splitting effect from inverse spin hall effect in ruo2,

    Ching-Te Liao, Yu-Chun Wang, Yu-Cheng Tien, Ssu-Yen Huang, and Danru Qu, “Separation of inverse altermag- netic spin-splitting effect from inverse spin hall effect in ruo2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low- z antiferromag- nets,

    Lin-Ding Yuan, Zhi Wang, Jun-Wei Luo, Emmanuel I. Rashba, and Alex Zunger, “Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low- z antiferromag- nets,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Quasiclassical theory of superconducting spin-splitter effects and spin-filtering via altermagnets,

    Hans Gløckner Giil, Bjørnulf Brekke, Jacob Linder, and Arne Brataas, “Quasiclassical theory of superconducting spin-splitter effects and spin-filtering via altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. B 110, L140506 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Heat assisted magnetic recording,

    Mark H. Kryder, Edward C. Gage, Terry W. McDaniel, William A. Challener, Robert E. Rottmayer, Ganping Ju, Yiao-Tee Hsia, and M. Fatih Erden, “Heat assisted magnetic recording,” Proceedings of the IEEE 96, 1810– 1835 (2008)

    2008

  56. [64]

    Spin hall effects,

    Jairo Sinova, Sergio O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, “Spin hall effects,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213–1260 (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    Spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance induced by the spin hall effect,

    Luqiao Liu, Takahiro Moriyama, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, “Spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance induced by the spin hall effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 036601 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    Time-domain measurements of nanomagnet dynamics driven by,

    Spin-Transfer Torques, “Time-domain measurements of nanomagnet dynamics driven by,” science 1105722, 307 (2005)

    2005

  59. [67]

    Different dynamic and static magnetic anisotropy in thin permalloy ™ films,

    R. Lopusnik, J. P. Nibarger, T. J. Silva, and Z. Celin- ski, “Different dynamic and static magnetic anisotropy in thin permalloy ™ films,” Applied Physics Letters 83, 96–98 (2003)

    2003

  60. [68]

    Tunable damping-like and field- like spin-orbit-torque in pt/co/hfo2 films via interfacial charge transfer,

    W. L. Peng et al., “Tunable damping-like and field- like spin-orbit-torque in pt/co/hfo2 films via interfacial charge transfer,” Applied Physics Letters 115, 172403 (2019)

    2019

  61. [69]

    Large damping-like spin–orbit torque in a 2d conductive 1t-tas2 monolayer,

    Sajid Husain and Xin Chen et al., “Large damping-like spin–orbit torque in a 2d conductive 1t-tas2 monolayer,” Nano Letters 20, 6372–6380 (2020)

    2020

  62. [70]

    Two-dimensional mag- netic crystals and emergent heterostructure devices,

    Cheng Gong and Xiang Zhang, “Two-dimensional mag- netic crystals and emergent heterostructure devices,” Sci- ence 363, eaav4450 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    X-ray magnetic circular dichroism in altermagnetic α-mnte,

    A. Hariki et al., “X-ray magnetic circular dichroism in altermagnetic α-mnte,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176701 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Nonrela- tivistic spin splittings and altermagnetism in twisted bi- layers of centrosymmetric antiferromagnets,

    Sajjan Sheoran and Saswata Bhattacharya, “Nonrela- tivistic spin splittings and altermagnetism in twisted bi- layers of centrosymmetric antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, L051401 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films,

    Sonka Reimers, Lukas Odenbreit, Libor ˇSmejkal, Vladimir N Strocov, Procopios Constantinou, Anna B Hellenes, Rodrigo Jaeschke Ubiergo, Warlley H Campos, Venkata K Bharadwaj, Atasi Chakraborty,et al., “Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films,” Natu...

    2024

  66. [74]

    Twisted magnetic van der waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism,

    Yichen Liu, Junxi Yu, and Cheng-Cheng Liu, “Twisted magnetic van der waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    General stacking theory for altermagnetism in bilayer systems,

    Baoru Pan, Pan Zhou, Pengbo Lyu, Huaping Xiao, Xue- juan Yang, and Lizhong Sun, “General stacking theory for altermagnetism in bilayer systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 166701 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Model for a quantum hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Model for a quantum hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015–2018 (1988)

    1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.